I’m very fond of Estonia, and not just because of the scenery.
Back in the early 1990s, it was the first post-communist nation to adopt a flat tax.
More recently, it showed that genuine spending cuts were the right way to respond to the 2008 crisis (notwithstanding Paul Krugman’s bizarre attempt to imply that the 2008 recession was somehow caused by 2009 spending cuts).
This doesn’t mean Estonia is perfect. It is ranked #22 by Economic Freedom of the World, which is a respectable score, but that puts them not only behind the United States (#12), but also behind Switzerland (#4), Finland (#10), the United Kingdom (#12), Ireland (#14), and Denmark (#19).
And you can see from the chart that Estonia’s overall score has dropped slightly since 2006.
But I don’t believe in making the perfect the enemy of the good. Estonia is still a reasonably good role model for reform, particularly for nations that emerged from decades of communist enslavement.
You can see how good policy makes a difference, for instance, by comparing Estonia with Croatia (#70). At the time of the breakup of the Soviet Empire, living standards in Croatia were low, but they were about twice as high as they were in Estonia. Today, though, per-capita economic output in Estonia is about $4000 higher than in Croatia.
That’s a dramatic turnaround and it shows that markets are much better for people than statism. Sort of like the lesson we learn by comparing Poland (#48) and Ukraine (#122).
Let’s now take a closer look at one of the policies that has helped Estonia prosper. The flat tax was first adopted in 1994 and the rate was 26 percent. Since then, the rate has been gradually reduced and is now 20 percent.
For some people, the most amazing aspect of the Estonian flat tax is its simplicity, as noted by Kyle Pomerleau of the Tax Foundation.
Republican Presidential hopeful Jeb Bush claimed that it only takes 5 minutes to file taxes in Estonia. This claim was confirmed by a number of reporters and tax authorities in Estonia. For those of us that do our taxes by hand, this sounds like a dream. Depending on your situation, filing your taxes can tax a significant amount of time and due to the numerous steps involved (especially if you are claiming credits) may lead some to make errors. According to the IRS, it takes an average taxpayer with no business income 8 hours to fill out their 1040 and otherwise comply with the individual income tax. Triple that for those with business income.
For those keeping score, this means Estonia is kicking America’s derriere.
But Kyle is even more impressed by other features of the Estonian system.
…that it is not the best part of the Estonian tax code. The best part of the Estonian tax code has more to do with its tax base (what it taxes) rather than how fast people can pay their taxes. Specifically, the Estonian tax code has a fully-integrated individual and corporate income tax. This means that corporate income is taxed only once either at the entity level or at the individual level.
And this means Estonia’s flat tax is far better for growth than America’s system, which suffers from pervasive and destructive double taxation.
In total, the tax rate on corporate income is 20 percent in Estonia. Compare this to the integrated tax rate on corporate profits of 56 percent in the United States. Even more, this tax system provides de facto full expensing for capital investments because the corporate tax is only levied on the cash distributed to shareholders, which is also a significant boon to investment and economic growth.
Wow. No double taxation and expensing of business investment.
There is a lot to admire about Estonia’s sensible approach to business taxation.
Particularly when compared to America’s masochistic corporate income tax, which ranks below even the Greek, Italian, and Mexican systems.
Having the world’s highest statutory corporate tax rate is part of the problem. But as Kyle pointed out, the problem is actually far worse when you calculate how the internal revenue code imposes extra layers of tax on business income.
That’s why, at a recent tax reform event at the Heritage Foundation, I tried to emphasize why it’s economically misguided to have a tax bias against saving and investment.
The bottom line is that high taxes on capital ultimately lead to lower wages for workers.
[…] The 2021 Index, authored by Daniel Bunn and Elke Asen, has now been released, and you can see that Estonia has the most sensible policy. […]
[…] The 2021 Index, authored by Daniel Bunn and Elke Asen, has now been released, and you can see that Estonia has the most sensible policy. […]
[…] The 2021 Index, authored by Daniel Bunn and Elke Asen, has now been released, and you can see that Estonia has the most sensible policy. […]
[…] The 2021 Index, authored by Daniel Bunn and Elke Asen, has now been released, and you can see that Estonia has the most sensible policy. […]
[…] good news is that Ireland (as well as other nations such as Hungary and Estonia) presumably can block Biden’s tax cartel by using their “national veto” and preventing the […]
[…] good news is that Ireland (as well as other nations such as Hungary and Estonia) presumably can block Biden’s tax cartel by using their “national veto” and […]
[…] 20-30% on profits.” So it would be very bad news for places with low rates, such as Ireland, Estonia, and […]
[…] to make matters simple, we can just copy Estonia, which has the world’s best system according to the Tax […]
[…] ranks #1 (not a big surprise) and Italy is at the bottom (also not a big […]
[…] In other words, higher taxes on business resulted in less investment and fewer jobs. Gee, what a surprise. […]
[…] we want a properly designed system for taxing businesses, we know the answer. Just get rid of the extra layer of […]
[…] bad news is that the United States is much worse than Estonia (the gold standard for neutral business […]
[…] should copy Estonia, which has been in first place for six consecutive […]
[…] Estonia has a very good corporate tax system. […]
[…] In part, this is an opportunity to highlight that Georgia is one of many nations to adopt a flat tax. Georgia’s 20 percent flat tax not only has a single rate, but also doesn’t have destructive forms of double taxation like a death tax or capital gains tax (it also has an Estonian-style corporate tax). […]
[…] system is so good (particularly its approach to business taxation) that the Tax Foundation ranks it as the best in the OECD. …Estonia…may be my favorite […]
[…] And efforts by the European Commission to harmonize business taxation ultimately may undermine the pro-growth approach to business taxation in the region as […]
[…] you can see, Switzerland is still at the top, though now it’s tied with Canada. Estonia (which wasn’t part of the OECD back in 2009) is in third place, and New Zealand and Sweden […]
[…] to make matters simple, we can just copy Estonia, which has the world’s best system according to the Tax […]
[…] to make matters simple, we can just copy Estonia, which has the world’s best system according to the Tax […]
[…] to make matters simple, we can just copy Estonia, which has the world’s best system according to the Tax […]
[…] is tax policy. All three nations have flat taxes. Estonia’s system is so good (particularly its approach to business taxation) that the Tax Foundation ranks it as the best in the […]
[…] of data and lots of countries. Estonia gets the top score, and deservedly so. It has a flat tax and many other good policies. It’s also no surprise to see New Zealand and […]
[…] to be at the top of the list not only because of the free-market reforms he implemented (such as tax reform and free trade) after taking office, but also because of his immense courage to be a public leader […]
[…] nations unfortunately go with the latter approach (with place such as Estonia and Hong Kong being admirable exceptions). And that’s why, as Pierre and Fabio explain, the […]
[…] the business tax system is remarkably benign with a rate of 20 percent that is imposed only on […]
[…] bottom. And they also suffer from brain drain since a very smart person, even from fast-growing, low-tax Estonia, generally can enjoy more after-tax income by moving to an already-rich nation such as […]
[…] good business tax system isn’t a fantasy. Jurisdictions such as Estonia and Hong Kong have business tax systems that are very close to the aforementioned ideal. And it […]
[…] has a simple tax system, an independent national tax policy, and lots of multinational companies and […]
[…] has a simple tax system, an independent national tax policy, and lots of multinational companies and […]
[…] its region and also the highest-ranked nation from what is considered to be the developing world. Estonia also deserves plaudits for being the highest-ranked nation to emerge from the former Soviet […]
[…] its region and also the highest-ranked nation from what is considered to be the developing world. Estonia also deserves plaudits for being the highest-ranked nation to emerge from the former Soviet […]
[…] advocates of a “Haig-Simons” tax system, which means they believe that there should be double taxation of all income that is saved and invested. You see this approach from the Joint Committee on […]
[…] people would simply choose to earn and report less income. And they didn’t even include the indirect economic damage (and reductions in taxable income) caused by less saving, investment, and […]