A new edition of the Human Freedom Index has been released. When you combine measures of personal freedom and economic freedom, the “sensible nation” of Switzerland is at the top of the rankings.
I don’t know if this means we should view Switzerland as the world’s most libertarian nation (or perhaps the world’s least statist nation), but it’s obviously good to lead this list.
And it’s not surprising that New Zealand is next, though many people are probably shocked to see Denmark in third place (it has very bad fiscal policy, but otherwise is a very laissez-faire nation).
The United States is #15, which is good but not great.
Here are a few passages from the report’s executive summary.
The Human Freedom Index (HFI) presents a broad measure of human freedom, understood as the absence of coercive constraint. This seventh annual index uses 82 distinct indicators of personal and economic freedom… The HFI covers 165 jurisdictions for 2019, t
he most recent year for which sufficient data are available. …fully 83 percent of the global population lives in jurisdictions that have seen a fall in human freedom since 2008. That includes decreases in overall freedom in the 10 most populous countries in the world. Only 17 percent of the global population lives in countries that have seen increases in freedom over the same time period. …Jurisdictions in the top quartile of freedom enjoy a significantly higher average per capita income ($48,748) than those in other quartiles; the average per capita income in the least free quartile is $11,259. The HFI also finds a strong relationship between human freedom and democracy
If you want to know the world’s worst nations, here are the bottom 10.
Venezuela is normally the worst of the worst, but in this case Syria wins the Booby Prize.
Let’s now give some extra attention to Hong Kong.
The report notes that there’s been a very unfortunate decline in human freedom in Hong Kong, mostly because of an erosion of personal freedom.
And Hong Kong’s score is expected to drop even further in future editions.
Freedom has suffered a precipitous decline in Hong Kong. The territory was once one of the freest places in the world,
but the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) escalating violations of Hong Kong’s traditional liberties has caused its ranking in our index to fall from 4th place in 2008—when the first globally comprehensive data appeared—to 30th place in 2019, the most recent year in our report… Our survey does not yet capture the suppression of 2020 and 2021, including the CCP’s imposition of a draconian security law that enabled its aggressive takeover of Hong Kong.
Thanks to the recent election, I expect we will see a similar discussion of Chile’s decline in future editions.
Here’s a final observation that should be highlighted.
Because the report relies on hard data (which often takes a year or two to be finalized and reported), this year’s HFI is based on 2019 data.
And that means we won’t see the effect of pandemic-related restrictions, which generally were adopted in early 2020, until next year’s version.
…this year’s report does not capture the effects of the coronavirus pandemic on freedom.
P.S. Here’s what I wrote about the previous edition of the Human Freedom Index. And if you want to dig into the archives, I also wrote about the publication in 2016 and 2018.
P.P.S. For what it’s worth, I still think Australia might have the best long-run outlook for human freedom.
[…] Indeed, it is the most libertarian country in the world according to one index. […]
[…] Indeed, it is the most libertarian country in the world according to one index. […]
[…] Indeed, it is the most libertarian country in the world according to one index. […]
[…] suspect that’s because Switzerland is a libertarian-oriented nation with a comparatively small welfare state. In other words, it’s a role model for good policy, […]
[…] suspect that’s because Switzerland is a libertarian-oriented nation with a comparatively small welfare state. In other words, it’s a role model for good policy, […]
[…] suspect that’s because Switzerland is a libertarian-oriented nation with a comparatively small welfare state. In other words, it’s a role model for good policy, […]
[…] So kudos to Switzerland, which is sometimes thought to be the world’s most libertarian nation. […]
[…] So kudos to Switzerland, which is sometimes thought to be the world’s most libertarian nation. […]
[…] so low in Switzerland, which arguably is the world’s best-governed (meaning least-governed) […]
[…] voting rates are so low in Switzerland, which arguably is the world’s best-governed (meaning least-governed) […]
[…] nation’s libertarian-leaning […]
[…] Our next visual shows that Singapore has the world’s freest economy, narrowly edging out Switzerland. […]
[…] not the worst possible outcome. After all, European nations rank highly in the Human Freedom […]
Switzerland, of course, is a direct democracy (so is New Zealand, but initiatives are non-binding and purely advisory). There is a long empirical literature on how direct democracy reduces taxation and spending: see, eg:
https://academic.oup.com/ej/article-abstract/121/557/1252/5079369
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods/article/abs/direct-democracy-and-government-size-evidence-from-spain/E3D106AD332D40789DECC98090EFBA90
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11127-017-0486-0
In Leichenstein voters in 1945 even capped income tax rate to 1%. It is worth noting that Hans Adams identifies the absence of direct democracy federally as a flaw in the US Constitution: https://youtu.be/8AXBX3e1T64
Direct democracy spurs policy innovation and competition, which compliements a federal system.
I am afraid when Dan rants on “unfiltered majoritarianism” he really means “representative government”, which is actually a form of minoritarianism – 0.00005% of the population binding everyone in the polity.
Anyways, there is no such thing as “unfiltered majoritarianism” – judges and petty administrators have to interpret the voter enacted law on a rolling case-by-case basis. Just look at capital punishment in California: voters consistently support the death penalty, but no one gets executed. Gavin Newsom has certainly “filtered” any majority preferences in that state, just as they did with Proposition 187. It is one thing thing to enact a law, another thing to have it enforced.
As for “rights” it is worth noting that voter laws decriminalised margarine production (yes, producing the stuff was banned by state legislators to prop up the butter industry!), decriminalised working on sundays, decriminalised medicinal marijuana, banned the poll tax, blocked eugenics legislation in Oregon in 1913, gave us Proposition 14 of 1964, and responded to the disastrous Kelo decision. Alas, America today suffer from tyranny of the minority rather than the majority.
As for democracy being two wolves deciding who shall eat the sheep, I note simply note wolves too have a fundamental right to life and serve a vital function within the overall ecosystem: https://www.livingwithwolves.org/about-wolves/why-wolves-matter/
Let them eat sheep.
Sorry, but I simply can’t take seriously any index that ranks Ireland fifth for “freedom.” Ireland is increasingly interfering in the area of personal choice and adopting nanny-state policies. In the new year Ireland will introduce minimum pricing for alcohol. The Government is considering an outright ban on tobacco. The so-called “Healthy Ireland” agency is coercing food outlets, supermarkets and food manufacturers to reformulate food products to conform to supposed healthy norms.
Irish business is heavily regulated and financial success is severely punished by a punitive tax system. Things are bad now for Irish business but they are about to get much worse because there are some horrendous laws in the pipeline that will cripple Irish commerce.
The private rental market has been destroyed by ham-fisted regulation and anti-landlord sentiment.
I could go on but I haven’t the time. Any freedom index that places Ireland in fifth place is a joke.
Hmm. I wonder who gets to decide what “freedom” means?
The Global Elite or the average citizen who has been confined to their house for nearly two years?
With Canada at #6 and Australia at #8 despite much COVID tyranny, the index ranking doesn’t seem credible..
I can’t agree with you on Australia after their crazy over the top Covid response. It will be interesting to see the 2020 rankings.