Reckless spending increases under both Bush and Obama have resulted in unprecedented deficits. Congress will soon be forced to increase the nation’s debt limit by an astounding $1.8 trillion. Government borrowing has become such a big issue that some politicians are proposing a deficit reduction commission, which may mean they are like alcoholics trying for a self-imposed intervention.
But all this fretting about deficits and debt is misplaced. Government borrowing is a bad thing, of course, but this video explains that the real problem is excessive government spending.
Fixating on the deficit allows politicians to pull a bait and switch, since they can raise taxes, claim they are solving the problem, when all they are doing is replacing debt-financed spending with tax-financed spending. At best, that’s merely taking a different route to the wrong destination. The more likely result is that the tax increases will weaken the economy, further exacerbating America’s fiscal position.
[…] government spending is the problem and borrowing is merely a symptom of that problem, I think it’s a mistake to fixate on red […]
[…] This video is a bit dated, but all of the economic analysis is still completely […]
[…] government spending is the problem and borrowing is merely a symptom of that problem, I think it’s a mistake to fixate on red […]
[…] government spending is the problem and borrowing is merely a symptom of that problem, I think it’s a mistake to fixate on red […]
[…] government spending is the problem and borrowing is merely a symptom of that problem, I think it’s a mistake to fixate on red […]
[…] government spending is the problem and borrowing is merely a symptom of that problem, I think it’s a mistake to fixate on red […]
[…] government spending is the problem and borrowing is merely a symptom of that problem, I think it’s a mistake to fixate on red […]
[…] government spending is the problem and borrowing is merely a symptom of that problem, I think it’s a mistake to fixate on red […]
[…] government spending is the problem and borrowing is merely a symptom of that problem, I think it’s a mistake to fixate on red […]
[…] is why I humbly think this is the best video ever produced on the […]
[…] that’s nonsense. As I’ve repeatedly explained, red ink is best viewed as a symptom. The real problem is excessive government […]
[…] when countries deal with the underlying disease of too much spending, they automatically solve the symptom of red ink, so it’s a win-win situation whether you’re a spending hawk or a so-called deficit […]
[…] is why I humbly think this is the best video ever produced on the […]
[…] is why I humbly think this is the best video ever produced on the […]
[…] I would argue that a bloated government is the symptom of growing immorality. Deficits and debt are then symptoms of that problem. […]
[…] government spending is the problem and borrowing is merely a symptom of that problem, I think it’s a mistake to fixate on red […]
[…] government spending is the problem and borrowing is merely a symptom of that problem, I think it’s a mistake to fixate on red […]
[…] government spending is the problem and borrowing is merely a symptom of that problem, I think it’s a mistake to fixate on red […]
[…] government spending is the problem and borrowing is merely a symptom of that problem, I think it’s a mistake to fixate on red […]
[…] I would argue that a bloated government is the symptom of growing immorality. Deficits and debt are then symptoms of that problem. […]
[…] been making that point over and over and over and over and over again, but I feel motivated to address the issue again after […]
[…] we have a spending problem, not a revenue problem or a deficit/debt problem. Red ink is undesirable, to be sure, but it is a symptom of the underlying problem of a government […]
[…] other words, you can get rid of symptoms (red ink) when you cure the underlying disease (big […]
[…] government spending is the problem and borrowing is merely a symptom of that problem, I think it’s a mistake to fixate on red […]
[…] I hope he’s not thinking about us. We argue for a smaller burden of government spending, not a balanced budget. And we haven’t made any assertions about higher interest rates. We instead point out that […]
[…] 10 years ago, the Center for Freedom and Prosperity released this video to explain that America’s real fiscal problem is too much spending and that red ink is best […]
[…] that make his plan desirable? Of course not. What he’s really proposing (and this is how CRFB should have presented the data) is $1.65 […]
[…] reasons I’ve previously outlined, I don’t lose too much sleep about the level of government borrowing. What’s far more […]
[…] As economist Dan Mitchell wrote in Forbes in April 2012, the debt brake mechanism “limits spending growth to average revenue increases over a multiyear period (as calculated by the Swiss Federal Department of Finance),” a feature appealing ‘to Keynesians, who like deficit spending when the economy stumbles and tax revenues dip’, as well as fiscal conservatives ‘who understand that politicians aren’t able to boost spending when the economy is doing well and the Treasury is flush with cash’. Furthermore, Mitchell noted that Switzerland’s debt break law makes it very difficult for politicians to increase the spending cap by raising taxes, with maximum rates for most national taxes in Switzerland constitutionally set (including an 11.5% income tax, an 8% value-added tax, and an 8.5% corporate tax). All these rates can only be changed ‘by a double-majority referendum, which means a majority of voters in a majority of cantons would have to agree’. So while the debt brake isn’t a de jure spending cap (hard legal cap on government spending), it is a de facto spending cap. And capping the growth of spending (which is the underlying disease) is the best way of controlling red ink (the symptom of excessive government). […]
[…] Most observers immediately looked at the estimates for deficits and debt. Those numbers are important, especially since America has an aging population, but they should be viewed as secondary. […]
[…] So why has the deficit increased? Because spending has jumped by 5.8 percent. We have a spending problem in America, not a deficit problem. Fortunately, there’s a very practical […]
[…] inflation. So why has the deficit increased? Because spending has jumped by 5.8 percent. We have a spending problem in America, not a deficit problem. Fortunately, there’s a very practical […]
[…] In other words, the fiscal burden of government is the total level of spending. How that spending is financed is a secondary concern. […]
[…] of whether it’s financed by taxes or financed by borrowing, undermines prosperity by diverting resources from the productive sector of the […]
[…] red ink is merely a symptom. I used numbers from Greece in this interview to underscore the fact that the real problem is […]
[…] fixate on the accompanying headache, taxpayers paying for a bloated government should pay excessive attention to the portion financed by red […]
[…] In other words, too much government spending is the disease. Deficits are best understood as a symptom of the disease. […]
[…] recommendation is to mostly ignore data on red ink. Yes, it is possible that a country can get in trouble because of deficits and […]
[…] leads to a fiscal crisis, but we do know that it is a bad idea for governments to engage in reckless spending over a long period of time. That’s a recipe for stifling taxes and large deficits. And when […]
[…] spending cap puts the focus on the real problem of excessive growth of government. And if you impose some sort of cap that complies with the Golden […]
[…] spending cap puts the focus on the real problem of excessive growth of government. And if you impose some sort of cap that complies with the Golden […]
[…] back in 2009, I narrated a video explaining that people worry too much about deficits and debt. Red ink isn’t desirable, to be […]
[…] back in 2009, I narrated a video explaining that people worry too much about deficits and debt. Red ink isn’t desirable, to be […]
[…] other words, the real problem is spending, not how it’s […]
[…] other words, the real problem is spending, not how it’s […]
The effect of government spending and deficits, taxes, regulation, etc result in government deadweight on the economy. Too much government deadweight (from which the USA currently suffers) slows economic growth and can results in economic shrinkage and decline, no growth, etc.
Bottom line, if you are poor and you want to stay poor or if you are not poor but want to become poor, have too much government. The resulting government deadweight will ensure you get what you desire, poverty.
[…] the part that resonated with me. It’s excessive spending that ultimately is the […]
[…] the part that resonated with me. It’s excessive spending that ultimately is the […]
[…] more sanguine about red ink than most people. After all, deficits and debt are merely symptoms. The real problem is excessive government […]
[…] critics of the deal are focusing on how it means more red ink. But that’s a secondary problem. The real mistake is that government is getting bigger, and that means private sector activity is […]
[…] In other words, the IMF mistakenly fixates on the symptom of red ink instead of addressing the real problem of excessive […]
[…] In other words, the IMF mistakenly fixates on the symptom of red ink instead of addressing the real problem of excessive […]
[…] revenue. In other words, the IMF mistakenly fixates on the symptom of red ink instead of addressing the real problem of excessive […]
[…] what it’s worth, I think she’s focusing on the symptom or red ink when it would be better to focus on the underlying disease of excessive […]
[…] makers dealt with the underlying disease of too much spending, that also meant eliminating the symptom of red ink. In other words, a big deficit became a big […]
[…] makers dealt with the underlying disease of too much spending, that also meant eliminating the symptom of red ink. In other words, a big deficit became a big […]
[…] of government shrinks relative to the private sector, but it’s also worth noting that the symptom of red ink begins to disappear when there is a serious effort to deal with the underlying disease of excessive […]
[…] grows slower than the private sector, that reduces the relative burden of government spending (the underlying disease) and also reduces red ink (the symptom of the underlying […]
[…] be balanced in 10 years if Trump’s budget is approved. That’s because a fixation on red ink is a distraction. What really matters is whether the burden of spending is falling relative to the private […]
[…] in 10 years if Trump’s budget is approved. That’s because a fixation on red ink is a distraction. What really matters is whether the burden of spending is falling relative to the private […]
[…] think that’s the wrong goal, and that instead the focus should be on reducing or stabilizing the burden of government spending, but I’m sharing this chart because it shows that spending would have to be lowered by 3.1 […]
[…] think that’s the wrong goal, and that instead the focus should be on reducing or stabilizing the burden of government spending, but I’m sharing this chart because it shows that spending would have to be lowered by 3.1 […]
[…] The table shows that nations practicing spending restraint for multi-year periods reduce the problem of excessive government and also address the symptom of red ink. […]
[…] are allocated by the productive sector of the economy. That being said, if lawmakers address the underlying disease of excessive spending, that automatically solves the symptom of red […]
[…] more worried, for what it’s worth, about the level of spending. And on that basis, there’s less fiscal space. Here’s a comparison (based on the […]
[…] also like that he explains that the real problem is spending, not just red ink (a point I often make, but not always successfully, when talking to […]
[…] also like that he explains that the real problem is spending, not just red ink (a point I often make, but not always successfully, when talking to […]
[…] include rankings for the overall burden of government spending. After all, government debt is basically a symptom of an underlying problem of a bloated public […]
[…] not welcome news, though I think it’s far more important to focus on the disease of too much spending rather than the symptom of red […]
[…] not welcome news, though I think it’s far more important to focus on the disease of too much spending rather than the symptom of red […]
[…] Simply stated, it’s a mistake to focus on the symptom of red ink rather than the underlying disease of excessive government […]
[…] For reasons that I’ve already covered, I didn’t like being called a “deficit hawk” by the […]
[…] I suppose this is the point where I should explain that good fiscal policy is defined by a modest-sized government and a tax code that is designed to raise revenue in a relatively non-destructive fashion, not by whether lots of wasteful spending is okay if accompanied by lots of destructive tax hikes (i.e., a fixation on fiscal balance). […]
[…] I suppose this is the point where I should explain that good fiscal policy is defined by a modest-sized government and a tax code that is designed to raise revenue in a relatively non-destructive fashion, not by whether lots of wasteful spending is okay if accompanied by lots of destructive tax hikes (i.e., a fixation on fiscal balance). […]
[…] My examples are from all over the world and cover all sorts of economic conditions. And the results repetitively show that when you deal with the underlying problem of too much government, you automatically improve the symptom of red ink. […]
[…] don’t like deficit and debt, to be sure, but government borrowing should be seen as the symptom. The real problem is excessive government […]
[…] be very simple to shrink the relative burden government (and also balance the budget very quickly if that’s what you care about) if the federal budget “only” grew by the rate of […]
[…] long-run fiscal problem isn’t debt. That’s just a symptom. The real challenge is a rising burden of government spending, largely because of demographic […]
[…] isn’t good news, of course, but it’s a mistake to focus on the symptom of red ink rather than the underlying disease of excessive […]
[…] isn’t good news, of course, but it’s a mistake to focus on the symptom of red ink rather than the underlying disease of excessive […]
[…] isn’t good news, of course, but it’s a mistake to focus on the symptom of red ink rather than the underlying disease of excessive […]
[…] isn’t good news, of course, but it’s a mistake to focus on the symptom of red ink rather than the underlying disease of excessive […]
[…] isn’t good news, of course, but it’s a mistake to focus on the symptom of red ink rather than the underlying disease of excessive […]
[…] isn’t good news, of course, but it’s a mistake to focus on the symptom of red ink rather than the underlying disease of excessive […]
[…] Some people think the key goal is making the program solvent, but that’s the wrong focus. Sort of like making balance the goal of budgetary policy. […]
[…] they focus on fiscal balance. In other words, they want to control deficits and debt, which I think is a misguided focus since red ink is merely the symptom of the real problem of excessive […]
[…] don’t necessarily care whether they balance the budget, but I do think proposals to reform and lower taxes won’t […]
[…] over a 10-year period. And those savings make big tax cuts very plausible. Even for the folks who myopically fixate on red ink when they should be worried about the overall burden of government […]
[…] At this point, I feel compelled to point out that the goal should be smaller government, not fiscal balance. […]
[…] At this point, I feel compelled to point out that the goal should be smaller government, not fiscal balance. […]
[…] Red ink isn’t a good thing, but CBO is very misguided about the importance of deficits compared to other […]
[…] being said, I think that CRFB’s focus is misplaced. They fixate on debt, which is the symptom, when they should be more concerned with reducing excessive government, which is the underlying […]
[…] By the way, the commentators who are fretting about French debt are focused on the wrong variable. The French disease is big government. High levels of debt are simply a symptom of that disease. […]
[…] nothing wrong, per se, with this type of information. But making deficits the focus of the analysis is akin to thinking that the time of possession is more important than the final score in the Super […]
[…] new report is overly focused on the symptom of deficits and debt rather than the underlying disease of excessive government. But if you dig into the details, you […]
[…] why the Swiss Debt Brake is the right model for how to get spending under control. And this video explains why the objective should be spending restraint rather than deficit […]
[…] keep in mind that this is just an estimate of the fiscal shortfall. What really matters is the total level of spending, not how much is financed with red […]
[…] keep in mind that this is just an estimate of the fiscal shortfall. What really matters is the total level of spending, not how much is financed with red […]
[…] keep in mind that this is just an estimate of the fiscal shortfall. What really matters is the total level of spending, not how much is financed with red […]
[…] at least should be – based on foregone growth. After all, government spending (whether it is financed by taxes or borrowing) diverts resources from the productive sector of society and results in the misallocation of labor […]
[…] By the way, this video explains why our goal should be smaller government, not fiscal […]
[…] By the way, this video explains why our goal should be smaller government, not fiscal […]
[…] The moral of the story is that when you address the real problem of too much spending, you automatically address the symptom of red ink. […]
[…] numbers) in any budget. If the burden of spending is rising, regardless of whether that increase is financed by taxes or borrowing, more resources will be diverted from the economy’s productive […]
[…] and scope of the federal government should be the main goal of fiscal policy. Deficits and debt are undesirable, of course, but they’re best viewed as symptoms of the real problem, which is too much […]
[…] P.P.S. I realize I’m being pedantic, but the two cartoons included in this post may be amusing, but they should have focused on the underlying disease of too much spending (particularly the problem of entitlement programs) rather than highlighting the symptom of red ink. […]
[…] P.P.S. I realize I’m being pedantic, but the two cartoons included in this post may be amusing, but they should have focused on the underlying disease of too much spending (particularly the problem of entitlement programs) rather than highlighting the symptom of red ink. […]
[…] a bit of a nag on getting people to realize that deficits are not the nation’s main fiscal problem. Government borrowing isn’t desirable, to be sure, but our real concern should be a government […]
[…] The first video defines the problem, explaining that deficits and debt are bad, but then explaining that red ink is best understood as a symptom of the real problem of too much government s…. […]
[…] Excessive spending is the problem, but many people mistakenly fixate on government borrowing. […]
[…] on deficits and debt. It creates an opening for people who want to push bad policy. But if you focus on the real problem of government spending, that problem […]
[…] I think it’s far more important to focus on the underlying disease of too much government, and not get fixated on the symptom of too much borrowing. If I go see a doctor because of […]
[…] and debt. Red ink is a serious issue, to be sure, but it’s very important to understand that too much borrowing is merely a symptom of too much […]
[…] for those who mistakenly focus on the symptom of red ink rather than the underlying disease of too much spending, you’ll be happy to know that […]
[…] other words, by addressing the underlying problem of too much government, the German government automatically dealt with the symptom of red […]
[…] other words, by addressing the underlying problem of too much government, the German government automatically dealt with the symptom of red […]
[…] many readers already know, I don’t fixate on balancing the budget. I care much more about reducing the burden of government spending and restoring the kind of […]
[…] Again, this cartoon correctly focuses on the main problems of punitive taxation and excessive spending, not the lesser symptom of too much borrowing. […]
[…] peculiar focus on the size and scope of government can be seen in this video, which explains that spending is the disease and deficits are just a […]
[…] other words, the problem isn’t deficits. Red ink is just a symptom. The real problem is that government is too […]
[…] bag should have been labelled “spending,” but that’s a minor […]
[…] even though I’m much more interested in reducing the size of the public sector than I am in fiscal balance, it’s worth noting that you can balance the budget by 2018 with this amount of modest […]
[…] the crowd in Washington doesn’t want to acknowledge that the real problem is spending. And I’m particularly irked (but not surprised) that Republicans now seem willing to go along […]
[…] It’s always important to focus first and foremost on the disease of spending, after all, and not the symptom of red ink. […]
[…] it’s worth reminding people that you begin to solve the symptom of red ink when you address the underlying disease of too much spending. That’s why the deficit has fallen by almost 50 percent in the past two […]
[…] what does all this mean? Simply stated, the fiscal problem in virtually all nations is not red ink. It’s big government. Large deficits aren’t desirable, to be sure, but they’re best […]
[…] Deficits and debt are bad, to be sure, but they are best understood as symptoms of the underlying disease of excessive spending. […]
[…] state in their report, is to “…stabilize and then reduce the national debt.” But as I explain in this video, the real problem is a federal government that is too big and spending too much. Red ink is just a […]
[…] addressed the underlying disease of excessive spending, it’s no surprise that the symptom of red ink became much less of a problem with the deficit falling by almost 50 percent in those two […]
[…] Deficits and debt are bad, to be sure, but they are best understood as symptoms of the underlying disease of excessive spending. […]
[…] Perhaps if some of their colleagues read today’s Becker-Lazear column, they’ll also understand why it’s better to focus on the underlying problem of government spending rather than getting distracted by the symptom of red ink. […]
[…] Perhaps if some of their colleagues read today’s Becker-Lazear column, they’ll also understand why it’s better to focus on the underlying problem of government spending rather than getting distracted by the symptom of red ink. […]
[…] That’s why, in this interview with John Stossel, I reiterate my mantra that government spending is the problem and that deficits and debt are symptoms of the problem. […]
[…] That’s why, in this interview with John Stossel, I reiterate my mantra that government spending is the problem and that deficits and debt are symptoms of the problem. […]
[…] When I write about the importance of understanding the difference between a disease and its symptoms, I’m almost always seeking to help people understand why it’s important to focus on the problem of government spending rather than the side-effect of government borrowing. […]
[…] When I write about the importance of understanding the difference between a disease and its symptoms, I’m almost always seeking to help people understand why it’s important to focus on the problem of government spending rather than the side-effect of government borrowing. […]
[…] America’s main fiscal problem is that government is too big. That’s the disease Deficits and debt are symptoms of that underlying […]
[…] Our main goal should be reducing the burden of government relative to private output, not balancing the budget. […]
[…] the crowd in Washington doesn’t want to acknowledge that the real problem is spending. And I’m particularly irked (but not surprised) that Republicans now seem willing to go along […]
[…] But I’m nit-picking. Cruz seems to get it. He puts the focus on the disease of too much government rather than fixating on the symptom of too much red ink. […]
[…] It’s always important to focus first and foremost on the disease of spending, after all, and not the symptom of red ink. […]
[…] It’s always important to focus first and foremost on the disease of spending, after all, and not the symptom of red ink. […]
[…] Deficits and debt are bad, to be sure, but they are best understood as symptoms of the underlying disease of excessive spending. […]
[…] Deficits and debt are bad, to be sure, but they are best understood as symptoms of the underlying disease of excessive spending. […]
[…] Deficits and debt are bad, to be sure, but they are best understood as symptoms of the underlying disease of excessive spending. […]
[…] But I’ve never been happy with these BIS and OECD numbers because they focus on deficits, debt, and fiscal balance. Those are important indicators, of course, but they’re best viewed as symptoms. […]
[…] you can probably guess, I wish the plus-sized lady was labeled “big government” or “government spending,” but […]
[…] The politicians claim that they are negotiating about how best to reduce the deficit. That irks me because our fiscal problem is excessive government spending. Red ink is merely a symptom of that underlying problem. […]
Good day! I just want to give an enormous thumbs up for the good information you will have here on this post.
I will likely be coming back to your blog for more soon.
[…] the crowd in Washington doesn’t want to acknowledge that the real problem is spending. And I’m particularly irked (but not surprised) that Republicans now seem willing to go along […]
[…] Excessive spending is the problem, but many people mistakenly fixate on government borrowing. […]
[…] Excessive spending is the problem, but many people mistakenly fixate on government borrowing. […]
Though, everyone is familiar with what ginger is, not many of us know the benefits of the root.
(You should be aware of the fact that in the North East
of China, when the Siberian wind blows in the winter, we can easily
reach temperatures of -30 to -35 degrees Celsius). There are also various
breathing exercises which will be effective in open
some of the many airways and let in some new oxygen.
[…] state in their report, is to “…stabilize and then reduce the national debt.” But as I explain in this video, the real problem is a federal government that is too big and spending too much. Red ink is just a […]
[…] budget requirement, but these policies have been very unsuccessful – perhaps because they mistakenly focus on the symptom of red ink rather than the underlying disease of government […]
[…] Deficits and debt are bad, to be sure, but they are best understood as symptoms of the underlying disease of excessive spending. […]
[…] In other words, deficits are bad, but the real problem is spending. I elaborate in this Center for Freedom and Prosperity video. […]
[…] what does all this mean? Simply stated, the fiscal problem in virtually all nations is not red ink. It’s big government. Large deficits aren’t desirable, to be sure, but they’re best […]
[…] what does all this mean? Simply stated, the fiscal problem in virtually all nations is not red ink. It’s big government. Large deficits aren’t desirable, to be sure, but they’re […]
[…] other words, the problem isn’t deficits. Red ink is just a symptom. The real problem is that government is too […]
[…] other words, the problem isn’t deficits. Red ink is just a symptom. The real problem is that government is too […]
[…] other words, the problem isn’t deficits. Red ink is just a symptom. The real problem is that government is too […]
[…] problem is spending, not […]
[…] America’s fiscal challenge is the overall burden of government spending, I’m not overly worried about the fact that Obama’s budget doesn’t get to […]
[…] a bit of a nag on getting people to realize that deficits are not the nation’s main fiscal problem. Government borrowing isn’t desirable, to be sure, but our real concern should be a government […]
[…] a bit of a nag on getting people to realize that deficits are not the nation’s main fiscal problem. Government borrowing isn’t desirable, to be sure, but our real concern should be a […]
[…] Again, this cartoon correctly focuses on the main problems of punitive taxation and excessive spending, not the lesser symptom of too much borrowing. […]
[…] Again, this cartoon correctly focuses on the main problems of punitive taxation and excessive spending, not the lesser symptom of too much borrowing. […]
[…] my video on the topic. In an ideal world, Republicans would not be allowed to talk about fiscal policy until they were […]
[…] It’s good to balance the budget, of course, but that should be a secondary goal. […]
[…] It’s always important to focus first and foremost on the disease of spending, after all, and not the symptom of red ink. […]
[…] problem is spending, not […]
[…] problem is spending, not […]
[…] But time for some caveats. The OECD research mistakenly focuses on debt levels and what needs to happen to reduce red ink to a certain level. This isn’t a meaningless issue, but it puts the cart before the horse. What matters most is the size of government and the total burden of government spending – not whether it is financed with borrowing rather than taxes. […]
[…] I hope he’s not thinking about us. We argue for a smaller burden of government spending, not a balanced budget. And we haven’t made any assertions about higher interest rates. We instead point out that […]
[…] I hope he’s not thinking about us. We argue for a smaller burden of government spending, not a balanced budget. And we haven’t made any assertions about higher interest rates. We instead point out that […]
[…] Now that new numbers have been released by the Congressional Budget Office, it’s time once again for me to show how easy it is to balance the budget with modest spending restraint (though please remember our goal should be smaller government, not fiscal balance). […]
[…] I hope he’s not thinking about us. We argue for a smaller burden of government spending, not a balanced budget. And we haven’t made any assertions about higher interest rates. We instead point out that […]
[…] you can probably guess, I wish the plus-sized lady was labeled “big government” or “government […]
[…] is the size of government, not the fact that nations are having a hard time borrowing money. As explained in this video, spending is the disease and deficits are one of the […]
[…] New 10-year budget projections have been released by the Congressional Budget Office, so it’s time once again for me to show how easy it is to balance the budget with modest spending restraint (though never forget that our goal should be smaller government, not fiscal balance). […]
[…] New 10-year budget projections have been released by the Congressional Budget Office, so it’s time once again for me to show how easy it is to balance the budget with modest spending restraint (though never forget that our goal should be smaller government, not fiscal balance). […]
[…] Deficits and debt are bad, to be sure, but they are best understood as symptoms of the underlying disease of excessive spending. […]
[…] But I’m nit-picking. Cruz seems to get it. He puts the focus on the disease of too much government rather than fixating on the symptom of too much red ink. […]
[…] with this cartoonist, but he or she deserves kudos for recognizing the problem is spending. Deficits and debt are merely symptoms of the disease of excessive […]
[…] Notwithstanding the last sentence, our main fiscal goal should be smaller government, not a balanced […]
[…] Notwithstanding the last sentence, our main fiscal goal should be smaller government, not a balanced […]
[…] But I think our chances of success will be much higher if advocates of good fiscal policy kept reminding the crowd in Washington that the real problem is too much spending and that red ink is just a symptom of the underlying disease. […]
[…] The politicians claim that they are negotiating about how best to reduce the deficit. That irks me because our fiscal problem is excessive government spending. Red ink is merely a symptom of that underlying problem. […]
[…] The politicians claim that they are negotiating about how best to reduce the deficit. That irks me because our fiscal problem is excessive government spending. Red ink is merely a symptom of that underlying problem. […]
[…] The politicians claim that they are negotiating about how best to reduce the deficit. That irks me because our fiscal problem is excessive government spending. Red ink is merely a symptom of that underlying problem. […]
[…] The politicians claim that they are negotiating about how best to reduce the deficit. That irks me because our fiscal problem is excessive government spending. Red ink is merely a symptom of that underlying problem. […]
[…] The politicians claim that they are negotiating about how best to reduce the deficit. That irks me because our fiscal problem is excessive government spending. Red ink is merely a symptom of that underlying problem. […]
[…] The politicians claim that they are negotiating about how best to reduce the deficit. That irks me because our fiscal problem is excessive government spending. Red ink is merely a symptom of that underlying problem. […]
[…] the crowd in Washington doesn’t want to acknowledge that the real problem is spending. And I’m particularly irked (but not surprised) that Republicans now seem willing to go along […]
[…] And when policy makers addressed the underlying disease of too much government spending, they solved the symptom of red ink. […]
[…] the disease, and deficits and debt are the symptoms of that underlying […]
[…] It’s always important to focus first and foremost on the disease of spending, after all, and not the symptom of red ink. […]
[…] I have many frustrations in my life, and near the top of the list is the conservative fixation about balancing the budget. […]
[…] my video on the topic. In an ideal world, Republicans would not be allowed to talk about fiscal policy until they were […]
[…] you want some serious analysis about government spending and red ink, watch my video (part of my series on the economics of government […]
[…] state in their report, is to “…stabilize and then reduce the national debt.” But as I explain in this video, the real problem is a federal government that is too big and spending too much. Red ink is just a […]
[…] in their report, is to “…stabilize and then reduce the national debt.” But as I explain in this video, the real problem is a federal government that is too big and spending too much. Red ink is just a […]
[…] But time for some caveats. The OECD research mistakenly focuses on debt levels and what needs to happen to reduce red ink to a certain level. This isn’t a meaningless issue, but it puts the cart before the horse. What matters most is the size of government and the total burden of government spending – not whether it is financed with borrowing rather than taxes. […]
[…] Now that new numbers have been released by the Congressional Budget Office, it’s time once again for me to show how easy it is to balance the budget with modest spending restraint (though please remember our goal should be smaller government, not fiscal balance). […]
[…] Here’s my video on the topic. In an ideal world, Republicans would not be allowed to talk about fiscal policy until they were first strapped in chairs, given a bunch of ADD medicine, and forced to watch this on automatic replay about 50 times. […]
[…] put it, “I would look at raising the capital gains tax for the purpose of fairness.” Spending policy under Clinton and Obama has differed as well, with the most striking instance being the […]
[…] my video on the topic. In an ideal world, Republicans would not be allowed to talk about fiscal policy until they were […]
[…] is the size of government, not the fact that nations are having a hard time borrowing money. As explained in this video, spending is the disease and deficits are one of the […]
[…] is the size of government, not the fact that nations are having a hard time borrowing money. As explained in this video, spending is the disease and deficits are one of the […]
[…] Now that new numbers have been released by the Congressional Budget Office, it’s time once again for me to show how easy it is to balance the budget with modest spending restraint (though please remember our goal should be smaller government, not fiscal balance). […]
[…] Now that new numbers have been released by the Congressional Budget Office, it’s time once again for me to show how easy it is to balance the budget with modest spending restraint (though please remember our goal should be smaller government, not fiscal balance). […]
[…] Now that new numbers have been released by the Congressional Budget Office, it’s time once again for me to show how easy it is to balance the budget with modest spending restraint (though please remember our goal should be smaller government, not fiscal balance). […]
[…] But time for some caveats. The OECD research mistakenly focuses on debt levels and what needs to happen to reduce red ink to a certain level. This isn’t a meaningless issue, but it puts the cart before the horse. What matters most is the size of government and the total burden of government spending – not whether it is financed with borrowing rather than taxes. […]
[…] balance the budget in 10 years. I explain how that could happen, but I then emphasize that what really matters is shrinking the burden of government spending. To balance the budget within 10 years would require that outlays grow by about 2% each year. […]
[…] the disease, and deficits and debt are the symptoms of that underlying […]
[…] policy makers addressed the underlying disease of too much government spending, they solved the symptom of red ink. Like this:LikeBe the first to like this. By Everette Hatcher III, on July 20, 2012 at 1:01 pm, […]
[…] the disease, and deficits and debt are the symptoms of that underlying […]
[…] the disease, and deficits and debt are the symptoms of that underlying […]
[…] policy makers addressed the underlying disease of too much government spending, they solved the symptom of red ink. Share this:TwitterFacebookPrintEmailMoreStumbleUponRedditDiggLike this:LikeBe the first to like […]
[…] policy makers addressed the underlying disease of too much government spending, they solved the symptom of red ink. Rate this:Share this:PrintEmailFacebookTwitterMoredeliciousDiggFarkLinkedInRedditStumbleUponLike […]
[…] growth of spending (which is the underlying disease) is the best way of controlling red ink (the symptom of excessive government). Switzerland’s spending cap has helped the country avoid the fiscal crisis affecting so many […]
[…] growth of spending (which is the underlying disease) is the best way of controlling red ink (the symptom of excessive government). Switzerland’s spending cap has helped the country avoid the fiscal crisis affecting so many […]
[…] Another problem is that many people in Washington are fixated on deficits and debt, but that’s akin to focusing on symptoms and ignoring the underlying disease. To elaborate, this video explains that America’s fiscal problem is too much spending rather than too much debt. […]
Ill ask himn tonight, Im going to his book signing.
[…] growth of spending (which is the underlying disease) is the best way of controlling red ink (the symptom of excessive government). Switzerland’s spending cap has helped the country avoid the fiscal crisis affecting so many […]
[…] an implication of what he says. Moreover, I’m just glad that someone recognizes that the problem is spending, and that debt and deficits are best understood as symptoms of that underlying […]
[…] That’s the topic we debated on Larry Kudlow’s program. I didn’t get much air time in this interview, but I’m glad that I got out the key point about the real problem being big government rather than red ink. […]
[…] the goal shouldn’t be to balance the budget. We want faster growth, more freedom, and constitutional government. All of these goals (as well as […]
[…] comes perilously close to winning a Bob Dole Award. The first chapter of their proposal fixates on symptoms of debt and deficits rather than the real problem of excessive government spending. Indeed, the first six charts all relate to deficits and debt, creating an easy opening for […]
[…] comes perilously close to winning a Bob Dole Award. The first chapter of their proposal fixates on symptoms of debt and deficits rather than the real problem of excessive government spending. Indeed, the first six charts all relate to deficits and debt, creating an easy opening for […]
[…] comes perilously close to winning a Bob Dole Award. The first chapter of their proposal fixates on symptoms of debt and deficits rather than the real problem of excessive government spending. Indeed, the first six charts all relate to deficits and debt, creating an easy opening for […]
[…] is excessive government spending, not red ink. Deficits and debt are undesirable, of course, but they are best understood as symptoms. The underlying disease is a bloated federal budget that diverts resources from the productive […]
[…] The first video defines the problem, explaining that deficits and debt are bad, but then explaining that red ink is best understood as a symptom of the real problem of too much government s…. […]
Almost. Government spending is increasing at a rate greater than economic growth, which when extrapolated leads to the result that all economic output supports the government. Over the last 50 years government spending has grown 30% faster than economic output.
ALL of the growth in government spending is the result of entitlement programs. As a share of the federal budget, defense and non-defense spending has shrunk. Only entitlement spending has grown.
The federal budget problems will be fixed only by restructuring the entitlement programs and reducing the spending on these programs.
People get the government they deserve and thus the problem isn’t the politicians, who are bad enough, but people ignorant of the economy that is the problem.
[…] confess to being monotonous and repetitive when it comes to explaining that America’s fiscal problem is too much spending, and that debt and deficits are simply symptoms of that underlying problem of excessive […]
[…] the goal shouldn’t be to balance the budget. We want faster growth, more freedom, and constitutional government. All of these goals (as well as […]
[…] for small government and this video examines the empirical evidence against big government. And this video explains that America’s fiscal problem is too much spending rather than too much debt (in other words, deficits are merely a symptom of an underlying problem of excessive […]
[…] government, not fiscal balance. Deficits are just a symptom of a government that is too large, as I have explained elsewhere. But the good news is that spending discipline is the right answer, regardless of the objective. I […]
[…] the goal shouldn’t be to balance the budget. We want faster growth, more freedom, and constitutional government. All of these goals (as well as […]
[…] the goal shouldn’t be to balance the budget. We want faster growth, more freedom, and constitutional government. All of these goals (as well as […]
[…] getting very frustrated. I spend too much time reminding my supposed allies that America’s fiscal problem is too much government. Deficits and debt, I constantly explain, are best understood as symptoms, whereas a bloated public […]
[…] other words, government spending undermines growth, and the damage is magnified by poorly designed tax […]
[…] other words, government spending undermines growth, and the damage is magnified by poorly designed tax […]
[…] other words, government spending undermines growth, and the damage is magnified by poorly designed tax […]
[…] other words, government spending undermines growth, and the damage is magnified by poorly designed tax […]
[…] other words, government spending undermines growth, and the damage is magnified by a poorly designed tax […]
[…] other words, government spending undermines growth, and the damage is magnified by a poorly designed tax […]
[…] We should be focusing on the underlying problem of excessive government, not the symptom of too much red ink. By pointing out the amount of spending restraint that would […]
[…] We should be focusing on the underlying problem of excessive government, not the symptom of too much red ink. By pointing out the amount of spending restraint that would […]
[…] I don’t expect a good outcome to the European fiscal crisis, largely because nobody seems to understand that the real problem is excessive government spending. […]
[…] Another problem is that many people in Washington are fixated on deficits and debt, but that’s akin to focusing on symptoms and ignoring the underlying disease. To elaborate, this video explains that America’s fiscal problem is too much spending rather than too much debt. […]
[…] I have many frustrations in my life, and near the top of the list is the conservative fixation about balancing the budget. […]
[…] First, the evidence shows that the problem is government spending, and that problem exists regardless of whether the budget is financed by taxes or borrowing. Unfortunately, too many supposedly conservative policy makers fail to grasp this key distinction […]
[…] especially like how he understands that the problem is the size of government, and I also admire his recognition that Republicans often are just as bad as […]
[…] Rule is that it doesn’t matter whether a nation has a budget deficit or a budget surplus. As I’ve explained on several occasions, the fiscal problem in most nations is that government is too big. Deficits […]
[…] problem is spending. That’s the fiscal disease facing America. Deficits and debt are just symptoms of that disease. LD_AddCustomAttr("AdOpt", "1"); LD_AddCustomAttr("Origin", "other"); […]
[…] who fixate on deficits and debt. Red ink is not good, of course, but the only good way to treat the symptom of too much borrowing is to address the underlying disease of too much government. LD_AddCustomAttr("AdOpt", "1"); LD_AddCustomAttr("Origin", "other"); […]
[…] for small government and this video examines the empirical evidence against big government. And this video explains that America’s fiscal problem is too much spending rather than too much debt (in other words, deficits are merely a symptom of an underlying problem of excessive […]
[…] government, not fiscal balance. Deficits are just a symptom of a government that is too large, as I have explained elsewhere. But the good news is that spending discipline is the right answer, regardless of the objective. I […]
[…] Another problem is that many people in Washington are fixated on deficits and debt, but that’s akin to focusing on symptoms and ignoring the underlying disease. To elaborate, this video explains that America’s fiscal problem is too much spending rather than too much debt. […]
[…] about the supposed horrors of deficits and debt (I write “supposed” because the real problem is spending, with red ink being a symptom of a government that is far too large). Yet he endorsed Obama’s […]
[…] getting wasted. Nonetheless, I’m on Grover’s side on this tax debate for two reasons. First, we have a spending problem, not a revenue problem or a deficit/debt problem. Red ink is undesirable, to be sure, but it is a symptom of the underlying problem of a government […]
[…] getting wasted. Nonetheless, I’m on Grover’s side on this tax debate for two reasons. First, we have a spending problem, not a revenue problem or a deficit/debt problem. Red ink is undesirable, to be sure, but it is a symptom of the underlying problem of a government […]
[…] debunked the notion that a higher debt limit was needed to avoid default and explained that the problem is too much spending and that deficits and debt are the symptoms of that […]
[…] He correctly understands that the problem is the size of government. As explained in this video, spending is the problem and deficits are a symptom of that […]
[…] correctly understands that the problem is the size of government. As explained in this video, spending is the problem and deficits are a symptom of that […]
[…] He correctly understands that the problem is the size of government. As explained in this video, spending is the problem and deficits are a symptom of that […]
All the latest Federal Budget News http://www.2012federalbudget.com
[…] he correctly understands that the problem is the size of government. As explained in this video, spending is the problem and deficits are a symptom of that […]
[…] he correctly understands that the problem is the size of government. As explained in this video, spending is the problem and deficits are a symptom of that […]
[…] he correctly understands that the problem is the size of government. As explained in this video, spending is the problem and deficits are a symptom of that […]
[…] he correctly understands that the problem is the size of government. As explained in this video, spending is the problem and deficits are a symptom of that […]
[…] he correctly understands that the problem is the size of government. As explained in this video, spending is the problem and deficits are a symptom of that […]
[…] we have a spending problem, not a revenue problem or a deficit/debt problem. Red ink is undesirable, to be sure, but it is a symptom of the underlying problem of a government […]
[…] we have a spending problem, not a revenue problem or a deficit/debt problem. Red ink is undesirable, to be sure, but it is a symptom of the underlying problem of a government […]
[…] we have a spending problem, not a revenue problem or a deficit/debt problem. Red ink is undesirable, to be sure, but it is a symptom of the underlying problem of a government […]
[…] we have a spending problem, not a revenue problem or a deficit/debt problem. Red ink is undesirable, to be sure, but it is a symptom of the underlying problem of a government […]
[…] we have a spending problem, not a revenue problem or a deficit/debt problem. Red ink is undesirable, to be sure, but it is a symptom of the underlying problem of a government […]
[…] we have a spending problem, not a revenue problem or a deficit/debt problem. Red ink is undesirable, to be sure, but it is a symptom of the underlying problem of a government […]
[…] There’s no reason why Republicans should unilaterally compromise, but I’m worried. One major problem for the GOP is a misguided focus on red ink. Too many people, including Senators, Representatives, pundits, and policy wonks, keep talking about deficits and debt. Government borrowing is not desirable, but red ink is merely a symptom of excessive spending. […]
[…] There’s no reason why Republicans should unilaterally compromise, but I’m worried. One major problem for the GOP is a misguided focus on red ink. Too many people, including Senators, Representatives, pundits, and policy wonks, keep talking about deficits and debt. Government borrowing is not desirable, but red ink is merely a symptom of excessive spending. […]
[…] There’s no reason why Republicans should unilaterally compromise, but I’m worried. One major problem for the GOP is a misguided focus on red ink. Too many people, including Senators, Representatives, pundits, and policy wonks, keep talking about deficits and debt. Government borrowing is not desirable, but red ink is merely a symptom of excessive spending. […]
[…] for small government and this video examines the empirical evidence against big government. And this video explains that America’s fiscal problem is too much spending rather than too much de… (in other words, deficits are merely a symptom of an underlying problem of excessive […]
[…] Another problem is that many people in Washington are fixated on deficits and debt, but that’s akin to focusing on symptoms and ignoring the underlying disease. To elaborate, this video explains that America’s fiscal problem is too much spending rather than too much debt. […]
[…] Another problem is that many people in Washington are fixated on deficits and debt, but that’s akin to focusing on symptoms and ignoring the underlying disease. To elaborate, this video explains that America’s fiscal problem is too much spending rather than too much debt. […]
[…] Another problem is that many people in Washington are fixated on deficits and debt, but that’s akin to focusing on symptoms and ignoring the underlying disease. To elaborate, this video explains that America’s fiscal problem is too much spending rather than too much debt. […]
[…] for small government and this video examines the empirical evidence against big government. And this video explains that America’s fiscal problem is too much spending rather than too much debt (in other words, deficits are merely a symptom of an underlying problem of excessive […]
[…] for small government and this video examines the empirical evidence against big government. And this video explains that America’s fiscal problem is too much spending rather than too much de… (in other words, deficits are merely a symptom of an underlying problem of excessive […]
[…] for small government and this video examines the empirical evidence against big government. And this video explains that America’s fiscal problem is too much spending rather than too much de… (in other words, deficits are merely a symptom of an underlying problem of excessive […]
[…] for small government and this video examines the empirical evidence against big government. And this video explains that America’s fiscal problem is too much spending rather than too much de… (in other words, deficits are merely a symptom of an underlying problem of excessive […]
[…] leads to a fiscal crisis, but we do know that it is a bad idea for governments to engage in reckless spending over a long period of time. That’s a recipe for stifling taxes and large deficits. And when […]
[…] leads to a fiscal crisis, but we do know that it is a bad idea for governments to engage in reckless spending over a long period of time. That’s a recipe for stifling taxes and large deficits. And when […]
[…] leads to a fiscal crisis, but we do know that it is a bad idea for governments to engage in reckless spending over a long period of time. That’s a recipe for stifling taxes and large deficits. And when […]
[…] spending should be the number-one goal of fiscal policy rather than deficit reduction. And since red ink is just a symptom of the real problem of too much spending, this data is very […]
[…] spending should be the number-one goal of fiscal policy rather than deficit reduction. And since red ink is just a symptom of the real problem of too much spending, this data is very […]
[…] spending should be the number-one goal of fiscal policy rather than deficit reduction. And since red ink is just a symptom of the real problem of too much spending, this data is very […]
[…] spending should be the number-one goal of fiscal policy rather than deficit reduction. And since red ink is just a symptom of the real problem of too much spending, this data is very […]
[…] In this video Mitchell looks at the bigger issue, explaining that America’s long-run fiscal problem is too much spending and that debt and deficits are merely symptoms of that underlying problem. Source. […]
[…] video explains that the real problem is spending, and that deficits are just a symptom of a government that is too big. This is not to say that CRS and CBO are completely wrong. We have […]
[…] video explains that the real problem is spending, and that deficits are just a symptom of a government that is too big. This is not to say that CRS and CBO are completely wrong. We have […]
[…] More commentary here. Tweet Categories: Economy Tags: Comments (0) Trackbacks (0) Leave a comment Trackback […]
[…] video explains that the real problem is spending, and that deficits are just a symptom of a government that is too big. This is not to say that CRS and CBO are completely wrong. We have […]
[…] video explains that the real problem is spending, and that deficits are just a symptom of a government that is too big. This is not to say that CRS and CBO are completely wrong. We have […]
[…] video explains that the real problem is spending, and that deficits are just a symptom of a government that is too big. This is not to say that CRS and CBO are completely wrong. We have […]
[…] much higher than it is even in Greece). As faithful readers of this blog already understand, the real issue is the size of government, but this site is a good indicator of nations that finance their spending in a risky […]
[…] if much higher than it is in Greece). As faithful readers of this blog already understand, the real issue is the size of government, but this site is a good indicator of nations that finance their spending in a risky […]
[…] if much higher than it is in Greece). As faithful readers of this blog already understand, the real issue is the size of government, but this site is a good indicator of nations that finance their spending in a risky […]
[…] fiscal policy goal should be smaller government. Regardless of how it is financed, government spending diverts resources from the productive sector […]
[…] 4, 2010 by Dan Mitchell Our fiscal policy goal should be smaller government, but here’s a video for folks who think that balancing the budget should be the main […]
[…] 4, 2010 by Dan Mitchell Our fiscal policy goal should be smaller government, but here’s a video for folks who think that balancing the budget should be the main […]
[…] government, not fiscal balance. Deficits are just a symptom of a government that is too large, as I have explained elsewhere. But the good news is that spending discipline is the right answer, regardless of the objective. I […]
[…] government, not fiscal balance. Deficits are just a symptom of a government that is too large, as I have explained elsewhere. But the good news is that spending discipline is the right answer, regardless of the objective. I […]
[…] such as the Concord Coalition and the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (they should be fighting spending instead, but let’s set that issue aside). Folks from these groups often ask politicians to be […]
[…] such as the Concord Coalition and the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (they should be fighting spending instead, but let’s set that issue aside). Folks from these groups often ask politicians to be […]