In recent months, I’ve displayed uncharacteristic levels of optimism on issues ranging from Obamacare to the Laffer Curve.
But this doesn’t mean I’m now a blind Pollyanna. We almost always face an uphill battle in our efforts to restrain the power and greed of the political class.
And in some areas, such as the fight for pro-growth and humane tax reform, I see very little reason for hope.
In honor of tax day, I explained my pessimism in an article for The Daily Caller.
I outlined four reasons to be glum, starting with the fact that tax reform yields big benefits in the long run, but that isn’t a very compelling argument for politicians that rarely think past the next election.
Our tax code is now a 74,000-page monstrosity, and it seems that politicians make the system more convoluted every year with new credits, deductions, exemptions, preferences, exclusions, and other special provisions. …In theory, it makes sense to scrape off these barnacles and restore the ship… Our political system, though, is dominated by lawmakers who tend not to think past the next election cycle.
I then mention that too many people now see the tax code as a tool for directly taking money from others.
…a growing number of Americans now see tax returns as a vehicle for getting money from the government. I’m not talking about the fiscal illusion that results when some people over-pay their taxes and then are happy to get a refund. …I’m talking about a different crowd. There are now millions of Americans who benefit from redistribution programs that are laundered through the tax code. …“refundable” credits allow people to get checks from the government even if they didn’t pay any tax. …Needless to say, those people don’t have much incentive to oppose the current system.
My third concern deals with the under-appreciated fact that the Washington establishment gets rich from the current system.
The metropolitan DC area is now the wealthiest region of the nation; it includes 10 of America’s 15 richest counties. …One of the main sources of that unearned — and undeserved — prosperity is the tax code… many people make big bucks manipulating the tax code. Lobbyists obviously would hate a simple and fair flat tax… Many of these insiders are former politicians and former Capitol Hill staffers — particularly those that worked on the tax-writing committees. They make big bucks, and the current staffers look forward to the day when they can cash in on their “government service” and start “earning” huge salaries. Needless to say, these people are not exactly advocates of reform.
Last but not least, I explain that high-tax governments are undermining tax competition with financial protectionism, thus giving them more leeway to impose bad policy.
Beginning with the Reagan and Thatcher tax cuts, the world experienced a virtuous period of tax competition that lasted for about 30 years. Even politicians in statist nations such as France and Germany felt compelled to lower tax rates… In recent years, however, high-tax nations and left-wing international bureaucracies such as the Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development have worked to undermine tax competition and make it easier for politicians to impose class-warfare tax policy. They first went after so-called tax havens… Now the OECD has a new plan to go after multinational companies and significantly boost their tax burdens, presumably through the creation of a global tax return and a policy called “formula apportionment.” …every time they make progress, politicians feel less pressure to lower tax rates and reform tax systems. Why bother improving the tax code, after all, if you think that taxpayers have no choice but to submit?
I also should have added another big challenge. In the absence of good entitlement reform, the burden of government spending will dramatically increase in coming decades and create pressure for additional tax hikes. That’s not an environment conducive to tax reform.
Unless, of course, you’re a politician and you somehow think adding a value-added tax on top of the current income tax can be considered reform.
P.S. I’ve referenced the flat tax in this post, but all of these obstacles also explain why there’s even less chance of a national sales tax.
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] I expressed pessimism a few days ago about the possibility of replacing the corrupt internal revenue code with a flat tax. Either now or in the future. […]
[…] I expressed pessimism a few days ago about the possibility of replacing the corrupt internal revenue code with a flat tax. Either now or in the future. […]
[…] also says the flat tax is politically unrealistic. Since I’m not expecting a flat tax in my lifetime, I obviously can’t argue with that statement. But he then proposes another plan that would be far […]
[…] also says the flat tax is politically unrealistic. Since I’m not expecting a flat tax in my lifetime, I obviously can’t argue with that statement. But he then proposes another plan that would be far […]
[…] P.P.S. Writing about the prospect of tax reform back in April, I warned that “…regardless of what happens with elections, I’m not overly optimistic about making progress.” […]
[…] regardless of the political situation. Since I’m a strong advocate for a flat tax even though it isn’t likely to happen, I can’t argue with this […]
[…] rest of Reihan’s column is more focused on political obstacles to the flat tax. Since I’ve expressed pessimism on getting a flat tax in my lifetime, I can’t really argue too strenuously with those […]
[…] is why, regardless of what happens with elections, I’m not overly optimistic about making progress. Unless, of course, we figure out some way of dealing the growing burden of federal spending. Which […]
[…] I’m not optimistic about fixing the tax code, in part because the crowd in DC would lose some […]
[…] stated, a flat tax would be a wonderful outcome to this latest IRS scandal. But for reasons I’ve already explained, I’m not holding my breath waiting for that to happen, either now or in the […]
[…] also says the flat tax is politically unrealistic. Since I’m not expecting a flat tax in my lifetime, I obviously can’t argue with that statement. But he then proposes another plan that would be far […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] bad there’s little reason to hope that America will ever be part of the flat tax […]
[…] that any of this matters since I doubt we’ll get tax reform in my […]
[…] perhaps, readers will understand why I’m rather pessimistic about achieving real tax […]
[…] perhaps, readers will understand why I’m rather pessimistic about achieving real tax […]
[…] I expressed pessimism a few days ago about the possibility of replacing the corrupt internal revenue code with a flat tax. Either now or in the future. […]
[…] exactly. I think we have to wait until 2017 to have any hope of tax reform (even then, only if we’re very lucky), whereas Hunt thinks the current logjam can be broken by adopting a VAT and using the money to […]
[…] stated, a flat tax would be a wonderful outcome to this latest IRS scandal. But for reasons I’ve already explained, I’m not holding my breath waiting for that to happen, either now or in the […]
[…] stated, a flat tax would be a wonderful outcome to this latest IRS scandal. But for reasons I’ve already explained, I’m not holding my breath waiting for that to happen, either now or in the […]
[…] also says the flat tax is politically unrealistic. Since I’m not expecting a flat tax in my lifetime, I obviously can’t argue with that statement. But he then proposes another plan that would be far […]
[…] also says the flat tax is politically unrealistic. Since I’m not expecting a flat tax in my lifetime, I obviously can’t argue with that statement. But he then proposes another plan that would be […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] here’s the challenge. We know the solution, but it will be almost impossible to implement good policy unless we figure out some way to restrain the spending side of the fiscal […]
[…] bad there’s little reason to hope that America will ever be part of the flat tax […]
[…] bad there’s little reason to hope that America will ever be part of the flat tax […]
[…] bad there’s little reason to hope that America will ever be part of the flat tax […]
[…] expressed pessimism a few days ago about the possibility of replacing the corrupt internal revenue code with a flat tax. Either now or […]
[…] expressed pessimism a few days ago about the possibility of replacing the corrupt internal revenue code with a flat tax. Either now or […]
Dan:
You continue to differentiate between the three types of taxes for the wrong reasons. In theory the Flat Tax, NST, and VAT are all consumption taxes with essentially the same impact on prices. If the tax as a percentage of the final price is the same [let’s use 25% for simplicity], 75% of the price is based on cost and profit. The only difference is when and how the tax is levied.
If you ignore both prebate and deductions for the moment, collection could be done by businesses only and there would be no need for employees to file at all.
However, without one or the other to make effective tax rates progressive; you could not pass any of the three options. Currently the top 5% earn 32% of the income, but pay 59% of the tax. You cannot expect the bottom 95% of voters to vote to pay that additional 27% of total tax revenues.
Between prebate and deductions, the prebate is preferable, because collection can be separated from progressivity. You say that you dislike direct payment, but wouldn’t it be preferable to filtering money through means-testing bureaucracies?
For more on this see:
One of the things that frustrates me here is there is nothing new to say. We cannot have honorable politicians because we no longer have majority honorable citizens. Society can mock us God bothers all they want but the world worked better when the Ten Commandments were viewed as good operating principles.
Steal via tax code, go for it. Insider trading on nonpublic information sure, as long as you’re in congress it’s all good.
As a public service I’m going to number a variety of clichés and will leave my comments according to a keyed map of clichés. Wait, I’m sure someone else has already done that. Oi!
BTW, is spite of the pessimism, you have to give Chair Dave Camp of House Ways and Means, an A for effort. He has suggestions for reform pouring in…
I understand he still has about 1000 to put up that came in the last few days…
http://waysandmeans.house.gov/taxreform/workinggroups.htm
Notice all the Repeal FATCA and End Citizenship taxation submissions. Time for the US to join the rest of the world and 50 stateswith a residency based system for DNA persons as well as a Territorial system for Paper Persons, Corporations, before they all start copying the US model which would be worse than FATCA for the world’s economy…
The Tax Complexity Industrial complex will assure that reform doesn’t happen. They love every new regulation and every new page and form added to the Tax Code or IRS regulations.
They currently are having an orgy of billable hours off of FATCA, and a whole subset Complex has been created which I call the FATCA Compliance Industrial Complex.(FCIC) Much of that has been offshore, but it is soon to go domestic, if Obama and Treasury have their way of imposing the domestic FATCA reciprocity or DATCA has was in their budget that came out last week..
The cost of FATCA is blowing back on U.S. Shore via DATCA
From page 202, of the 2014 Budget Analytical Perspectives:
http://1.usa.gov/12YGdoG
I quote….
Provide for reciprocal reporting of information in connection with the implementation of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA).—In many cases, foreign law would prevent foreign financial institutions from complying with the FATCA provisions of the Hiring Incentives to restore Employment Act of 2010 by reporting to the IRS information about U.S. accounts.
Such legal impediments can be addressed through intergovernmental agreements under which the foreign government agrees to provide the information required by FATCA to the IRS requiring U.S. financial institutions to report similar information to the IRS with respect to nonresident accounts would facilitate such intergovernmental cooperation by enabling the IRS to reciprocate in appropriate circumstances by exchanging similar information with cooperative foreign governments to support their efforts to address tax evasion by their residents.
The proposal would provide the Secretary of the Treasury with authority to prescribe regulations that would require reporting of information with respect to nonresident alien individuals, entities that are not U.S. persons, and certain U.S. entities held in substantial part by non-U.S. owners, including information regarding account balances and payments made with respect to accounts held by such persons and entities. End quote…
This is huge, if imposed on all U.S. Financial Entities as proposed, and the FCIC will develope a domestic arm, and billable hours will soar. They LOVE it.
Of course, don’t expect to hear anything about it on NBC nightly news with Brian Williams. 🙂
As for the Bigger picture, as you point out, OECD is companioning this effort, and if they have their way, we will soon have a global GATCA riding on the back of FATCA, the “tip of the spear” in this War Against Offshore Tax Evasion (WOOTE)”.
If you can only think in biblical terms, then remember this….
FATCA begets DATCA begets GATCA
If you don’t want a GATCA, then you have to kill DATCA. If one good thing could come out of the Tax reform effort, it would be to stop DATCA and slow up the birthing process of GATCA, IMHO