I’ve repeatedly argued that faster growth is the only effective way of helping the less fortunate.
Class warfare and redistribution, by contrast, are not effective. Such policies are based on the fallacy that the economy is a fixed pie, and proponents of this view fixate on inequality because they mistakenly believe that additional income for the rich means less income for the poor.
Today, let’s look at some numbers that prove that a fixation on inequality is misguided. The Census Bureau this week released its annual report on Income and Poverty in the United States. That publication includes data (Table A-2) showing annual inflation-adjusted earnings by income quintile between 1967-2017.
To see if my left-leaning friends are right about the rich getting richer at the expense of the poor, I calculated the annual percent change for each quintile. Lo and behold, the data actually show that there’s a very clear pattern showing how all income quintiles tend to rise and fall together.
The lesson from this data is clear. If you want policies that help the poor, those also will be policies that help the middle class and rich.
And if you hate the rich, you need to realize that policies hurting them will almost certainly hurt the less fortunate as well.
One other lesson is that all income quintiles did particularly well during the 1980s and 1990s when free-market policies prevailed.
P.S. Many people (including on the left) have pointed out that the Census Bureau’s numbers under-count compensation because fringe benefits such as healthcare are excluded. This is a very legitimate complaint, but it doesn’t change the fact that all income quintiles tend to rise and fall together. For what it’s worth, adding other forms of compensation would boost lower quintiles compared to higher quintiles.
P.P.S. Here’s an interesting video from Pew Research showing how the middle class has become more prosperous over the past few decades.
P.P.P.S. The Census Bureau’s report also has the latest data on poverty. The good news is that the poverty rate fell. The bad news is that long-run progress ground to a halt once the federal government launched the ill-fated War on Poverty.
[…] suspect, however, that he was most hurt by falling levels of real income. And when I write “real income,”I’m referring to income after adjusting for […]
[…] suspect, however, that he was most hurt by falling levels of real income. And when I write “real income,”I’m referring to income after adjusting for […]
[…] suspect, however, that he was most hurt by falling levels of real income. And when I write “real income,” I’m referring to income after adjusting for […]
[…] shown by U.S. Census Bureau data, there’s a strong correlation between rising income and falling income […]
[…] shown by U.S. Census Bureau data, there’s a strong correlation between rising income and falling […]
[…] And there’s also lots of data showing how average incomes can rise over time and how all segments of society tend to rise together. […]
[…] And there’s also lots of data showing how average incomes can rise over time and how all segments of society tend to rise together. […]
[…] We are much richer, on average, than we were 50 years ago. This is a point I made both in June and September, and it’s worth adding that the all income groups tend to rise together. […]
[…] We are much richer, on average, than we were 50 years ago. This is a point I made both in June and September, and it’s worth adding that the all income groups tend to rise together. […]
[…] the way, when you break down the data by quintiles, as I did back in 2018, you find that a big overlap in the economic well-being of all income […]
[…] that the poor, middle class, and rich can all simultaneously enjoy rising incomes, click here, here, and here for […]
[…] all groups in a society to become richer if the economic pie expands. I’ve shown this with U.S. data and I’ve shown it with global […]
[…] from the Census Bureau shows that all income groups tend to rise and fall […]
[…] from the Census Bureau shows that all income groups tend to rise and fall […]
[…] from the Census Bureau shows that all income groups tend to rise and fall […]
[…] from the Census Bureau shows that all income groups tend to rise and fall […]
[…] bottom line is that market-driven growth is good for everyone, especially the […]
[…] bottom line is that market-driven growth is good for everyone, especially the […]
[…] of course, that they want poor people to climb the economic ladder to […]
[…] que un ingreso adicional para los ricos significa menos ingresos para los pobres.” Dan Mitchell. One Image that Underscores Why Growth Is the Most Effective Way to Help the Poor. Sept. […]
[…] of course, that they want poor people to climb the economic ladder to […]
[…] los años ochenta y noventa, cuando prevalecieron las políticas de libre mercado. Dan Mitchell. One Image that Underscores Why Growth Is the Most Effective Way to Help the Poor. Sept. […]
[…] los años ochenta y noventa, cuando prevalecieron las políticas de libre mercado. Dan Mitchell. One Image that Underscores Why Growth Is the Most Effective Way to Help the Poor. Sept. […]
[…] resist making a silly assertion that growth isn’t part of the solution (she’s obviously not familiar with Census Bureau […]
[…] stated, the former approach is a recipe for making everyone more prosperous, while the latter approach means everyone fights for bigger slices of a shrinking […]
[…] shouldn’t be a surprise. I’ve shared lots of evidence (over and over and over again) showing that market-driven growth is the best way of helping low-income […]
Reblogged this on Langeweile in Rödermark.
[…] this position is certainly supported by the historical data. We are much richer than 50 years ago and 100 years […]
[…] rising tide can lift all boats, which is why I write so often about growth in general and comparative growth between nations in […]
[…] they believe it is wrong to have significant income disparities. Especially if they’ve been snookered into thinking that the rich are getting richer at the expense of the […]
[…] My left-leaning friends sometimes look at this data and complain that the rich are paying more of the tax burden only because they have grabbed a larger share of national income. And this means we should impose punitive tax rates. […]
[…] Economic growth, by contrast, truly is the rising tide that lifts all boats. […]
[…] other words, a rising tide lifts all boats (just as in the U.S.), but the bottom quintile is enjoying the biggest […]
[…] By contrast, I strongly suspect the average lower-income person is far more interested in more prosperity for their family and far less concerned about the prosperity of the rich family on the other side of town. They presumably are unaware of the powerful Chinese data on poverty reduction and inequality, but they instinctively understand that a rising tide lifts all boats. […]
[…] think growth is far more important, especially for poor people, which is what I said (using the amazing data from China) in a recent […]
[…] think growth is far more important, especially for poor people, which is what I said (using the amazing data from China) in a recent […]
[…] This is an encouraging development. My support for pro-market policies is partly driven by philosophy (freedom to engage in voluntary exchange, etc), but also motivated by a desire to help people become more prosperous. […]
[…] Click here to go to the original source of this article […]
[…] Source of original article […]
[…] Dan Mitchell, our man in DC with current US data to demonstrate that all boats rise and fall together. […]