The Census Bureau just released a report on America’s aging population.
The big takeaway is that our population will be getting much older between now and 2050.
And since I’m a baby boomer, I very much like the fact that we’re expected to live longer.
But as a public finance economist, I’m not nearly as happy.
As I explain in this interview with the Wall Street Journal’s Digital Network (and as confirmed by BIS, OECD, and IMF data), the United States is going to get deluged by a tsunami of entitlement spending.
I mentioned that it’s important to focus on the ratio of workers to retirees. This “dependency ratio” matters because economic output largely is a function of an economy’s working-age population.
To cite my famous cartoons, you need a sufficient number of people pulling the wagon to support those riding in the wagon.
Here’s a chart from the Census report to help you understand the magnitude of the problem. As you can see, both in the United States and other nations, the increase in the dependency ratio is almost entirely the result of aging populations.
This is why I said that we face a slow-motion train wreck because of poorly designed entitlement programs.
But the good news is that there is time to reform those programs and avert a crisis.
Which explains why I probably sound like a broken record about the need for genuine entitlement reform.
In a column citing the new private pension system in the Faroe Islands, I gave the arguments for modernizing Social Security with personal retirement accounts.
But we also need to deal with the health entitlements.
Here’s how to fix Medicare.
And here’s how to fix Medicaid.
By the way, some of the damaging provisions of Obamacare can be de facto repealed by including them in the Medicaid block grant, so it’s a critically important reform.
Needless to say, I think these reforms are far better for the economy than the big tax hike Obama has endorsed to deal with the giant financing gap.
P.S. For a clever look at the worker-dependency ratio, check out the party ship produced by a Danish think tank.
P.P.S. The interviewer also mentioned that America’s racial composition is changing, which gives me an excuse to point out that Social Security reform is particularly beneficial for blacks because of differences in life expectancy.
[…] like a broken record when it comes to entitlement spending. I’ve explained, ad nauseam, that programs such as […]
[…] However, that approach means America’s economy is weakened by an ever-growing burden of federal spending and eventually is plunged into fiscal crisis. […]
[…] However, that approach means America’s economy is weakened by an ever-growing burden of federal spending and eventually is plunged into fiscal crisis. […]
[…] If we also add the fiscal aggregates for other entitlement programs, it would be abundantly clear why we face a “crisis” and a “train wreck.” […]
[…] If we also add the fiscal aggregates for other entitlement programs, it would be abundantly clear why we face a “crisis” and a “train wreck.” […]
[…] like a broken record when it comes to entitlement spending. I’ve explained, ad nauseam, that programs such as […]
[…] Once again, the obvious and unambiguous takeaway is that domestic spending is the problem in general, with entitlements being the problem in particular. […]
[…] Once again, the obvious and unambiguous takeaway is that domestic spending is the problem in general, with entitlements being the problem in particular. […]
[…] like a broken record when it comes to entitlement spending. I’ve explained, ad nauseam, that programs such as […]
[…] like a broken record when it comes to entitlement spending. I’ve explained, ad nauseam, that programs such as […]
[…] like a broken record when it comes to entitlement spending. I’ve explained, ad nauseam, that programs such as […]
[…] like a broken record when it comes to entitlement spending. I’ve explained, ad nauseam, that programs such as […]
[…] like a broken record when it comes to entitlement spending. I’ve explained, ad nauseam, that programs such as […]
[…] like a broken record when it comes to entitlement spending. I’ve explained, ad nauseam, that programs such as […]
[…] like a broken record when it comes to entitlement spending. I’ve explained, ad nauseam, that programs such as […]
[…] 5. Entitlement programs are a slow-motion fiscal train wreck. […]
[…] 5. Entitlement programs are a slow-motion fiscal train wreck. […]
[…] Regardless of the best definition, the reason for my pessimism is simple. It’s a combination of changing demographics and poorly designed entitlement programs. […]
[…] that looming entitlement crisis explains why I also criticized a paid-leave proposal developed by AEI and the Urban […]
[…] that looming entitlement crisis explains why I also criticized a paid-leave proposal developed by AEI and the Urban […]
[…] sure when we’ll have a chance to address this simmering crisis. But if you’re wondering whether changes are necessary, check out this chart I put together earlier this year showing Social Security’s annual shortfall […]
[…] we’ll have a chance to address this simmering crisis. But if you’re wondering whether changes are necessary, check out this chart I put together earlier this year showing Social Security’s annual […]
[…] eu escrevo sobre programas sociais mal formulados , eu estou avisando sobre o futuro grego dos Estados Unidos . Falando claramente, nós […]
[…] For more on America’s built-in entitlement crisis, click here, here, here, and […]
[…] other words, our fiscal problems start with entitlements and end with […]
[…] other words, our fiscal problems start with entitlements and end with […]
[…] other words, our fiscal problems start with entitlements and end with […]
[…] that higher taxes are necessary and desirable. People like me will respond by explaining that the real problem is entitlements and that we need structural reform of programs such as Medicaid and Medicare. Moreover, I […]
[…] other words, our fiscal problems start with entitlements and end with […]
[…] that higher taxes are necessary and desirable. People like me will respond by explaining that the real problem is entitlements and that we need structural reform of programs such as Medicaid and Medicare. Moreover, I will […]
[…] agreement is bad news. That being said, the extra outlays are relatively trivial compared to the gigantic problem of ever-expanding entitlement […]
[…] Or we can stay with the current approach and become another Greece. […]
[…] to stumble along for decades without doing anything to reform entitlements (the programs that are causing our long-term fiscal […]
[…] to stumble along for decades without doing anything to reform entitlements (the programs that are causing our long-term fiscal […]
[…] And the long-run numbers were bad – and still are bad – because he chose to let the entitlement problem fester. But he was still better (less worse) than Bush I, Bush II, and […]
[…] And the long-run numbers were bad – and still are bad – because he chose to let the entitlement problem fester. But he was still better (less worse) than Bush I, Bush II, and […]
[…] And that’s a pretty good description of how I feel about the easy-to-predict, visible-to-the-naked-eye, baked-in-the-cake, bound-to-happen fiscal crisis that will occur because of the combination of demographic change and poorly designed entitlement programs. […]
[…] And that’s a pretty good description of how I feel about the easy-to-predict, visible-to-the-naked-eye, baked-in-the-cake, bound-to-happen fiscal crisis that will occur because of the combination of demographic change and poorly designed entitlement programs. […]
[…] And that’s a pretty good description of how I feel about the easy-to-predict, visible-to-the-naked-eye, baked-in-the-cake, bound-to-happen fiscal crisis that will occur because of the combination of demographic change and poorly designed entitlement programs. […]
[…] because of dramatic demographic changes, we are doomed to have a large-sized welfare state. At least that’s what will happen if we don’t reform entitlement […]
[…] Brian nails it. I made this same point earlier this year. Indeed, because the tax burden is projected to automatically increase over time, it is accurate to say that more than 100 percent of the long-run fiscal problem is caused by excessive spending (particularly poorly designed entitlement programs). […]
[…] the numbers are today, they are likely to get worse in the future because of demographic change and poorly designed entitlement programs. So unless we have genuine entitlement reform, we will become a failed welfare […]
[…] with questions about Donald Trump. It doesn’t matter whether my speech was about tax reform, entitlements, fiscal crisis, or tax competition, most people wanted to know what I think about The […]
[…] The good news is that we don’t have central planning in the United States. As such, we’re not in any danger of complete economic breakdown because of government intervention (our long-run danger is instead the result of a metastasizing welfare state). […]
[…] lawmakers won’t put the brakes on spending. And it’s not just that I fear they won’t enact much-needed entitlement reform. I worry they’ll actually increase the burden of federal spending. Just look what’s happening […]
[…] still don’t know what he’ll do on issues such as the entitlement crisis, the border-adjustable tax, infrastructure, and red […]
[…] won’t put the brakes on spending. And it’s not just that I fear they won’t enact much-needed entitlement reform. I worry they’ll actually increase the burden of federal spending. Just look what’s […]
[…] I write about poorly designed entitlement programs, I will warn about America’s Greek future. Simply stated, we will suffer the same chaos and […]
[…] I write about poorly designed entitlement programs, I will warn about America’s Greek future. Simply stated, we will suffer the same chaos and […]
[…] I sometimes feel like a broken record about entitlement programs. How many times, after all, can I point out that America is on a path to become a decrepit European-style welfare state because of a combination of demographic changes and poorly designed entitlement programs? […]
[…] I sometimes feel like a broken record about entitlement programs. How many times, after all, can I point out that America is on a path to become a decrepit European-style welfare state because of a combination of demographic changes and poorly designed entitlement programs? […]
[…] A few programs are targeted for cuts, to be sure, but I explained last week, that “taxpayers won’t reap the benefits since those savings will be spent elsewhere, mostly for a bigger Pentagon budget.” More worrisome, I also pointed out that his budget proposal is “silent on the very important issues of tax reform and entitlement reform.” […]
[…] A few programs are targeted for cuts, to be sure, but I explained last week, that “taxpayers won’t reap the benefits since those savings will be spent elsewhere, mostly for a bigger Pentagon budget.” More worrisome, I also pointed out that his budget proposal is “silent on the very important issues of tax reform and entitlement reform.” […]
[…] Donald Trump’s Budget Blueprint doesn’t thrill me, largely because it’s silent on the very important issues of tax reform and entitlement reform. […]
[…] the way, the “two cheers” in the title may be a bit too generous. After all, there should be full reform of Medicare and Medicaid. Though I suppose some of that can happen (at least Medicaid, hopefully) as part of the regular […]
[…] government won’t change. He’s kicking the can down the road on entitlements, which is obviously disappointing for people who can add and subtract. He does cut some domestic programs, but taxpayers won’t […]
[…] the “two cheers” in the title may be a bit too generous. After all, there should be full reform of Medicare and Medicaid. Though I suppose some of that can happen (at least Medicaid, hopefully) as part of the regular […]
[…] there be a plan to address the entitlement crisis? I alternate between complete pessimism and mild […]
[…] I warn about the fiscal and economic consequences of America’s poorly designed entitlement programs (as well as the impact of demographic changes), […]
[…] I warn about the fiscal and economic consequences of America’s poorly designed entitlement programs (as well as the impact [READ MORE […]
[…] I warn about the fiscal and economic consequences of America’s poorly designed entitlement programs (as well as the impact of demographic […]
[…] I warn about the fiscal and economic consequences of America’s poorly designed entitlement programs (as well as the impact of demographic […]
[…] I warn about the fiscal and economic consequences of America’s poorly designed entitlement programs (as well as the impact of demographic […]
[…] I warn about the fiscal and economic consequences of America’s poorly designed entitlement programs (as well as the impact of demographic […]
[…] I warn about the fiscal and economic consequences of America’s poorly designed entitlement programs (as well as the impact of demographic […]
[…] I warn about the fiscal and economic consequences of America’s poorly designed entitlement programs (as well as the impact of demographic changes), […]
[…] I warn about the fiscal and economic consequences of America’s poorly designed entitlement programs (as well as the impact of demographic […]
[…] I warn about the fiscal and economic consequences of America’s poorly designed entitlement programs (as well as the impact of demographic […]
[…] I warn about the fiscal and economic consequences of America’s poorly designed entitlement programs (as well as the impact of demographic […]
[…] I warn about the fiscal and economic consequences of America’s poorly designed entitlement programs (as well as the […]
[…] I warn about the fiscal and economic consequences of America’s poorly designed entitlement programs (as well as the impact of demographic […]
[…] I warn about the fiscal and economic consequences of America’s poorly designed entitlement programs (as well as the impact of demographic […]
[…] I warn about the fiscal and economic consequences of America’s poorly designed entitlement programs (as well as the impact of demographic changes), […]
[…] cylinder. …this looming shift in America’s population profile means massive amounts of red ink as the baby boom generation moves into full […]
[…] I warn about the fiscal and economic consequences of America’s poorly designed entitlement programs (as well as the impact of demographic […]
[…] Our population pyramid also is going to become a population cylinder. Not as fast, to be sure, but we’re still heading in the wrong direction. That means if we don’t reform our entitlement programs, it’s just a matter of time before we also have a fiscal crisis. […]
[…] explains why I think Medicaid reform should be the first priority when looking at how to fix the entitlements mess, even before Medicare reform and Social Security […]
[…] which explains why I think Medicaid reform should be the first priority when looking at how to fix the entitlements mess, even before Medicare reform and Social Security […]
[…] the future of the nation, I want a national discussion and debate about big issues such as the entitlement crisis and our insane tax […]
[…] For more information on the United States, here’s the breakdown of America’s score. As you can see, our worst category is “government size.” In other words, we tax too much and spend too much. […]
[…] Well, as I’ve already confessed, I don’t know what to expect. The biggest wild card, at least for fiscal policy, is whether he’ll be serious about the problem of government spending. Especially entitlements. […]
[…] Well, as I’ve already confessed, I don’t know what to expect. The biggest wild card, at least for fiscal policy, is whether he’ll be serious about the problem of government spending. Especially entitlements. […]
[…] cylinder. …this looming shift in America’s population profile means massive amounts of red ink as the baby boom generation moves into full […]
[…] world through green-eyeshade-colored lenses. But I don’t think it’s an exaggeration to say that expanding entitlements, changing demographics, and increasing dependency are the main long-run threats to the American […]
[…] Last month, I explained that America’s fiscal problems are almost entirely the result of domestic spending programs, particularly entitlements. […]
I agree with the top answer. Entitled to our Social Security that ONLY we paid by the FICA tax and our employers matched dollar for dollar as an insurance that it would be there with compounded interest from being invested by our government in trustworthy assets after paying for the current generation is NOT an Entitlement or Welfare Plan. It is insurance. LBJ moved this pot of gold into his general budget to make it LOOK balanced from his war chest from Nam.
Then the Democrats in Congress saw a Pot of Gold to spend any which way they pleased. Well they OWE the seniors a Hell of a lot of money plus interest.
Some of those years; interest rates were at 17% in this country. Compound all of them and then count those who died before collecting or right after…
that’s a lot of dough. And they were Democrats. They controlled Congress most of the time. They same ones sometimes who voted to take out $738 BILLION DOLLARS OF MEDICARE MONEY FOR OBAMACARE AND THE CREDITS GIVEN TO THOSE FOLKS AND UNDER 65. AND WHO DID THAT; THE DEMOCRATS AGAIN. well, SS and Medicare are not Entitlements they are the LAW to cover seniors. and we paid for them.
So I hope Trump realizes it and takes away the money out of their salaries to pay us all back.
[…] Last month, I explained that America’s fiscal problems are almost entirely the result of domestic spending programs, particularly entitlements. […]
[…] Last month, I explained that America’s fiscal problems are almost entirely the result of domestic spending programs, particularly entitlements. […]
It is not the entitlement that is hurting our budget. At this time if you check there is 2.7 Trillin dollar deficit in social security. Like Ibamacare. Obama borrowed 500,000,000 dollars out Medicare for the program. Other money being borrowed are for refugees illegal immigrants. This money has been coming out social security for years. The borrowing from social security by the president started way back in Johnson administration to pay for Vietnam. War. No accountability. It was taken out trust and put in General treasury fund by Ronald Regan. Every president been borrowing the money with no intentions of paying the debt back.
[…] Based on this preference for liberty and a desire to avoid government coercion, what’s the most libertarian nation in the world? Is it Australia, which I recommended as the best option for escaping Americans if the U.S. becomes a failed welfare state? […]
[…] Will Trump be too timid to deal with the huge entitlement problem? […]
[…] Based on this preference for liberty and a desire to avoid government coercion, what’s the most libertarian nation in the world? Is it Australia, which I recommended as the best option for escaping Americans if the U.S. becomes a failed welfare state? […]
[…] To the extent that Will is simply making a prediction about the likelihood of continued government expansion, I assume (and fear) he’s right. […]
[…] world through green-eyeshade-colored lenses. But I don’t think it’s an exaggeration to say that expanding entitlements, changing demographics, and increasing dependency are the main long-run threats to the American […]
[…] world through green-eyeshade-colored lenses. But I don’t think it’s an exaggeration to say that expanding entitlements, changing demographics, and increasing dependency are the main long-run threats to the American […]
[…] because of demographic changes and bad policy choices, outlays for entitlement are projected to become a much larger burden in the […]
[…] green-eyeshade-colored lenses. But I don’t think it’s an exaggeration to say that expanding entitlements, changing demographics, and increasing dependency are the main long-run threats to the American […]
[…] Donald Trump has been elected, one of my main goals will be to convince him and his team that it would be wrong to leave government spending on autopilot (and it would be even worse to spend more money and increase the burden of […]
[…] Donald Trump has been elected, one of my main goals will be to convince him and his team that it would be wrong to leave government spending on autopilot (and it would be even worse to spend more money and increase the burden of […]
[…] Donald Trump has been elected, one of my main goals will be to convince him and his team that it would be wrong to leave government spending on autopilot (and it would be even worse to spend more money and increase the burden of […]
[…] Donald Trump has been elected, one of my main goals will be to convince him and his team that it would be wrong to leave government spending on autopilot (and it would be even worse to spend more money and increase the burden of […]
[…] Donald Trump has been elected, one of my main goals will be to convince him and his team that it would be wrong to leave government spending on autopilot (and it would be even worse to spend more money and increase the burden of […]
[…] Donald Trump has been elected, one of my main goals will be to convince him and his team that it would be wrong to leave government spending on autopilot (and it would be even worse to spend more money and increase the burden of […]
[…] untouched. And if we wait another four – or eight – years to address the problem, the slow-motion train wreck may turn into an about-to-happen train wreck. Last but not least, what if Trump gets to the White […]
Aging population? Time to import a tsunami of Muslims! They’re turning Europe into a paradise!
[…] But as longevity has increased and fertility has decreased, the population pyramid increasingly looks like a cylinder. This helps to explain why the inflation-adjusted shortfall for Social Security is now about $37 trillion (and if you include the long-run shortfalls for Medicare and Medicaid, the outlook is even worse). […]
[…] But as longevity has increased and fertility has decreased, the population pyramid increasingly looks like a cylinder. This helps to explain why the inflation-adjusted shortfall for Social Security is now about $37 trillion (and if you include the long-run shortfalls for Medicare and Medicaid, the outlook is even worse). […]
[…] like a broken record when it comes to entitlement spending. I’ve explained, ad nauseam, that programs such as […]
[…] Let’s bury our heads in the sand and pretend there’s no entitlement crisis. […]
[…] like a broken record when it comes to entitlement spending. I’ve explained, ad nauseam, that programs such as […]
[…] like a broken record when it comes to entitlement spending. I’ve explained, ad nauseam, that programs such as […]
[…] like a broken record when it comes to entitlement spending. I’ve explained, ad nauseam, that programs such as […]
[…] like a broken record when it comes to entitlement spending. I’ve explained, ad nauseam, that programs such as […]
[…] like a broken record when it comes to entitlement spending. I’ve explained, ad nauseam, that programs such as […]
[…] like a broken record when it comes to entitlement spending. I’ve explained, ad nauseam, that programs such as […]
[…] will cripple America’s economy if left on auto-pilot. I’ve repeatedly made the point that we’re like Greece 10 or 15 years ago. By claiming […]
[…] In previous years (2012, 2013, 2014), I’ve used this opportunity to play Paul Revere. But instead of warning that the British are coming, I sound the alarm about a future fiscal crisis resulting from demographic change and poorly designed entitlement programs. […]
[…] what about entitlement programs, which arguably represent the greatest long-term threat to America’s economy? Trump certainly gives the impression that he thinksSocial Security, Medicare, andMedicaid don’t […]
[…] are opposed to genuine entitlement reform, so that means the burden of government spending automatically will climb in coming decades. And we also know that Hillary and Bernie also want to create new programs and additional spending […]
[…] this is one of the reasons why I picked Australia when asked which nation to choose if (when?) America suffers a Greek-style fiscal and economic […]
[…] The bottom line is that America is heading in the wrong direction, with Washington projected to consume ever-larger amounts of the economy’s output. This is a recipe for continued economic weakness in the short run and economic crisis in the long run. […]
[…] what about entitlement programs, which arguably represent the greatest long-term threat to America’s economy? Trump certainly gives the impression that he thinksSocial Security, Medicare, andMedicaid don’t […]
[…] what about entitlement programs, which arguably represent the greatest long-term threat to America’s economy? Trump certainly gives the impression that he thinks Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid […]
[…] what about entitlement programs, which arguably represent the greatest long-term threat to America’s economy? Trump certainly gives the impression that he thinks Social Security,Medicare, and Medicaid don’t […]
[…] what about entitlement programs, which arguably represent the greatest long-term threat to America’s economy? Trump certainly gives the impression that he thinks Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid […]
[…] isn’t Kristof clever. If you don’t support a bankrupt entitlement state and inane over-regulation, then you must want chaos and civil […]
[…] isn’t Kristof clever. If you don’t support a bankrupt entitlement state and inane over-regulation, then you must want chaos and civil […]
[…] isn’t Kristof clever. If you don’t support a bankrupt entitlement state and inane over-regulation, then you must want chaos and civil […]
[…] America’s long-run fiscal problem isn’t debt. That’s just a symptom. The real challenge is a rising burden of government spending, largely because of demographic change and poorly designed entitlement programs. […]
[…] exacerbates America’s long-run challenge of excessive entitlement […]
[…] But not all of them. Some politicians, either because of malice or ignorance, think we should do nothing, even though that will mean a very unpleasant future. […]
[…] to keep in mind next time someone argues that we can stick our heads in the sand and not enact genuine entitlement […]
[…] on genuine entitlement reform. And in the grand scheme of things, reining in those programs is much more important to the nation’s long-run fiscal health than curtailing sleazy corporate […]
[…] true that the defense budget is being capped while most domestic spending (specifically entitlement programs) is left unconstrained. But that doesn’t mean the nation’s security is […]
[…] you can see, entitlement programs are the big problem, especially Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and […]
[…] It would mean that they are willing to explicitly embrace the types of policies that are desperately needed to avert long-run fiscal crisis in America. […]
[…] It would mean that they are willing to explicitly embrace the types of policies that are desperately needed to avert long-run fiscal crisis in America. […]
[…] we have a contribution from Glenn McCoy that I find very appealing because it focuses on the ticking time bomb of poorly designed entitlement […]
[…] we have a contribution from Glenn McCoy that I find very appealing because it focuses on the ticking time bomb of poorly designed entitlement […]
In the comment above, I mentioned that cash paid into Health Savings Accounts would be better than vouchers.
What is cash anyway other than a voucher from government.
However, people will be more careful with cash. Should they somehow raid their account, no one else is hurt. If they can save by being healthy or frugal in their choice of healthcare, the residual would build for future emergencies. Vouchers must be spent immediately, since there is no way to trade current health value for future health value plus time value interest.
Giving people cash will provide funds for healthcare coverage, however, free riding can no longer be allowed. If an individual tries to save by not buying insurance, he should face the full liability of the medical bills which will wipe out any “saved” funds in his HSA and then some. This approach is far better [and more aligned with Constitutional limits] than the current mandated purchase.
Every adult citizen could receive a cost neutral $3,000; to be paid out of current programs including: the value of the healthcare tax deduction, Medicaid support for the poor, a portion of Medicare, and ACA support.
The poor would have funds to buy healthcare. The cash would more than replace the healthcare tax deduction, except for Cadillac plans. [However, front end cash would make for better healthcare selections.] Those on Medicare would see no change, since benefits would be reduced by that $3,000.
While I’m a big fan of either vouchers or [better] cash deposited into Health Savings Accounts; the proposal to match the dollar value of current payments and then increase it by GDP growth plus 1% will break us.
Superficially, it is flawed because it violates Mitchell’s Rule on spending. However, the thrust of this article was to describe how the number of retired will double. That means that the underlying costs will double, even before we hit the cost escalators.
We must fulfill our commitments to seniors, however, we must stop all future commitments. Current retirees are 100% vested, because of previous FICA payments. We should stop FICA payments and the sham of “Trust [me] Funds”, immediately. All payments should come out of General Funds.
Beginning next month, retirees will only be partially vested. For every month they don’t pay FICA, their eligibility gets pushed back by 1/3 of a month. In thirty years retirement age will be pushed back to 76.
People will start saving immediately to fill in the anticipated gaps. That saving will kick-start the economy. Politicians will no long be able to raid the Trust Funds for current spending.
It is flawed thinking to believe that the young will be overly burdened by an aging population.
As the non-productive become a larger percentage they gain political power. However, as the productive become a smaller percentage, they gain economic power, and economic power trumps political power.
Sometimes it’s effective to describe a ridiculously extreme case to highlight flawed thinking: Assume one person makes the world run. No matter how much is demanded of him politically, he requires half of world production as compensation for his services. Who will win this argument?
Now replace this one man will an ever smaller group of producers. Who will win?
Because there are limits to the share taken by the elderly, that share will have to be divided by an ever larger contingent. It is misplaced to feel sorry for the future’s young people.
Reblogged this on Public Secrets and commented:
Another of the definitions of insanity: refusal to change policies and programs that are clearly headed for disaster. Also, progressives.
The government theft of social security funds and medicare funds over decades does not create an “entitlement problem”. These piggy banks are being raided by fraud, illegal payments to non contributors, fraudulent disability claims. These Funds should have been, from day ONE, separate business units, OUTSIDE THE US TREASURY BUDGET. They exist much like insurance companies that operate annuities and health insurance services. If insurance companies spent their reserve, they would be bankrupt. Social security has been calculated to be funded until 2032. A few changes now may push that crunch date forward decades. Raise salary contribution ceiling to $140,000, stop fraud, stop giving away funds to illegal aliens, extended families of immigrants, disability fraud claims…simply stop using SS as a welfare fund. It is very disturbing to see media people use the term entitlement, as though it were free payments to demanding seniors, as a form of welfare. A LIE.
These Funds are Business Units that should be operated as a separate business, unhampered by government, politics, the Treasury, and certainly not part of the Budget. Due to government abuse, the DEBT to SS and medicare is now a budget debt item as a payment on loans taken out by politician abuse. The SS fund is solvent, accounting – wise, until 2032. The above changes would keep it solvent into the future.