In Part I of this series, I explained that President-Elect Biden’s soak-the-rich agenda didn’t make sense because the internal revenue code already is very biased against upper-income taxpayers. Indeed, the U.S. tax system is even more weighted against the rich than the tax codes of nations such as France and Sweden.
In Part II of this series, I explained that Biden’s proposed reincarnation of Obamanomics would not be a recipe for increased federal revenues. Simply stated, higher tax rates on productive behavior will lead to macro-economic and micro-economic responses that have the effect of producing lower-than-expected revenues.
For today’s addition to the series, I want to focus on how Biden’s tax agenda will discourage investment and undermine competitiveness by saddling the United States with the developed world’s highest effective tax rate on corporate income – as measured by the combined burden of the corporate income tax and the additional layer of tax when dividends are paid to shareholders.
Everything you need to know is captured by this new data from the Tax Foundation.
Needless to say, American policy makers should be striving to make our business tax system more like the one in Estonia.
Instead, Biden wants to go from America being worse than average to America being the absolute worst.
When faced with this data, my friends on the left usually respond in one of two ways.
Some of them simply assert that there is no double taxation. I don’t know if they are ignorant or if they are dishonest.
The others (either more honest or more knowledgeable) will agree with the numbers but assert it is okay because any economic damage will be modest and the benefits of new spending will be significant.
But if higher taxes and more spending are somehow beneficial, why is the United States so much more prosperous than the nations that do have higher taxes and more spending?
P.S. While Biden’s proposals, if enacted, will result in the United States having a very bad tax system for companies, the U.S. will still have some big fiscal advantages over other nations.
- No value-added tax.
- Lower-than-average payroll taxes.
- Less-onerous personal income tax.
- Lower-than-average spending burden.
P.P.S. Adding everything together, the biggest difference between the United States and other developed nations is that lower-income and middle-class taxpayers in America enjoy far lower tax burdens.
[…] tax proposals. Consider this Part VI in a series (Parts I-V can be found here, here, here, here, and here), and we’ll use data from the folks at the Tax […]
[…] tax proposals. Consider this Part VI in a series (Parts I-V can be found here, here, here, here, and here), and we’ll use data from the folks at the Tax […]
[…] 2020 and 2021, I wrote a four-part series (here, here, here, and here) about Biden’s class-warfare tax […]
[…] States should not throw away its competitive advantage. Yet another reason to reject Joe Biden’s class-warfare fiscal […]
[…] should not throw away its competitive advantage. Yet another reason to reject Joe Biden’s class-warfare fiscal […]
[…] States is higher than the average. That’s not good. But what’s really bad is that we would be the worst in the world if Biden’s tax plan gets […]
[…] if you read this, this, this, and this, you already knew […]
[…] if you read this, this, this, and this, you already knew […]
[…] since Joe Biden is motivated by class warfare (see here, here, here, and here), he apparently doesn’t care about the economic […]
[…] since Joe Biden is motivated by class warfare (see here, here, here, and here), he apparently doesn’t care about the economic […]
[…] explained here, here, here, and here, I don’t like Biden’s class-warfare tax […]
[…] explained here, here, here, and here, I don’t like Biden’s class-warfare tax […]
[…] Biden Administration’s approach to tax policy is awful, as documented here, here, here, and […]
[…] Biden Administration’s approach to tax policy is awful, as documented here, here, here, and […]
[…] not referring to President Biden’s destructive tax plan (which you can read about here, here, here, and here). Instead, today’s column will focus on the tax increase being considered by the […]
[…] not referring to President Biden’s destructive tax plan (which you can read about here, here, here, and here). Instead, today’s column will focus on the tax increase being considered by the […]
[…] Part II, I pointed out that the plan would saddle Americawith the developed world’s highest corporate tax […]
[…] explained here, here, here, and here, I don’t like Biden’s class-warfare tax […]
[…] Indeed, many voices in the establishment press are citing favorable polling data in hopes of creating an aura on inevitably for President Biden’s proposed tax hikes. […]
[…] Part II, I pointed out that the plan would saddle Americawith the developed world’s highest corporate tax […]
[…] Part II, I pointed out that the plan would saddle America with the developed world’s highest corporate tax […]
[…] explained here, here, here, and here, I don’t like Biden’s class-warfare tax […]
[…] explained here, here, here, and here, I don’t like Biden’s class-warfare tax […]
[…] Indeed, many voices in the establishment press are citing favorable polling data in hopes of creating an aura on inevitably for President Biden’s proposed tax hikes. […]
[…] Indeed, many voices in the establishment press are citing favorable polling data in hopes of creating an aura on inevitably for President Biden’s proposed tax hikes… […]
[…] Indeed, many voices in the establishment press are citing favorable polling data in hopes of creating an aura on inevitably for President Biden’s proposed tax hikes. […]
[…] have a four-part series (here, here, here, and here) about the conceptual downsides of Joe Biden’s class-warfare approach to tax […]
[…] especially if Biden is able to push through his agendaof higher taxes on work, saving, and […]
[…] have a four-part series (here, here, here, and here) about the conceptual downsides of Joe Biden’s class-warfare approach to tax […]
[…] have a four-part series (here, here, here, and here) about the conceptual downsides of Joe Biden’s class-warfare approach to tax […]
[…] especially if Biden is able to push through his agendaof higher taxes on work, saving, and […]
[…] especially if Biden is able to push through his agendaof higher taxes on work, saving, and […]
[…] especially if Biden is able to push through his agenda of higher taxes on work, saving, and […]
[…] rich taxpayers, the tax hike would have Laffer-Curve implications, and it would saddle America with the world’s highest corporate tax […]
[…] is biased against rich taxpayers, the tax hike would have Laffer-Curve implications, and it would saddle America with the world’s highest corporate tax […]
Reblogged this on boudica.us.
Ahhh… sorry about the ill-placed apostrophes in my post above. : )
I could find no way to edit a comment on this site.
One could just as well ask why some of the nation’s with the highest rates are much more prosperous than some of the nation’s with the lowest rates.
I agree that corporate taxes are unproductive (a hidden tax on shareholders, workers, and customers), and that dividends are doubly taxed. My solution is a bit different, but will never happen . The corporate tax rate should be zero, and the there should be no difference made between dividends and earned income. This includes tax rates plus FICA, etc. Treating all income the same would remove one way that govt perturbs the economy, usually to it’s detriment.
[…] The Case Against Biden’s Class-Warfare Tax Policy, Part III […]