Here’s a list of posts that raise challenging issues for (at least some) libertarians and small-government conservatives.
I sometimes refer to these as “you be the judge” questions.
- Is it appropriate to put politicians on trial for economic malfeasance?
- Is it excessive vigilante justice to set your daughter’s rapist on fire?
- Should prisoners with AIDS be segregated from other convicts?
- Which tax collection tactic is more brutal and unjust?
- When a wheelchair-bound guy uses a baseball bat to punish his granddaughter’s molester, what’s the right response?
- Should politicians set pay levels at government-owned firms?
- Is sharia law sometimes appropriate?
- Is the Netherlands right to segregate troublemakers from the general population?
- What do you do about self-destructive behavior in a government-run healthcare system?
- Should there be laws against incest among consenting adults?
- Should motorists be allowed to warn other drivers about speed traps?
- Is jury nullification the right approach for victimless crimes?
- Was this angry father wrong to take matters into his own hands?
- Should drunk-rafting be a crime?
- Should rich people pay higher speeding fines?
- Is it proper for government to take obese children from their parents?
- What’s more important, good tax policy or gun ownership?
- Should the government opt to ignore bad laws?
- Should deference to the Constitution allow barbarians to escape punishment?
- Regarding Operation Chokepoint, is it right to impose a regulation to hinder the biased actions of regulators?
- Is the former Michigan governor responsible for Flint’s contaminated water?
- Should we legalize drugs if it means more tax revenue for politicians?
- Does bad local government justify centralization?
And here’s a quandary for leftists and social conservatives.
- Should a gay man be able to adopt his lover to avoid the death tax?
[…] Libertarian Quandaries […]
[…] Libertarian Quandaries […]
[…] Libertarian Quandaries […]
I don’t think these are real quandaries.
In any case, here are some real quandaries for you:
1. Should the Federal Government sell off the National Parks?
2. Should municipal fire departments be privatized?
3. Should the military be privatized?
4. Should laws preventing child labor be repealed?
5. Should I be able, legally, to manufacture high explosives in my basement?
6. Should American citizens be allowed to purchase nuclear weapons?
[…] you might imagine, I had mixed emotions about that […]
[…] Libertarian Quandaries […]
[…] Libertarian Quandaries […]
Ah, a Lifeboat Ethics infiltrator. This is a perfect example of imaginary hard cases trying to make bad law, rather than using real spoiler votes to force the looters to repeal the more cruel and coercive laws across the board. –libertariantranslator
[…] Libertarian Quandaries […]
IMO government should limit itself to the Constitution. There are thousands of what if’s. Allow people to settle their problems between people, come what may.
[…] Libertarian Quandaries […]
[…] Libertarian Quandaries […]
I can think of others that at least deserve mention. “Where to draw the line where permissible abortion ends” is conspicuous by its absence.
Why are these Libertarian quandaries? One of the basic tenets of Libertarianism is do no harm to others. Another is voluntary cooperation. Most oppose the fed, fiat money, and fractional reserve banking — things that have brought great tragedy and suffering to this country the past 100 years. Libertarians, like republicans, are not monolithic.
[…] We’ll add this post to my collection of libertarian […]
[…] We’ll add this post to my collection of libertarian […]
[…] Libertarian Quandaries […]