The Congressional Budget Office has released its new Long-Term Budget Outlook and I will continue a now-annual tradition (see 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022) of sharing some very bad news about America’s fiscal future.
Here’s the most important chart. It shows two unfortunate developments. First, we see that the tax burden is gradually increasing as a share of economic output. Second, we see that the burden of federal spending is increasing even faster.
What happens when spending grows even faster than revenue?
We get more government debt. Or, to be more precise, this next chart shows that we get a lot more debt.
Indeed, the debt is going to reach unprecedented levels over the next 30 years.
I normally don’t fret that much about red ink. After all, deficits and debt are largely symptoms of a much bigger problem, which is excessive government spending.
That being said, high levels of debt can trigger a crisis if investors decide (like they did in Greece) that a government can’t be trusted to pay all promised money to bondholders.
Now let’s get back to the underlying problem of too much government.
What’s driving America’s long-run problems? In part, the answer is higher interest payments on the ever-increasing debt.
But the real problem, as CBO shows in Figure 2-5, is entitlement programs.
Looking at the above charts, and at the risk of repeating what I’ve already written (many times), the United States is between a rock and a hard place. The only choices are:
- Keep fiscal policy on auto-pilot, allowing government to grow until we suffer a Greek-style debt crisis.
- Impose massive tax increases on the middle class to finance an ever-bigger future government.
- Reform entitlement programs to restrain the growing burden of government spending.
Unlike Joe Biden and Donald Trump, I think the obvious choice is #3.
P.S. There was some sensible economic analysis in the CBO report.
Here’s what it said about the economic impact of deficits.
Deficits grow in the agency’s budget projections, and as a result, the federal government borrows more each year. That increase in federal borrowing pushes up interest rates and thus reduces private investment in capital, causing output to be lower in the long term than it would be otherwise, especially in the last two decades of the projection period. Less private investment reduces the amount of capital per worker, making workers less productive and leading to lower wages. Those lower wages reduce people’s incentive to work and, consequently, lead to a smaller supply of labor.
And here’s what CBO says about the impact of taxes.
Under current law, tax rates on individual income will rise at the end of 2025 when those provisions are scheduled to expire. Moreover, as income rises faster than inflation, more income is pushed into higher tax brackets over time. That real bracket creep results in higher effective marginal tax rates on labor income and capital income.11 Higher marginal tax rates on labor income would reduce people’s after-tax wages and weaken their incentive to work. Likewise, an increase in the marginal tax rate on capital income would lower people’s incentives to save and invest, thereby reducing the stock of capital and, in turn, labor productivity. That reduction in labor productivity would put downward pressure on wages. All told, less private investment and a smaller labor supply decrease economic output and income in CBO’s extended baseline projections.
Nothing wrong with that analysis. There are negative consequences when governments borrow and there are negative consequences when governments tax. But there was a sin of omission. CBO also should have explained (as it has on other occasions) that there are negative economic consequences when governments spend.
[…] And it shows why things will get worse in the future if we leave government on autopilot (because of too much spending). […]
[…] Budget Outlook and I will continue my annual tradition (see 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023) of sharing some very bad news about America’s fiscal […]
[…] We have a long-run fiscal problem. […]
[…] Budget Outlook and I will continue my annual tradition (see 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023) of sharing some very bad news about America’s fiscal […]
[…] And it shows why things will get worse in the future if we leave government on autopilot (because of too much spending). […]
[…] to profligacy in Washington, we’re stumbling and bumbling our way into becoming a sl0w-growth, European-style welfare […]
[…] key thing to understand is causality. America’s ever-growing burden of government spending is causing rising levels of […]
[…] key thing to understand is causality. America’s ever-growing burden of government spending is causing rising levels of […]
[…] As clearly shown by the Congressional Budget Office, America’s long-run fiscal challenge is an ever-growing burden of federal spending. Particularly entitlement programs. […]
[…] As clearly shown by the Congressional Budget Office, America’s long-run fiscal challenge is an ever-growing burden of federal spending. Particularly entitlement programs. […]
[…] clearly shown by the Congressional Budget Office, America’s long-run fiscal challenge is an ever-growing […]
[…] In Part I of this series, I looked at Ronald Reagan’s reasonably successful track record on government spending (which could be characterized as fantastically successful when compared to other Republican presidents) and explained why we need Reaganomics 2.0 to deal with today’s federal leviathan that is far too big and projected to get even bigger. […]
[…] the study, I included this chart from the Congressional Budget Office, which shows that the burden of federal spending is on a very […]
[…] We have a long-run fiscal problem. […]
[…] few months ago, I shared some alarming CBO data about the ever-growing burden of […]
[…] few months ago, I shared some alarming CBO data about the ever-growing burden of […]
[…] America’s current fiscal trajectory, it’s more important than ever to mimic his successful policies […]
[…] In Part I of this series, I looked at Ronald Reagan’s reasonably successful track record on government spending (which could be characterized as fantastically successful when compared to other Republican presidents) and explained why we need Reaganomics 2.0 to deal with today’s federal leviathan that is far too big and projected to get even bigger. […]
[…] the study, I included this chart from the Congressional Budget Office, which shows that the burden of federal spending is on a very […]
[…] Some of the above conversation is reasonable. People won’t be happy, for instance, if they think the future is grim (and there are reasons to be worried). […]
[…] a fan of the no-tax increase pledge for the simple reason that our greatest economic threat is the rising burden of government […]
[…] United States is in fiscal trouble because of over-spending by Washington. And the problem will get worse in the future because of poorly designed entitlement […]
[…] Some of the above conversation is reasonable. People won’t be happy, for instance, if they think the future is grim (and there are reasons to be worried). […]
[…] though America’s fiscal policy is in bad shape and getting worse, I’m afraid that politicians who claim to want to make things better will wind up making […]
[…] In Part I of this series, I looked at Ronald Reagan’s reasonably successful track record on government spending (which could be characterized as fantastically successful when compared to other Republican presidents) and explained why we need Reaganomics 2.0 to deal with today’s federal leviathan that is far too big and projected to get even bigger. […]
[…] the study, I included this chart from the Congressional Budget Office, which shows that the burden of federal spending is on a […]
[…] In Part I of this series, I looked at Ronald Reagan’s reasonably successful track record on government spending (which could be characterized as fantastically successful when compared to other Republican presidents) and explained why we need Reaganomics 2.0 to deal with today’s federal leviathan that is far too big and projected to get even bigger. […]
[…] the study, I included this chart from the Congressional Budget Office, which shows that the burden of federal spending is on a very […]
[…] Mostly because of an aging population, entitlement spending in the United States is projected to become a much bigger burden. […]
[…] though America’s long-run fiscal outlook is very grim, I wrote a two-part series earlier this year (here and here) to explain why the situation is not […]
[…] The 2023 Version of America’s Dismal Fiscal Future […]
It’s unlikely that the United States will ever “suffer a Greek-style debt crisis.” The reason is Greece, because its currency is the Euro, could not print money. The United States, via the Federal Reserve, can print unlimited amounts of money to cover its debts.
If the United States keeps fiscal policy on auto-pilot, it’s likely that the United States will suffer from high levels of inflation.
Reblogged this on Utopia, you are standing in it!.
[…] The 2023 Version of America’s Dismal Fiscal Future […]