Back in the 1960s, Clint Eastwood starred in a movie entitled The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.
I was thinking that might be a good title for today’s post about some new research by Michelle Harding, a tax economist for the OECD. But then I realized that her study on “Taxation of Dividend, Interest, and Capital Gain Income” doesn’t contain any “good” news.
At least not if you want the United States to be more competitive and create more jobs. This is because the numbers show that the internal revenue code results in punitive double taxation of income that is saved and invested.
But it’s not newsworthy that there’s a lot of double taxation in America. What is shocking and discouraging, however, is finding out that our tax code is more punitive than just about every European welfare state.
This is the “bad” part of today’s discussion. Indeed, the tax burden on dividends, interest, and capital gains in America is far above the average for other industrialized nations.
Let’s look at some charts from the study, starting with the one comparing the tax burden on dividends.
As you can see, the United States has the dubious honor of having the sixth-highest overall tax rate (combined burden of corporate and personal taxes) among developed nations.
Though maybe we should feel lucky we’re not in France or Denmark.
The next chart looks at the tax burden on capital gains.
Once again, the United States has one of the most onerous tax systems among OECD countries, with only four other nations imposing a higher combined tax rate on capital gains.
By the way, if you want to know why this is a very bad idea, click here.
Last but not least, let’s look at the tax burden on interest.
I’m sure you’ve already detected the pattern, but I’ll state the obvious that this is another example of the United States being on the wrong side of the graph.
So the next time you hear somebody bloviating about Americans being too short-sighted and not saving enough, you may want to inform them that there’s not much incentive to save when the IRS gets a big share of any interest we earn.
Not that any of us are getting much interest since the Fed’s easy-money policy has created an atmosphere of artificially low interest rates, but that’s a topic for another day.
Let’s now move to the “ugly” part of the analysis.
Some of you may have noticed that the charts replicated above are based on tax laws on July 1, 2012.
Well, thanks to Obamacare and the fiscal cliff deal, the IRS began imposing higher tax rates on dividends, capital gains, and interest on January 1, 2013.
And because of the new surtax on investments and the higher tax rates on dividends and capital gains, the United States will move even further in the wrong direction on the three charts.
I don’t know if that means we’ll overtake France in the contest to have the most anti-competitive tax treatment of dividends and capital gains, but it’s definitely bad news.
Oh, and let’s add another bit of “ugly” news to the discussion.
The OECD study didn’t look at death tax rates, but a study by the American Council for Capital Formation shows that the United States also has one of the world’s most punitive death taxes.
Even worse than France, Greece, and Venezuela, which is nothing to brag about.
I don’t want to be the bearer of nothing but bad news, so let’s close with some “good” news. At least relatively speaking.
It’s not part of the study, but it’s worth pointing out that the overall burden of taxation – measured as a share of GDP – is higher in most other nations. The absence of a value-added tax is probably the most important reason why the United States retains an advantage in this category.
Needless to say, this is why we should fight to our last breath to make sure this European version of a national sales tax is never imposed in America.
P.S. One of the big accounting firms, Ernst and Young, published some research last year that is very similar to the OECD’s data.
[…] speaking last year in Hawaii on the topic of good tax policy, I explained why it is misguided to impose extra layers of tax on saving and […]
[…] bad enough that government gets to tax our income one time, but it’s even worse whenthey get to impose multiple layers of tax on the same […]
[…] I discuss the varying types of double taxation on saving and investment (capital gains tax, dividend tax, corporate income tax, […]
[…] I discuss the varying types of double taxation on saving and investment (capital gains tax, dividend tax, corporate income tax, […]
[…] bad enough that government gets to tax our income one time, but it’s even worse whenthey get to impose multiple layers of tax on the same […]
[…] bad enough that government gets to tax our income one time, but it’s even worse whenthey get to impose multiple layers of tax on the same […]
[…] bad enough that government gets to tax our income one time, but it’s even worse whenthey get to impose multiple layers of tax on the same […]
[…] of the negative impact on competitiveness, productivity, and worker compensation, it’s a very bad idea to impose double […]
[…] it’s foolish to penalize jobs and investment, but I also think it’s morally wrong to impose discriminatory tax rates on people who are […]
[…] bad enough that government gets to tax our income one time, but it’s even worse whenthey get to impose multiple layers of tax on the same […]
[…] bad enough that government gets to tax our income one time, but it’s even worse when they get to impose multiple layers of tax on the same […]
[…] of the negative impact on competitiveness, productivity, and worker compensation, it’s a very bad idea to impose double […]
[…] of the negative impact on competitiveness, productivity, and worker compensation, it’s a very bad idea to impose […]
[…] No tax bias (i.e., extra layers of tax) that penalizes saving and investment. […]
[…] have pervasive double taxation of income that is saved and invested (see accompanying chart), so the message from Uncle Sam is to […]
[…] No tax bias (i.e., extra layers of tax) penalizing saving and investment. […]
[…] critics invariably explain that the tax is a bad idea because it would exacerbate the tax code’s bias against saving and investment and thus have a negative effect on jobs, wages, productivity, and […]
[…] No tax bias (i.e., extra layers of tax) against saving and investment. […]
[…] No tax bias (i.e., extra layers of tax) against saving and investment. […]
[…] is a self-destructive approach since all economic theories – even Marxism and socialism – agree that capital formation […]
[…] And this doesn’t even include the fact that the U.K. has above-average death taxes and higher-than average levels of double taxation. […]
[…] My goal was to explain the problem of double taxation. […]
[…] close by noting that the United States has one of the world’s least friendly tax codes for […]
[…] More double taxation of investment […]
[…] growth and competitiveness by reducing the burden on businesses and investment. That’s laudable, but critics will say “the rich” will get most of the tax relief. And even though the […]
[…] of high tax rates that penalize productive behavior. We could eliminate the double taxation that discourages saving and investment. And we could wipe out the rat’s nest of deductions, credits, exemptions, preferences, […]
[…] Very little double-taxation of interest and dividends (unlike most other developed nations). […]
[…] is abolished, the capital gains tax is abolished, there’s no double taxation on savings, the second layer of tax on dividends is eliminated, and depreciation is replaced by […]
In my opinion, capital gains taxes should be dictated at the state level. Some states may have varying rates on capital gains taxes, however, at the federal level, I view the capital gains tax as Unconstitutional.
[…] Senator Rubio gets rid of almost all double taxation of income that is saved and invested. […]
[…] e) Reduced competitiveness? […]
[…] Having the world’s highest statutory corporate tax rate is part of the problem. But as Kyle pointed out, the problem is actually far worse when you calculate how the internal revenue code imposes extra layers of tax on business income. […]
[…] Having the world’s highest statutory corporate tax rate is part of the problem. But as Kyle pointed out, the problem is actually far worse when you calculate how the internal revenue code imposes extra layers of tax on business income. […]
[…] By the way, none of this should be interpreted to suggest that Rubio-Lee is bad tax policy. It’s a huge improvement over the current system. As I wrote last month, it’s a very good tax reform plan. It is especially good about fixing some of the worst features of the current tax code, such as worldwide taxation, depreciation, and double taxation. […]
[…] First and foremost, the VAT doesn’t do nearly as much damage, per dollar raised, as our current income tax. That’s because the VAT is a single-rate tax (i.e., no class warfare) with no double taxation of income that is saved and invested. […]
[…] money will be generated. Does the senator want a new top tax rate? Does he want to increase the double taxation of dividends and capital gains? A more onerous death tax? Or is he planning some indirect money grab, such as disallowing certain […]
[…] the money will be generated. Does the senator want a new top tax rate? Does he want to increase the double taxation of dividends and capital gains? A more onerous death tax? Or is he planning some indirect money grab, such as disallowing certain […]
[…] the money will be generated. Does the senator want a new top tax rate? Does he want to increase the double taxation of dividends and capital gains? A more onerous death tax? Or is he planning some indirect money grab, such as disallowing certain […]
[…] contemplating any good unilateral changes. Instead, the policies being examined would exacerbate double taxation and extend worldwide […]
[…] contemplating any good unilateral changes. Instead, the policies being examined would exacerbate double taxation and extend worldwide […]
[…] Sweeping reductions in double taxation – The Rubio-Lee plans eliminates the capital gains tax, the double tax on dividends, and the second layer of tax on interest. […]
[…] Sweeping reductions in double taxation – The Rubio-Lee plans eliminates the capital gains tax, the double tax on dividends, and the second layer of tax on interest. […]
[…] the lesson they teach us is that the tax bias against saving and investment is extremely […]
[…] explanation for why they reject the types of tax policies (such as lower corporate rates, reduced double taxation, and expensing) that will increase investment, thus boosting productivity and […]
[…] explanation for why they reject the types of tax policies (such as lower corporate rates, reduced double taxation, and expensing) that will increase investment, thus boosting productivity and […]
[…] tax havens are a liberalizing force in the global economy, while also touching on issues such as double taxation, corporate inversions, financial privacy, and […]
[…] to Ernst and Young, as well as the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the United States has one of the highest tax rates on capital gains in the entire developed […]
This is proof of the incompetence and greed that most all elected officials seem to have as relates to getting money to waste. All not for profits should be made illegal period. All funding for elected offices should be limited to the district the candidate is going to represent. The DNC, RNC and all PACs should be banned. Unions should not be able to spend their member funds of any candidate. Millionaires and billionaires should not have the ability to send money to a candidate outside of the their home area. To spend millions of dollars for a job that pays less than 200,000 is really wasting resources that could be better used to help the needy instead of paying for the greedy.
[…] if you don’t trust the numbers from a big accounting firm, then you can peruse a study from the pro-tax Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development that reaches the same […]
[…] not just because of high tax rates and double taxation of savings. Allister says people are worried about outright confiscation resulting from possible […]
Singapore has no inheritance tax. It used to, but dropped it in 2008.
[…] Massive Double Taxation Is a Self-Inflicted Tax Injury that … […]