Back in 2012, I wrote a column for the Wall Street Journal to highlight the success of Switzerland’s spending cap (also known as the “debt brake”).
Swiss voters voted for this spending cap in 2001 and ever since it took effect in 2003, government spending has increased by an average of 2.2 percent annually, only about half as fast as it was growing in the decades before the cap was imposed.
To show the ongoing success of the debt brake, here’s a map comparing changes in the burden of spending in Switzerland and its four major neighbors (France, Germany, Italy, and Austria). As you can see, IMF data reveals that Switzerland has been more responsible.
I even calculated changes in national spending burdens since the start of the pandemic.
You can see that all governments used the virus as an excuse for more spending, but the fiscal damage was most contained in Switzerland.
Seems like Switzerland is a role model, right?
Professors Steve Hanke and Barry Poulson presumably agree. They have a column in National Review arguing in favor of a similar spending cap for the United States.
President Biden’s budget proposal for 2024 makes it clear that the U.S. needs a budget straitjacket sooner rather than later. …Switzerland has been arguably the most successful country in reining in budget deficits and its debt burden. …The Swiss debt brake requires that expenditures be brought into balance with revenues. A cap is imposed on spending based on expected revenue, and revenue is projected based on long-term trends in the real growth of national income. Expenditures may exceed the cap in response to extraordinary events such as war, but if that’s the case, eventually, revenues from budget surpluses must be generated and set aside to offset this excess expenditure. We propose a debt brake for the U.S. that would initially be more stringent than the Swiss debt brake…a spending limit (read: cap) be calculated each year, and that the cap be reduced by 1 percent.
Interestingly, they want a spending cap that is stricter than the Swiss version.
That would be ideal (the tighter the cap, the greater the progress), but I’d settle for the Swiss approach. Why? Because here’s the data comparing US profligacy and Swiss prudence.
When I contemplate these numbers, my disdain for Bush, Obama, Trump, and Biden becomes even more intense.
They all put political ambition about what’s best for America.
But I’m digressing. Let’s put the focus back on the success of the Swiss spending cap.
It’s worth noting, for instance, that Switzerland also is out-performing the United States when comparing changes in government debt.
And the Swiss also have been enjoying better economic performance since they imposed a spending cap on their politicians.
I’ll close by observing that a spending cap would have prevented massive debt accumulation in the United States. And the same is true for other nations as well.
P.S. Colorado has a very successful spending cap known as TABOR.
P.P.S. There’s plenty of academic evidence for Switzerland’s debt brake. But what’s more surprising are that pro-spending cap studies from the International Monetary Fund (here and here), the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (here and here) and the European Central Bank (here and here).
[…] I want you to buy the book, but if you are a regular reader of this column, you already know the only practical way of averting a fiscal crisis in the United States. Simply follow the Golden Rule. And, because of its spending cap, Switzerland is a good role model. […]
[…] standard for good fiscal policy at the state level. And Switzerland shows that spending caps also are very effective at the national […]
[…] standard for good fiscal policy at the state level. And Switzerland shows that spending caps also are very effective at the national […]
[…] I want you to buy the book, but if you are a regular reader of this column, you already know the only practical way of averting a fiscal crisis in the United States. Simply follow the Golden Rule. And, because of its spending cap, Switzerland is a good role model. […]
[…] it goes without saying (but I’ll say it anyhow) that we explain how a Swiss-style or TABOR-style spending cap is needed to impose some discipline on reckless, self-serving […]
[…] This analysis is why a spending cap amendment (like TABOR or the Swiss Debt Brake) is much betterthan a balanced budget […]
[…] This analysis is why a spending cap amendment (like TABOR or the Swiss Debt Brake) is much better than a balanced budget […]
[…] Today, I’ll add a fourth potential item for trade. I’ll accept a big tax hike in exchange for an ironclad spending cap, sort of like the one that has been so successful in Switzerland. […]
[…] Debt Brake complies with this […]
[…] very impressive, especially compared to the irresponsible 4.9 percent average annual spending growth in the United […]
[…] makes the Swiss example especially persuasive is a comparison over the past 20 years between spending growth in Switzerland and the United […]
[…] makes the Swiss example especially persuasive is a comparison over the past 20 years between spending growth in Switzerland and the United […]
[…] Switzerland’s version is far better (and far more effective) because it is designed to control spending rather than deficits. In other words, a spending […]
[…] I’m a big fan of spending caps in Switzerlandand Colorado, I’m always on the lookout for research and analysis about fiscal […]
[…] I’m a big fan of spending caps in Switzerland and Colorado, I’m always on the lookout for research and analysis about fiscal […]
[…] Even since Swiss voters overwhelmingly imposed their “debt brake” on politicians 20 years ago, total government spending in Switzerland has increased by an average of just 2.2 percent per year. […]
[…] the month before that (March), I wrote about the ongoing success of the country’s spending […]
[…] the month before that (March), I wrote about the ongoing success of the country’s spending […]
[…] The Swiss Debt Brake and Colorado’s TABOR work because they limit spending. Balanced budget requirements, by contrast, have a weak track record […]
[…] Swiss Debt Brake and Colorado’s TABOR work because they limit spending. Balanced budget requirements, by […]
[…] share one final excerpt from Hanke’s article. He points out that Switzerland’s spending cap is a big reason for the nation’s […]
[…] this month, I wrote separate columns about the spending cap in Switzerland (the “debt brake“) and the spending cap in Colorado […]
[…] this month, I wrote separate columns about the spending cap in Switzerland (the “debt brake“) and the spending cap in Colorado […]
[…] This is remarkable. Germany, governed by a Social Democrat, is proposing a spending cap that is even better than Switzerland’s debt brake. […]
[…] More Evidence for Switzerland’s Spending Cap […]
[…] More Evidence for Switzerland’s Spending Cap […]
There’s nothing surprising about the IMF, OECD, and ECB funding science that reaches useful conclusions and supporting good policy ideas.
Reblogged this on Utopia, you are standing in it!.
I love all your analysis about financial burden of government and especially about spending restrictions. But what is actually being done to implement anything to put the brakes on spending? Is there someone out there trying to get legislation or better yet an amendment passed to impose some restraint on our profligate politicians?