This blog has been warning about the danger of a value-added tax. We’ve cited the salivating comments of Speaker Pelosi. We’ve noted the favorable comments by Obama insiders like the former Co-Chairman of his transition team. We know the battle is coming. Now we need to fight. This newly-released video from the Center for Freedom and Prosperity provides the data showing that this is a do-or-die fight. If we lose, there is no hope of stopping statism. Blocking a VAT is not a sufficient condition to protect America from becoming a French-style welfare state, but it is a necessary condition.
A VAT Would Finance the Road to Serfdom
October 14, 2009 by Dan Mitchell
Posted in Big Government, Center for Freedom and Prosperity, Economics, Fiscal Policy, Government Spending, Pelosi, Spending, Tax Competition, Taxation, Value-Added Tax, VAT, Video | Tagged Big Government, Obama, Pelosi, Tax, Taxation, Value-Added Tax, VAT, Video | 151 Comments
151 Responses
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Pages
Visitors (beginning December 23, 2010)
Tags
Big Government Bureaucracy Bureaucrats Class warfare Competitiveness Constitution Corruption Crime Debt Deficit Dependency Economics England Entitlements Europe Fiscal Policy Free Markets Government-run healthcare Government intervention Government Spending Government stupidity Government waste Gun control Health Care Higher Taxes Humor IRS Jobs Keynesian Economics Laffer Curve Liberty News Appearance Obama Obamacare Political Humor Redistribution Regulation Statism stimulus Taxation Tax Competition Tax Increase Tax Increases United Kingdom Welfare StateArchives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
Recent Comments
Categories
- 2nd Amendment
- African-Americans
- Al Gore
- Alarmism
- Argentina
- Atlas Shrugged
- Australia
- Austrian Economics
- Ayn Rand
- Bailout
- Balanced Budget
- Barney Frank
- Baseball
- Bernanke
- Big business
- Big Government
- Bob Dole Award
- Boondoggle
- Brain drain
- Bulldogs
- Bureaucracy
- Bureaucrats
- Bush
- California
- Canada
- Capital Gains Tax
- cash for clunkers
- Cato Institute
- CBO
- Center for Freedom and Prosperity
- Central planning
- Centralization
- Charity
- Chile
- China
- Chris Christie
- Class warfare
- Climate change
- Clinton
- Cold War
- Collectivism
- Communism
- Competitiveness
- Congress
- Congressional Budget Office
- Constitution
- Corporate income tax
- Corporate tax
- Corruption
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Crime
- Cronyism
- Cuba
- Dan Hannan
- David Cameron
- Dawgs
- Death Tax
- Debt
- Deferral
- Deficit
- Delaware
- Democrats
- Dependency
- Deposit Insurance
- Discrimination
- Double Taxation
- Drug War
- Earmarks
- Easy money
- Economics
- Education
- Election
- Elitism
- Eminent Domain
- England
- Entitlements
- Environmentalism
- Estonia
- Euro
- Europe
- European Commission
- Executive pay
- Fair Tax
- Fannie Mae
- Fascism
- Fatal conceit
- Federal Reserve
- Federalism
- Financial Crisis
- Financial Privacy
- Finland
- Fiscal Crisis
- Fiscal Policy
- Flat Tax
- food nazi
- Food Stamps
- Foreign Aid
- Foreign Policy
- France
- Freddie Mac
- Free Markets
- Free Speech
- Free State Project
- Freedom
- Geithner
- General Motors
- Georgia
- Germany
- Gingrich
- Global Taxation
- Global warming
- Gordon Brown
- Government intervention
- Government Spending
- Government stupidity
- Government Thuggery
- Great Depression
- Greece
- Gross domestic product
- Gun control
- Harmonization
- Hayek
- Health Care
- Health Reform
- Higher Taxes
- Hong Kong
- Hoover
- Housing
- HUD
- Human Rights
- Humor
- Hypocrisy
- Iceland
- Illinois
- Immigration
- Income tax
- Inflation
- International bureaucracy
- International Criminal Court
- International Monetary Fund
- International Taxation
- Ireland
- IRS
- Italy
- Japan
- JCT
- Jobs
- John Stossel
- Joint Committee on Taxation
- Joker
- Jurisdictional Competition
- Kelo
- Keynes
- Keynesian
- KPMG
- Laffer Curve
- Lakers
- Leviathan
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Liechtenstein
- Lobbying
- Local government
- Marginal Tax Rate
- Media Bias
- Medicaid
- Medicare
- Migration
- Minimum Wage
- Mitchell's Golden Rule
- Mitchell's Law
- Monaco
- Monetary Policy
- Money Laundering
- Moral Hazard
- nanny state
- National Education Association
- National Sales Tax
- Netherlands
- New Jersey
- New York
- News Appearance
- North Korea
- Obama
- OECD
- Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
- PATRIOT Act
- Patriotism
- Patriots
- Paul Ryan
- Paulson
- Pelosi
- Pets
- Philippines
- Podcast
- Political Correctness
- Political Humor
- Politicians
- Politics
- Polling Data
- Portugal
- Postal Service
- Poverty
- Price Controls
- Privacy
- Privatization
- Prohibition
- Property Rights
- Property Tax
- Prostitution
- Protectionism
- Public Opinion
- Race
- Rahn Curve
- Rand
- Rankings
- Reagan
- Recession
- Redistribution
- Regulation
- Republicans
- Roman Polanski
- Romney
- Roosevelt
- Russia
- Sales Tax
- Savings
- School Choice
- Singapore
- Sleaze
- Slovakia
- Snow
- Soccer
- Social Security
- Social Security Privatization
- Socialism
- Softball
- South Korea
- Sovereignty
- Spain
- Spending
- States
- Statism
- stimulus
- Subsidies
- Supercommittee
- Supply-side economics
- Supreme Court
- Swedem
- Switzerland
- Tax avoidance
- Tax Competition
- Tax Compliance
- Tax evasion
- Tax Harmonization
- Tax Haven
- Tax Increase
- Tax Reform
- Taxation
- Taxpayer Ripoff
- Tea Party
- Territorial Taxation
- Terrorism
- Texas
- Thanksgiving
- Third party payer
- Tobacco
- Tobin Tax
- Toilet Paper
- Trade
- TSA
- Uncategorized
- Underground Economy
- Unemployment
- Union Bosses
- United Kingdom
- United Nations
- United States
- Value-Added Tax
- VAT
- Video
- Vouchers
- Walter Williams
- Waste
- Weekly Economics Lesson
- Welfare
- Welfare State
- World Bank
- Worldwide Taxation
- Yankees
[...] June 22, 2010 by Dan Mitchell I’ve frequently argued that the main purpose of “taxing the rich” is not to collect more revenue. Smart leftists, after all, understand that there are very strong Laffer Curve effects at the top of the income scale since investors and entrepreneurs have considerable ability to control the timing, level, and composition of their income. So if higher tax rates on upper-income taxpayers don’t collect much revenue, why is the left so insistent on class-warfare taxation? The answer, I think, is that soak-the-rich taxes are a “loss-leader” that politicians impose in order to pave the way for higher taxes on the middle class. Indeed, I made this point in my video on class warfare taxation, and noted that are not enough rich people to finance big government. As such, politicians that want to tax the middle class hope to soften opposition among ordinary people by first punishing society’s most productive people. We already know that tax rates on the so-called rich will jump next January thanks to higher income tax rates, higher capital gains tax rates, more double taxation of dividends, and higher death taxes. Now the politicians are preparing to drop the other shoe. Excerpted below is a blurb from the Washington Post about a member of the House Democratic leadership urging middle-class tax hikes, and let’s not forgot all the politicians salivating for a value-added tax. [...]
[...] the House Democratic leadership urging middle-class tax hikes, and let’s not forgot all the politicians salivating for a value-added tax. Tax cuts that benefit the middle class should not be “totally sacrosanct” as [...]
[...] of the House Democratic leadership urging middle-class tax hikes, and let’s not forgot all the politicians salivating for a value-added tax. Tax cuts that benefit the middle class should not be “totally sacrosanct” as policymakers try [...]
[...] of the House Democratic leadership urging middle-class tax hikes, and let’s not forgot all the politicians salivating for a value-added tax. Tax cuts that benefit the middle class should not be “totally sacrosanct” as policymakers try [...]
[...] welfare state without a value-added tax, but they don’t want to publicly associate themselves with that view until the political environment is more conducive to success. Most important, they realize that it [...]
[...] welfare state without a value-added tax, but they don’t want to publicly associate themselves with that view until the political environment is more conducive to success. Most important, they realize that it [...]
[...] welfare state without a value-added tax, but they don’t want to publicly associate themselves with that view until the political environment is more conducive to success. Most important, they realize that it [...]
[...] to fiscal responsibility is a value-added tax, as I’ve explained here, here, here, here, and here. So I’m delighted to see a growing amount of research showing that a VAT is bad news. Jim [...]
[...] to fiscal responsibility is a value-added tax, as I’ve explained here, here, here, here, and here. So I’m delighted to see a growing amount of research showing that a VAT is bad news. Jim Powell [...]
[...] welfare state without a value-added tax, but they don’t want to publicly associate themselves with that view until the political environment is more conducive to success. Most important, they realize that it [...]
[...] evidence, Daniels has indicated that he is open to a value-added tax (and energy taxes as well). A VAT would be a fiscal catastrophe for America, paving the way for European-style statism. Here’s an excerpt from Politico. Indiana [...]
[...] evidence, Daniels has indicated that he is open to a value-added tax (and energy taxes as well). A VAT would be a fiscal catastrophe for America, paving the way for European-style statism. Here’s an excerpt from Politico. Indiana Gov. Mitch [...]
[...] news for taxpayers. From a policy perspective, I’m very much against a VAT because it will finance bigger government, as explained in this [...]
[...] bad news for taxpayers. From a policy perspective, I’m very much against a VAT because it will finance bigger government, as explained in this [...]
[...] to travel. But, more important, imagine what American politicians will do if they ever succeed in imposing a value-added tax. The rate initially will be low (just as the original income tax had a top rate of just 7 percent), [...]
[...] to travel. But, more important, imagine what American politicians will do if they ever succeed in imposing a value-added tax. The rate initially will be low (just as the original income tax had a top rate of just 7 percent), [...]
[...] to travel. But, more important, imagine what American politicians will do if they ever succeed in imposing a value-added tax. The rate initially will be low (just as the original income tax had a top rate of just 7 percent), [...]
[...] The Task Force proposes a value-added tax, which is estimated to generate more than $3 trillion between 2012 and 2020. They call this new tax [...]
[...] The Task Force proposes a value-added tax, which is estimated to generate more than $3 trillion between 2012 and 2020. They call this new tax [...]
[...] Task Force proposes a value-added tax, which is estimated to generate more than $3 trillion between 2012 and 2020. They call this new tax [...]
[...] news for taxpayers. From a policy perspective, I’m very much against a VAT because it will finance bigger government, as explained in this [...]
[...] deal, sort of like a football team trading a great young quarterback for a 35-year old lineman. The VAT would give statists a money machine that they need to turn the United States into a French-style welfare state. This type of national [...]
[...] deal, sort of like a football team trading a great young quarterback for a 35-year old lineman. The VAT would give statists a money machine that they need to turn the United States into a French-style welfare state. This type of national [...]
[...] deal, sort of like a football team trading a great young quarterback for a 35-year old lineman. The VAT would give statists a money machine that they need to turn the United States into a French-style welfare state. This type of national [...]
[...] deal, sort of like a football team trading a great young quarterback for a 35-year old lineman. The VAT would give statists a money machine that they need to turn the United States into a French-style welfare state. This type of national [...]
[...] system that Romney imposed on Massachusetts. And if I was to pick the Republican most likely to impose a VAT on America, it would be a corporatist GOPer like Romney. Axelrod, one of Obama’s most trusted [...]
[...] system that Romney imposed on Massachusetts. And if I was to pick the Republican most likely to impose a VAT on America, it would be a corporatist GOPer like Romney. Axelrod, one of Obama’s most trusted [...]
[...] revenue that would be necessary to finance promised entitlement benefits. As I’ve noted before, the VAT is a giant source of tax revenue, so the left no longer would have to worry about financing a European-sized welfare state. After [...]
[...] revenue that would be necessary to finance promised entitlement benefits. As I’ve noted before, the VAT is a giant source of tax revenue, so the left no longer would have to worry about financing a European-sized welfare state. After [...]
[...] I should have known to force myself back into the discussion. I did get in a final warning about the value-added tax, but this was not my best [...]
[...] five other witnesses, and all of the other people testifying were sympathetic to a VAT. But since I had truth on my side, that made it a fair fight (though it did cross my mind that it’s not a good sign when a [...]
[...] five other witnesses, and all of the other people testifying were sympathetic to a VAT. But since I had truth on my side, that made it a fair fight (though it did cross my mind that it’s not a good sign when a [...]
[...] steak every night. But since I’m a cranky libertarian, let’s assume Obama has imposed a European-style 20 percent VAT and the tax burden has [...]
[...] steak every night. But since I’m a cranky libertarian, let’s assume Obama has imposed a European-style 20 percent VAT and the tax burden has [...]
[...] steak every night. But since I’m a cranky libertarian, let’s assume Obama has imposed a European-style 20 percent VAT and the tax burden has [...]
[...] steak every night. But since I’m a cranky libertarian, let’s assume Obama has imposed a European-style 20 percent VAT and the tax burden has [...]
[...] value-added tax, not surprisingly, has played a key role in Europe’s fiscal [...]
[...] me put it more bluntly. A national sales tax – such as a Fair Tax or a VAT – would be a less destructive way of raising revenue than the current tax [...]
[...] the big expansion of the welfare state in the 1960s (which was made possible by the money maching known as the value-added tax) has slowed growth in western nations. The only silver lining to that dark cloud is that at least [...]
[...] This Center for Freedom and Prosperity study has all the gory details. The OECD bureaucrats (who get tax-free salaries, by the way) endorsed Obamacare, supported the failed stimulus, and are big advocates of a value-added tax for America. [...]
[...] This Center for Freedom and Prosperity study has all the gory details. The OECD bureaucrats (who get tax-free salaries, by the way) endorsed Obamacare, supported the failed stimulus, and are big advocates of a value-added tax for America. [...]
[...] A value-added tax would be a disaster. This was music to my ears since I have repeatedly warned that the statists won’t be able to impose a European-style welfare state in the United States [...]
[...] A value-added tax would be a disaster. This was music to my ears since I have repeatedly warned that the statists won’t be able to impose a European-style welfare state in the United States [...]
[...] value-added tax would be a disaster. This was music to my ears since I have repeatedly warned that the statists won’t be able to impose a European-style welfare state in the United States [...]
[...] value-added tax would be a disaster. This was music to my ears sinceI have repeatedly warned that the statists won’t be able to impose a European-style welfare state in the United States [...]
[...] a column for today’s Wall Street Journal, I elaborated on those concerns, explaining why a VAT is bad fiscal policy. I had three main points. First, I noted that the big spenders need a VAT in order to achieve a [...]
[...] a column for today’s Wall Street Journal, I elaborated on those concerns, explaining why a VAT is bad fiscal policy. I had three main points. First, I noted that the big spenders need a VAT in order to achieve a [...]
[...] a column for today’s Wall Street Journal, I elaborated on those concerns, explaining why a VAT is bad fiscal policy. I had three main points. First, I noted that the big spenders need a VAT in order to achieve a [...]
[...] One of my key points was that the VAT is a money machine for big government. [...]
[...] One of my key points was that the VAT is a money machine for big government. [...]
[...] tempted to say the value-added tax since our hopes of restraining the federal government will be greatly undermined if we give the [...]
[...] tempted to say the value-added tax since our hopes of restraining the federal government will be greatly undermined if we give the [...]
[...] tempted to say the value-added tax since our hopes of restraining the federal government will be greatly undermined if we give the [...]
[...] tempted to say the value-added tax since our hopes of restraining the federal government will be greatly undermined if we give the [...]
[...] tempted to say the value-added tax since our hopes of restraining the federal government will be greatly undermined if we give the [...]
[...] tempted to say the value-added tax since our hopes of restraining the federal government will be greatly undermined if we give the [...]
[...] tempted to say the value-added tax since our hopes of restraining the federal government will be greatly undermined if we give the [...]
[...] are all good points. The bottom line is that failure to reform entitlements guarantees that politicians eventually will impose a value-added tax. Or they’ll push red ink to unsustainable levels. Actually, based on what’s happened in [...]
[...] I’m happy to report that there is no value-added tax in the revenue portion of Congressman Ryan’s budget. There is a VAT in his Roadmap plan, and [...]
[...] I’m happy to report that there is no value-added tax in the revenue portion of Congressman Ryan’s budget. There is a VAT in his Roadmap plan, and I [...]
[...] do the flat tax and national sales tax (and even the value-added tax) have in [...]
[...] The left isn’t wrong. They know the higher taxes lead to higher spending, and they know the VAT is a money machine for big government. They just don’t publicly admit these are the results they want. Rate this: Share [...]
[...] For instance, we both testified to the Ways & Means Committee last year about the value-added tax, and he sided with all the other witnesses and favored adding a pernicious European-style national sales tax on top of the income tax. [...]
[...] another cartoon that you’ll appreciate. It’s not by Chuck Asay, but it bashes the value-added tax, and that’s a quick way to get on my good [...]
[...] When I testified to the Ways & Means Committee about the VAT, I was a lone voice against this pernicious tax while the other four witnesses supported making America more like [...]
[...] value-added tax, which averages 21 percent in Europe, is a huge shadow income tax on lower-income and middle-income [...]
[...] When I testified to the Ways & Means Committee about the VAT, I was a lone voice against this pernicious tax while the other four witnesses supported making America more like [...]
[...] see eye to eye on this issue, but that would be a rash assumption. While I see a giant new tax as a dangerous step on the road to serfdom, Josh thinks it’s a necessary and desirable reform. …it is time to reconsider a VAT. It [...]
[...] I assume this cartoon was designed to show why a value-added tax is a bad idea, but it’s very appropriate for this topic as [...]
[...] be an improvement, especially if the warning signs are correct and he saddles the country with a value-added tax, so the American people may be tossed from one frying pan to [...]
[...] be an improvement, especially if the warning signs are correct and he saddles the country with a value-added tax, so the American people may be tossed from one frying pan to [...]
[...] I should have mentioned that some politicians think that we can boost savings by imposing a value-added tax! This is not only a perverse example of Mitchell’s law, but it’s also completely [...]
[...] When I testified to the Ways & Means Committee about the VAT, I was a lone voice against this pernicious tax while the other four witnesses supported making America more like [...]
[...] explained before that I’m skeptical of the Fair Tax, hostile to the value-added tax, and opposed to other forms of a national sales tax for the simple reason that I don’t trust [...]
[...] I am 100 percent confident, for instance, that they intend big tax hikes on the middle class, even though they would piously swear an oath to the contrary. Indeed, I suspect more than 90 percent of them secretly would like a value-added tax. [...]
[...] I am 100 percent confident, for instance, that they intend big tax hikes on the middle class, even though they would piously swear an oath to the contrary. Indeed, I suspect more than 90 percent of them secretly would like a value-added tax. [...]
[...] I am 100 percent confident, for instance, that they intend big tax hikes on the middle class, even though they would piously swear an oath to the contrary. Indeed, I suspect more than 90 percent of them secretly would like a value-added tax. [...]
[...] Romney and Ryan are somewhat sympathetic to a value-added tax. My worst-case scenario is they win the election, but then can’t get a good budget approved [...]
[...] Romney and Ryan are somewhat sympathetic to a value-added tax. My worst-case scenario is they win the election, but then can’t get a good budget approved [...]
[...] swear an oath to the contrary. Indeed, I suspect more than 90 percent of them secretly would like a value-added tax. It’s not that they necessarily dislike ordinary people, but privately they understand that [...]
[...] In this video, I explain why this European-style national sales tax is a money machine for bigger government. [...]
[...] somewhat sympathetic to a value-added tax. My worst-case scenario is they win the election, but then can’t get a good budget approved [...]
[...] swear an oath to the contrary. Indeed, I suspect more than 90 percent of them secretly would like a value-added tax. var AdBrite_Title_Color = 'FFFF66'; var AdBrite_Text_Color = 'FFFFFF'; var [...]
[...] it’s particularly worrisome to see that the author wants a value-added tax, which is a sure-fire way of giving politicians a big pile of money that will be used to expand the [...]
[...] own personal guess is that he would impose a value-added tax if he thought it was politically feasible. Not that I’m showing any great insight. After all, [...]
[...] Mitt Romney wins and proposes to burden the U.S. economy with a value-added tax, would a majority of Republicans rise up in revolt and oppose that dangerous [...]
[...] (see these amusing posters to understand why this was a foolish idea), along with a big hike in the value-added tax (though, to be fair, the corporate rate has been slightly reduced and part of Gordon Brown’s [...]
[...] That would mean some progress on the spending side and presumably reduce the risk of bad things (like a VAT!) on the revenue side. Rate this:Share [...]
[...] That would mean some progress on the spending side and presumably reduce the risk of bad things (like a VAT!) on the revenue side. Like this:LikeBe the first to like this. By Everette Hatcher III, on [...]
[...] But not because we tax rich people more. Instead, our system is more progressive because we don’t screw over lower-income and middle-income taxpayers with policies like the value-added tax. [...]
[...] written many times about the dangers of a value-added tax. I obviously think it’s a bad idea as an add-on tax, but I also think it’s dangerous as [...]
[...] direction and presumably deserves part of the blame. The top income tax rate is now 45 percent. The value-added tax has jumped to 20 percent. Allister provides more details. Capital gains tax is too high. Luxury [...]
[...] could evolve. My greatest fear is that a future president (perhaps Romney!) will decide to impose a value-added tax. In normal circumstances, that might upset state politicians since it would complicate their [...]
[...] own personal guess is that he would impose a value-added tax if he thought it was politically feasible. Not that I’m showing any great insight. After all, [...]
[...] of limited government should never give politicians a new source of revenue, which is why fighting the value-added tax is one of my main priorities (and why advocates of small government should be worried not just [...]
[...] If Obama and other statists get their way, we’ll see similar statistic in the United States. Higher income tax rates for the rich will mean higher income tax rates for the rest of us. Though I’m even more worried about a value-added tax, which would be a huge burden on ordinary people and a revenue machine for greedy politicians. [...]
[...] 4. High taxes on the rich are a precursor to higher taxes on everyone else – This is a point I have made on several occasions, including just yesterday. I’m particularly concerned that the politicians in Washington will boost income tax rates for everybody, then decide that even more money is needed and impose a value-added tax. [...]
[...] If Obama and other statists get their way, we’ll see similar statistic in the United States. Higher income tax rates for the rich will mean higher income tax rates for the rest of us. Though I’m even more worried about a value-added tax, which would be a huge burden on ordinary people and a revenue machine for greedy politicians. [...]
[...] 4. High taxes on the rich are a precursor to higher taxes on everyone else – This is a point I have made on several occasions, including just yesterday. I’m particularly concerned that the politicians in Washington will boost income tax rates for everybody, then decide that even more money is needed and impose a value-added tax. [...]
[...] Now the IMF has a new study about the relationship between economic growth and different types of taxes. Those finding are interesting, and I may even write about them in the next few days, but I want to focus on some amazing data from this research that shows exactly why proponents of limited government should resist the value-added tax. [...]
[...] 2. One of the most worrisome things about Mitt Romney is that he repeatedly refused to rule out a value-added tax when asked by the editors of the Wall Street Journal. I don’t trust politicians when they say they’ll do the right thing. So when they refuse to even give rhetorical assurances, alarm bells definitely start ringing. My nightmare scenario is that Romney would have been elected, made some half-hearted attempt to restrain spending, and then would have decided that a new source of revenue was needed once Harry Reid said no to any fiscal restraint. And as we saw during the Bush years, Republicans in Congress generally are willing to do the wrong thing when a Republican President makes the request. With Obama in the White House, it is highly unlikely that House Republicans would agree to this dangerous new tax. [...]
[...] I am 100 percent confident, for instance, that they intend big tax hikes on the middle class, even though they would piously swear an oath to the contrary. Indeed, I suspect more than 90 percent of them secretly would like a value-added tax. [...]
[...] you don’t want the government grabbing a big chunk of your income with a value-added tax, then you’re much better off with Jersey’s 5 percent rate rather than the 20 percent [...]
[...] the Secretary-General of the Paris-based bureaucracy just pontificated about the value-added tax. Let’s see whether my knee-jerk hostility is [...]
[...] direction and presumably deserves part of the blame. The top income tax rate is now 45 percent. The value-added tax has jumped to 20 percent. Allister provides more [...]
[...] If I had to guess, I would say that Obama’s ultimate goal for hurting the middle class is a value-added tax. Notwithstanding the fiscal crisis in Europe, he actually said the VAT is “something that has [...]
[...] If I had to guess, I would say that Obama’s ultimate goal for hurting the middle class is a value-added tax. Notwithstanding the fiscal crisis in Europe, he actually said the VAT is “something that has [...]
[...] they were protesting the VAT, I would give them three cheers, but if they’re simply protesting the fact that theater [...]
[...] and no double taxation of income that is saved and invested. That can be a national sales tax or value-added tax, but it usually refers to the “Hall-Rabushka” flat tax championed by Dick Armey and [...]
[...] se révoltaient contre la taxe sur la valeur ajoutée, je leur donnerais 3 ovations, mais s’ils ne font que contester le fait que désormais les [...]
[...] se révoltaient contre la taxe sur la valeur ajoutée, je leur donnerais 3 ovations, mais s’ils ne font que contester le fait que désormais les [...]
[...] So the ultimate target will be the middle class, as more and more statists are admitting, and the most worrisome threat is the value-added tax. [...]
[...] So the ultimate target will be the middle class, as more and more statists are admitting, and the most worrisome threat is the value-added tax. [...]
[...] So the ultimate target will be the middle class, asmore and more statists are admitting, and the most worrisome threat isthe value-added tax. [...]
[...] surprisingly, it shows that the tax burden has jumped significantly. I suspect the adoption of the value-added tax deserves a good bit of the blame, but that’s a separate [...]
[...] * I reserve the right to defect to the Cayman Islands if the crooks in Washington ever succeed in saddling America with a value-added tax. [...]
[...] of semi-honest leftists who admit that their real goal is taxing the middle class (probably with a value-added tax!), so we can’t say we haven’t been [...]
[...] imposed very significant tax increases on the private sector. Income tax rates have been increased. Value-added taxes have been hiked, and other taxes have climbed as well. These penalties on productive activity [...]
[...] imposed very significant tax increases on the private sector. Income tax rates have been increased. Value-added taxes have been hiked, and other taxes have climbed as well. These penalties on productive activity [...]
[...] privé à des hausses d'impôts très importantes. Les taux d'imposition ont été augmentés. Les Taxes sur la Valeur Ajoutée ont progressé, et d'autres taxes ont grimpé aussi. Cela pénalise l'activité productive et sape [...]
[...] government’s decision to double the value-added tax? I’m definitely not a fan of adding a VAT on top of the income tax, but Japan made that mistake years ago. The choice to increase the tax [...]
[...] government’s decision to double the value-added tax? I’m definitely not a fan of adding a VAT on top of the income tax, but Japan made that mistake years ago. The choice to increase the tax [...]
[...] yes, I may decide to give up if something really horrible happens, such as adoption of a value-added tax. Giving politicians a big new source of revenue, after all, would cripple any incentive for fiscal [...]
[...] 2. One of the most worrisome things about Mitt Romney is that he repeatedly refused to rule out a value-added tax when asked by the editors of the Wall Street Journal. I don’t trust politicians when they say they’ll do the right thing. So when they refuse to even give rhetorical assurances, alarm bells definitely start ringing. My nightmare scenario is that Romney would have been elected, made some half-hearted attempt to restrain spending, and then would have decided that a new source of revenue was needed once Harry Reid said no to any fiscal restraint. And as we saw during the Bush years, Republicans in Congress generally are willing to do the wrong thing when a Republican President makes the request. With Obama in the White House, it is highly unlikely that House Republicans would agree to this dangerous new tax. [...]
[...] with both an income tax and national sales tax. Which is what happened in Europe when governments implemented the value-added tax without repealing income [...]
[...] (see these amusing posters to understand why this was a foolish idea), along with a big hike in the value-added tax (though, to be fair, the corporate rate has been slightly reduced and part of Gordon Brown’s [...]
[...] it’s particularly worrisome to see that the author wants a value-added tax, which is a sure-fire way of giving politicians a big pile of money that will be used to expand the [...]
[...] government’s decision to double the value-added tax? I’m definitely not a fan of adding a VAT on top of the income tax, but Japan made that mistake years ago. The choice to increase the tax [...]
[...] I am 100 percent confident, for instance, that they intend big tax hikes on the middle class, even though they would piously swear an oath to the contrary. Indeed, I suspect more than 90 percent of them secretly would like a value-added tax. [...]
[...] it’s particularly worrisome to see that the author wants a value-added tax, which is a sure-fire way of giving politicians a big pile of money that will be used to expand the [...]
[...] own personal guess is that he would impose a value-added tax if he thought it was politically feasible. Not that I’m showing any great insight. After all, [...]
[...] in my remarks. I pointed out the flat tax and sales tax (and even, at least in theory, the value-added tax) all share very attractive [...]
[...] That’s about the time, however, that the European governments began to impose value-added taxes. [...]
[...] That’s about the time, however, that the European governments began to impose value-added taxes. [...]
[...] That’s about the time, however, that the European governments began to impose value-added taxes. [...]
[...] fact that we should fight to our last breaths before we let this awful tax get imposed in America. This video has more [...]
[...] That would mean some progress on the spending side and presumably reduce the risk of bad things (like a VAT!) on the revenue [...]
[...] (see these amusing posters to understand why this was a foolish idea), along with a big hike in the value-added tax (though, to be fair, the corporate rate has been slightly reduced and part of Gordon Brown’s [...]
[...] I criticized the Paris-based bureaucracy for making the rather remarkable assertion that a value-added tax would boost growth and [...]
[...] it wasn’t their intention, IMF bureaucrats even provided very strong evidence showing why the value-added tax is a destructive money machine for big [...]
[...] it wasn’t their intention, IMF bureaucrats even provided very strong evidence showing why the value-added tax is adestructive money machine for big [...]
[...] of limited government should never give politicians a new source of revenue, which is why fighting the value-added tax is one of my main priorities (and why advocates of small government should be worried not just [...]
[...] of course, you’re a politician and you somehow think adding a value-added tax on top of the current income tax can be considered [...]
[...] sales tax cartel to reduce income tax rates. What’s next, a column saying we should have a value-added tax because the politicians may use the revenue to get rid of the income tax? Yeah, good luck with that [...]
[...] direction and presumably deserves part of the blame. The top income tax rate is now 45 percent. The value-added tax has jumped to 20 percent. Allister provides more [...]
[...] state sales tax cartel to reduce income tax rates. What’s next, a column saying we should have a value-added tax because the politicians may use the revenue to get rid of the income tax? Yeah, good luck with that [...]
[...] direction and presumably deserves part of the blame. The top income tax rate is now 45 percent. The value-added tax has jumped to 20 percent. Allister provides more [...]
[...] more information, here’s my video that describes the VAT and explains why it’s a bad [...]
[...] more information, here’s my video that describes the VAT and explains why it’s a bad [...]
[…] of semi-honest leftists who admit that their real goal is taxing the middle class (probably with a value-added tax!), so we can’t say we haven’t been […]
[…] If Obama and other statists get their way, we’ll see similar statistic in the United States. Higher income tax rates for the rich will mean higher income tax rates for the rest of us. Though I’m even more worried about a value-added tax, which would be a huge burden on ordinary people and a revenue machine for greedy politicians. […]