Using a comparison of Jamaica and Singapore, I recently argued that growth should trump inequality.
Simply stated, a growing economic pie is much better for poor people that incentive-sapping redistribution programs that trap people in dependency.
In other words, nations with smaller government and less intervention produce better results than nations with bloated governments and lots of meddling.
You see that relationship by comparing Jamaica and Singapore, and you also see it when examining other nations.
This is fresh in my mind since I just spoke at the Kyiv stop on the Free Market Road Show.
I told the audience about the reforms that Ukraine needs to strengthen economic performance, but I probably should have simply read what one expert recently wrote about Ukraine and Poland.
Here’s some of what Allister Heath had to say for London’s City A.M.
In the dreadful communist days, Ukraine and Poland used to be equally poor. The former was part of the Soviet Union, and Poland was one of the USSR’s satellite nations, belonging to the Warsaw pact. In 1990, both countries had roughly the same GDP per capita – their economies were eerily similar. A quarter of a century later, everything has changed… It’s a tale of two economic models, and a central reason why Russia – a waning world power desperate to cling on to its historic zone of influence – has felt able to bully Ukraine in such a shocking way. …The big difference is that Poland has pursued free-market policies, reducing the size of its state, introducing a strict rule of law and respect for property rights, privatising in a sensible way, avoiding the kleptocracy and corruption that has plagued regimes in Kiev, and embracing as much as possible Western capitalism.
Allister cites World Bank data to state that “Poland’s GDP per capita is now 3.3 times greater than Ukraine’s.”
I prefer the Angus Maddison data, which doesn’t show quite the same divergence. But if you look at the chart, you still see an amazing change in relative living standards in the two nations.
These numbers are shocking. Even with the Maddison data, Poland quickly passed Ukraine after the collapse of communism and now enjoys more than twice the level of per-capita output (and would probably have about three times as much per-capita GDP if the numbers were updated through 2014).
This doesn’t mean, by the way, that Poland is a pro-market paradise. As Allister explains, it’s not exactly Hong Kong or Singapore.
Poland’s tax system remains far too oppressive, the red tape is too strict and the bureaucracy still too redolent of the bad old days, the labour market is excessively regulated, parts of the population rejects elements of the new order and the country remains relatively poor, which explains why so many of its most ambitious folk have moved to the UK and elsewhere. But Poland has been one of the great success stories of the post-communist era, whereas Ukraine, tragically, has been one of the great failures.
To add some details, Freedom of the World ranks Poland as the 59th-freest economy in the world.
That’s not great, but it’s a lot better than Ukraine, which ranks only 126 out of 152 nations (behind even Russia!).
More important, Poland’s overall score was only 3.90 in 1990 and now it is up to 7.20.
Ukraine, by contrast, has only climbed to 6.16.
As I’ve already stated, their big problem is Putinomics. If they want to catch the West, they need free markets and small government.
P.S. If you examine the five major factors in Freedom of the World, Ukraine does best in the fiscal policy measure (in part because it has a flat tax!), but it has a horrible grade for monetary policy and doesn’t do well in the other areas.
P.P.S. On the issue of ethnic division in the country, Ukraine also would benefit from Swiss-style decentralization.
P.P.P.S. This chart comparing Argentina, Chile, and Venezuela also should be very persuasive to every open-minded person.
P.P.P.P.S. I visited the Maidan Square, which is where the recent revolution took place.
Here’s one of the main buildings that caught fire.
Here are pictures of those killed by (presumably) government snipers.
And here’s yours truly playing tourist.
It’s only an armored personnel carrier, but it got me thinking that maybe I should copy other Americans and get my own tank?
[…] Poland’s progress (even though I wrote about that nation’s relative success in both 2014 and […]
[…] como Chile vs. Argentina vs. Venezuela. Ou Coreia do Norte vs. Coreia do Sul. Ou Ucrânia vs. Polônia. Ou Hong Kong vs. Argentina. Ou Cingapura vs. Jamaica. Ou Estados Unidos vs. Hong […]
[…] dollars to rebuild their economy, but only if they get rid of the statist policies that have been holding back the nation’s development ever since the collapse of the Soviet […]
[…] specifically, I compared Poland (which has engaged in substantial liberalization) and Ukraine (which has not) and showed a […]
[…] Ukraine also suffers from bad economic policy. If Russia ultimately succeeds in taking over the country, the U.S. should […]
[…] Example #6: Ukraine vs. Poland […]
[…] como Chile vs. Argentina vs. Venezuela. Ou Coreia do Norte vs. Coreia do Sul. Ou Ucrânia vs. Polônia. Ou Hong Kong vs. Argentina. Ou Singapura vs. Jamaica. Ou Estados Unidos vs. Hong […]
[…] There are also chapters about Sweden, Venezuela, North Korea, China, Georgia, and Russia/Ukraine. […]
[…] There are also chapters about Sweden, Venezuela, North Korea, China, Georgia, and Russia/Ukraine. […]
[…] grupo de baixo, é triste ver a Ucrânia indo tão mal, mas esse é um resultado previsível dada a quase total ausência de liberdade econômica neste desafortunado […]
[…] I’m not surprised to see that Jordan, Ukraine, and South Africa are doing poorly. Sadly, there’s not much hope for improvement in those […]
[…] exemplo, tais como Chile vs. Argentina vs. Venezuela. Ou Coreia do Norte vs. Coreia do Sul. Ou Ucrânia vs. Polônia. Ou Hong Kong vs. Argentina. Ou Cingapura vs. Jamaica. Ou Estados Unidos vs. Hong Kong e Cingapura. […]
[…] check out this graph comparing Ukraine and Poland if you want a remarkable […]
[…] seja Coreia do Norte contra Coreia do Sul, Cuba contra o Chile, ou Ucrânia contra Polônia, nações com governos inchados e com mais intervenção inevitavelmente afundam em comparação […]
[…] realize that Venezuelan statism and North Korean statism aren’t the same (and that Ukraine is a failed kleptocracy more than anything else), but the broad point about the failure of big government makes this meme […]
[…] it’s sad to see Ukraine doing so poorly, but that’s a predictable result given the near-total absence of economic freedom in that unfortunate […]
[…] other nations – most notably Ukraine and Russia – remain economically […]
[…] lots of examples, such as Chile vs. Argentina vs. Venezuela. Or North Korea vs. South Korea. Or Ukraine vs. Poland. Or Hong Kong vs. Argentina. Or Singapore vs. Jamaica. Or the United States vs. Hong Kong and […]
[…] as Poland has out-paced Ukraine because it has better […]
[…] point out in the article that there are some bright spots in the region, especially Estonia, though Poland also has made big […]
[…] point out in the article that there are some bright spots in the region, especially Estonia, though Poland also has made big […]
[…] Ukraine vs. Poland […]
[…] to where Ethiopia is today and below the scores we now see in economically unfree nations such as Ukraine and […]
[…] to where Ethiopia is today and below the scores we now see in economically unfree nations such as Ukraine and […]
[…] it’s North Korea vs. South Korea, Cuba vs. Chile, or Ukraine vs. Poland, nations with bigger governments and more intervention inevitably decline compared to […]
[…] * Ukraine vs. Poland […]
[…] That’s a dramatic turnaround and it shows that markets are much better for people than statism. Sort of like the lesson we learn by comparing Poland (#48) and Ukraine (#122). […]
[…] That’s a dramatic turnaround and it shows that markets are much better for people than statism. Sort of like the lesson we learn by comparing Poland (#48) and Ukraine (#122). […]
[…] Poland is now a reasonably good example of how markets enable higher living […]
[…] since I’ve written about the good reforms in Estonia and Poland and complained about bad policy in Venezuela and South Africa, you can understand why this is yet […]
[…] * Ukraine vs. Poland […]
[…] * Ukraine vs. Poland […]
In the dreadful communist days, Ukraine and Poland used to be equally poor. The former was part of the Soviet Union, and Poland was one of the USSR’s satellite nations, belonging to the Warsaw pact.
insight into what’s ahead… from both Russia and China…
“How Putin Is Reinventing Warfare”
“Though some deride Russia for backward thinking, Putin’s strategy in Ukraine betrays a nuanced understanding of 21st century geopolitics. ”
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2014/05/05/how_putin_is_reinventing_warfare
Russia is emerging from a period if introspection… the country is a work in progress… with vast energy reserves… and abundant raw materials… Russia will be a major player in the new multi-polar world of the 21st century… like it or not…
“‘From Lisbon to Vladivostok’: Putin Envisions a Russia-EU Free Trade Zone”
http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/from-lisbon-to-vladivostok-putin-envisions-a-russia-eu-free-trade-zone-a-731109.html
Ukraine is disintegrating… what will likely be left… is the western part of the nation… with little industry… and an agrarian economy… let’s hope that the process results in minimal loss of human life… and that sane and reasonable people retain control of Ukraine’s nuclear assets… dark days are ahead for the Ukrainian people… and it was all so unnecessary….