A few days ago, I shared some slides from a presentation to an e-symposium organized by Trends Research in Abu Dhabi.
Here’s a video of my presentation, which includes 16 visuals to drive home the point that the world is facing a demographic/entitlement crisis.
Today, I want to share five more visuals to underscore the severity and magnitude of this catastrophe.
But before we look at the charts, I’ll start by saying this isn’t a fast-developing problem. It’s taken several decades to get where we are now and most nations probably have several decades before an actual crisis materializes.
Though what’s already happened in Greece (and what’s presumably about to happen in Italy) should underscore the seriousness of this issue.
This issue is global, as illustrated by this chart showing the staggering shift that will happen to the world’s population. Simply stated, there are going to be lots and lots of old people, but no concomitant increase in the number of children.
It’s not just that there’s not a corresponding increase in the number of children.
The real story is that birthrates are plummeting.
The data for Europe is particularly sobering.
Here’s a look at some other nations that face big fertility declines.
By the way, there’s absolutely nothing wrong with families deciding they want fewer children.
But it does create a big fiscal problem because governments have tax-and-transfer entitlement programs that were created when everyone thought there would always be ever-larger generations.
But that’s not happening now, which explains why the world is going from eight workers per retiree to four workers per retiree.
That’s the global data. For many developed regions, such as Europe, the situation is far more challenging.
And the United States isn’t far behind.
I’ll close by observing that there’s actually a very simple solution to this problem. We need genuine entitlement reform.
Sadly, that definitely didn’t happen in the past four years in the United States. And it also won’t be happening in the next four years.
P.S. Hong Kong and Singapore have very low birth rates and very long lifespans, but those jurisdictions are in reasonably good shape because they didn’t make the mistake of imposing western-style welfare states.
P.P.S. Some have argued that the demographic problem can be solved by having government-created incentives for fertility. At the risk of understatement, I’m skeptical of that approach.
[…] first, I wasn’t planning to share this video, particularly since I covered much of the same material in a speech back in […]
[…] first, I wasn’t planning to share this video, particularly since I covered much of the same material in a speech back in […]
[…] P.P.P.S. You can read my two-part series on this topic here and here. […]
[…] of demographic change and poorly designed entitlement programs, we’re already on a path to become a European welfare […]
[…] because of demographic change and poorly designed entitlement programs, we’re already on a path to become a European welfare […]
[…] stated, tax-and-transfer programs collapse when there are too many beneficiaries and too few […]
[…] P.P.P.S. You can read my two-part series on this topic here and here. […]
[…] P.P.P.S. You can read my two-part series on this topic here and here. […]
[…] P.P.P.S. You can read my two-part series on this topic here and here. […]
[…] P.P.P.S. You can read my two-part series on this topic here and here. […]
[…] P.P.P.S. You can read my two-part series on this topic here and here. […]
What nations desires to import all those highly skilled Yemenis, Burmese, Haitians that Mr. Wright’s lobotomy tells him is the case. As unemployment rises the need for immigration grows? In a high tech society immigrants are an asset? Maybe in some leftist lala land but I haven’t found Somalis, Chadians, Bolivians, Pakis to be a real benefit to my business. No doubt Wright employs hundreds. LOL.
Ask Sweden, Germany, France about immigration and why they wish to force others to take these desirable masses rather than them.
Reblogged this on boudica.us.
A solution to the problem that Dan didn’t mention is immigration. Developed nations are going to compete for working age immigrants in order to prop up their old age pension systems.
One quibble: how does changing infant and maternal mortality affect all this?
One question: this has been obvious for 50 yrs (+/-). No one seems to be able to acquire the political capital to change things. Why?
John Schedler | 206-550-9831
Advancing technology has and probably will continue to save the day, just as it has for the past century, even in the face of rampant government profligacy. Any reason why not? This is not to say that government profligacy is acceptable.
COVID to the rescue! Sayonara, senior citizens!