There’s a recipe for growth and prosperity. It’s called capitalism.
As Dan Hannan explains in this video, it’s the way to help all groups in a society become richer.
This is a great video about how free enterprise delivers prosperity for the masses.
And because wealthy societies have lots of financial resources, capitalism also is correlated with good outcomes such as reduced pollution and increased literacy.
Hannan makes three key points in his video.
- First, he makes the should-be-obvious case that it’s possible for all groups in a society to become richer if the economic pie expands. I’ve shown this with U.S. data and I’ve shown it with global data.
- Second, he echoes the great insight of the late Walter Williams by pointing out that you get rich under capitalism by serving others. In government-controlled economies, by contrast, you get rich by stealing from others.
- Third, he cites Joseph Schumpeter’s sage observation about how capitalism makes life better for ordinary people. That’s never happens in government-controlled economies.
Indeed, the only possible shortcoming in the video is that it truncates Schumpeter’s quote.
As you can see below, it’s not just that free enterprise makes goods available for those at the bottom, it does so in a way that is increasingly affordable over time.
P.S. Here are Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV of the series.
P.P.S. As always, I ask my left-leaning friends to shown me an example, either today or at some point in history, where a society became rich with big government rather than capitalism? I call this my never-answered question.
[…] have a multi-part series making the case for capitalism (Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV, Part V, and Part VI), and I’ve shared lots of long-run datashowing how some peoplebegan to enjoy […]
[…] have a multi-part series making the case for capitalism (Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV, Part V, and Part VI), and I’ve shared lots of long-run data showing how some people began to enjoy […]
[…] let’s forget about economic jargon. What the chart really shows is how free markets enable societies to generate so much income that we can enjoy better lives in exchange for far less […]
[…] let’s forget about economic jargon. What the chart really shows is how free markets enable societies to generate so much income that we can enjoy better lives in exchange for far less […]
[…] let’s forget about economic jargon. What the chart really shows is how free markets enable societies to generate so much income that we can enjoy better lives in exchange for far less […]
[…] warm and fuzzy feelings for “capitalism” turn sour when someone promotes a modified version such as […]
[…] warm and fuzzy feelings for “capitalism” turn sour when someone promotes a modified version such as […]
[…] warm and fuzzy feelings for “capitalism” turn sour when someone promotes a modified version such as […]
[…] On a related note, I have a five-part series (Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV, and Part V) on “The Case for […]
[…] On a related note, I have a five-part series (Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV, and Part V) on “The Case for […]
[…] good news is that capitalism began to emerge a couple of hundred years. The parts of the world that adopted free enterprise […]
[…] good news is that capitalism began to emerge a couple of hundred years. The parts of the world that adopted free enterprise […]
[…] have shared five videos (Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV, and Part V) that make the case for […]
[…] have shared five videos (Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV, and Part V) that make the case for […]
[…] On a related note, I have a five-part series (Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV, and Part V) on “The Case for […]
[…] On a related note, I have a five-part series (Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV, and Part V) on “The Case for […]
[…] On a related note, I have a five-part series (Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV, and Part V) on “The Case for […]
[…] On a related note, I have a five-part series (Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV, and Part V) on “The Case for […]
[…] this was a boxing match between capitalism and socialism, the refs would have stopped the fight several decades […]
[…] is almost always the right […]
[…] made the case for capitalism (Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV, and Part V) and the case against socialism (Part I, Part II, and Part III), while also noting that […]
[…] I’ve repeatedly pointed out, capitalism (oops, I mean free enterprise) is far superior than the various forms of […]
[…] Part V […]
[…] Part V […]
[…] people say the key feature of capitalism is competition. Hard to argue with that characterization, but I would go one step further and say […]
[…] note, I have a five-part series (Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV, and Part V) on “The Case for […]
[…] The bottom line, as I said to conclude the video, is that, “No other system, anywhere in the world, has ever come close to capitalism’s ability to generate mass prosperity.” […]
[…] The bottom line, as I said to conclude the video, is that, “No other system, anywhere in the world, has ever come close to capitalism’s ability to generate mass prosperity.” […]
[…] The bottom line, as I said to conclude the video, is that, “No other system, anywhere in the world, has ever come close to capitalism’s ability to generate mass prosperity.” […]
[…] On a related note, I have a five-part series (Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV, and Part V) on “The Case for […]
[…] On a related note, I have a five-part series (Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV, and Part V) on “The Case for […]
Reblogged this on boudica.us.
Excellent video! But I think most socialists will claim it’s beside the point. They don’t really care if we are richer or not as long as we’re unequal. Their goal is equality of income/wealth, not more wealth. Most of them think we’re too rich anyway!
[…] Source: The Case for Capitalism, Part V | International Liberty […]