Part I of this series featured Dan Hannan explaining how the emergence of capitalism led to mass prosperity, while Part II featured Madeline Grant explaining how competition and cooperation make markets so successful.
Today, in Part III, Andy Puzder compares capitalism with socialism.
The core theoretical argument in the video is that capitalism is based on serving the needs of consumers.
As captured by one of my favorite quotes from Professor Walter Williams, you only make yourself better off in a free market system by serving others.
In a socialist system, by contrast, the only people who get rich are the government elites who plunder the people.
I also like that the video explains that Nordic nations are not socialist. As I’ve also pointed out, there’s no government ownership, central planning, and price controls in nations such as Sweden and Denmark.
Those countries do have higher tax burdens and more costly welfare states, which is the main reason they generally rank below the United States in measures of national economic liberty.
More important, the larger fiscal burden in Scandinavia help to explain why Americans enjoy higher living standards.
Indeed, my one complaint about the above video is that it didn’t show any of the data about relative levels of prosperity.
Yes, I want people to understand that Nordic nations have market-based economies, but I also want them to understand that those countries could be significantly more prosperous with less-onerous fiscal policy.
The most powerful data in that regards comes from a Swedish researcher who put together data showing that Americans of Scandinavian descent are much richer than their counterparts who are still in Scandinavia.
So the moral of the story is not only that capitalism is better than socialism, but also that capitalist nations with medium-sized governments do better than capitalist nations with large-sized governments.
P.S. Needless to say, capitalist jurisdictions with small-sized government do best of all.
[…] have a multi-part series making the case for capitalism (Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV, Part V, and Part VI), and I’ve shared lots of long-run datashowing how some […]
[…] have a multi-part series making the case for capitalism (Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV, Part V, and Part VI), and I’ve shared lots of long-run data showing how some […]
[…] On a related note, I have a five-part series (Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV, and Part V) on “The Case for […]
[…] On a related note, I have a five-part series (Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV, and Part V) on “The Case for […]
[…] have shared five videos (Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV, and Part V) that make the case for […]
[…] have shared five videos (Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV, and Part V) that make the case for […]
[…] other words, three cheers for […]
[…] other words, three cheers for […]
[…] On a related note, I have a five-part series (Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV, and Part V) on “The Case for […]
[…] On a related note, I have a five-part series (Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV, and Part V) on “The Case for […]
[…] On a related note, I have a five-part series (Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV, and Part V) on “The Case for […]
[…] On a related note, I have a five-part series (Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV, and Part V) on “The Case for […]
[…] made the case for capitalism (Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV, and Part V) and the case against socialism (Part I, Part II, and Part III), while also […]
[…] markets aren’t just superior at producing mass prosperity. Or at reducing mass poverty (the normal state of human […]
[…] Because here’s a look at what capitalism actually delivers. […]
[…] Part III […]
[…] Part III […]
[…] On a related note, I have a five-part series (Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV, and Part V) on “The Case for […]
[…] On a related note, I have a five-part series (Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV, and Part V) on “The Case for […]
[…] On a related note, I have a five-part series (Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV, and Part V) on “The Case for […]
[…] Because here’s a look at what capitalism actually delivers. […]
Reblogged this on boudica.us.
[…] Here are Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV of the […]
[…] so long as there’s an economic environment that gives both of us a chance to prosper based on how much value we are providing to […]
[…] Because here’s a look at what capitalism actually delivers. […]
[…] Because here’s a look at what capitalism actually delivers. […]
[…] editions of the case for capitalism (Part I, Part II, and Part III) have focused on big-picture analyses of markets vs statism. Today, let’s look at a specific […]
[…] other words, it’s good when people become rich by providing the rest of us with goods and services we value, but it’s not good for them to get rich by climbing into bed with […]
[…] other words, it’s good when people become rich by providing the rest of us with goods and services we value, but it’s not good for them to get rich by climbing into bed with […]
[…] other words, it’s good when people become rich by providing the rest of us with goods and services we value, but it’s not good for them to get rich by climbing into bed with […]
[…] other words, it’s good when people become rich by providing the rest of us with goods and services we value, but it’s not good for them to get rich by climbing into bed with […]
[…] United States is much richer than other countries in large part because we haven’t replicated their mistakes. So why start […]
[…] won’t bother with another chart, but I also invite readers to peruse the OECD’s AIC data, which shows the average person in the United States being way ahead of the average person in […]
Reblogged this on Boudica BPI Weblog.