What do Joe Biden and Donald Trump have in common?
Speaking earlier this year to the Mackinac Center in Michigan, I warned they both implicitly favor massive tax increases on ordinary households.
If you don’t want to spend two minutes watching the video, I explained that the burden of government spending is going to dramatically increase over the next several decades because of demographic change and poorly designed entitlement programs.
This means we will have to make a choice: Either reform entitlements or acquiesce to massive future tax increases.
And because Biden and Trump oppose entitlement reform, that means that they favor tax increases.
Moreover, since there are not nearly enough rich people to finance big government, this means Biden and Trump favor massive tax increases on lower-income and middle-class households.
To be fair, there are alternatives other than entitlement reform or big tax increases.
For instance, politicians could endlessly issue more debt. That might work, at least until the fiscal house of cards collapses.
Another possibility, at least with regards to Social Security, is to do nothing.
How is this an alternative? Well, David McIntosh, President of the Club for Growth, explained last month in the Wall Street Journal that the Biden-Trump position on Social Security could be a recipe for automatic benefit cuts.
Joe Biden and Donald Trump agree on one thing. “I guarantee you I will protect Social Security and Medicare without any change. Guaranteed,” Mr. Biden said in March. Mr. Trump has said: “I will do everything within my power not to touch Social Security, to leave it the way it is.” …The Biden-Trump position may sound like a pledge to protect Social Security, but it isn’t. …the Old Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund…will be able to issue payments to retirees only until 2034. …once the trust fund reserve is depleted, beneficiary payouts will be limited to whatever funds come in from Social Security payroll taxes. …Thus consequences of leaving Social Security “without any changes,” as promised by Biden-Trump, are dire. Ten years from now, benefit cuts of 23% will be triggered if there is no change to Social Security…the Biden-Trump strategy has been to play “beat the clock,” leaving their successors to deal with the crisis. Candidates with a record of entitlement reform like Messrs. Pence and DeSantis would do well to point out that doing nothing is the worst Social Security cut.
Technically, McIntosh is 100 percent correct. Under current law, there will be automatic benefit cuts once there no longer are any IOUs in the Social Security Trust Fund.
In reality, future politicians almost surely will change the law to continue full payments. Which is why I feel confident in stating that our real choice is between genuine entitlement reform and massive tax increases.
P.S. My collection of “honest leftists” includes many who openly admit that giant tax increases will be needed if there is no entitlement reform.
P.P.S. The agreement between Biden and Trump on entitlements should not be a surprise. They also agree on many other issues, such as nationalized infrastructure, industrial policy, government spending, and trade protectionism.
[…] The bottom line is that there’s an unavoidable choice to be made in the United States. We either reform the entitlement programs or we agree to let politicians take more of our money. […]
[…] We either have entitlement reform or we have massive tax increases. Sadly, the two main presidential candidates in 2024 prefer the wrong option. […]
[…] Ordinary Americans will be pillaged, […]
[…] The bottom line is that there’s an unavoidable choice to be made in the United States. We either reform the entitlement programs or we agree to let politicians take more of our money. […]
[…] We either have entitlement reform or we have massive tax increases. Sadly, the two main presidential candidates in 2024 prefer the wrong option. […]
[…] to profligacy in Washington, we’re stumbling and bumbling our way into becoming a sl0w-growth, European-style welfare […]
[…] Politicians who oppose spending restraint implicitly support massive tax increases on lower-income and middle-class […]
[…] Ordinary Americans will be pillaged, […]
[…] is that there’s no possibility of getting that kind of approach anytime soon. Especially with two big spenders running against each other for the White […]
[…] shows that the Biden-Trump policy will increase future […]
[…] shows that the Biden-Trump policy will increase future […]
[…] and responsible people (in other words, not Trump or Biden) know that Social Security has a massive long-run […]
[…] both say they want to keep the status quo (Biden actually wants to make it worse). That’s a recipe for giant future tax increases on lower-income and middle-class households. So you can easily understand why I’m not excited […]
[…] toward fiscal crisis in the United States – Politicians in the United States generally care more about buying votes than in preserving or enhancing the economic well-being of […]
[…] Politicians who oppose spending restraint implicitly support massive tax increases on lower-income and middle-class […]
[…] Politicians who oppose spending restraint implicitly support massive tax increases on lower-income and middle-class […]
[…] Politicians who oppose spending restraint implicitly support massive tax increases on lower-income and middle-class […]
[…] Consider, for instance, the Trump-Biden hostility to trade, the Trump-Biden support for industrial policy, and the Trump-Biden opposition to entitlement reform. […]
[…] Biden and Donald Trump have both stated that they oppose entitlement reform, so this raises the very important question of how they would […]
[…] can impose massive tax increases on lower-income and middle-class households, which is the approach that is implicitly embraced by […]
[…] and the United States gets an awful score (zero) in that category. Sadly, both Trump and Biden have openly stated that they have no desire to fix this […]
[…] I don’t know whether to characterize that as head-in-the-sand thinking or kick-the-can-down-the-road thinking, but it’s a recipe for giant future tax increases. […]
[…] I don’t know whether to characterize that as head-in-the-sand thinking or kick-the-can-down-the-road thinking, but it’s a recipe for giant future tax increases. […]
[…] bigger government sooner or later will lead to massive tax increases such as a value-added […]
[…] giant tax increases. And because there are not enough rich people to finance big government, the Biden-Trump tax increases will target lower-income and middle-class […]
[…] which group wants to reform entitlements to protect the country from massive future increases in the fiscal burden of […]
[…] Trump and Biden attack anyone who wants to do the right thing on entitlements, so that makes it more likely that politicians eventually will compound the damage of higher spending by enacting higher […]
[…] One of the reasons I get upset about the Biden/Trump approach to entitlements is that I fear it would make a VAT more […]
[…] One of the reasons I get upset about the Biden/Trump approach to entitlements is that I fear it would make a VAT more […]
[…] anyone who wants to do the right thing on entitlements, so that makes it more likely that politicians eventually will compound the damage of higher spending by enacting higher […]
[…] Trump and Biden attack anyone who wants to do the right thing on entitlements, so that makes it more likely that politicians eventually will compound the damage of higher spending by enacting higher […]
[…] Trump and Biden attack anyone who wants to do the right thing on entitlements, so that makes it more likely that politicians eventually will compound the damage of higher spending by enacting higher […]
[…] Impose massive tax increases on the middle class to finance an ever-bigger future government. […]
[…] massive tax increases on the middle class to finance an ever-bigger future […]
[…] means the real issue is whether the next president prefers spending restraint or massive tax increases. And, if the next president wants to do the right thing, then we will see if the base of support in […]
[…] means the real issue is whether the next president prefers spending restraint or massive tax increases. And, if the next president wants to do the right thing, then we will see if the base of support in […]
[…] Massive tax increases. […]
[…] Massive tax increases. […]
[…] The Biden-Trump Plan for Middle-Class Tax Increases […]
[…] The Biden-Trump Plan for Middle-Class Tax Increases — International Liberty […]