Joe Biden’s economic policy has been a disaster.
- He’s bad on the issues where Trump was bad (spending and trade).
- He’s bad on the issues where Trump was good (most notably, taxes).
- And he’s bad on the issues where Trump had a mixed record (regulation).
Based on his track record as a long-time Senator, none of this is a surprise. According to vote ratings from the Club for Growth and National Taxpayers Union, Biden was to the left of even Crazy Bernie.
Unfortunately, a bad president (anyone remember Nixon?) can do a lot more damage than a bad senator.
Today is Part I of a series of columns analyzing Biden’s failure.
We’ll start with his so-called Build Back Better plan. Joe Biden didn’t explicitly mention “BBB” is his State of the Union address, but he did promote almost all of the specific policies that are in that plan.
And he even made the preposterous argument that some of those policies would help bring inflation under control.
I’ve repeatedly explained why the president’s plan for a bigger welfare state is bad news, but this tweet from Americans for Prosperity’s Akash Chougule does a great job of debunking Biden’s argument in a very succinct fashion.
You may recognize the chart. As I pointed out last year, it shows that prices rise rapidly in areas where government subsidies distort the market.
In areas where the free market operates, by contrast, prices actually tend to decline.
I’ll close with the observation that Biden’s Build Back Better is a clunky amalgamation of new and expanded entitlements. His per-child handout is the most expensive, and it’s especially pernicious because it would undo the success of Bill Clinton (and Newt Gingrich’s) welfare reform.
But if there was a prize for the most economic damage per dollar spent, Biden’s scheme for government-dictated childcare would be the worst of the worst since he subsidizes demand while also restricting supply. If it gets approved, the chart may need a new vertical axis because Biden will screw up the market for childcare even more than the government has screwed up the markets for health care and higher education.
[…] I’ve written a 7-part series on Bidenomics, reviewing the president’s record on issues such as subsidies, inflation, protectionism, household income, fiscal policy, red tape, and […]
[…] written a 7-part series on Bidenomics, reviewing the president’s record on issues such as subsidies, inflation, protectionism, household income, fiscal policy, red tape, and […]
[…] editions of this series have focused on Biden’s dismal record with regards to subsidies, inflation, protectionism, household income, fiscal policy, and red […]
[…] editions of this series have focused on Biden’s dismal record with regards to subsidies,inflation, protectionism, household income, fiscal policy, and red […]
[…] editions of this series have focused on Biden’s dismal record with regards to subsidies, inflation, protectionism, household income, fiscal policy, and red […]
[…] part of a six-part series on Biden’s economic mistakes (the other five columns can be found here, here, here, here, and […]
[…] part of a six-part series on Biden’s economic mistakes (the other five columns can be found here, here, here, here, and […]
[…] Yesterday’s column explained that Biden’s proposals to expand the welfare state were bad news, in part because government subsidies often lead to inefficiency and higher prices. […]
[…] with Biden pursuing other bad policies (FWIW, I don’t blame him for today’s price […]
[…] subsidy agenda will lead to higher prices and economic […]
[…] addressed Biden’s track record on subsidies, inflation, protectionism, household income, and fiscal policy, let’s finish our series by […]
[…] addressed Biden’s track record on subsidies, inflation, protectionism, household income, and fiscal policy, let’s finish our series by […]
[…] subsidy agenda will lead to higher prices and economic […]
[…] subsidy agenda will lead to higher prices and economic […]
[…] For previous columns in this series, click here, here, […]
[…] For previous columns in this series, click here, here, and […]
[…] Part I of this series, I pointed out that Biden’s plethora of proposed handouts and subsidies would lead to higher prices and more […]
[…] been writing a series of columns about the failure of Bidenomics (see here, here, and here), but let’s switch gears today and focus on some remarkably bad behavior by […]
[…] Part I of this series, I pointed out that Biden’s plethora of proposed handouts and subsidies would lead to higher prices and more […]
Reblogged this on Utopia, you are standing in it!.
[…] Yesterday’s column explained that Biden’s proposals to expand the welfare state were bad news, in part because government subsidies often lead to inefficiency and higher prices. […]
[…] Yesterday’s column explained that Biden’s proposals to expand the welfare state were bad news, in part because government subsidies often lead to inefficiency and higher prices. […]
[…] « The Failure of Bidenomics, Part I […]
[…] The Failure of Bidenomics, Part I […]