Last November, I shared a one-minute video from Freedom Partners on the economics of trade.
Here’s a full-length (but still only four minutes) treatment of the issue from the Center for Freedom and Prosperity.
The first part of the video is a quick glimpse at some of the academic evidence for open trade, and I hope it helps make the case against protectionism.
I then cite some country-specific examples, including how Herbert Hoover’s protectionism contributed to the economic misery of the Great Depression.
Argentina is another bad example mentioned in the video. It used to be one of the world’s richest countries, but it plummeted in the rankings in part because of its protectionist policy of “import substitution.”
The video also mentions the examples of China and India. Since I think this point is especially compelling, I want to take this opportunity to briefly elaborate on my comments in the video.
First, let’s establish that both nations did liberalize trade. Here’s a chart from Economic Freedom of the World, and you can see that there was dramatic liberalization starting about 1990.
Both nations are still a long way from total free trade (Singapore and Hong Kong, for instance, respectively get scores of 9.29 and 9.32), but it goes without saying that there was considerable liberalization in China and India.
And how did that work out?
Trade liberalization was a slam-dunk success. Based on data from the World Bank, here’s a look at how China and India started converging with the United States after opening to the world economy.
To be sure, both nations still have a long way to go. And it’s highly unlikely that either nation will ever fully converge to American living standards unless there is a lot more pro-market reform. Not just in trade, but all facets of economic policy.
But as I mentioned in the video, the reforms that already have occurred – particularly trade liberalization – have contributed to huge reductions in poverty in China and India.
Given all this evidence, I’ll close with a version of my two-question challenge. Can anybody identify a nation that has prospered by moving to protectionism (h/t: the USA in the 1800s is not a good answer) or a nation that has suffered because of trade liberalization?
[…] I pontificate about trade, I often point out that protectionism is a net negative for the […]
[…] Brussels, but I always assumed that those costs would be acceptable because the EU would give them expanded trade and help improve the rule of […]
[…] January, I shared a short video about protectionism, which expanded on some analysis from a one-minute video from last […]
[…] a video I shared two months ago included a wide range of academic studies showing that government-imposed trade […]
[…] I write about the benefits of trade, I periodically point out that America has a trade deficit because it has a foreign investment […]
[…] Even though open trade is very beneficial for American prosperity, I would not want a future president to assert unilateral power to eliminate tariffs. Yes, I want […]
[…] trade promotes prosperity, I want increased market-driven, cross-border commerce between China and the United […]
You cannot have free trade with a communist nation. It is a virtual slave state.
[…] Here’s Dan Mitchell, complete with a new video, on the evidence-based case for free trade. […]
[…] canter through the recent studies and reports by our man in DC. And a youtube video to go with […]
I cannot agree more with you Dan, as an Argentinian who studied the economic history of my country, one of the causes of the economic decline was the trade restrictions imposed by the democratic governments, military governments and worker’s unions. All these efforts to bring “social justice” and “equal redistribution of income” have pushed more than 30% of the population into poverty and government dependence.