I wrote yesterday that the Trump tax plan is yielding significant benefits, but one of my caveats at the end of the column warned that Trump’s weak record on spending undermines the long-run sustainability of lower tax rates.
The latest example of Trump’s profligacy is the $1.4 trillion spending bill for the 2020 fiscal year that was just approved (this is the “discretionary” money for the parts of the budget that are annually appropriated, so keep in mind that there’s also more than $3 trillion of “mandatory” spending for entitlement programs in 2020).
This pork-filled spending bill became inevitable when Trump surrendered to the Democrats this summer and agreed to bust the spending caps (something politicians also did in 2013, 2015, and 2018).
It’s hard to capture the utterly reckless nature of the new spending bill.
Here’s how Senator Rick Scott described the legislation.
…a giant spending package — 2,313 pages long — that was…negotiated in secret, spends $1.4 trillion, and is chock full of member projects and special-interest giveaways. …more than $4,200 for every man, woman, and child in America.
…This package includes $25 million for the “operation, maintenance, and security” of the Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C. It includes a $7.25 million increase in funding for the National Endowment for the Arts, the largest increase in a decade. …It includes more than $1 billion in new foreign-aid funding without any discussion about what we’re getting for this funding. …This bill spends $1.4 trillion, with no cuts or reforms. …How many more trillions of dollars do we need to spend before we wake up to the danger…? We need to reform the way Washington works, and we need to do it now.
The Wall Street Journal was similarly dismayed, opining about the bipartisan spending orgy and pointing out the real problem is that all this spending violates the Golden Rule of fiscal policy.
Congress has left town for the year but alas not before another bipartisan spending party that has typified the Trump Presidency. …The budget problem isn’t a shortage of revenue. CBO says tax receipts grew 4% last fiscal year,
through September, and 3% in the first two months this year. Economic growth is feeding the Treasury. But spending is growing much faster: 8% last fiscal year, more than four times the inflation rate, and 6% in October and November this year. In addition to the latest discretionary bills, spending on Social Security (6%), Medicare (6.1%) and Medicaid (9.2%) continue to soar this year. Neither party shows any inclination to do anything about those programs, except expand them. Mr. Trump may yet join Barack Obama in the spending record books.
Regarding the final sentence in the above excerpt, I will predict now that Trump will exceed Obama’s profligacy.
And I’ll have the numbers to prove that early next year when I update my data on presidential spending.
In the meantime, I’ll close with this very depressing chart from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.
The bottom line is that Republican big spenders are enablers of Democratic big taxers.
- In a couple of years, when there’s a big fight to get rid of the Trump tax cuts, every Republican who supported this awful deal
(including Trump) will be responsible.
- When there’s a Democratic president and a big push for class-warfare taxes, every Republican who supported this awful deal (including Trump) will be responsible.
- When there’s a big fight after that to impose a European-style value-added tax, every Republican who supported this awful deal (including Trump) will be responsible.
Gee, isn’t bipartisanship wonderful?
[…] also agree on many other issues, such as nationalizedinfrastructure, industrial policy, governmentspending, and trade […]
[…] also agree on many other issues, such as nationalized infrastructure, industrial policy, government spending, and trade […]
[…] I’d prefer to be called a libertarian, but I won’t quibble with being a “classic conservative” since I’ll interpret that as being the same as a Reagan-style conservative (rather than a big-spending Trump-style conservative). […]
[…] The good news is that Republicans are talking about spending caps. This is a welcome change of pace after the profligacy of the Trump years. […]
[…] The good news is that Republicans are talking about spending caps. This is a welcome change of pace after the profligacy of the Trump years. […]
[…] and Rishi Sunak are doing more damage to good fiscal policy in the U.K. than George Bush and Donald Trump did to good fiscal policy in the […]
[…] and Rishi Sunak are doing more damage to good fiscal policy in the U.K. than George Bush and Donald Trump did to good fiscal policy in the […]
[…] and Rishi Sunak are doing more damage to good fiscal policy in the U.K. than George Bush and Donald Trump did to good fiscal policy in the […]
[…] president this century – Biden, Trump, Obama, and Bush – has been a big spender. But I told an audience at the Acton Institute that […]
[…] To be fair, the Trump Administration sort of proposed to defund the OECD back in 2017, but there was zero follow-through (hardly a surprise since Trump wound up being a big spender). […]
[…] I contemplate these numbers, my disdain for Bush, Obama, Trump, and Biden becomes even more […]
[…] I contemplate these numbers, my disdain for Bush, Obama, Trump, and Biden becomes even more […]
[…] because the Republican party generally does a terrible job. Donald Trump expanded government. George W. Bush expanded government. And George H.W. […]
[…] I contemplate these numbers, my disdain for Bush, Obama, Trump, and Biden becomes even more […]
[…] because the Republican party generally does a terrible job. Donald Trump expanded government. George W. Bush expanded government. And George H.W. […]
[…] Trump, by contrast, did the wrong thing. And he wants to do the wrong thing in the future. And that means huge future tax increases on you […]
[…] He favored big government as a candidate in 2016and he expanded the burden of spending when he was President. […]
[…] He favored big government as a candidate in 2016 and he expanded the burden of spending when he was President. […]
[…] because the Republican party generally does a terrible job. Donald Trump expanded government. George W. Bush expanded government. And George H.W. […]
[…] because the Republican party generally does a terrible job. Donald Trump expanded government. George W. Bush expanded government. And George H.W. Bush expanded […]
[…] trade issues, Biden has been just about as badas his predecessor, (he’s also been as bad as Trumpwith regards to spending, but that’s a topic for another […]
[…] trade issues, Biden has been just about as bad as his predecessor, (he’s also been as bad as Trump with regards to spending, but that’s a topic for another […]
[…] that Trumpies want, such as lower tax rates, but it also means genuine spending restraint. Which we didn’t get during the Trump […]
[…] that Trumpies want, such as lower tax rates, but it also means genuine spending restraint. Which we didn’t get during the Trump […]
[…] strong support for Trump from grassroots conservative Republicans. Yes, they didn’t like his fiscal profligacy and they mostly didn’t like his protectionism, but they did like the fact that he was a […]
[…] strong support for Trump from grassroots conservative Republicans. Yes, they didn’t like his fiscal profligacy and they mostly didn’t like his protectionism, but they did like the fact that he was a […]
[…] geeks at the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) have a well-deserved reputation for rigorous analysis. I regularly cite their numbers and appreciate the work that they […]
[…] he could have written a column arguing that Trump had the same big-spending policies when he was in office. That also would have been […]
[…] he could have written a column arguing that Trump had the same big-spending policies when he was in office. That also would have been […]
[…] I say that as someone who has no problem criticizing some of the other policies we got during that […]
[…] was a big spender even if you don’t count the explosion of pandemic-related […]
[…] was a big spender, of course, but at least there were people in his administration who realized there was a […]
[…] an acceptable Brexit, but otherwise has been a big spender. Sort of the a British version of Trump or […]
[…] an acceptable Brexit, but otherwise has been a big spender. Sort of the a British version of Trump or […]
[…] an acceptable Brexit, but otherwise has been a big spender. Sort of the a British version of Trump or […]
[…] spending restraint was hibernating during the presidency of Donald […]
[…] in mind that Biden’s orgy of new spending is on top of record spending increases that occurred when Republicans were in […]
[…] bad on the issues where Trump was bad (spending and […]
[…] bad on the issues where Trump was bad (spending and […]
[…] was a big spender, of course, but at least there were people in his administration who realized there was a […]
[…] was a big spender, of course, but at least there were people in his administration who realized there was a […]
[…] in mind that Biden’s orgy of new spending is on top of record spending increases that occurred when Republicans were in […]
[…] has been profligate with our money, and he was that way even before the coronavirus became an excuse to open the budgetary spigot. Moreover, he was just like […]
[…] in mind that Biden’s orgy of new spending is on top of record spending increases that occurred when Republicans were in […]
[…] in mind that Biden’s orgy of new spending is on top of record spending increases that occurred when Republicans were in […]
[…] spending restraint was hibernating during the presidency of Donald […]
[…] didn’t like many of the things Trump did (his wasteful spendingand his protectionist tax increases) and I don’t like many of the things Biden is doing […]
[…] didn’t like many of the things Trump did (his wasteful spending and his protectionist tax increases) and I don’t like many of the things Biden is doing (his […]
[…] has been profligate with our money, and he was that way even before the coronavirus became an excuse to open the budgetary spigot. Moreover, he was just like […]
[…] has been profligate with our money, and he was that way even before the coronavirus became an excuse to open the budgetary spigot. Moreover, he was just like […]
[…] this simply because Republicans were corrupted by Trump’s profligacy and are now comfortable with big […]
[…] this simply because Republicans were corrupted by Trump’s profligacy and are now comfortable with big […]
[…] has been profligate with our money, and he was that way even before the coronavirus became an excuse to open the budgetary spigot. Moreover, he was just like […]
[…] geeks at the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) have a well-deserved reputation for rigorous analysis. I regularly cite their numbers and appreciate the work that they […]
[…] geeks at the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) have a well-deserved reputation for rigorous analysis. I regularly cite their numbers and appreciate the work that they […]
[…] spending restraint was hibernating during the presidency of Donald […]
[…] he did bad things, I […]
[…] has been profligate with our money, and he was that way even before the coronavirus became an excuse to open the budgetary spigot. Moreover, he was just like […]
[…] has been profligate with our money, and he was that way even before the coronavirus became an excuse to open the budgetary spigot. Moreover, he was just like […]
[…] Especially since the economy also is saddled with lots of wasteful spending by Bush, Obama, and Trump. […]
[…] spending restraint was hibernating during the presidency of Donald […]
[…] spending restraint was hibernating during the presidency of Donald […]
[…] that could also be a depiction of spending policy under Trump and […]
[…] Especially since the economy also is saddled with lots of wasteful spending by Bush, Obama, and Trump. […]
[…] Especially since the economy also is saddled with lots of wasteful spending by Bush, Obama, and Trump. […]
[…] Especially since the economy also is saddled with lots of wasteful spending by Bush, Obama, and Trump. […]
[…] for proponents of limited government. Bush was a big spender, Obama was a big spender, Trump was a big spender, and now Biden also wants to buy votes with other people’s […]
[…] for proponents of limited government. Bush was a big spender, Obama was a big spender, Trump was a big spender, and now Biden also wants to buy votes with other people’s […]
[…] for proponents of limited government. Bush was a big spender, Obama was a big spender, Trump was a big spender, and now Biden also wants to buy votes with other people’s […]
[…] bottom line is that Trump was good on taxes and bad on spending and […]
[…] bottom line is that Trump was good on taxes and bad on spending and […]
[…] bottom line is that Trump was good on taxes and bad on spending and […]
[…] strong support for Trump from grassroots conservative Republicans. Yes, they didn’t like his fiscal profligacy and they mostly didn’t like his protectionism, but they did like the fact that he was a […]
[…] strong support for Trump from grassroots conservative Republicans. Yes, they didn’t like his fiscal profligacy and they mostly didn’t like his protectionism, but they did like the fact that he was a […]
[…] has been profligate with our money, and he was that way even before the coronavirus became an excuse to open the budgetary spigot. Moreover, he was just like […]
[…] thought the pre-pandemic excuse was pathetic and I’ve been skeptical of the post-pandemic excuse (why, for instance, are bureaucrats getting […]
[…] thought the pre-pandemic excuse was pathetic and I’ve been skeptical of the post-pandemic excuse (why, for instance, are bureaucrats […]
[…] has been profligate with our money, and he was that way even before the coronavirus became an excuse to open the budgetary spigot. Moreover, he was just like […]
[…] has been profligate with our money, and he was that way even before the coronavirus became an excuse to open the budgetary spigot. Moreover, he was just like Obama in […]
[…] election – If you care about trade and spending, then Biden’s victory may turn out to be good news. If you care about taxes and red tape, […]
[…] Trump has his share of flaws and he wasn’t the type of Republican I like, but that doesn’t prevent me from […]
[…] Trump has his share of flaws and he wasn’t the type of Republican I like, but that doesn’t prevent me from […]
[…] Of course, we’ll be on that path even if Biden doesn’t become President, so perhaps the moral of the story is to buy land in […]
[…] will now become much better on spending issues. They’ll no longer face pressure to go along with Trump’s profligacy and they’ll have a partisan incentive to oppose Biden’s profligate […]
[…] will now become much better on spending issues. They’ll no longer face pressure to go along with Trump’s profligacy and they’ll have a partisan incentive to oppose Biden’s profligate […]
[…] now become much better on spending issues. They’ll no longer face pressure to go along with Trump’s profligacy and they’ll have a partisan incentive to oppose Biden’s profligate […]
[…] other words, taxpayers are getting screwed because Trump has been profligate (even more of a big spender than […]
[…] pro-market on some issues (taxes and red tape) and we know he’s anti-market on other issues (spending and […]
[…] all his flaws, at least Trump isn’t a hypocrite on this issue (though all his spending may pave the way for future tax […]
[…] all his flaws, at least Trump isn’t a hypocrite on this issue (though all his spending may pave the way for future tax […]
[…] gets good marks on issues such as taxes and regulation, but bad marks in other areas, most notably spending and […]
[…] I put together a report card last year showing that his economic policies have been a mixed bag, with good grades on tax and regulation, but bad grades on trade and spending. […]
[…] back in early 2017, I warned in an interview that Trump would be a big spender (sadly, I was right). But I wasn’t being reflexively […]
[…] since the major parties are giving voters a choice between big-spender Trump and big-spender […]
[…] Donald Trump wins the 2020 election, I don’t expect any serious effort to rein in the burden of government […]
[…] The following cartoon strip is especially painful to me since so few Republicans are publicly opposing Trump’s wasteful spending. […]
[…] a grade, but it’s not looking good. He not only has a bad record on big issues such as spending and trade, but he also is prone to cronyist policies in other […]
[…] Trump’s awful track record on spending, it would be more accurate to speculate that I’ll be playing in the outfield for the Yankees […]
[…] were motivated at least in part by disappointment with Trump’s anti-conservative record on government spending (and also on […]
[…] Trump is making government bigger. […]
[…] if Trump (being a big spender) decided to bail out the states, it would be good to attach requirements so that there would be a […]
[…] know pro-market people who plan on voting against Trump because they don’t like his record on spending or […]
[…] For what it’s worth, I’m not optimistic about America’s trajectory. If Trump gets reelected, I don’t expect big developments in the policy areas where he’s good (taxes and red tape), but I wouldn’t be surprised to see new initiatives in the areas where he is bad (trade and spending). […]
[…] P.P.S. If Patterson decides to learn and use real budget data, I hope he’ll join me in criticizing Trump for being a big spender. […]
[…] because of Bush, Obama, and Trump, the federal budget has tripled since 1980 (Reagan and Clinton were comparatively frugal). Keep in […]
[…] I doubt that either Donald Trump or Joe Biden is interested in that […]
[…] in case those last two sentences sound overly favorable to Trump, I’ll remind people that reckless spending increases – sooner or later – will lead to punitive tax increases. In other words, if Biden wins […]
[…] Obama’s faux stimulus and then was briefly constrained during the Tea Party era (and is now climbing rapidly under […]
[…] For what it’s worth, Trump is the best of the non-Reagan Republicans, though that is damning with very faint praise. […]
[…] but he’s also moved policy in the wrong direction on other issues (trade and spending). Simply stated, his bad policies are offsetting his good […]
[…] Trump’s record on spending is bad, though his mistakes are measured in billions rather than […]
[…] The bottom line is that modest spending restraint (government growing at 1.7 percent annually, nearly as fast as projected inflation) would slowly but surely achieve that goal by gradually reversing the big-government policies of Bush, Obama, and Trump. […]
[…] Of course, we’ll be on that path even if Biden doesn’t become President, so perhaps the moral of the story is to buy land in […]
[…] gets reelected – Because Trump is producing worse spending policy and worse trade policy, and because of my concerns never-ending Keynesian monetary policy from the […]
[…] is far too big, and it keeps growing in size. Entitlements are the main problem, but Trump added to the mess by capitulating to another budget deal that increases the burden of discretionary […]
The spike in spending after Obama was handed Bush’s faith-based asset forfeiture Crash and Depression (from banning plant leaves) is much like the one following Bert Hoover’s attempt to enforce the Increased Penalties Act of March 2, 1929, making light beer a chain-gang felony with a fine worth 30 lbs of today’s gold. These matters are conveniently ignored, for the solution would entail less coercion and more individual rights–not market shutdowns to stop flash crashes.
setonmotley – You make a potentially good point, but can you provide any evidence showing that Trump’s budgets proposed “cuts everywhere except Defense”. Can you, for instance, give us a link to some documents supporting your claim? I am not saying I disagree, I would just like to see some supporting evidence.
Not to worry, the deficit spending will stop when the government cannot service the interest on the debt. The economy will collapse, the US will be bankrupt, and the government will be able to spend only what they can extract in taxes. It won’t be nice, but it will cure the financial ills of the nation and end obligating future generations to pay for today’s debt. Hope you are not around to see it though. Just ask the Soviets/Russians!
setonmotley writes, “So what exactly is he supposed to do?”
Veto. Veto. Veto. If Trump cared about runaway spending, he would use his veto power. Trump would use his veto power over-and-over until either Congress overrode his vote or Congress slowed spending growth. Unfortunately Trump doesn’t give a damn about runaway spending, and he wants to be crowned the King of debt.
Re: “Trump surrendered to the Democrats this summer”
Trump didn’t surrender. Surrender implies that if he could have had his way, the caps would still be in place. Trump doesn’t want the caps. Trump is on the side of more spending, and caps just get in the way of his spending.
That is a factor. Ryan was in charge of the House when Obama was on his spending spree. I guess thats one issue both parties agree on.
politicians use tax money to buy votes… it’s no mystery… and they are unlikely to control spending unless they are forced to do so… left to their own devices… they will bankrupt the country in order to get themselves re-elected… that’s why we have article V in the constitution… there is already a move afoot for an amendment to cap spending…. and another to limit terms… so far 18 states have signed on… it might take some time…. but it can be done….
Read some of the other comments and check on who is in charge of the House.
To all of those that pointed out CONGRESS Is responsible for appropriations and NOT even doing that in good order. GMTA
– Dan, Did you happen to notice that in the spending bill there is a special helping of pork specifically reserved for the United Mine Workers of America to bail out the coal miners pensions and health care? Here the government is once again picking the winners and losers in the pork bailout game! How many votes are they purchasing with my tax dollars here at what total cost per Coal Miner? Rich Forshey
Of course the spending is a travesty and insanely out of control. Of course the politicians who vote for it all are pathetic weasels who know better but can’t help themselves. But we are kidding our selves if we do not recognize and admit the fact that the reason for it is that The People are stupid and idiotic and pathetic and insanely greedy and would refuse to vote for anyone who does not continue to stoke the gravy train of free loot to be passed out.
Of course The People have been carefully brainwashed to believe in the Welfare/Warfare State, but, it is every individual’s moral responsibility to resist being brainwashed; I believe a careful and honest reading of the Bible supports me in this contention, that each and everyone one of us needs to repent of our brainwashedness.
Bottom line, only if and when The People repent and turn from their wicked spendthrift ways will the politicians be willing and able to do things differently.
I’m not saying this to excuse Orange Man and the Republicans, I’m just trying to point out political facts.
I just checked the Constitution – and it turns out US federal government budgets don’t originate in the White House.
They originate in the House of Representatives.
Trump has submitted great budgets every year he’s been in office. Cuts everywhere except Defense.
Every single one of which the profligate Congress immediately ignores.
The only thing Trump can do about it – is veto and shut down government.
Which the Left and Never Trump Land assails as the end of the Earth spinning on its access.
So what exactly is he supposed to do?
[…] via Trump’s Record on Spending Gets Worse Every Year — International Liberty […]
Trump is worse than Obama at deficit spending. Most of his supporters overlook this huge fact.