Hardly anybody noticed because the nation has been focused on protests about police misbehavior, but Joe Biden officially clinched the Democratic nomination this past week.
And he’s now comfortably ahead in the political betting markets as well as public polling.
If Biden wins in November, what does that mean for the nation’s economic policy?
According to folks on the left, a Biden presidency means bigger government and more statism.
For instance, opining for the New York Times, Jamelle Bouie applauds Biden’s leftist agenda.
…if the goal is to move America to the left…then a Biden candidacy…represents an opportunity. …If Biden goes on to win the White House, there’s real space for the pro-Sanders left to work its will on policy.
…It can fulfill some of its goals under the cover of Biden’s moderation, from raising the minimum wage nationally to pushing the American health care system closer to single-payer. …Biden…is a creature of the party. He doesn’t buck the mainstream, he accommodates it. He doesn’t reject the center, he tries to claim it. …the center of the Democratic Party as far left as it’s been since before Ronald Reagan, then Biden is likely to hew to that center, not challenge it.
His colleague at the NYT, Michelle Goldberg, is similarly enthused about the prospects for bigger government under a Biden Administration.
Biden’s proposals go far beyond his call for a $15 federal minimum wage — a demand some saw as radical when Sanders pushed it four years ago. While it’s illegal for companies to fire employees for trying to organize a union, the penalties are toothless.
Biden proposes to make those penalties bite and to hold executives personally liable. …should Biden become president, progressives have the opportunity to make generational gains. …To try to unite the party around him, he’s making serious progressive commitments. …he’s moving leftward. Biden recently came out for tuition-free college for students whose families earn less than $125,000. He endorsed Elizabeth Warren’s bankruptcy plan…His climate plan already went beyond any of Barack Obama’s initiatives, and he’s pledged to make it even more robust.
According to (supposedly) neutral analysts, a Biden presidency means bigger government and more statism.
In an article for Newsweek, Steve Friess discusses Biden’s shift to the left.
Being stuck running for the presidency from the basement of his home in Wilmington, Delaware, had given the former vice president a lot of time to think, he told them, and he wanted bigger ideas. Go forth, he urged his financial brain trust, and bring back the boldest, most ambitious proposals they’d ever dreamed of to reshape the U.S. economy…
Biden began issuing a raft of new proposals that move his positions closer to the progressive wing of the Democratic Party, with a promise to unveil an even more transformative economic plan this summer. …It’s a yes to adding $200 a month to Social Security benefits and lowering the qualifying age for Medicare from 65 to 60. Yes to trillions in new spending, yes to new regulations on banks and industry, yes to devil-may-care deficits. …the leader he most often invokes—in interviews, in public addresses, on his podcast—is no longer Barack Obama but Franklin Delano Roosevelt. …Biden has already made a series of significant leftward policy shifts since effectively sewing up the nomination in March.
Perry Bacon, in a piece for fivethirtyeight, analyzes Biden’s statist agenda.
…if Biden is elected in November, the left may get a presidency it likes after all…if American politics is moving left, expect Biden to do the same. …Biden’s long record in public office suggests that he is fairly flexible on policy — shifting his positions to whatever is in the mainstream of the Democratic Party at a given moment.
…Biden is likely to be a fairly liberal president, no matter how moderate he sounded in the primaries. …Biden’s 2020 primary platform…adopted fairly liberal policies…more liberal than his pre-campaign record suggested. The Democratic Party is more liberal now than it was when Bill Clinton took office, or even when Obama was inaugurated, and Biden’s platform reflects that shift. …Biden and his advisers are now…rolling out more liberal policy plans, speaking in increasingly populist terms and joining forces with the most progressive voices in the party. …“Joe Biden is running on the most progressive platform of any Democratic nominee in recent history. But given the pandemic, he has to look at the New Deal and Great Society traditions in the Democratic Party and go bigger,” said Waleed Shahid, the communications director for Justice Democrats, a left-wing group aligned with Ocasio-Cortez.
Writing for the Washington Post, Sean Sullivan documents Biden’s leftward drift.
Joe Biden sought to appeal to liberal supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders on Thursday with a pair of new proposals to expand access to health care and curtail student loan debt. Biden proposed lowering the eligibility age for Medicare coverage from 65 to 60.
He also came out in favor of forgiving student loan debt for people who attended public colleges and universities and some private schools and make up to $125,000 a year. …In another peace offering to liberals, Biden proposed paying for his student debt plan by repealing a provision in the recent coronavirus legislation that Congress passed and President Trump enacted. “That tax cut overwhelmingly benefits the richest Americans and is unnecessary for addressing the current COVID-19 economic relief efforts,” he wrote… Biden endorsed a bankruptcy plan put forth by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), another rival who ran to his left.
And, according to more market-friendly sources, a Biden presidency means bigger government and more statism.
The Wall Street Journal editorialized about Biden’s leftist agenda.
Already Medicare is scheduled to be insolvent by 2026. …In 1970, life expectancy in the U.S. was 70.8. Now it’s about eight years longer. By lowering the age of eligibility instead, Mr. Biden would begin shifting Medicare’s focus from seniors to everybody else.
Don’t worry about the funding, he insists, since the extra costs would be “financed out of general revenues.” …Mr. Biden’s new left turn on student loans is equally sharp. …Cancel all federal undergraduate tuition debt for many borrowers who went to public schools, including four-year universities. This forgiveness would be given to anyone who earns $125,000 a year or less. …How much would it cost? There’s no explanation.
Jeff Jacoby analyzed Biden in a column for the Boston Globe.
Biden…is running on a platform far more progressive — i.e., far less moderate — than any Democratic presidential nominee in history. …on issue after issue, Biden has veered sharply from Obama’s path. On health insurance, for example, Obama rejected a public option as part of the Affordable Care Act and repeatedly stressed the importance of maintaining private coverage.
But Biden favors a public option open to everyone… Biden supports government-funded health care even for unauthoritzed immigrants, something Obama never came close to proposing. …No Democratic presidential nominee ever endorsed anything like the radical Green New Deal, with its price tag in the tens of trillions of dollars and its goal of eliminating the use of all fossil fuels. But Biden does. No Democratic nominee ever called for a national minimum wage of $15 an hour. But Biden does. …Sanders may not end up on the November ballot, but it will unmistakably reflect his influence. For he and his band of progressives have pushed their party to the left with such success that even the “moderate” in the race would be the most liberal Democrat ever nominated for president.
Here’s some of what Peter Suderman wrote for Reason.
Biden is a moderate compared to Sanders, but he is notably to the left of previous Democratic standard-bearers. …Biden has proposed a significant expansion of the Affordable Care Act that his campaign estimates would cost $750 billion over a decade… Biden has proposed a $1.7 trillion climate plan
that is similar in scope to many candidates on his left and a $750 billion education plan… He favors an assault weapons ban and other gun control measures, a national $15 minimum wage, and a raft of subsidies, loans, and other government-granted nudges designed to promote rural economies. Has proposed $3.4 trillion worth of tax hikes—more than double what former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton proposed when she ran in 2016. …Biden’s leftward drift is thus the party’s leftward shift…, a big-government liberal, a candidate whose current incarnation was shaped and informed by progressive politics, if not wholly captured by them.
The Tax Foundation examined the former Vice President’s tax plan and the results are not encouraging.
Former Vice President Joe Biden would enact a number of policies that would raise taxes, including individual income taxes and payroll taxes, on high-income individuals with income above $400,000. …According to the Tax Foundation’s General Equilibrium Model, the Biden tax plan
would reduce GDP by 1.51 percent over the long term. …The plan would shrink the capital stock by 3.23 percent and reduce the overall wage rate by 0.98 percent, leading to 585,000 fewer full-time equivalent jobs. …On a dynamic basis, we estimate that Biden’s tax plan would raise about 15 percent less revenue than on a conventional basis over the next decade. …That is because the relatively smaller economy would shrink the tax base for payroll, individual income, and business income taxes. …The plan would lead to lower after-tax income for all income levels.
Here’s a table summarizing the findings.
So what does all this mean?
At the risk of oversimplifying, Biden unquestionably would move tax policy to the left (he actually said higher taxes are patriotic, even though he engages in aggressive tax avoidance), and the same thing would happen on regulatory issues.
His spending agenda is terrible, though it’s worth noting that Democrat presidents usually don’t spend as much as Republicans (with the admirable exception of Reagan).
And, to be fair, there’s no way he could be as bad on trade as Trump.
Let’s close by looking at some hard data. Back in January, I sifted through the vote ratings prepared by the National Taxpayers Union and the Club for Growth and showed that Biden was not a Bill Clinton-style moderate.
I went back to those same sources an put together this comparison of Biden and some other well-known Democrats (scores on a 0-100 scale, with zero being statism and 100 being libertarian).
In both measures, he’s worse than Crazy Bernie!
Moreover, a lifetime average of zero from the Club for Growth is rather horrifying. His average from the National Taxpayers Union isn’t quite so bad, but the trend is in the wrong direction. Biden’s post-2000 average was less than 10, while his score for the preceding years averaged more than 23.
That being said, my two cents on this topic is that Biden is a statist, but not overly ideological.
His support for bigger government is largely a strategy of catering to the various interest groups that dominate the Democratic Party.
The good news is that he’s an incrementalist and won’t aggressively push for a horrifying FDR-style agenda if he gets to the White House.
The bad news is that he will probably allow Nancy Pelosi and other statist ideologues to dictate that kind of agenda if he wins the presidency.
P.S. My collection of Biden-oriented humor is rather sparse (see here, here, here, and here), an oversight that I’ll have to address in the near future.
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] close by noting we mock Crazy Bernie for his overt hurry-up socialism. Well, the incremental version isn’t much better since you eventually wind up in the same bad […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] else, after all, would someone categorize Obama’s policies? Or Biden’s platform? It’s “We shall tax and tax, and spend and spend, and elect and elect,” just as FDR advisor […]
[…] assessment has not been positive, which shouldn’t be very surprising since Biden is basically a slow-motion version of Bernie […]
[…] assessment has not been positive, which shouldn’t be very surprising since Biden is basically a slow-motion version of Bernie […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] to keep in mind since some politicians in Washington want a return to confiscatory taxes on work, saving, investment, and […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] Joe Biden: An Incrementalist Version of Bernie Sanders […]
[…] Joe Biden: An Incrementalist Version of Bernie Sanders […]
[…] on his track record as a long-time Senator, none of this is a surprise. According to vote ratings from the Club for Growth and National Taxpayers Union, Biden was to the left of even Crazy […]
[…] on his track record as a long-time Senator, none of this is a surprise. According to vote ratings from the Club for Growth and National Taxpayers Union, Biden was to the left of even Crazy […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] to keep in mind since some politicians in Washington want a return to confiscatory taxes on work, saving, investment, and […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] to keep in mind since some politicians in Washington want a return to confiscatory taxes on work, saving, investment, and […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] to keep in mind since some politicians in Washington want a return to confiscatory taxes on work, saving, investment, and […]
[…] I didn’t think Biden actually understood why free trade is good (he’s always been a proponent of bigger government, after […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] November’s election, I figured we would have gridlock. Biden would propose some statist ideas, but they would be blocked by Republicans in the […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] November’s election, I figured we would have gridlock. Biden would propose some statist ideas, but they would be blocked by Republicans in the […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] November’s election, I figured we would have gridlock. Biden would propose some statist ideas, but they would be blocked by Republicans in the […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] P.S. Because he said some sensible things about “basic income” back in 2017, I had hoped Biden would be better on this issue. I should have known better based on his track record. […]
[…] P.S. Because he said some sensible things about “basic income” back in 2017, I had hoped Biden would be better on this issue. I should have known better based on his track record. […]
[…] November’s election, I figured we would have gridlock. Biden would propose some statist ideas, but they would be blocked by Republicans in the […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] P.S. Sadly, Biden has not reversed many of Trump’s protectionist policies. But that’s not a surprise given his support for statism. […]
[…] P.S. Sadly, Biden has not reversed many of Trump’s protectionist policies. But that’s not a surprise given his support for statism. […]
[…] November’s election, I figured we would have gridlock. Biden would propose some statist ideas, but they would be blocked by Republicans in the […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] making the case for the Italian approach of higher taxes and bigger government during his speech to Congress, President Biden exclaimed that “trickle-down economics has […]
[…] making the case for the Italian approach of higher taxes and bigger government during his speech to Congress, President Biden exclaimed that “trickle-down economics has […]
[…] November’s election, I figured we would have gridlock. Biden would propose some statist ideas, but they would be blocked by Republicans in the […]
[…] November’s election, I figured we would have gridlock. Biden would propose some statist ideas, but they would be blocked by Republicans in the […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] One obvious takeaway from Cochrane’s data (though not obvious to President Biden) is that the United States should not be copying Europe. Unless, of course, one wants ordinary […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] The 21st century has been bad news for proponents of limited government. Bush was a big spender, Obama was a big spender, Trump was a big spender, and now Biden also wants to buy votes with other people’s money. […]
[…] The 21st century has been bad news for proponents of limited government. Bush was a big spender, Obama was a big spender, Trump was a big spender, and now Biden also wants to buy votes with other people’s money. […]
[…] The 21st century has been bad news for proponents of limited government. Bush was a big spender, Obama was a big spender, Trump was a big spender, and now Biden also wants to buy votes with other people’s money. […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] that definitely didn’t happen in the past four years in the United States. And it also won’t be happening in the next four […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] Joe Biden: An Incrementalist Version of Bernie Sanders […]
[…] November’s election, I figured we would have gridlock. Biden would propose some statist ideas, but they would be blocked by Republicans in the […]
[…] November’s election, I figured we would have gridlock. Biden would propose some statist ideas, but they would be blocked by Republicans in the […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] Well, Trump in on the way out and Biden is on the way in, which means one big spender is being replaced by another. […]
[…] Well, Trump in on the way out and Biden is on the way in, which means one big spender is being replaced by another. […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] – I don’t necessarily think Biden is a hard-core leftist, but his fiscal agenda is terrible. I want him to have an excuse to put those policies on the back burner, and that will happen if […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] the campaign, Joe Biden proposed a massive tax increase, far beyond what either Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton put forth when they […]
[…] now Biden will be in the White House, and he wants to expand those programs, so that presumably kills reform for the next four […]
[…] now Biden will be in the White House, and he wants to expand those programs, so that presumably kills reform for the next four […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] fully expect the Biden White House to be much worse on those issues. And I’m sure Biden will also try to move policy in the wrong direction on other issues as […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] the campaign, Joe Biden proposed a massive tax increase, far beyond what either Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton put forth when they […]
[…] the campaign, Joe Biden proposed a massive tax increase, far beyond what either Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton put forth when they […]
[…] the campaign, Joe Biden proposed a massive tax increase, far beyond what either Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton put forth when they […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] why it’s so disappointing that Joe Biden, as part of his platform in the presidential race, has embraced class-warfare […]
[…] why it’s so disappointing that Joe Biden, as part of his platform in the presidential race, has embraced class-warfare […]
[…] good news, as I wrote earlier this year, is that he probably isn’t serious about some of his worst […]
[…] to keep in mind since some politicians in Washington want a return to confiscatory taxes on work, saving, investment, and […]
[…] to keep in mind since some politicians in Washington want a return to confiscatory taxes on work, saving, investment, and […]
[…] to keep in mind since some politicians in Washington want a return to confiscatory taxes on work, saving, investment, and […]
[…] Biden, we have his track record in the United States Senate, where he routinely voted to expand the burden of […]
[…] Joe Biden, even though he is considered to be a moderate, is currently running on a platform of higher taxes and higher […]
[…] to keep in mind since some politicians in Washington want a return to confiscatory taxes on work, saving, investment, and […]
[…] worst of the worst is Jay Inslee of Washington. So however bad Biden’s agenda is for the country, let’s be happy that Governor Inslee didn’t win the Democratic […]
[…] to keep in mind since some politicians in Washington want a return to confiscatory taxes on work, saving, investment, and […]
[…] publicity to Keynesian predictions that the economy will grow faster if Biden wins and then imposes his profligate agenda – which they underestimate to include $7.3 trillion of new spending and $4.1 trillion of new […]
[…] why it’s so disappointing that Joe Biden, as part of his platform in the presidential race, has embraced class-warfare […]
[…] Especially since the major parties are giving voters a choice between big-spender Trump and big-spender Biden. […]
[…] if Joe Biden wins the 2002 election, I don’t expect any serious effort to rein in the burden of government […]
[…] else, after all, would someone categorize Obama’s policies? Or Biden’s platform? It’s “We shall tax and tax, and spend and spend, and elect and elect,” just as FDR advisor […]
[…] else, after all, would someone categorize Obama’s policies? Or Biden’s platform? It’s “We shall tax and tax, and spend and spend, and elect and elect,” just as […]
[…] that Joe Biden has been officially nominated, I should probably augment my analysis of his statist economic […]
[…] Sadly, Trump is on the wrong side on that issue and Biden wants to add fuel to the fire by making the programs even bigger. […]
[…] though Joe Biden has embraced a very left-wing agenda, I suspect many of the items on his wish list are designed to placate Bernie-type activists who have considerable influence in the Democratic […]
[…] I fully expect that Biden will make government […]
[…] bad news is that he nonetheless is supporting a wide range of punitive tax […]
[…] Under Joe Biden’s tax plan, the U.S. would have the world’s-highest combined tax rate on […]
[…] Biden, meanwhile, has a very statist policy agenda. So if he gets elected, we have to cross our fingers that he doesn’t really believe in his Bernie-lite agenda. […]
“American politics has never had a top politician who (apparently suffering from dementia) makes such wandering, incoherent, garbled comments. The game he has inspired has two simple rules: (1) prune the gibberish and (2) add what is needed to make sense.”
Deciphering Bidenese”
by Daniel Pipes
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/16109/deciphering-biden
[…] the Democrats also win the Senate along with the White House, we may be poised to take a big leap in the direction of bigger government and more statism (which is why I explained […]
Regarding “life expectancy”: The WSJ editorial wrote, “In 1970, life expectancy in the U.S. was 70.8. Now it’s about eight years longer.”
What the WSJ meant was that “life expectancy at birth” was now around 78 years. Life expectancy hasn’t changed for millenia. To get an accurate statistic, use the “average age of death”. No one is living longer because of physiological changes to the human body. Evolution simply doesn’t work that fast.
Using the average age when humans die will account for the medical advances, improved diet, food and drug advances, etc. that prolong human aging.
Reblogged this on Gds44's Blog.
Your final assessment of Biden is probably correct. I once met Biden in the late 1980s at a security conference in Munich when I was a reporter for the Stars and Stripes, and he’s motivated mostly by the political winds that are blowing at the time. But a Pelosi would definitely control his agenda. He is generally a weak man in my opinion.