When I warn about the fiscal and economic consequences of America’s poorly designed entitlement programs (as well as the impact of demographic changes), I regularly suggest that the United States is on a path to become Greece.
Because of Greece’s horrible economy, this link has obvious rhetorical appeal.
But there’s another nation that may be a more accurate “role model” of America’s future. This other country, like the United States, is big, relatively rich, and has its own currency.
For these and other reasons, in an article for The Hill, I suggest that Japan is the nation that may offer the most relevant warning signs. I explain first that Japan shows the failure of Keynesian economics.
…ever since a property bubble burst in the late 1980s, Japan’s economy has been in the doldrums, and its politicians deserve much of the blame. They’ve engaged in repeated binges of so-called Keynesian stimulus. But running up the national credit card hasn’t worked any better in Japan than it did for President Barack Obama. Instead of economic rejuvenation, Japan is now saddled with record levels of debt.
In other words, Japan already is a basket case and may be the next Greece. And all this foolish policy has been cheered on by the IMF.
I then highlight how Japan shows why a value-added tax is a huge mistake.
Japan’s politicians also decided to impose a value-added tax (VAT) on the nation. As so often happens when a VAT gets adopted, it turns into a money machine, as legislators start ratcheting the rate higher and higher. That happened in Europe back in the 1960s and 1970s, and it’s happening in Japan today.
And regular readers know my paranoid fear of the VAT taking hold in the United States.
But here’s the main lesson in the column.
The combination of demographic changes and redistribution programs is a recipe for fiscal crisis.
…the biggest economic threat to the country is the way Japan’s welfare state interacts with demographic changes. It’s not that the welfare state is enormous, particularly compared with European nations, but the system is becoming an ever-increasing burden because the Japanese people are living longer and having fewer children. …America faces some of the same problems. …if we don’t reform our entitlement programs, it’s just a matter of time before we also have a fiscal crisis.
To be sure, as I note in the article, Japan’s demographic outlook is worse. And that nation’s hostility to any immigration (even from high-skilled people) means that Japan can’t compensate (as America has to some degree) for low birth rates by expanding its population.
Indeed, the demographic situation in Japan is so grim that social scientists have actually estimated the date on which the Japanese people become extinct.
Mark August 16, 3766 on your calendar. According to…researchers at Tohoku University, that’s the date Japan’s population will dwindle to one. For 25 years, the country has had falling fertility rates, coinciding with widespread aging. The worrisome trend has now reached a critical mass known as a “demographic time bomb.” When that happens, a vicious cycle of low spending and low fertility can cause entire generations to shrink — or disappear completely.
Though I guess none of us will know whether this prediction is true unless we live another 1750 years. But it doesn’t matter if the estimate is perfect. Japan’s demographic outlook is very grim.
By the way, the problem of aging populations and misguided entitlements exists in almost every developed nation.
But I mentioned in the article for The Hill that there are two exceptions. Hong Kong and Singapore have extremely low birthrates and aging populations. But neither jurisdiction faces a fiscal crisis for the simple reason that people largely are responsible for saving for their own retirement.
And that, of course, is the main lesson. The United States desperately needs genuine entitlement reform. While I’m not overflowing with optimism about Trump’s view on these issues, hope springs eternal.
P.S. In yesterday’s column about Germany, I listed bizarre policies in Germany in the postscripts. My favorite example from Japan is the regulation of coffee enemas. And the Japanese government has even proven incompetent at giving away money.
[…] addition to South Korea, Japan also faces a major […]
[…] the way, if you look at the right side of Chart 4, you’ll see Japan’s horrible numbers as well as a worrisome trend for the United […]
[…] the way, if you look at the right side of Chart 4, you’ll see Japan’s horrible numbers as well as a worrisome trend for the United […]
[…] Heck, many European nations are vulnerable to a debt crisis. As are many developing countries. And don’t forget Japan. […]
[…] Heck, many European nations are vulnerable to a debt crisis. As are many developing countries. And don’t forget Japan. […]
[…] Heck, many European nations are vulnerable to a debt crisis. As are many developing countries. And don’t forget Japan. […]
[…] hard to be optimistic about Japan’s economic future, in large part because the burden of government is expanding […]
[…] addition to South Korea, Japan also faces a major […]
[…] addition to South Korea, Japan also faces a major […]
[…] addition to South Korea, Japan also faces a major […]
[…] addition to South Korea, Japan also faces a major […]
[…] addition to South Korea, Japan also faces a major […]
[…] was true in developed nations (the U.S., Europe, Japan), but also in developing […]
[…] We can study the impact of population aging on fiscal outcomes. […]
[…] the United States is soon going to follow Japan in that wrong direction according to fiscal projections from the Congressional Budget […]
[…] Heck, it’s going to spread everywhere: Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Asia, the developing world, Japan and the United States. […]
[…] is it the data on an aging population and falling […]
[…] But the problems of excessive spending and excessive debt are not limited to Europe. Or Japan. […]
[…] write constantly (some would say incessantly and annoyingly) about entitlement spending. And I occasionally write about discretionary […]
[…] write constantly (some would say incessantly and annoyingly) about entitlement spending. And I occasionally write about discretionary […]
[…] write constantly (some would say incessantly and annoyingly) about entitlement spending. And I occasionally write about discretionary […]
[…] write constantly (some would say incessantly and annoyingly) about entitlement spending. And I occasionally write about discretionary […]
[…] repeated (and failed) attempts to stimulate the economy with Keynesianism. And Japan’s demographic crisis is also a very important […]
[…] Heck, it’s going to spread everywhere: Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Asia, the developing world, Japan and the United States. […]
[…] tax rates, if you want growth and competitiveness. Japan as a more likely role model for the future of the US than Greece. Tax policy and welfare, don’t miss the video at the end about killing the […]
[…] is a guest post by Dan Mitchell “a high priest of light tax small state […]
[…] « Does America Share Japan’s Grim Future? […]
Well, you know, genetic engineering is the only hope for a prosperous statist leftist world. They can engineer humans that can be taxed at ninety percent without losing enthusiasm– coupled with humans who are given cradle to grave welfare and still maintain motivation to be all that they can be.
I guess libertarians can counter engineer humans that are devoid of envy and instinctively understand the exponentially compounding effect of growth vs the fixed effect of redistribution.
Then the two groups will find two planets that are a good eleven billion light years apart and move there. Everyone will be happy and prosperous. The earth, of course, will burn to atone for humanity’s past industrial sins.
P.S. That was an interesting video talk but there’s a more practical problem. If I can make my kid live two hundred years and also be a much better scientist than Mr. Knoepfler, then I might become willing to go even to North Korea, ( or even better a country that will give me true nuclear protection) in order to make that happen. The incentives are unstoppable. What is Mr. Knoepfler going to do to prevent me from doing so? Have the IRS enforce a worldwide ban? More to the point, how are Mr. Knoepfler’s dumber kids going to prevent my smarter kids for doing the same with their grandchildren? The intelligence and capability gap will keep diverging with each generation. Mr. Knoepfler is fighting a losing battle against an exponential force. He’ll eventually lose.
…And Mr. Knoepfler is just looking at a fifteen year horizon! Is it perhaps a little clearer why worrying that in one hundred years humans will suffer as a result of global warming is so naive? Strange things will happen. Unimaginable things will happen that will change all our assumptions and outlook. Wonderful things will happen.
the Chinese have already produced genetically modified human embryos… using CRISPER technology… it’s just a matter of time until desperate statist governments begin to use genetic modification to address policy issues… eugenics is back… in a big way… and the technology is new… cheap… and powerful……..
Japan?
It would just suffice for the US to drop down to the growth rate trendlines of any Western European nation — and it’s doomed!
Come to think about it, we’re almost there — and a two percent growth trendline will not help us avoid decline. The world average is growing twice as fast. So we will be a middle income nation by the later half of this century, without even becoming Japan.
Is for predictions for the year 3766? In a mere hundred years the Japanese will be producing custom babies using genetically modified pigs as surrogate mothers or something else that seems equally crazy to us today. Actually, things like that are already in the horizon
https://www.wsj.com/articles/diy-gene-editing-fast-cheapand-worrisome-1488164820
and one hundred years is way beyond anyone’s predictive horizon (hence the main reason that predicting human suffering in a hundred years from global warming is speculation akin to religious eschatology).
I won’t specifically predict that Japanese babies, perhaps genetically engineered to live five centuries of productive life, will be born to Sumatran pigs in a hundred years. But in any case, other fantasy changes will happen in one hundred years (perhaps Japan will have split into hundreds of micro-states, who knows?). Marking calendars with predictions for 3766 is crazy.
Much more prescient is the simple arithmetic realization that countries with growth rates equal to half the average world growth rate will fade into obscurity in fifty to one hundred years — at most ! And as one can see, that ride down is not that pleasant.
Those who think that the future will be about the same as today are in for a big-big surprise.