Biden campaigned for higher taxes and a bigger welfare state, so I haven’t been surprised by his misguided fiscal agenda.
That being said, I was modestly hopeful that he would move trade policy in the right direction after four years of Trump’s protectionism.
To be sure, I didn’t think he would do the right thing because of some long-hidden belief in sound economics. But I figured he might reduce trade barriers simply to do the opposite of his predecessor.
We should be so lucky. Regardless of the policy, we’ve been getting statism.
Catherine Rampell of the Washington Post is not impressed by Biden’s protectionism.
Several months after he left office, some of President Donald Trump’s most foolish economic policies remain in place: his sweeping trade restrictions. …Trump began waging a series of trade wars three years ago — not primarily with U.S. adversaries, mind you, but with friends. Among the dumbest and most self-sabotaging measures were global tariffs
levied on nearly $50 billion of imported steel and aluminum. …the countries most affected by Trump’s move were our close economic and military allies, including the European Union, Canada and Japan. …Despite Trump’s claims otherwise, the cost of the tariffs was primarily passed through to American consumers and companies. Downstream firms that use steel or inputs made of steel, which employ about 80 times more workers than the steel industry does, faced higher costs. One estimate found that Trump’s steel tariffs alone cost U.S. consumers and businesses about $900,000 for every job created or saved.
Getting rid of taxes on imported steel and aluminum would be a positive step for the economy.
But the real goal should be getting rid of all Trump’s taxes on global trade. Garrett Watson from the Tax Foundation recently shared estimates of how this would benefit the American economy.
…repealing the tariffs imposed under President Trump’s administration would be one of the simplest ways policymakers could boost economic growth. …About $460 billion worth of goods were subject to the tariffs, raising prices for consumers. In fact, we estimated the tariffs were about an $80 billion annual tax increase, reducing consumer purchasing power.
…According to the Tax Foundation model, repealing tariffs imposed since 2018 would raise long-run GDP by 0.1 percent, long-run incomes (gross national product) by 0.2 percent, and create about 83,000 full-time equivalent jobs. This growth would boost after-tax incomes by about 0.3 percent for people across the income spectrum, helping low-income and middle-class taxpayers. …Repealing the tariffs would be a simple option to boost growth because it can be done without congressional authorization by President Biden, and would provide timely relief to businesses and households.
The last sentence is key. Trump had lots of unilateral authority to impose bad trade policy, and Biden has lots of unilateral authority to undo bad trade policy.
The fact that he hasn’t exercised that authority makes him just as guilty of anti-market trade policy as Trump.
The next thing to watch for is whether he continues Trump’s bad policy of sabotaging the World Trade Organization.
[…] P.P.P.S. Biden and other folks on the left sometimes are very open about tax increases on ordinary people, though they have different terms for those tax hikes – such as carbon fees and import barriers. […]
[…] P.P.P.S. Biden and other folks on the left sometimes are very open about tax increases on ordinary people, though they have different terms for those tax hikes – such as carbon fees and import barriers. […]
[…] trade issues, Biden has been just about as badas his predecessor, (he’s also been as bad as Trumpwith regards to spending, but that’s a topic […]
[…] trade issues, Biden has been just about as bad as his predecessor, (he’s also been as bad as Trump with regards to spending, but […]
[…] why, then, do politicians like Donald Trump and Joe Biden support imposing the same policies on the United […]
[…] we hit that point in late January of […]
Dan Mitchell: It takes one dollar in 2021 to purchase what 4 cents could purchase in 1950.
We ran our federal government on import taxes, duties, or fines until about 1915 when this kind of federal government funding came to an end, when Woodrow Wilson initiated the federal income tax on individuals. We had a relatively stable currency up until Woodrow Wilson implemented ever more expansions such as the creation of the Administrative State (permanent bureacracy with no end in power, example, Fauci). Also, in the early 1900s, Wilson created the federal reserve and later FDR in the mid-1930s took us off the Gold Standard. Those actions were bad enough but it became even less promising when the Democrats under FDR placed their blessings upon the concept of labor unions. These left-wing or Democratic party’s policies decreased the value of the currency by their excessive meddling in free enterprise and then again in the mid-1960s LBJ (Great Society) went on a crazy streak expanding federal welfare programs.
Trump’s trade policy did not hurt our economy. We have been burdened for over 100 years with the Democratic Party’s economic policies. The concept of import duties has never been a negative, while expanding government functions such as the Administrative State (bureacrats in power forever) and ect. has been the big negative.
The LP added planks in 2018 inviting terrorists to enter uninspected and get free room and board for life if they manage to murder someone here. Small wonder we traded the 328% increase pro-choice Gary handed us for the chance to burden Jo’s campaign with an anarco-communist clown. Parasites, lacking competition, have seen their chances and are taking them!
[…] Biden’s Failure on Trade […]