I’ve shared several videos (here, here, here, and here) that use rigorous data to show that grinding poverty and severe material deprivation was the norm for humanity – until capitalism gained a foothold a few hundred years ago.
Fortunately, as free enterprise has gradually spread around the world, there’s been a remarkable increase in living standards, leading to a stunning drop in poverty.
For today’s column, let’s look at some new academic evidence about the link between capitalism and poverty reduction.
Here the abstract of a new study by Colin Doran and Thomas Stratmann of George Mason University.
We study the relationship between economic freedom and poverty rates in 151 countries over a twenty–year period. Using the World Bank’s poverty headcounts
of those living on less than $1.90 per day, $3.20 per day, and $5.50 per day, we find evidence that economic freedom, measured by the Heritage Foundation’s Index of Economic Freedom, is associated with lower poverty rates. We also test the effect of various components of the Index of Economic Freedom. We find that a government’s integrity and a country’s trade freedom are associated with lower poverty rates.
Keep in mind that this study is looking at the relationship between free markets and extreme poverty (not the relatively comfortable type of poverty that exists in the United States).
More specifically, the authors were investigating the impact of public policy on people who live on between about $700-$2000 per year. In other words, poor people in poor nations.
And the big takeaway is that capitalism leads to less poverty, but what really makes a difference is to have open trade and less corruption.
The good news is that we know how to get free trade. Just get rid of protectionist policies.
The bad news is that corruption in government is a much more challenging topic. Yes, shrinking government would mean less opportunity for graft, but that doesn’t solve the problem of delivering “public goods” in a competent and honest manner.
P.S. Foreign aid makes things worse rather than better.
P.P.S. Click here is you want to learn about poverty reduction in rich nations.
[…] P.S. For anyone who actually wants to help poor people, we already know what works. […]
[…] P.S. For anyone who actually wants to help poor people, we already know what works. […]
[…] bottom line is that free enterprise is the best way of helping poor people, not government […]
[…] case for capitalism is especially powerful if you care about what’s best for the disadvantaged. As the chart from Economic Freedom of the World illustrates, poor people enjoy much higher levels […]
[…] is why genuinely compassionate people support capitalism, which is the only system that has a proven track record of reducing […]
[…] is why genuinely compassionate people support capitalism, which is the only system that has a proven track record of reducing […]
[…] What actually happened is that nations did shift toward free markets. And pro-market policies are the only effective way to reduce poverty. […]
[…] Reduce Poverty with Free Enterprise […]
Dawgs lookin good
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 10:56 AM International Liberty wrote:
> Dan Mitchell posted: “I’ve shared several videos (here, here, here, and > here) that use rigorous data to show that grinding poverty and severe > material deprivation was the norm for humanity – until capitalism gained a > foothold a few hundred years ago. Fortunately, as free en” >
Free enterprise, as used politically, is another way of asking government to “get out of the way”…., that is after they have botched things resulting from their presumed “leadership”…or even “following” the dictates of “Deep State” politicians, bureaucrats, and self-anointed “elitist” with whom government colludes.
Much as they play at subverting market forces to their benefit, reality has it way, and they fail catastrophically, producing inflation, unemployment, depressions, and even the big one…, a market crash. The penalty of their mistakes is large. The salvation is that “the people” somehow survive, hopefully sufficient to bring life back the rewards of individual freedom, and enterprise.
Further, the paper indirectly establishes that crime causes poverty, not what the liberals claim of poverty causes crime.