Economists widely agree with the theory of “convergence,” which is the (mostly true) idea that poor nations should grow faster than rich nations.
This means that we can learn important lessons by looking at examples of “divergence,” and I provide 20 examples in this presentation.
The above video is an excerpt from a presentation I made earlier this week to a seminar organized by the New Economic School in the country of Georgia.
While it seems like I was making the same point, over and over again (and I was), I wanted the students to understand that the real-world evidence clearly shows that good policy is critical if less-developed nations want convergence.
And I also wanted them to realize that there are many examples of free market-oriented nations growing much faster than anti-market countries.
But, by contrast, there are not examples that go the other way.
I’ve challenged my leftist friends to cite one case study of a poor nation that became a rich nation with big government.
Or to cite a single example of an anti-market nation that has grown faster than a market-oriented country.
Especially when using decades of data, which means there’s no ability to cherry-pick the data and create a misleading impression.
Needless to say, I’m still waiting for them to give me an answer.
Here are the background stories from the examples of divergence in my presentation.
- Example #1: Singapore vs. Jamaica
- Example #2: Hong Kong vs. Cuba
- Example #3: Botswana vs. other African nations
- Example #4: The United States vs. Hong Kong and Singapore
- Example #5: Hong Kong vs. Argentina
- Example #6: Ukraine vs. Poland
Example #7: Chile vs. Argentina vs. Venezuela
- Example #8: North Korea vs. South Korea
- Example #9: Cuba vs. Chile
- Example #10: Estonia vs. the world average
- Example #11: Ireland vs. the world average
- Example #12: Botswana vs the Africa average
- Example #13: Chile vs the world average
- Example #14: Taiwan and South Korea vs the world average
- Example #15: China vs. Taiwan
- Example #16: Hong Kong vs. France
- Example #17: West Germany vs East Germany
- Example #18: Czechoslovakia vs. Finland, Austria, and West Germany
- Example #19: Western Europe vs. the United States
My last example showed important examples of convergence.
- Example #20: United States vs. Hong Kong, Singapore, and Switzerland
And here are a few other examples of divergence that I didn’t include in my presentation.
- Estonia vs. Croatia
- Singapore vs. the United States
- Botswana vs. South Africa and Zimbabwe
Hong Kong vs. the United States
- Hong Kong vs. the United Kingdom and the United States
- China vs. Taiwan vs. the world
- South Korea vs. Brazil
- China vs. South Korea, Taiwan, and Japan
- Singapore vs Botswana, United States, China, France, and Japan
- The United States vs France, Italy, and the United Kingdom
- Chile vs. South America
- Baltic nations vs. other countries
Shifting back to convergence, my column on breaking out of the “middle income trap” also has very interesting data on how Hong Kong, Singapore, Ireland, and Taiwan have closed the gap with (or even exceeded) the United States.
I also recommend this column which looks at a wide range of nations that are converging with, diverging from, or staying flat compared with the United States, as well as this column showing how Ireland has caught up and surpassed other European nations.
The moral of the story is that there’s a very simple recipe showing how poor nations can become rich nations.
[…] Over the past dozen years, I’ve repeatedly shared that chart and featured it in the “anti-convergence club.” […]
[…] Over the past dozen years, I’ve repeatedly shared that chart and featured it in the “anti-convergence club.” […]
[…] frequently call attention to the “anti-convergence club” because of the many real-world examples showing that nations with free markets and limited […]
[…] frequently call attention to the “anti-convergence club” because of the many real-world examples showing that nations with free markets and limited […]
[…] frequently call attention to the “anti-convergence club” because of the many real-world examples showing that nations with free markets and limited […]
[…] created the Anti-Convergence Club so I could have concrete examples of how more economic liberty translates into higher living […]
[…] in looking at long-run trends, particularly whether countries are experiencing convergence of divergence with regards to per-capita economic […]
[…] I do the same when debunking Keynesian economics. And when showing the superiority of markets over dirigisme. […]
[…] I do the same when debunking Keynesian economics. And when showing the superiority of markets over dirigisme. […]
[…] illustrated by the “anti-convergence club,” there is a very strong relationship between economic liberty and national […]
[…] illustrated by the “anti-convergence club,” there is a very strong relationship between economic liberty and national […]
[…] frequently call attention to my “anti-convergence club” because it shows – using decades of data – that you get more prosperity in […]
[…] Nobody on the left ever tries to produce an alternative explanation for why there’s much-faster long-run growth in market-oriented nations. […]
[…] we don’t need to rely on numbers from 100 years ago or 200 years ago. My “anti-convergence club” is based on dozens of comparisons over recent decades and in every case we see that […]
[…] we don’t need to rely on numbers from 100 years ago or 200 years ago. My “anti-convergence club” is based on dozens of comparisons over recent decades and in every case we see that […]
[…] gives us another example of the “anti-convergence” that occurs when two nations have big differences in economic […]
[…] And that’s very apparent when you review decades of data. […]
[…] written many times that convergence (or lack thereof) is the way to assess a nation’s economic […]
[…] I’ll be adding this data to my “anti-convergence club.” […]
[…] I suppose that’s possible, just as it’s possible I might be playing for the Yankees in the World Series later this year. But neither of those outcomes is likely for those of us who care about real-world evidence. […]
[…] By the way, based on current trends, Madrid and Catalonia now may become members of the anti-convergence club. […]
[…] By the way, based on current trends, Madrid and Catalonia now may become members of the anti-convergence club. […]
[…] More specifically, I compared Poland (which has engaged in substantial liberalization) and Ukraine (which has not) and showed a growing gap between the two nations (another case study for the anti-convergence club). […]
[…] As part of my ongoing efforts to show that free enterprise produces better results than statism, I often use data on per-capita economic output – especially when comparing nations over long periods of time. […]
[…] As part of my ongoing efforts to show that free enterprise produces better results than statism, I often use data on per-capita economic output – especially when comparing nations over long periods of time. […]
[…] Nobody on the left ever tries to produce an alternative explanation for why there’s much-faster long-run growth in market-oriented nations. […]
[…] In other words, we’re seeing divergence. […]
[…] Which is the lesson of my anti-convergence club. […]
[…] Which is the lesson of my anti-convergence club. […]
[…] Why the stunning divergence (one of many examples I’ve collected)? […]
[…] Why the stunning divergence (one of many examples I’ve collected)? […]
[…] To end on a serious point, I challenge any and all leftists to respond to my never-answered question. Or to show me their version of the anti-convergence club. […]
[…] obvious lesson to be learned from this example of “anti-convergence” is that market-oriented economies out-perform state-controlled […]
[…] you want to understand why some nations enjoy much stronger economic growth than other nations, the best place to start is the Fraser […]
[…] you want to understand why some nations enjoy much stronger economic growth than other nations, the best place to start is the Fraser Institute’s Economic Freedom of the […]
[…] Nobody on the left ever tries to produce an alternative explanation for why there’s much-faster long-run growth in market-oriented nations. […]
[…] Nobody on the left ever tries to produce an alternative explanation for why there’s much-faster long-run growth in market-oriented nations. […]
[…] P.P.S. After a period of “convergence” after World War II, European countries have actually been falling further behind the United States in recent decades. Needless to say, it’s not good to be part of the “anti-convergence club.” […]
[…] than Chile, so it makes sense that Chile began to converge. But now the two countries are part of the anti-convergence club because Chile is now richer and continuing to grow much […]
[…] than Chile, so it makes sense that Chile began to converge. But now the two countries are part of the anti-convergence club because Chile is now richer and continuing to grow much […]
[…] poor countries fail to converge because they tend to have bad economic […]
[…] poor countries fail to converge because they tend to have bad economic […]
[…] P.P.S. What’s especially revealing is that European nations have been falling further behind the United States, making them members of the “Anti-Convergence Club.” […]
[…] the biggest lesson is that you have divergence rather than convergence if one nation follows good policies and the other one embraces […]
[…] last month, I shared a video with 20 example of market-friendly jurisdictions growing much faster than government-dominated […]
Hey Dan: the USA is seeing rising costs accompanied by rising minimum wages. Were not yet pushing around wheelbarrows of money, but mabye our grandkids will. Do you have any historical data about how these events played out in other places in the past? ~John Rybon, Easton, MD
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021, 1:45 PM International Liberty wrote:
> Dan Mitchell posted: “Economists widely agree with the theory of > “convergence,” which is the (mostly true) idea that poor nations should > grow faster than rich nations. This means that we can learn important > lessons by looking at examples of “divergence,” and I provide 20 ex” >
@David Potts,
I’ve worked with the Maddison data at my agency. They used to use $1990 inflation-adjusted dollars and now they use $2011 inflation-adjusted dollars. Makes a big difference when looking at actual annual values (though not relevant for Dan’s point about some nations growing much faster than other nations).
There is a discrepancy in your GDP per capita numbers for Taiwan. Example 14 shows Taiwan’s per capita GDP at about $23K in 2010. Example 15 shows it to be about $42K in 2016. I don’t know what accounts for this, but you should address it.
I admire your work, by the way.