Last November, I shared a one-minute video from Freedom Partners on the economics of trade.
Here’s a full-length (but still only four minutes) treatment of the issue from the Center for Freedom and Prosperity.
The first part of the video is a quick glimpse at some of the academic evidence for open trade, and I hope it helps make the case against protectionism.
I then cite some country-specific examples, including how Herbert Hoover’s protectionism contributed to the economic misery of the Great Depression.
Argentina is another bad example mentioned in the video. It used to be one of the world’s richest countries, but it plummeted in the rankings in part because of its protectionist policy of “import substitution.”
The video also mentions the examples of China and India. Since I think this point is especially compelling, I want to take this opportunity to briefly elaborate on my comments in the video.
First, let’s establish that both nations did liberalize trade. Here’s a chart from Economic Freedom of the World, and you can see that there was dramatic liberalization starting about 1990.
Both nations are still a long way from total free trade (Singapore and Hong Kong, for instance, respectively get scores of 9.29 and 9.32), but it goes without saying that there was considerable liberalization in China and India.
And how did that work out?
Trade liberalization was a slam-dunk success. Based on data from the World Bank, here’s a look at how China and India started converging with the United States after opening to the world economy.
To be sure, both nations still have a long way to go. And it’s highly unlikely that either nation will ever fully converge to American living standards unless there is a lot more pro-market reform. Not just in trade, but all facets of economic policy.
But as I mentioned in the video, the reforms that already have occurred – particularly trade liberalization – have contributed to huge reductions in poverty in China and India.
Given all this evidence, I’ll close with a version of my two-question challenge. Can anybody identify a nation that has prospered by moving to protectionism (h/t: the USA in the 1800s is not a good answer) or a nation that has suffered because of trade liberalization?
[…] but it actually reflects poorly on the European Union. Thatcher liked the E.U. when it was a free-trade area based on mutual recognition, but she became disillusioned as it morphed into a supra-national […]
[…] like to think that my four-part video series on trade (here, here, here, and here) has a lot of useful facts and […]
[…] narrated this video in 2019, hoping that it would help people understand why free trade is good and protectionism is […]
[…] I don’t like any type of protectionism, but I don’t want to focus on that issue (you can read my thought here). […]
[…] Removing trade barriers. […]
[…] Open trade […]
[…] I’m opposed to globalism (because global governance means bigger government), but I’m in favor of globalization (because free trade makes us richer). […]
[…] I expressed optimism at the start of 2021 that Joe Biden would steer the country back toward free trade after the economically debilitating protectionist mistakes of the Trump […]
[…] The economic analysis of trade […]
[…] The economic analysis of trade […]
[…] I wrote about here. His analysis is very helpful since it shows that improvements in policy areas like trade have helped to offset the damage of bigger […]
[…] the overall case for free trade, here’s my video on the […]
[…] blame, to be sure, but other politicians (including Biden) have caused problems because of their protectionist […]
[…] trade is good and protectionism is […]
[…] trade is good and protectionism is […]
[…] retirement accounts,but there were many other reforms that liberalized the economy. Everything from free trade to […]
[…] accounts, but there were many other reforms that liberalized the economy. Everything from free trade to […]
[…] protectionists make one accurate point. While free trade increases overall employment, that does not mean every worker in every industry […]
[…] Recent years have been very depressing for supporters of free trade. […]
[…] Recent years have been very depressing for supporters of free trade. […]
[…] point. Hopefully the US eventually will have someone in the White House who understands that free trade makes the country more […]
[…] approach to public policy – very bad on fiscal issues but very good in other areas like trade, regulation, and monetary […]
[…] protectionists make one accurate point. While free trade increases overall employment, that does not mean every worker in every industry […]
[…] globalism means free trade and peaceful interaction among peoples, sign me up. I’m a big […]
[…] globalism means free trade and peaceful interaction among peoples, sign me up. I’m a big […]
[…] I’m trying to figure out my all-time biggest fail. Was it when I listed trade liberalization as a hope for 2021 (wildly wrong since Biden has been just as badas Trump)? Or […]
[…] I’m trying to figure out my all-time biggest fail. Was it when I listed trade liberalization as a hope for 2021 (wildly wrong since Biden has been just as bad as Trump)? Or was it back in 2018 […]
[…] narrated a video making the case for free tradeback in […]
[…] narrated a video making the case for free trade back in […]
[…] the first 50-plus years of my life, free trade was in the […]
[…] the first 50-plus years of my life, free trade was in the […]
[…] P.S. A big problem is that politicians genuinely don’t understand that a “trade deficit” is automatically and necessarily offset by a capital surplus. Helping them to understand this fact is key to renewing support for free trade. […]
[…] P.S. A big problem is that politicians genuinely don’t understand that a “trade deficit” is automatically and necessarily offset by a capital surplus. Helping them to understand this fact is key to renewing support for free trade. […]
[…] European Union started as a good idea (unfettered free trade between member nations) and has morphed into a troubling idea (a super-state based on […]
[…] European Union started as a good idea (unfettered free trade between member nations) and has morphed into a troubling idea (a super-state based on […]
[…] Venezuela. I like when people make this point since it shows they (at least implicitly) are making the case for free trade. But I disagree if they want people to believe that such sanctions explain more than a small […]
[…] going to start with the topic of free trade, which people sometimes oppose when casting ballots but inevitably support when spending […]
[…] The OECD and IMF, while usually bad on fiscal issues, historically have favored unfettered trade. And the World Trade Organizationexists specifically to protect global commerce. But will […]
[…] protectionists make one accurate point. While free trade increases overall employment, that does not mean every worker in every industry […]
[…] The OECD and IMF, while usually bad on fiscal issues, historically have favored unfettered trade. And the World Trade Organizationexists specifically to protect global commerce. But will […]
[…] My attack on Biden is not partisan. On the issueof trade, some of Trump’s tweets displayed jaw-dropping stupidity and […]
[…] My attack on Biden is not partisan. On the issue of trade, some of Trump’s tweets displayed jaw-dropping stupidity and […]
[…] The OECD and IMF, while usually bad on fiscal issues, historically have favored unfettered trade. And the World Trade Organizationexists specifically to protect global commerce. But will […]
[…] support free trade for selfish reasons. I want my life to be better and I want my country to be […]
[…] support free trade for selfish reasons. I want my life to be better and I want my country to be […]
[…] a knee-jerk supporter of free trade, which simply means I don’t think politicians and bureaucrats should be able to interfere with my […]
[…] a knee-jerk supporter of free trade, which simply means I don’t think politicians and bureaucrats should be able to interfere […]
[…] But it wasn’t just that Bill Clinton was good on spending. Good things happened in the 1990s in other areas as well, especially trade. […]
[…] But it wasn’t just that Bill Clinton was good on spending. Good things happened in the 1990s in other areas as well, especially trade. […]
[…] bottom line is that free trade is much better for long-run prosperity than […]
[…] bottom line is that free trade is much better for long-run prosperity than […]
[…] respond to incentives (do high tax rates encourage or discourage work, do trade barriers increase or decrease prosperity, […]
[…] how people respond to incentives (do high tax rates encourage or discourage work, do trade barriers increase or decrease prosperity, […]
[…] The argument for competition in the market for government procurement is the same as the general argument for free trade. And since we’re on the topic of trade, remember that dollars sent overseas as […]
[…] The argument for competition in the market for government procurement is the same as the general argument for free trade. And since we’re on the topic of trade, remember that dollars sent overseas as […]
[…] The argument for competition in the market for government procurement is the same as the general argument for free trade. And since we’re on the topic of trade, remember that dollars sent overseas as […]
[…] on making sure we have sensible policies (low tax rates, efficient markets, spending restraint, open trade, etc) that allow high levels of new job creation in the United […]
[…] moral of the story is that free trade is desirable…and small government is […]
[…] Michael Strain recommended trade liberalization. […]
[…] Michael Strain recommended trade liberalization. […]
[…] Remains a Protectionist – I hoped last year that Biden would reduce government trade taxes. Not because he believes in economic liberty, but simply because he wouldn’t want to continue a […]
[…] Remains a Protectionist – I hoped last year that Biden would reduce government trade taxes. Not because he believes in economic liberty, but simply because he wouldn’t want to continue […]
[…] always happy to sing the praises of free trade and condemn protectionism, but let’s keep the focus on today’s election in Chile and […]
[…] self-interested reasons, I obviously like my video on the merits of free trade and the downside of […]
[…] good news is that we know how to get free trade. Just get rid of protectionist […]
[…] good news is that we know how to get free trade. Just get rid of protectionist […]
[…] investment is a good thing (much like international trade) and it necessarily requires the use of “offshore” entities such as companies, funds, […]
[…] Though I appreciate the fact that our friends on the left are willing to extol the virtues of free trade, at least in this rare […]
[…] The OECD and IMF, while usually bad on fiscal issues, historically have favored unfettered trade. And the World Trade Organizationexists specifically to protect global commerce. But will […]
[…] on the latest available data on key indicators such as taxes, spending, regulation, trade policy, rule of law, and monetary policy, here are the top-20 […]
[…] on the latest available data on key indicators such as taxes, spending, regulation, trade policy, rule of law, and monetary policy, here are the top-20 […]
[…] Let’s enjoy some Cuba-themed humor. First, our friends on the left sometimes claim free trade exploits developing nations. But, it that’s true, why do they claim Cuba is hurt be an […]
[…] Let’s enjoy some Cuba-themed humor. First, our friends on the left sometimes claim free trade exploits developing nations. But, it that’s true, why do they claim Cuba is hurt be an […]
[…] The OECD and IMF, while usually bad on fiscal issues, historically have favored unfettered trade. And the World Trade Organizationexists specifically to protect global commerce. But will […]
[…] The OECD and IMF, while usually bad on fiscal issues, historically have favored unfettered trade. And the World Trade Organizationexists specifically to protect global commerce. But will […]
[…] proposals. The OECD and IMF, while usually bad on fiscal issues, historically have favored unfettered trade. And the World Trade Organization exists specifically to protect global commerce. But will these […]
[…] Over the past four years, Donald Trump presumably was the biggest threat to global trade. […]
[…] Over the past four years, Donald Trump presumably was the biggest threat to global trade. […]
[…] Allowing free trade between the U.S. and Haiti would be a very practical way of […]
[…] be sure, I didn’t think he would do the right thing because of some long-hidden belief in sound economics. But I figured he might reduce trade barriers simply to do the opposite of his […]
[…] be sure, I didn’t think he would do the right thing because of some long-hidden belief in sound economics. But I figured he might reduce trade barriers simply to do the opposite of his […]
[…] primary takeaway from this research is that free trade is good for prosperity. Not only does it lead to more growth, but low-income people enjoy above-average […]
[…] primary takeaway from this research is that free trade is good for prosperity. Not only does it lead to more growth, but low-income people enjoy above-average […]
[…] President Reagan, I believe in free trade rather than […]
[…] President Reagan, I believe in free trade rather than […]
[…] for instance, that some Republicans abandoned (or at least downplayed) their support for free trade to accommodate Trump’s illiteracy on that […]
[…] important, why didn’t they factor in the impact of other government policies (trade, regulation, government spending, monetary policy, etc)? Taxation is just one […]
[…] important, why didn’t they factor in the impact of other government policies (trade, regulation, government spending, monetary policy, etc)? Taxation is just one small piece of the […]
[…] Trade policy will move in the right direction. […]
[…] Institute is very misguided on the tradeoff between inequality and growth, it is quite good on trade-related issues (see here, here, here, here, here, here, and […]
[…] not a fan of the European Union, which has morphed from something good (a free-trade pact) to something bad (a pro-centralization,wannabe United States of Europe that exacerbates the […]
[…] how to respond to this statement about international cooperation. Does that mean open trade? If so, my response is “strongly agree.” But if cooperation means a global tax cartel, my answer is […]
[…] Trade policy will move in the right direction. […]
[…] any influence with Republicans, I’ll try to convince them to at least protect and promote free trade with other democratic nations. And I’ll also remind them that high-skill immigration (such as […]
[…] Trade policy will move in the right direction. […]
[…] Trade policy will move in the right direction. […]
[…] Trade policy will move in the right direction. […]
[…] The good news is that trade policy will move in the right direction. […]
[…] The good news is that trade policy will move in the right direction. […]
[…] By the way, I have very mixed feelings on Trump’s strategy. Some of his policies are good (lower taxes and less red tap), but he also tries to appeal to union workers with policies that are bad (most notably, protectionism). […]
[…] a big fan of trade, I obviously agree with this […]
[…] An obvious takeaway from the video is that consumers benefit from global markets, which hopefully helps to explain why free trade is desirable. […]
[…] For what it’s worth, I don’t think there’s good modern-quality data on JFK (or, to be more accurate, I’ve never searched for it), but I included him since he’s part of Tomasky’s analysis. That being said, he may be ranked too low. Yes, he spent too much money and implemented some bad policies, but he also lowered tax rates and pushed for free trade. […]
[…] its early days, the European Union increased economic liberty since it largely existed as a free-trade pact for member […]
[…] early 2019, I released this video summarizing some of the evidence for free […]
[…] trade is good because societies are more prosperous with free markets and open […]
[…] Garett’s hypothesis that politicians will be more likely to support good policies such as free trade if they have longer […]
[…] the plus side, there are no trade barriers between nations that belong to the EU, and membership also makes it difficult for countries to […]
[…] Trade was the only area where he consistently pushed policy in the right direction. […]
[…] in part by a sensible desire for free trade, six nations from Western Europe signed the Treaty of Rome in 1957, thus creating the European […]
[…] lado bueno de esa nube oscura es que el Presidente Trump puede que aprenda que el comercio es realmente bueno en lugar de […]
[…] quest’aria di tempesta è che il Presidente Donald Trump potrebbe imparare che il commercio è in realtà buono e non […]
[…] silver lining to that dark cloud is that President Trump may learn that trade is actually good rather than […]
[…] silver lining to that dark cloud is that President Trump may learn that trade is actually good rather than […]
[…] One of the big risks from the coronavirus is that it will weaken global trade. Which led me to mention in the interview that hopefully Trump might learn from this growing crisis that expanded trade is good for prosperity. […]
[…] P.P.S. As a general rule, governments should be free to impose very bad tax policy on economic activity inside their borders (just as places such as Monaco and the Cayman Islands should be free to impose very good tax policy on what happens inside their borders). That being said, it’s also true that nations like France are designing their digital taxes American companies are the sole targets. An indirect form of protectionism. […]
[…] Iran presumably is doing the wrong thing for geopolitical reasons (avoiding sanctions) rather than protectionist […]
[…] At the beginning of the Trump era, many of us (including me) warned that his statements on trade were nonsensical. […]
[…] costs include foregone trade, which would be bad for American consumers, workers, and […]
[…] P.S. I mentioned an ideal free trade agreement in the interview. I also should have pointed out that unilateral free trade also is a good option. Assuming, of course, one understands the benefits of trade. […]
[…] young lady is right about free trade, but wrong in thinking that approach requires a supranational […]
[…] is that an agreement to buy $40-$50 billion of agricultural products is managed trade rather than free trade. Consumers in a competitive market should be determining how much is being purchased, not […]
[…] this year, I shared a short video about the benefits of the World Trade […]
[…] depends on what is meant by that term. If it means free trade and peaceful interaction with other nations, the answer is […]
[…] Brazil gets a horrible grade on regulation, and it’s also in the bottom half of all nations when looking at fiscal policy, quality of governance, and trade. […]
[…] sucede, habrá una disminución del comercio entre el Reino Unido y la Unión Europea. Eso será malo para ambas […]
[…] happens, there will be diminished trade between the United Kingdom and the European Union. That will be bad for both […]
[…] The economic consequences would be profound. In a negative way. […]
[…] put it mildly, more redistribution, more protectionism, and taxes on investment is not a Reaganite […]
[…] the article, Professor Walt mentions sanctions and protectionism as potential […]
[…] this interview with Fox Business, I make my usual points (trade barriers are misguided, China is protectionist, Trump’s not responding wisely, […]
[…] point about whether China could “trick Trump.” The best outcome of negotiations is genuine free trade between the US and China, with no subsidies and cronyism to tilt the playing field. But since Trump […]
[…] Now let’s enjoy some satire, though combined with a serious message. […]
[…] the continent’s economic performance. Which is sad since the EU started as a noble idea of a free trade area and instead has become a vehicle for […]
[…] There were plenty of great presentations (including, I hope, my remarks on the economics of protectionism). […]
[…] he imposes more and more taxes on trade (and as foreign governments then impose retaliation), the cumulative economic damage may be enough to completely offset the benefits of his tax reform […]
[…] In other cases, they don’t understand the economic downsides of protectionism. […]
[…] I pontificate about trade, I often point out that protectionism is a net negative for the […]
[…] Brussels, but I always assumed that those costs would be acceptable because the EU would give them expanded trade and help improve the rule of […]
[…] January, I shared a short video about protectionism, which expanded on some analysis from a one-minute video from last […]
[…] a video I shared two months ago included a wide range of academic studies showing that government-imposed trade […]
[…] I write about the benefits of trade, I periodically point out that America has a trade deficit because it has a foreign investment […]
[…] Even though open trade is very beneficial for American prosperity, I would not want a future president to assert unilateral power to eliminate tariffs. Yes, I want […]
[…] trade promotes prosperity, I want increased market-driven, cross-border commerce between China and the United […]
You cannot have free trade with a communist nation. It is a virtual slave state.
[…] Here’s Dan Mitchell, complete with a new video, on the evidence-based case for free trade. […]
[…] canter through the recent studies and reports by our man in DC. And a youtube video to go with […]
I cannot agree more with you Dan, as an Argentinian who studied the economic history of my country, one of the causes of the economic decline was the trade restrictions imposed by the democratic governments, military governments and worker’s unions. All these efforts to bring “social justice” and “equal redistribution of income” have pushed more than 30% of the population into poverty and government dependence.