The Congressional Budget Office released it’s 2020 Long-Term Budget Outlook yesterday.
Almost everybody has focused on CBO’s projections for record levels of red ink. And it is worrisome that debt is heading to Greek/Japanese levels (especially if the folks who buy government bonds think American politicians are more like Greek politicians rather than Japanese politicians).
But what should really have us worried, both in the short run and the long run, is that the burden of government spending is on an upward trajectory.
CBO has some charts showing that federal government spending will consume more than 30 percent of GDP by 2050, assuming the budget is left on autopilot.
But I dug into CBO’s database and created my own chart because I think it does a much better job of illustrating our problem.
As you can see, the problem is that government spending is projected to grow too fast, violating the Golden Rule of fiscal policy.
The solution to this problem is very simple.
We need spending restraint, ideally enforced by some sort of spending cap.
And if we control the growth of spending (preferably so that it grows no more than the rate of inflation), the projections for ever-rising levels of red ink will disappear.
In other words, you can get rid of symptoms (red ink) when you cure the underlying disease (big government).
P.S. Given all the profligacy over the past year, you won’t be surprised to learn that this year’s long-run forecast from CBO is more depressing than last year’s forecast.
P.P.S. While the solution is simple, it’s not easy. Restraining the growth of spending – especially in the long run – will require entitlement reforms, especially for Medicare and Medicaid.
P.P.P.S. Tax increases almost certainly would make a bad situation even worse by weakening the economy and encouraging more spending.
[…] Biden’s budget shows why supporters of good fiscal policy should not focus on deficits. A myopic fixation on red ink allows a big spender like Biden to claim the moral high ground […]
[…] readers know that I generally don’t get overly agitated about government debt (I get far more upset about counterproductive spending, regardless of how it is […]
[…] And if you understand those three things, then you realize that the real problem is spending. […]
[…] spending restraint. In other words, deal with the underlying disease of excessive government and the symptom of red ink goes […]
[…] spending restraint. In other words, deal with the underlying disease of excessive government and the symptom of red ink goes […]
[…] being said, they mistakenly focus on deficits and debt when the real problem is too much […]
[…] I tell people to focus on government spending rather than red ink. After all, the economy is hurt whether spending is financed by taxes or borrowing (or […]
[…] I tell people to focus on government spending rather than red ink. After all, the economy is hurt whether spending is financed by taxes or borrowing (or printing […]
[…] an economic perspective, the real problem is spending, regardless of whether outlays are financed by taxes or […]
[…] an economic perspective, the real problem is spending, regardless of whether outlays are financed by taxes or […]
[…] Budget Office has released its new long-run fiscal forecast. Like I did last year (and the year before, and the year before, etc), let’s look at some very worrisome […]
[…] Budget Office has released its new long-run fiscal forecast. Like I did last year (and the year before, and the year before, etc), let’s look at some very worrisome […]
[…] I’ve repeatedly written, I don’t think we should focus on red ink. What really matters is the burden of government […]
[…] budget wonks who (mistakenly) focus on red ink say the problem is so serious that we need higher […]
[…] budget wonks who (mistakenly) focus on red ink say the problem is so serious that we need higher […]
[…] my main message, which I’ve shared over and over again, is that deficits and debt are merely a symptom. The underlying disease is excessive […]
[…] my main message, which I’ve shared over and over again, is that deficits and debt are merely a symptom. The underlying disease is excessive […]
[…] my main message, which I’ve shared over and over again, is that deficits and debt are merely a symptom. The underlying disease is excessive […]
[…] Why do folks on the left support punitive policies such as high tax rates and a bigger burden of government? […]
[…] think controlling red ink should be the main focus of fiscal policy, whereas I think controlling spending should be the top […]
[…] Why do folks on the left support punitive policies such as high tax rates and a bigger burden of government? […]
[…] think controlling red ink should be the main focus of fiscal policy, whereas I think controlling spending should be the top […]
[…] think controlling red ink should be the main focus of fiscal policy, whereas I think controlling spending should be the top […]
[…] think controlling red ink should be the main focus of fiscal policy, whereas I think controlling spending should be the top […]
[…] (CRFB). They think controlling red ink should be the main focus of fiscal policy, whereas I think controlling spending should be the top […]
[…] Why do folks on the left support punitive policies such as high tax rates and a bigger burden of government? […]
[…] being said, they mistakenly focus on deficits and debt when the real problem is too much […]
[…] being said, they mistakenly focus on deficits and debt when the real problem is too much […]
[…] Why do folks on the left support punitive policies such as high tax rates and a bigger burden of government? […]
[…] Why do folks on the left support punitive policies such as high tax rates and a bigger burden of government? […]
[…] Why do folks on the left support punitive policies such as high tax rates and a bigger burden of government? […]
[…] taxes too much today and wastes too much money […]
[…] To put this discussion in the proper context, I’ll close with another chart from Brian Riedl. The long-run problem we face is not red ink. Deficits and debt are merely the symptom of the real problem of excessive government spending. […]
[…] To put this discussion in the proper context, I’ll close with another chart from Brian Riedl. The long-run problem we face is not red ink. Deficits and debt are merely the symptom of the real problem of excessive government spending. […]
[…] I have repeatedly warned that nations get in fiscal trouble when government is too big and growing too fast. […]
[…] for instance, but that won’t happen in the real world). But at least he recognizes the long-run spending outlook is so dour that entitlement reform is absolutely […]
[…] for instance, but that won’t happen in the real world). But at least he recognizes the long-run spending outlook is so dour that entitlement reform is absolutely […]
[…] been making that point over and over and over and over and over again, but I feel motivated to address the issue again after reading two columns about government […]
[…] other words, the bottom line is that we shouldn’t have any tax increase. Especially since 100 percent of America’s fiscal problem is the consequence of excessive government […]
[…] readers know that I’m far more interested in focusing on the real fiscal problem, which is excessive government […]
[…] Here are some of the ways the IMF wants to expand the burden of government spending. […]
How can we have spending restraint when both sides are using government money to buy votes?
Reblogged this on Boudica BPI Weblog.
Reblogged this on artversnick.