I’ve had ample reason to praise Hong Kong’s economic policy.
Most recently, it was ranked (once again) as the world’s freest economy.
And I’ve shown that this makes a difference by comparing Hong Kong’s economic performance to the comparatively lackluster (or weak) performance of economies in the United States, Argentina, and France.
But perhaps the most encouraging thing about Hong Kong is that the nation’s top officials genuinely seem to understand the importance of small government.
Here are some excerpts from a recent speech delivered by Hong Kong’s Financial Secretary. He brags about small government and low tax rates!
Hong Kong has a simple tax system built on low tax rates. Our maximum salaries tax rate is 15 per cent and the profits tax rate a flat 16.5 per cent. Few companies and individuals would find it worth the risk to evade taxes at this low level. And that helps keep our compliance and enforcement costs low. Keeping our government small is at the heart of our fiscal principles. Leaving most of the community’s income and wealth in the hands of individuals and businesses gives the private sector greater flexibility and efficiency in making investment decisions and optimises the returns for the community. This helps to foster a business environment conducive to growth and competitiveness. It also encourages productivity and labour participation. Our annual recurrent government expenditure has remained steady over the past five years, at 13 per cent of GDP. …we have not responded irresponsibly to…populist calls by introducing social policies that increase government spending disproportionally. …The fact that our total government expenditure on social welfare has remained at less than 3 per cent of our GDP over the past five years speaks volumes about the precision, as well as the effectiveness, of these measures.
And he specifically mentions the importance of controlling the growth of government, which is the core message of Mitchell’s Golden Rule.
Our commitment to small government demands strong fiscal discipline….It is my responsibility to keep expenditure growth commensurate with growth in our GDP.
Is that just empty rhetoric?
Hardly. Here’s Article 107 from the Basic Law, which is “the constitutional document” for Hong Kong
The most important part of Article 107, needless to say, is that part of keeping budgetary growth “commensurate with the growth rate of its gross domestic product.”
The folks in Hong Kong don’t want to wind up like Europe.
Last year, I set up a Working Group on Long-term Fiscal Planning to conduct a fiscal sustainability health check. We did it because we are keenly aware of Hong Kong’s low fertility rate and ageing population, not unlike many advanced economies. And that can pose challenges to public finance in the longer term. A series of expenditure-control measures, including a 2 per cent efficiency enhancement over the next three financial years, has been rolled out.
And, speaking of Europe, he says the statist governments from that continent should clean up their own messes before criticizing Hong Kong for being responsible.
I would hope that some of those governments in Europe, those that have accused Hong Kong of being a tax haven, would look at the way they conduct their own fiscal policies. I believe they could learn a lesson from us about the virtues of small government.
Just in case you think this speech is somehow an anomaly, let’s now look at some slides from a separate presentation by different Hong Kong officials.
Here’s one that warmed my heart. The Hong Kong official is bragging about the low-tax regime, which features a flat tax of 15 percent!
But what’s even more impressive is that Hong Kong has a very small burden of government spending.
And government officials brag about small government.
By the way, you’ll also notice that there’s virtually no red ink in Hong Kong, largely because the government focuses on controlling the disease of excessive spending.
Why is government small?
In large part, as you see from the next slide, because there is almost no redistribution spending.
Indeed, officials actually brag that fewer and fewer people are riding in the wagon of dependency.
Can you imagine American lawmakers with this kind of good sense?
None of this means that Hong Kong doesn’t have any challenges.
There are protests about a lack of democracy. There’s an aging population. And there’s the uncertainty of China.
But at least for now, Hong Kong is a tribute to the success of free markets and small government.





[…] Reposted from International Liberty […]
My daughter is studying in Hong Kong this semester. She raves about the positive attitude of the people and visitors and the dynamism of the economy.
I think she would be even more positive, if it weren’t for the student protests.
My own view is that current government is so small, the damage that can be done by any single politician is also small, unless he tries to reverse course and go for bigger government.
@nedlandp – I agree with you almost entirely.
I obviously don’t appreciate corrupt politicians, but the protests in HK risk provoking China into taking action that would see the political and economic settlement dramatically altered for the worse.
This should also serve as a warning to those in HK who are able to exert influence in the SAR’s administration. If the HK CEO is acting in a way that could eventually lead to intervention from Beijing, it would be in their own interests to have him quietly deposed, buying him off if necessary, and to watch for similar corruption in future office holders.
Small countries have little inertia. The effects of good/bad policy, especially those policies affecting growth, make their impact known immediately. Hence small jurisdictions have higher pressures to be realistic.
These jurisdictions cannot sell the cool aid that trimming the rewards of the exceptional to insulate the less competent from the consequences of mediocrity is the way to growth — and thus systemic compounding prosperity.
This is why most prosperous countries are small, with America the first notable exception (more on that later).
Many foreign travelers to HK in the ’80s lamented how very few HK citizens had money while the rest of the population was only given a thin glimmer of hope to hope on and console them in their poverty. Well, guess what? Abstaining from redistribution lead to great growth. And the glimmer of hope has now shone on virtually everyone in HK.
But HK’s threat comes from the north. While Chinese leaders have made great comparative strides towards a freer economy (and are now reaping the huge growth benefits), China remains a country with sub-par freedom. Fast growing and free HK must not be sitting well with Chinese leaders.
Under the superficial condemnation, OECD and the other high tax nation cartels will probably celebrate, were China to squash HK.
This is a big problem Singapore does not have, or at least is more remote.
But even if China destroys HK, economic freedom will not die. The evolutional, Darwinian, pressure of laissez faire policies that foster motivation and high growth is too great to squelch. Others will pick up the baton. However, the mere law of probabilities makes it unlikely that it will be America.
America had been a notable exception to the small-prosperous correlation. But America’s serendipitous fortune went unappreciated, and its citizens, like many electorates past and gone, finally drank the cool aid of prosperity through flatter effort-reward curves. There is no escape from these choices. The vicious cycle will intensify with small lulls of short lived hope. See Europe. Europe is America’s destiny, but America has come too far on this road to turn around — even if the sound of the waterfall starts now been heard.
[…] Mitchell wrote an interesting article about how Hong Kong has been able to avoid following most of the 1st world in the path to fiscal […]
[…] If you want to see far more striking examples of Chinese people being successful, check out Hong Kong and […]
[…] If you want to see far more striking examples of Chinese people being successful, check out Hong Kong and […]
[…] Not that we should be surprised. After all, the rich nations of the western world all became prosperous back in the 1800s and early 1900s when the burden of government was tiny, smaller even than the public sector in Hong Kong today. […]
[…] The key lesson isn’t that spending restraint is good, though that obviously is important. The most important takeaway is that spending restraint appears to be sustainable only if there is some sort of permanent external constraint on politicians. Like the debt brake. Or like Article 107 of Hong Kong’s Basic Law. […]
[…] The key lesson isn’t that spending restraint is good, though that obviously is important. The most important takeaway is that spending restraint appears to be sustainable only if there is some sort of permanent external constraint on politicians. Like the debt brake. Or like Article 107 of Hong Kong’s Basic Law. […]
[…] makes sense. There are still a few places in the world – such as Switzerland, Cayman, Hong Kong, Bermuda, etc – where the political class actually understands it is good to have wealth […]
[…] should mimic Hong Kong and Singapore, not France and […]
[…] Hong Kong and Singapore have been role models for economic liberty for several decades, so it’s no surprise that their living standards have enjoyed the most impressive increase. […]
[…] but I’ve always liked his reasoning. When I look at a jurisdiction such as Hong Kong, with a relatively small and honest government, I think of taxes as an unfortunate but acceptable price to pay. But when I think of nations with […]
[…] understand that an economy will grow much faster if the burden of government is constrained (think Hong Kong or […]
[…] very well, policies that explicitly restrain spending work very well. The data from Switzerland, Hong Kong, and Colorado is particularly […]
[…] speaker was Clement Leung, Hong Kong’s Commissioner to the United States. He talked about Article 107 and other rules from Hong Kong’s Basic Law (their constitution) that limit the temptation to over-tax and […]
[…] speaker was Clement Leung, Hong Kong’s Commissioner to the United States. He talked about Article 107 and other rules from Hong Kong’s Basic Law (their constitution) that limit the temptation to over-tax and […]
[…] second speaker was Clement Leung, Hong Kong’s Commissioner to the United States. He talked about Article 107 and other rules from Hong Kong’s Basic Law (their constitution) that limit the temptation to over-tax and […]
[…] speaker was Clement Leung, Hong Kong’s Commissioner to the United States. He talked about Article 107 and other rules from Hong Kong’s Basic Law (their constitution) that limit the temptation to over-tax and […]
[…] jurisdictions such as Hong Kong and Singapore, there may be a significant amount of income inequality simply because some people […]
[…] jurisdictions such as Hong Kong and Singapore, there may be a significant amount of income inequality simply because some people […]
[…] Perhaps most important, why assume that faster income growth for the bottom 20 percent automatically means there should be more redistribution through the tax and transfer system? Maybe that income growth is the natural – and desirable – outcome of good Hong Kong-type policies? […]
[…] fully agree with this final point. Just like it’s good to have positive examples (think Hong Kong, Switzerland, Texas, or Singapore), it’s also good to have bad examples (such as France, […]
[…] for the developing world? Looking at the incredible economic rise of jurisdictions such as Hong Kong and Singapore, it’s easy to answer that question. Simply put in place the rule of law, […]
[…] at the incredible economic rise of jurisdictions such as Hong Kong and Singapore, it’s easy to answer that question. Simply put in place the rule of law, […]
[…] routinely is ranked as being the world’s freest economy, and its fiscal policy is a role model for spending […]
[…] at the incredible economic rise of jurisdictions such as Hong Kong andSingapore, it’s easy to answer that question. Simply put in place the rule of law, accompanied […]
[…] any sort of miracle. Yes, it would be nice if Greece and other nations decided to become like Hong Kong and Singapore, high-growth economies thanks to small government and […]
[…] any sort of miracle. Yes, it would be nice if Greece and other nations decided to become like Hong Kong and Singapore, high-growth economies thanks to small government and […]
[…] era, China is still way behind the United States and other nations with more capitalistic systems. Hong Kong, Singapore, and Taiwan are appropriate role […]
[…] stated, the close you get to a Hong Kong-style flat tax, the closer you get to robust Hong Kong-type growth […]
[…] stated, the close you get to a Hong Kong-style flat tax, the closer you get to robust Hong Kong-type growth […]
[…] the United States now has dropped to #16. Here are the new rankings (based on a 0-10 scale), with Hong Kong and Singapore once again leading the […]
[…] the United States now has dropped to #16. Here are the new rankings (based on a 0-10 scale), with Hong Kong and Singapore once again leading the […]
[…] that I created. It’s designed to show that there are no pure libertarian paradises, not even Hong Kong. And there are no pure statist dystopias, not even North Korea (though that despotic regime is as […]
[…] that I created. It’s designed to show that there are no pure libertarian paradises, not even Hong Kong. And there are no pure statist dystopias, not even North Korea (though that despotic regime is as […]
[…] stated, the United States should not be more like Europe. Instead, we should seek to be more like Hong Kong and […]
[…] a medium-sized government, they are highly productive (so just imagine what they could achieve in Hong Kong or […]
[…] because America is a hyper-free market jurisdiction like Hong Kong or Singapore. Instead, the U.S. does better simply because European nations deviate even further […]
[…] the bad news is that we have more of these policies than Hong Kong and […]
[…] advising nations in the region to copy France and Italy instead of seeking to be more like Hong Kong and […]
[…] advising nations in the region to copy France and Italy instead of seeking to be more like Hong Kong and […]
[…] said, while it’s much better to be Sweden rather than Greece, I obviously would prefer to be Hong Kong (or, even better, pre-1913 […]
[…] while Goldilocks always liked the middle option, I obviously think we should be more like Hong Kong and […]
[…] But the comparatively low levels of tax are not because of a Hong Kong-type commitment to limited government. […]
[…] But the comparatively low levels of tax are not because of a Hong Kong-type commitment to limited government. […]
[…] But the comparatively low levels of tax are not because of a Hong Kong-type commitment to limited government. […]
[…] is destiny. At least in most advanced nations. The exceptions are jurisdictions such as Hong Kong and Singapore. By the way, both have aging populations and extremely low birthrates (Singapore in […]
[…] But the comparatively low levels of tax revenue are not because of a Hong Kong-type commitment to limited government. […]
[…] But the comparatively low levels of tax revenue are not because of a Hong Kong-type commitment to limited government. […]
[…] one might predict, Hong Kong once again ranks as the jurisdiction with the most liberty to engage in mutually beneficial […]
[…] one might predict, Hong Kong once again ranks as the jurisdiction with the most liberty to engage in mutually beneficial […]
[…] one might predict, Hong Kong once again ranks as the jurisdiction with the most liberty to engage in mutually beneficial […]
[…] rather have the benign tax system of Hong Kong instead of the punitive tax system of France. Now let’s look at a real-world (though very […]
[…] rather have the benign tax system of Hong Kong instead of the punitive tax system of France. Now let’s look at a real-world (though very […]
[…] one might predict, Hong Kong once again ranks as the jurisdiction with the most liberty to engage in mutually beneficial […]
[…] line is that poor people and middle-class people have much more opportunity and prosperity with a Hong Kong-style tax system instead of a punitive French-style tax […]
[…] worse than what you find in Europe, but I explained that this won’t cause a crisis because Hong Kong wisely has chosen not to adopt a welfare state. People basically save for their own […]
[…] is far worse than what you find in Europe, but I explained that this won’t cause a crisis because Hong Kong wisely has chosen not to adopt a welfare state. People basically save for their own […]
[…] One final comment. Long-run growth matters. Hong Kong and Singapore, for instance, used to be a poor jurisdictions. But free markets and small government […]
[…] Can you name, after all, another government in the world that brags about how little it spends on redistribution programs and how few people are dependent on government? […]
[…] Can you name, after all, another government in the world that brags about how little it spends on redistribution programs andhow few people are dependent on government? […]
[…] Can you name, after all, another government in the world that brags about how little it spends on redistribution programs andhow few people are dependent on government? […]
[…] that brags about how little it spends on redistribution programs and how few people are dependent on government? […]
[…] Can you name, after all, another government in the world that brags about how little it spends on redistribution programs andhow few people are dependent on government? […]
[…] would mean for economic liberty and American prosperity. Would the United States become more like Hong Kong, with a smaller burden of government and less intervention? Or more like France, with higher taxes […]
[…] would mean for economic liberty and American prosperity. Would the United States become more like Hong Kong, with a smaller burden of government and less intervention? Or more like France, with higher taxes […]
[…] would mean foreconomic liberty and American prosperity. Would the United States become more like Hong Kong, with a smaller burden of government and less intervention? Or more like France, with higher taxes […]
[…] same point seems appropriate when examining how people of Chinese origin earn very high incomes in Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan, and the United States (all places with reasonably high levels of economic […]
[…] seems like a Hobson’s choice for those of us who would prefer that America become more like Hong Kong or […]
[…] this seems like a Hobson’s choice for those of us who would prefer that America become more like Hong Kong or […]
[…] final comment. Long-run growth matters. Hong Kong and Singapore, for instance, used to be poor jurisdictions. But free markets and small government […]
[…] any good libertarian, I generally focus on the size of government. I compare France with Hong Kong and that tells me that big is bad and small is […]
[…] any good libertarian, I generally focus on the size of government. I compare France with Hong Kong and that tells me that big is bad and small is […]
[…] any good libertarian, I generally focus on the size of government. I compare France with Hong Kong and that tells me that big is bad and small is […]
[…] same point seems appropriate when examining how people of Chinese origin earn very high incomes in Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan, and the United States (all places with reasonably high levels of economic […]
[…] this seems like a Hobson’s choice for those of us who would prefer that America become more like Hong Kong or […]
[…] any good libertarian, I generally focus on the size of government. I compareFrance with Hong Kong and that tells me that big is bad and small is […]
[…] Sweden and Greece, for instance), but both well behind the pace setters for economic liberty, Hong Kong and […]
[…] Sweden and Greece, for instance), but both well behind the pace setters for economic liberty, Hong Kong and […]
[…] Kong has a simple tax system, an independent national tax policy, and lots of multinational companies and […]
[…] Kong has a simple tax system, an independent national tax policy, and lots of multinational companies and […]
[…] Kong has a simple tax system, an independent national tax policy, and lots of multinational companies and […]
[…] Can you name, after all, another government in the world that brags about how little it spends on redistribution programs andhow few people are dependent on government? […]
[…] good business tax system isn’t a fantasy. Jurisdictions such as Estonia and Hong Kong have business tax systems that are very close to the aforementioned ideal. And it goes without […]
[…] much prefer spending caps, such as those found in Hong Kong, Switzerland, and Colorado. If you cure the disease of excessive government, you automatically […]
[…] good business tax system isn’t a fantasy. Jurisdictions such as Estonia and Hong Kong have business tax systems that are very close to the aforementioned ideal. And it goes without […]
[…] There are two ways to deal with this problem. First, make the spending restraint part of a jurisdiction’s constitution, as we see in Switzerland and Hong Kong. […]
[…] There are two ways to deal with this problem. First, make the spending restraint part of a jurisdiction’s constitution, as we see in Switzerland and Hong Kong. […]
[…] Can you name, after all, another government in the world that brags about how little it spends on redistribution programs andhow few people are dependent on government? […]
[…] This is why the best long-run answer is some sort of constitutional spending cap, similar to what exists in Switzerland or Hong Kong. […]
[…] would mean foreconomic liberty and American prosperity. Would the United States become more like Hong Kong, with a smaller burden of government and less intervention? Or more like France, with higher taxes […]
[…] course, the real role models should be Hong Kong and Singapore since those jurisdictions have more economic liberty than even […]
[…] said fewer than 3 percent of Hong Kong residents get public assistance when I should have said that Hong Kong spends less than 3 percent of GDP on redistribution. That’s an amazingly small welfare state, but it does ensnare about 5.5 percent of the […]
[…] Today’s column is about Switzerland, but I can’t resist pointing out that Hong Kong and Singapore both score highly for rule of law and small government. And Chile deserves honorable […]
[…] dramatically improve China’s score from Economic Freedom of the World. And if China can ever climb as high as Hong Kong, then the sky’s the limit for growth and […]
[…] Can you name, after all, another government in the world that brags about how little it spends on redistribution programs andhow few people are dependent on government? […]
[…] nations unfortunately go with the latter approach (with place such as Estonia and Hong Kong being admirable exceptions). And that’s why, as Pierre and Fabio explain, the corporate […]
[…] Kong has been consistently superb, though it’s troubling that its score has weakened slightly since 2008. Singapore also has a […]
[…] and Greece) and compare them with the better performance of places with smaller government (such as Hong Kong, Switzerland, and […]
[…] and Greece) and compare them with the better performance of places with smaller government (such as Hong Kong, Switzerland, and […]
[…] So as I argued in the interview, let’s rip up the corrupt and destructive internal revenue code and copy the simple and fair flat tax that is used by Hong Kong. […]
[…] It would be even better to move to Monaco, Hong Kong, or the Cayman Islands, but those presumably aren’t very practical options for most of […]
[…] It would be even better to move to Monaco, Hong Kong, or the Cayman Islands, but those presumably aren’t very practical options for most of […]
[…] you’re wondering, Hong Kong was #1, as you might expect from a well-run jurisdiction with small government and a flat tax. Though I must say that it is rather disappointing that the Report doesn’t include rankings […]
[…] happened in Switzerland early last decade thanks to a voter referendum. And that’s what has been part of Hong Kong’s Basic Law since it was approved back in […]
[…] numbers for its member nations). Nonetheless, it would be great to somehow include places such as Hong Kong, Singapore, Bermuda, and the Cayman Islands (all of which punch way above their weight in the […]
[…] simple reason that lower spending and better tax policy is a win-win situation that would make us more like Hong Kong. And I certainly don’t mind going with a pure, stand-alone tax cut since it’s generally […]
[…] Will is skeptical of this approach, though I would point out that the one major developed economy that doesn’t have withholding is Hong Kong. And that’s a place that has successfully constrained government spending. […]
[…] even the top three jurisdictions (Hong Kong, Switzerland, and New Zealand), while very admirable compared to most other nations, still have too […]
[…] happy when Brazil changed its constitution to limit spending to the rate of inflation. Brazil joins Hong Kong and Switzerland in an elite club of jurisdictions with constitutional provisions that focus on the […]
[…] twice annually. So they are fully aware of the cost of government, which may explain why the fiscal burden of government is relatively low (it also helps that there is a constitutional spending […]
[…] twice annually. So they are fully aware of the cost of government, which may explain why the fiscal burden of government is relatively low (it also helps that there is a constitutional spending […]
[…] caveats don’t change the main conclusion, which is that the Russian flat tax works. Just as it works in Hong Kong. And just as it works in Jersey. It works wherever it is […]
[…] these caveats don’t change the main conclusion, which is that the Russian flat tax works. Just as it works in Hong Kong. And just as it works in Jersey. It works wherever it is […]
[…] wins the prize for the least-punitive tax regime, though it’s worth noting that Hong Kong easily would have the best system if it was included in the […]
[…] wins the prize for the least-punitive tax regime, though it’s worth noting that Hong Kong easily would have the best system if it was included in the […]
[…] wins the prize for the least-punitive tax regime, though it’s worth noting that Hong Kong easily would have the best system if it was included in the […]
[…] final comment. Long-run growth matters. Hong Kong and Singapore, for instance, used to be poor jurisdictions. But free markets and small government […]
[…] Kong has the policies – a spending cap, very little redistribution, open trade, private Social Security, etc – that China needs to become a rich […]
[…] If nations want faster growth and more prosperity, they need to mimic jurisdictions such as Hong Kong and […]
Reblogged this on Davi Lyra-Leite.
[…] when government was very small (about 10 percent of GDP, about one-half the size of the current Hong Kong and Singapore public […]
[…] the same thing is true in Hong Kong, another jurisdiction that is in good long-run shape even though the fertility rate is extremely […]
[…] the same thing is true in Hong Kong, another jurisdiction that is in good long-run shape even though the fertility rate is extremely […]
[…] as part of a nation’s constitution. Jurisdictions that have adopted this approach, such as Hong Kong and Switzerland, have very strong long-run fiscal performance rather than just temporary blips of […]
[…] I also want to ask why Mr. Kay to explain why the l0w-tax outposts of Hong Kong and Singapore ranked #1 and #2 for […]
[…] Hong Kong shows that eliminating withholding would create a political environment conducive to limited government. […]
[…] giving speeches, asking audiences whether poor people are better off in Hong Kong, which has only a tiny welfare state, or better off in nations such as France and Greece, which have bloated welfare states but very […]
[…] There’s a real-world example of a tax system where people actually write checks to the government and are much more aware of the cost of the public sector. It’s called Hong Kong, which is – not coincidentally – an economic success story in large part because of a good fiscal system. […]
[…] you limit yourself to modern data and think the growth-maximizing size of government, based on Hong Kong and Singapore, is 15 percent-20 percent of economic […]
[…] reform, particularly efforts to reduce the burden of government spending to the levels found in Hong Kong and […]
[…] If the Baltic countries want genuine convergence (or if they want to surpass Western Europe), that will require additional reform, particularly efforts to reduce the burden of government spending to the levels found in Hong Kong and Singapore. […]
[…] I’m not surprised to see Hong Kong as a role model. And I’ve already written about the U.K.’s success […]
[…] There’s a real-world example of a tax system where people actually write checks to the government and are much more aware of the cost of the public sector. It’s called Hong Kong, which is – not coincidentally – an economic success story in large part because of a good fiscal system. […]
[…] I added Hong Kong and Sweden to the matrix to show that balanced budgets are possible with small government or big […]
[…] I added Hong Kong and Sweden to the matrix to show that balanced budgets are possible with small government or big […]
[…] perguntando aos presentes se as pessoas pobres estão melhor em Hong Kong, onde há apenas um minúsculo Estado de bem-estar social , ou melhor em nações como a França e a Grécia , onde há inchados Estados de […]
[…] Hong Kong’s Remarkable Fiscal Policy […]
[…] making spending restraint part of the Constitution, an approach that has been very successful for Hong Kong and […]
[…] In other words, I certainly don’t mind if Swedish policy is the short-run goal for Greek voters. If they ever get to that point, then I’ll try to convince them to go the Full Hong Kong. […]
[…] But compared to Italy’s current tax regime, 23 percent will be like a Mediterranean version of Hong Kong. […]
[…] But compared to Italy’s current tax regime, 23 percent will be like a Mediterranean version of Hong Kong. […]
[…] But compared to Italy’s current tax regime, 23 percent will be like a Mediterranean version of Hong Kong. […]
[…] why I’m a big fan of the “debt brake” in Switzerland’s constitution and Article 107 in Hong Kong’s […]
[…] why I’m a big fan of the “debt brake” in Switzerland’s constitution and Article 107 in Hong Kong’s […]
[…] why I’m a big fan of the “debt brake” in Switzerland’s constitution and Article 107 in Hong Kong’s […]
[…] Hong Kong also has a spending […]
[…] this is damning with faint praise. Our tax system is very unfriendly if you compare it to Monaco, Hong Kong, or […]
[…] Combined with the state’s requirement for a balanced budget, this means Colorado has a de facto spending cap (similar to what exists in Switzerland and Hong Kong). […]
[…] eso soy una gran fan del “freno de la deuda” en la constitución de Suiza y el Artículo 107 en la constitución de Hong […]
[…] lesson is not that nations need perfect policy (even Hong Kong has some statism). Instead, the message is that governments should strive to increase economic […]
[…] lesson is not that nations need perfect policy (even Hong Kong has some statism). Instead, the message is that governments should strive to increase economic […]
[…] lesson is not that nations need perfect policy (even Hong Kong has some statism). Instead, the message is that governments should strive to increase economic […]
[…] Combinado con los requisitos estatales para un presupuesto equilibrado, esto significa que Colorado tiene de hecho un tope de gasto (similar a los que existen en Suiza y Hong Kong). […]
[…] of some sort of spending cap, preferably enshrined in a jurisdiction’s constitution like in Hong Kong and […]