In Part I of this series, I expressed some optimism that Joe Biden would not aggressively push his class-warfare tax plan, particularly since Republicans almost certainly will wind up controlling the Senate.
But the main goal of that column was to explain that the internal revenue code already is heavily weighted against investors, entrepreneurs, business owners and other upper-income taxpayers.
And to underscore that point, I shared two charts from Brian Riedl’s chartbook to show that the “rich” are now paying a much larger share of the tax burden – notwithstanding the Reagan tax cuts, Bush tax cuts, and Trump tax cuts – than they were 40 years ago.
Not only that, but the United States has a tax system that is more “progressive” than all other developed nations (all of whom also impose heavy tax burdens on upper-income taxpayers, but differ from the United States in that they also pillage lower-income and middle-class residents).
In other words, Biden’s class-warfare tax plan is bad policy.
Today’s column, by contrast, will point out that his tax increases are impractical. Simply stated, they won’t collect much revenue because people change their behavior when incentives to earn and report income are altered.
This is especially true when looking at upper-income taxpayers who – compared to the rest of us – have much greater ability to change the timing, level, and composition of their income.
This helps to explain why rich people paid five times as much tax to the IRS during the 1980s when Reagan slashed the top tax rate from 70 percent to 28 percent.
When writing about this topic, I normally use the Laffer Curve to help people understand why simplistic assumptions about tax policy are wrong (that you can double tax revenue by doubling tax rates, for instance). And I point out that even folks way on the left, such as Paul Krugman, agree with this common-sense view (though it’s also worth noting that some people on the right discredit the concept by making silly assertions that “all tax cuts pay for themselves”).
But instead of showing the curve again, I want to go back to Brian Riedl’s chartbook and review his data on of revenue changes during the eight years of the Obama Administration.
It shows that Obama technically cut taxes by $822 billion (as further explained in the postscript, most of that occurred when some of the Bush tax cuts were made permanent by the “fiscal cliff” deal in 2012) and raised taxes by $1.32 trillion (most of that occurred as a result of the Obamacare legislation).
If we do the math, that means Obama imposed a cumulative net tax increase of about $510 billion during his eight years in office
But, if you look at the red bar on the chart, you’ll see that the government didn’t wind up with more money because of what the number crunchers refer to as “economic and technical reestimates.”
Indeed, those reestimates resulted in more than $3.1 trillion of lost revenue during the Obama years.
I don’t want the politicians and bureaucrats in Washington to have more tax revenue, but I obviously don’t like it when tax revenues shrink simply because the economy is stagnant and people have less taxable income.
Yet that’s precisely what we got during the Obama years.
To be sure, it would be inaccurate to assert that revenues declined solely because of Obama’s tax increase. There were many other bad policies that also contributed to taxable income falling short of projections.
Heck, maybe there was simply some bad luck as well.
But even if we add lots of caveats, the inescapable conclusion is that it’s not a good idea to adopt policies – such as class-warfare tax rates – that discourage people from earning and reporting taxable income.
The bottom line is that we should hope Biden’s proposed tax increases die a quick death.
P.S. The “fiscal cliff” was the term used to describe the scheduled expiration of the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax cuts. According to the way budget data is measured in Washington, extending some of those provisions counted as a tax cut even though the practical impact was to protect people from a tax increase.
P.P.S. Even though Biden absurdly asserted that paying higher taxes is “patriotic,” it’s worth pointing out that he engaged in very aggressive tax avoidance to protect his family’s money.
[…] some policies will move in the wrong direction. Biden is awful on tax policy, for instance, though I expect Republicans in the Senate will block his class-warfare […]
[…] his class-warfare tax proposals. Consider this Part VI in a series (Parts I-V can be found here, here, here, here, and here), and we’ll use data from the folks at the Tax […]
[…] his class-warfare tax proposals. Consider this Part VI in a series (Parts I-V can be found here, here, here, here, and here), and we’ll use data from the folks at the Tax […]
[…] 2020 and 2021, I wrote a four-part series (here, here, here, and here) about Biden’s class-warfare tax […]
[…] some policies will move in the wrong direction. Biden is awful on tax policy, for instance, though I expect Republicans in the Senate will block his class-warfare […]
[…] some policies will move in the wrong direction. Biden is awful on tax policy, for instance, though I expect Republicans in the Senate will block his class-warfare […]
[…] some policies will move in the wrong direction. Biden is awful on tax policy, for instance, though I expect Republicans in the Senate will block his class-warfare […]
[…] is that the United States should not throw away its competitive advantage. Yet another reason to reject Joe Biden’s class-warfare fiscal […]
[…] is that the United States should not throw away its competitive advantage. Yet another reason to reject Joe Biden’s class-warfare fiscal […]
[…] is that the United States should not throw away its competitive advantage. Yet another reason to reject Joe Biden’s class-warfare fiscal […]
[…] if you read this, this, this, and this, you already knew […]
[…] if you read this, this, this, and this, you already knew […]
[…] since Joe Biden is motivated by class warfare (see here, here, here, and here), he apparently doesn’t care about the economic […]
[…] since Joe Biden is motivated by class warfare (see here, here, here, and here), he apparently doesn’t care about the economic […]
[…] The Case Against Biden’s Class-Warfare Tax Policy, Part II […]
[…] The Case Against Biden’s Class-Warfare Tax Policy, Part II […]
[…] The Case Against Biden’s Class-Warfare Tax Policy, Part II […]
[…] explained here, here, here, and here, I don’t like Biden’s class-warfare tax […]
[…] The Case Against Biden’s Class-Warfare Tax Policy, Part II […]
[…] years, a policy that boosted the economy and led to more revenues from the rich. Biden now wants to run that experiment in reverse, so don’t expect positive […]
[…] The Case Against Biden’s Class-Warfare Tax Policy, Part II […]
[…] some policies will move in the wrong direction. Biden is awful on tax policy, for instance, though I expect Republicans in the Senate will block his class-warfare […]
[…] years, a policy that boosted the economy and led to more revenues from the rich. Biden now wants to run that experiment in reverse, so don’t expect positive […]
[…] explained here, here, here, and here, I don’t like Biden’s class-warfare tax […]
[…] Biden Administration’s approach to tax policy is awful, as documented here, here, here, and […]
[…] https://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2020/11/16/the-case-against-bidens-class-warfare-tax-policy-pa… https://themoneymanifesto.com/2021/01/17/the-case-against-bidens-class-warfare-tax-policy-part-iii/ https://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2021/01/21/the-case-against-bidens-class-warfare-tax-policy-part-iv/ Biden and Pelosi’s Tax Plan Will Penalize Success […]
[…] Biden Administration’s approach to tax policy is awful, as documented here, here, here, and […]
[…] last week, I touched on three policies (easy money from the Fed, Biden’s class-warfare tax agenda, and the ever-increasing burden of federal spending) that create risks for the economy in […]
[…] years, a policy that boosted the economy and led to more revenues from the rich. Biden now wants to run that experiment in reverse, so don’t expect positive […]
[…] years, a policy that boosted the economy and led to more revenues from the rich. Biden now wants to run that experiment in reverse, so don’t expect positive […]
[…] not referring to President Biden’s destructive tax plan (which you can read about here, here, here, and here). Instead, today’s column will focus on the tax increase being considered by the […]
[…] not referring to President Biden’s destructive tax plan (which you can read about here, here, here, and here). Instead, today’s column will focus on the tax increase being considered by […]
[…] The Case Against Biden’s Class-Warfare Tax Policy, Part II […]
[…] The Case Against Biden’s Class-Warfare Tax Policy, Part II […]
[…] some policies will move in the wrong direction. Biden is awful on tax policy, for instance, though I expect Republicans in the Senate will block his class-warfare […]
[…] The Case Against Biden’s Class-Warfare Tax Policy, Part II […]
[…] The Case Against Biden’s Class-Warfare Tax Policy, Part II […]
[…] Part II, I explained how the tax hike would have Laffer-Curve implications, meaning politicians would not get a windfall of tax […]
[…] some policies will move in the wrong direction. Biden is awful on tax policy, for instance, though I expect Republicans in the Senate will block his class-warfare […]
[…] some policies will move in the wrong direction. Biden is awful on tax policy, for instance, though I expect Republicans in the Senate will block his class-warfare […]
[…] some policies will move in the wrong direction. Biden is awful on tax policy, for instance, though I expect Republicans in the Senate will block his class-warfare […]
[…] The Case Against Biden’s Class-Warfare Tax Policy, Part II […]
[…] explained here, here, here, and here, I don’t like Biden’s class-warfare tax […]
[…] Part II, I explained how the tax hike would have Laffer-Curve implications, meaning politicians would not get a windfall of tax […]
[…] Part II, I explained how the tax hike would have Laffer-Curve implications, meaning politicians would not get a windfall of tax […]
[…] explained here, here, here, and here, I don’t like Biden’s class-warfare tax […]
[…] explained here, here, here, and here, I don’t like Biden’s class-warfare tax […]
[…] The Case Against Biden’s Class-Warfare Tax Policy, Part II […]
[…] have a four-part series (here, here, here, and here) about the conceptual downsides of Joe Biden’s class-warfare approach to tax […]
[…] The Case Against Biden’s Class-Warfare Tax Policy, Part II […]
[…] last week, I touched on three policies (easy money from the Fed, Biden’s class-warfare tax agenda, and the ever-increasing burden of federal spending) that create risks for the economy in […]
[…] last week, I touched on three policies (easy money from the Fed, Biden’s class-warfare tax agenda, and the ever-increasing burden of federal spending) that create risks for the economy in […]
[…] The Case Against Biden’s Class-Warfare Tax Policy, Part II […]
[…] have a four-part series (here, here, here, and here) about the conceptual downsides of Joe Biden’s class-warfare approach to tax […]
[…] have a four-part series (here, here, here, and here) about the conceptual downsides of Joe Biden’s class-warfare approach to tax […]
[…] The Case Against Biden’s Class-Warfare Tax Policy, Part II […]
[…] The Case Against Biden’s Class-Warfare Tax Policy, Part II […]
[…] is misguided (the tax code is biased against rich taxpayers, the tax hike would have Laffer-Curve implications, and it would saddle America with the world’s highest corporate tax […]
[…] is misguided (the tax code is biased against rich taxpayers, the tax hike would have Laffer-Curve implications, and it would saddle America with the world’s highest corporate tax […]
[…] tax plan is misguided (the tax code is biased against rich taxpayers, the tax hike would have Laffer-Curve implications, and it would saddle America with the world’s highest corporate tax […]
[…] In Part II of this series, I explained that Biden’s proposed reincarnation of Obamanomics would not be a recipe for increased federal revenues. Simply stated, higher tax rates on productive behavior will lead to macro-economic and micro-economic responses that have the effect of producing lower-than-expected revenues. […]
[…] Part II of this series, I explained that Biden’s proposed reincarnation of Obamanomics would not be a recipe for […]
[…] to fight some of Biden’s awful ideas (the “public option” threat to private health insurance, class-warfare taxes, gun control, a blue-state bailout, […]
[…] of Biden’s awful ideas (the “public option” threat to private health insurance, class-warfare taxes, gun control, a blue-state bailout, […]
[…] last week, I touched on three policies (easy money from the Fed, Biden’s class-warfare tax agenda, and the ever-increasing burden of federal spending) that create risks for the economy in […]
[…] is why I’ve pointed out that Biden’s plan will make the tax code more punitive, not more equitable and efficient as Lane […]
[…] is why I’ve pointed out that Biden’s plan will make the tax code more punitive, not more equitable and efficient as […]
[…] The Case Against Biden’s Class-Warfare Tax Policy, Part II […]
[…] last week, I touched on three policies (easy money from the Fed, Biden’s class-warfare tax agenda, and the ever-increasing burden of federal spending) that create risks for the economy in […]
[…] last week, I touched on three policies (easy money from the Fed, Biden’s class-warfare tax agenda, and the ever-increasing burden of federal spending) that create risks for the economy in […]
[…] Absence of gridlock, leading to big anti-growth tax increases – If Democrats win both Senate seats in Georgia in a few days, that will give them control of the Senate, which will dramatically increase the danger that Biden will push his class-warfare tax policies. […]
[…] The Case Against Biden’s Class-Warfare Tax Policy, Part II […]
[…] Biden didn’t include a wealth tax in his class-warfare campaign manifesto, but Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warrenboth pushed for the idea. And there are plenty of other […]
[…] Biden didn’t include a wealth tax in his class-warfare campaign manifesto, but Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren both pushed for the idea. And there are plenty of other […]
[…] Source […]
[…] The Case Against Biden’s Class-Warfare Tax Policy, Part II […]
[…] some policies will move in the wrong direction. Biden is awful on tax policy, for instance, though I expect Republicans in the Senate will block his class-warfare […]
[…] some policies will move in the wrong direction. Biden is awful on tax policy, for instance, though I expect Republicans in the Senate will block his class-warfare […]
[…] some policies will move in the wrong direction. Biden is awful on tax policy, for instance, though I expect Republicans in the Senate will block his class-warfare […]
[…] some policies will move in the wrong direction. Biden is awful on tax policy, for instance, though I expect Republicans in the Senate will block his class-warfare […]
[…] Source: DanielJMitchell.wordpress.com | November 17, 2020 […]
Reblogged this on boudica.us.
[…] The Case Against Biden’s Class-Warfare Tax Policy, Part II […]