Back in 2013, when I was still doing a “question of the week” column, I suggested that Australian was the best option for those contemplating a new home in the event of some sort of Greek-style fiscal collapse in the United States.
I pointed out that America wasn’t in any immediate danger, though I can understand why some people are interested in the question since our long-run outlook is rather grim.
Anyhow, I picked Australia for several reasons, including its geographic position (no unstable welfare states on the border, which is why I didn’t select Switzerland), its private social security system (unfunded liabilities are small compared to the $44 trillion shortfall in America’s government-run system), and its relatively high level of economic freedom.
I’m not the only person to notice that Australia is a good place to live. A recent Bloomberg column noted that millionaires are moving Down Under.
They’re all going to the land Down Under. Australia is luring increasing numbers of global millionaires, helping make it one of the fastest growing wealthy nations in the world… Over the past decade, total wealth held in Australia has risen by 85 percent compared to 30 percent in the U.S. and 28 percent in the U.K., aided by the fact that Australia has gone 25 years without a recession. As a result, the average Australian is now significantly wealthier than the average American or Briton. …At the end of 2016 individuals held about $192 trillion of wealth worldwide…, with 13.6 million millionaires holding $69 trillion of this. There were 522,000 multi-millionaires, having net assets of $10 million or more.
The number of millionaires moving to Australia is especially impressive when looking at global data.
Here’s a map showing the nations with the most incoming and outgoing rich people (h/t: Steve Hanke). Maybe it’s because there’s no death tax in Australia, but it’s remarkable that a nation with less than one-tenth the population of the United States manages to attract more millionaires.
But not everybody is cheerful about Australia’s economic position.
I’m currently in Brisbane for a couple of speeches. I spoke earlier today about how market-oriented jurisdictions grow much faster over the long run when compared to nations with statist economic policy.
But I don’t want to focus on my remarks (much of which will be old news to regular readers). Instead, let’s look at the some of the information in a speech by Professor Tony Makin of Griffith University.
Two of his slides caught my attention. Let’s start with a depressing look at how Australia has declined in the global competitiveness rankings put together each year by the World Economic Forum.
This is not a good trend.
That being said, I think Economic Freedom of the World is a more accurate measure and it shows that Australia (whether looking at its absolute score or its relative ranking) has suffered only a small decline.
Here’s another chart that is depressing as well. It shows that the per-capita burden of taxes and spending has continuously increased even after adjusting for inflation.
To be fair, the numbers aren’t quite as bad when looking at taxes and spending as a share of gross domestic product.
Nonetheless, the trend isn’t favorable, which is a point I made back in 2014.
None of this changes my view that Australia is still a good choice for emigrating Americans. But it does leave me worried about whether it will still be the top choice in 10 years or 20 years.
For what it’s worth, the main recommendation in my speech was for Australia to adopt a spending cap, similar to the ones that exist in Hong Kong and Switzerland. I also should have suggested sweeping decentralization since the government actually is open to that idea.
P.S. One of the most disappointing things about Australia is that the country’s foreign aid bureaucrats are trying to bribe/coerce Vanuatu’s government into adopting an income tax.
P.P.S. Professor Makin was the author of the report I recently cited about the failure of Australia’s Keynesian spending binge.
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] countries that moved in the wrong direction by the smallest amounts are Switzerland (-.12), Australia (-.13), Sweden (-.14), and Denmark […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] For what it’s worth, I still think Australia might have the best long-run outlook for human […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] means Singapore is now the world’s most laissez-faire jurisdiction, followed by New Zealand, Australia, and […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] P.S. Of course, we’ll be on that path even if Biden doesn’t become President, so perhaps the moral of the story is to buy land in Australia. […]
[…] For those on the losing side of the upcoming election, I’ll remind you that Australia is probably the best option if you want to escape the United States. Though you may want to pick Switzerland if you have a lot […]
[…] Ranked-choice voting in Alaska and Massachusetts. This is a system that requires voters rank all candidates and awards victory to whoever has the strongest support across all ballots. It is assumed that the impact will be more centrist candidates and more civil elections. I don’t have strong views, but it’s worth noting that Australia uses this approach and it’s one of my favorite nations. […]
[…] I’ve argued that Australia is a good place to emigrate even for those of us who aren’t […]
[…] debt (far-right column) and the existing level of debt (the next-to-far-right column). So I’m not overly worried about Australia. Debt is still comparatively low, even though it almost doubled last […]
[…] In the past, I’ve suggested that Australia is the best long-run option if the United States suffers a Greek-style economic decline. That’s still true, especially […]
[…] P.S. Of course, we’ll be on that path even if Biden doesn’t become President, so perhaps the moral of the story is to buy land in Australia. […]
[…] wonder I’ve identified an escape option if America goes down the wrong […]
[…] suggested that Australia as an option if the United States ever suffers a Greek-style collapse, but my answer wasn’t based solely […]
[…] Sur le web. Traduction : Raphaël Marfaux pour […]
Another reason for an American like me to move to Australia: the logical, smooth-sailing metric system.
Australia and New Zealand managed to smoothly transition from imperial to metric back in the ’70s (some years after replacing the old system of pounds, shillings and pence with dollars and cents in ’66 and ’67). Little to no progress has been made in America. Britain*, Ireland and Canada (despite being listed as officially adopting metric) are still stuck halfway. The cases of America and Britain I can understand (since their populations are a lot bigger), but the cases of Canada and Ireland are surprising.
*Side note: some Britons have a rather annoying aversion to decimal currency (I’m looking at you, Peter Hitchens) and continue to harp on how it and the metric system have contributed to the decline of Anglo-Saxon society and culture. I mean, really, is this how you measure (pun not intended) the well-being of society? Correlation does not imply causation, guys!
As an American, I envy the Aussies for staying independent from Great Britain. If the Founding Fathers declared independence from Britain in 1776 and adopted decimal currency in 1792, then why does the US continue to use English units (under the guise of “customary”) after being “independent” for 200 years? Thomas Jefferson even thought of switching to a decimalized system of measurements. Why didn’t that catch on?
For the United States to transition to metric nowadays would cost millions of dollars of infrastructure changes and reeducation, and what doesn’t help is America’s external debt. To be honest, they should’ve made the move back in the 1790s or 1800s (especially when the US and Great Britain were still at war with each other (e.g. the War of 1812)), and now it’s too late. America is a lost cause. They waited too long, so I guess they don’t deserve it. You know what they say: “strike the iron while it’s hot”.
OT: Daniel, if you’re going to have your readers write comments, at least respond to them so we can have a healthy discussion.
[…] P.S. If it wasn’t so cold in Canada, that might be my escape option instead of Australia. […]
[…] Fark […]
[…] Is Australia Still the Best Country for American Refugees? […]
[…] Is Australia Still the Best Country for American Refugees? […]
@smapple – Australia runs a points-based system. If you’re a native English speaker with professional qualifications or other skills in demand you’re most of the way there. I don’t know if the difference in the experience with illegals is a function of policy or the fact that Australia is an island a long way from anywhere. Finally, who are these “tribes” we’re letting in “with little requirements”? As an Aussie, that’s news to me.
Yes, but— look into migrating there. The rules for actually getting into Australia are daunting. As a middle-age white man, my prospects are quite limited unless I want to bring a ton of investment capital with me. (thus the millionaire bulge) A normal person in the world would find it much easier to migrate to America or Canada than Australia. Just google migrating to Australia if you want to check it out yourself. If Trump were to match Australia’s immigrant policies, our issues with illegals would end. Of course, Australia tends to have a bit of that problem itself, as its leftist policies allow certain tribes in with little requirements just due to where they are from. Probably some vestiges of their original prisoner island status, I guess.