I’m not a big fan of the International Monetary Fund, largely because the folks in charge oftentimes advocate toxic policies such as bailouts, higher taxes, and currency devaluation.
But there are some top-rate economists working at the IMF, and the bureaucracy has published some good studies about the economic benefits of reducing government spending and others warning that tax increases can be self defeating (by the way, too bad we can’t get the Joint Committee on Taxation to also acknowledge the Laffer Curve).
Now the IMF has a new study about the relationship between economic growth and different types of taxes. Those finding are interesting, and I may even write about them in the next few days, but I want to focus on some amazing data from this research that shows exactly why proponents of limited government should resist the value-added tax.
These charts are taken from page 10 of the IMF study and they depict changes, over the past several decades, for both personal income tax (PIT) revenues and consumption tax revenues, both measured as a share of economic output. The charts are divided to show trends in low-income countries, middle-income countries, and high-income countries.
These are remarkable numbers. They basically show that politicians have been unable to squeeze more money out of the income tax. We don’t know if that’s because of the Laffer Curve, tax competition, electoral resistance, or all of the above. But we can say with considerable confidence that the income tax has not been a money machine over the past 40 years.
I’m not saying it’s a good tax. Far from it. The income tax is unfair. It’s punitive. It’s discriminatory. It’s corrupt. And, when it was first adopted, it did generate a big new pile of revenue for the politicians.
But that was 100 years ago. In recent decades, by contrast, it hasn’t been a piggy bank for statists seeking to expand the burden of government spending.
The data for the VAT and other consumption taxes, by contrast, shows just the opposite. With each passing decade, the VAT burden climbs, and that’s true for nations at all stages of development.
This is one of the reasons why a VAT would be a disaster for the United States. Politicians might make promises about repealing or reducing other taxes in exchange for a VAT, but it is a 99-percent certainty that politicians would pull a bait-and-switch. We’d still be stuck with the awful income tax system and the IRS, but the crooks and clowns in Washington would have a new source of revenue to feed their spending addiction.
Isn’t that wonderful? We’d be taxed when we earn our income (often more than one time), and then taxed again when we spend our income. Just like Europe.
Here’s my video explaining why a value-added tax would be a fiscal disaster.
One final point. I don’t care if you like Mitt Romney or dislike Mitt Romney. But, given his less-than-sound views on the VAT, I want everybody to be prepared to hold his feet to the fire if he happens to prevail on November 6.
P.S. You’ll be delighted to learn that the pampered bureaucrats at the IMF get tax-free salaries, just like their cousins at the OECD and the rest of the international bureaucracies.
P.P.S. I just shared these a few days ago, but if you didn’t get a chance to see them, you can enjoy some good anti-VAT cartoons here, here, and here.
[…] By every possible measure, the value-added tax is a big mistake (as even the IMF inadvertently shows). […]
[…] you don’t have to believe me. The International Monetary Fund unintentionally provided the data showing that VATs are the most effective tax for financing bigger […]
[…] The pro-tax International Monetary Fund inadvertently produced a study showing why the VAT is a money machine for big […]
[…] chart shows why the pro-tax crowd at the IMF is in love with the VAT. Simply stated, it’s a very effective money machine for bigger […]
[…] My favorite IMF study was the one that accidentally provided very compelling evidence against the value-added […]
[…] tax nightmare before Christmas” was based on my fear that politicians will try to impose a value-added tax at some point in the not-too-distant […]
[…] gives me powerful evidence for good policy. That happened in 2012, for example, when it produced some very persuasive data showing that value-added taxes are money machines to finance a bigger burden of […]
[…] spending in a three-month period. And I also think it’s funny that IMF bureaucrats inadvertently generated some very powerful evidence against the […]
[…] is why many statists are pushing so hard for the VAT. It’s a money machine for big […]
[…] And you know I get a “thrill up my leg” when I read about a place that fights against the value-added tax. […]
[…] And you know I get a “thrill up my leg” when I read about a place that fights against the value-added tax. […]
[…] that some otherwise sensible lawmakers (including Rand Paul and Ted Cruz) have embraced this money machine for big government. I don’t care if their plans are theoretically sensible. I worry about what will happen in […]
[…] IMF, for instance, accidentally put together some solid evidenceshowing that a value-added tax is a money machine for bigger […]
[…] IMF, for instance, accidentally put together some solid evidence showing that a value-added tax is a money machine for bigger […]
[…] IMF, for instance, accidentally put together some solid evidence showing that a value-added tax is a money machine for bigger […]
[…] professional economists on the staff slip something useful past the political types. Though my all-time-favorite bit of IMF research was the study that inadvertently showed why a value-added tax is so […]
[…] The one silver lining to the dark cloud of the IMF is that the bureaucrats inadvertently generated some very powerful evidence against the […]
[…] Source: New International Monetary Fund Study Inadvertently Provides Very Strong Evidence against the Value-… […]
[…] Though I’ll also be grateful that the IMF inadvertently and accidentally provided some very powerful data against the value-added […]
[…] And if you don’t believe the VAT is a money machine for bigger government, check out this data from the […]
[…] why the VAT is the key to financing bigger government. Heck, even the International Monetary Fund inadvertently provided very powerful evidence that a VAT is the recipe for bigger […]
[…] International Monetary Fund accidentally confirmed that the value-added tax is a revenue machine to finance bigger government and heavier tax […]
[…] International Monetary Fund accidentally confirmed that the value-added tax is a revenue machine to finance bigger government and heavier tax […]
[…] ratified one of the key tenets of supply-side economics, let’s remember that the IMF also confirmed one of the key reasons to oppose a value-added […]
[…] even the IMF has provided evidence (albeit inadvertently) that the VAT is a money […]
[…] even the IMF has provided evidence (albeit inadvertently) that the VAT is a money […]
[…] is exactly what the IMF inadvertently revealed in a study showing that VATs are the “effective” way of financing bigger […]
[…] I’m also quite amused that the IMF accidentally provided key evidence against the […]
[…] be fair to the IMF. The bureaucrats have given us – albeit unintentionally – some very good evidence against the value-added […]
[…] But I don’t want to be unfair. The IMF did provide – albeit by accident – very powerful evidence showing why the United States should not have a value-added tax. So I guess that was one useful […]
[…] from the International Monetary Fund. That bureaucracy actually supports the VAT, but the IMF inadvertently revealed in some research last year that the VAT is far more effective at generating new revenue than the income […]
[…] the burden of government spending. And even though it wasn’t their intention, IMF bureaucrats provided very strong evidence showing why the value-added tax is a destructive money machine for big […]
[…] the burden of government spending. And even though it wasn’t their intention, IMF bureaucrats provided very strong evidence showing why the value-added tax is a destructive money machine for big […]
[…] the burden of government spending. And even though it wasn’t their intention, IMF bureaucrats provided very strong evidence showing why the value-added tax is a destructive money machine for big […]
[…] even though it wasn’t their intention, IMF bureaucrats even provided very strong evidence showing why the value-added tax is adestructive money machine for big […]
[…] even though it wasn’t their intention, IMF bureaucrats even provided very strong evidence showing why the value-added tax is a destructive money machine for big […]
[…] nations and those should be part of the equation when comparing tax policies. Indeed, this is why my recent post on the rising burden of the value-added tax looked at data for nations at different levels of […]
[…] nations and those should be part of the equation when comparing tax policies. Indeed, this is why my recent post on the rising burden of the value-added tax looked at data for nations at different levels of […]
I totally am against a VAT I think getting the 50% that don’t pay taxes to pay even a little something will help greatly. Every town and city and state is about to increase its taxes in one form or another. If the Feds go on the bank wagon, we will be taxed right out of helping the economy. We won’t have a dime to spend on anything. Getting Obama out and Obamacare is essential.