Earlier this year, extrapolating from a study by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, Robert O’Quinn (former Chief Economist at the Department of Labor) and I authored a study on the economic impact of Biden’s fiscal plan.
The results are not pretty.
Lost jobs, lost wages, lower living standards, and lost competitiveness.
But those estimates were based on the parameters of Biden’s economic plan in the summer.
His agenda has since been modified, which raises the question of how the current proposal would affect economic performance.
In a piece for Canada’s Fraser Institute (publishers of Economic Freedom of the World and Economic Freedom of North America), Robert and I updated our numbers and explained the implications of Biden’s tax-and-spend agenda.
According to independent experts at the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, the actual cost of the president’s policies is closer to $4.9 trillion. Some of this new spending will be financed with red ink, but President Biden also has embraced higher tax rates on work, saving, investment and entrepreneurship.
Indeed, if his plan were enacted, the United States would have both the highest corporate tax rate and the highest capital gains tax rate in the developed world. …But how much would the economy be hurt? There are groups such as the Tax Foundation that do excellent work measuring the adverse effects of higher tax rates. But it’s also important to measure the harmful impact of a bigger welfare state. …Based on that CBO study, and using the CBO fiscal and economic baselines, we calculated the following unpalatable outcomes if Build Back Better bill (pushed by the president and Democrats in Congress) becomes law and growth is reduced by 2/10ths of 1 per cent per year.
And here are the results.
The good news is that the latest version of Biden’s plan doesn’t do quite as much damage as what was being discussed earlier this year.
The bad news is that our economy will be much weaker (and our results are in line with other estimates, including those done before the election and since the election).
Not that we should be surprised. If the United States becomes more like Europe, we’ll be more likely so suffer from European-style anemia.
[…] is a lesson to keep in mind when people on the left or right try to tell you that bigger government is a good […]
[…] is a lesson to keep in mind when people on the left or right try to tell you that bigger government is a good […]
[…] had been able to convince Congress to approve $trillions of additional spending as part of his “build back better” […]
[…] been able to convince Congress to approve $trillions of additional spending as part of his “build back better” […]
[…] above video warns that Democrats have a policy agenda that will make America more like Argentina. That’s true, but the profligate spending of Bush I, Bush II, and Trump suggests most Republicans are not any […]
[…] Especially since politicians almost certainly would respond to the expectation of additional revenue by increasing spending above the baseline (as would happen with Joe Biden’s so-called Build Back Better scheme). […]
[…] is a good description of Biden’s so-called plan to Build Back […]
[…] good news is that his big tax-and-spend plan to “build back better” has not been approved by Congress (and fingers crossed that it stays that […]
[…] good news is that his big tax-and-spend plan to “build back better” has not been approved by Congress (and fingers crossed that it stays that […]
[…] repeatedly explained why the president’s plan for a bigger welfare state is bad news, but this tweet from Americans […]
[…] repeatedly explained why the president’s plan for a bigger welfare state is bad news, but this tweet from […]
[…] The bottom line is that America’s fiscal problem is too much government spending. […]
[…] of federal spending. There are many good reasons to criticize Biden’s spending spree.It is not good for the economy to increase the burden of government spending and push for higher tax rates… But that does not […]
[…] of federal spending. There are many good reasons to criticize Biden’s spending spree. It is not good for the economy to increase the burden of government spending and push for higher tax rates… But that does […]
[…] definitely isn’t the biggest reason to oppose Biden’s so-called Build Back Better, but ethical people of all persuasions should […]
[…] still a significant risk that this economy-sapping plan will get enacted, resulting in big tax increases and a larger burden of government […]
[…] Better” plan may be on life support, but sadly it’s not quite dead. I fear a scaled-down (but still horrible) version of the legislation may get approved this year. Senator Manchin of West Virginia, for […]
[…] plan may be on life support, but sadly it’s not quite dead. I fear a scaled-down (but still horrible) version of the legislation may get approved this year. Senator Manchin of West Virginia, for […]
[…] The bottom line is that America’s fiscal problem is too much government spending. […]
[…] The bottom line is that America’s fiscal problem is too much government spending. […]
[…] The bottom line is that America’s fiscal problem is too much government spending. […]
[…] fiscal policy, almost everyone’s attention is focused on Biden’s growth-sapping plan to increase the burden of taxes and […]
[…] fiscal policy, almost everyone’s attention is focused on Biden’s growth-sapping plan to increase the burden of taxes and […]
My pockets are empty. How about yours?
And someone is playing with my balls.