Lord Acton famously noted that “power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”
I need to develop something similar about socialism. Based on the statism spectrum, it could be something like “socialism deprives and absolute socialism deprives absolutely.”
In other words, the bigger the government, the worse the results.
And when the government controls everything, the consequences can be catastrophic. Horrifyingly catastrophic, as Marian Tupy explains.
America’s college-educated youth…are too young to remember the Cold War and few study history. It is, therefore, timely to remind the millennials of what socialism wrought – especially in some of the world’s poorest countries. Those of us who remember the early 1980s will always remember the images of starving Ethiopian children.
…these were the innocent victims of the Derg – a group of Marxist militants who took over the Ethiopian government… Between 1983 and 1985, some 400,000 people starved to death. …in 1999, Robert Mugabe, the 92-year-old Marxist dictator who came to power in 1980, embarked on a catastrophic “land reform” program. The program saw the nationalization of privately-held farmland and the expulsion of non-African farmers and businessmen. The result was a collapse of agricultural output, the second highest hyperinflation in recorded history that peaked at 89.7 sextillion or 89,700,000,000,000,000,000,000 percent per year and an unemployment rate of 94 percent. Thousands of Zimbabweans died of hunger and disease despite massive international help.
It turns out that governments have played big roles in some of the worst famines in recent memory.
Benjamin Zycher’s table of the greatest famines of the 20th century. …six out of the 10 worst famines happened in socialist countries. Other famines, including those in Nigeria, Somalia and Bangladesh, were partly a result of war and partly a result of a government’s economic mismanagement.
Here’s a table with some of the grim totals. Unsurprisingly, Pol Pot’s Cambodia is at the top of the list.
In some cases, such as Cambodia and Ukraine, starvation was a policy choice by evil communist governments (are there any other kinds?).
In other cases, the total state control of economic life produced famine as a byproduct.
In either case, Marian has a suggestion for some of today’s vapid millennials.
Wherever it has been tried, from the Soviet Union in 1917 to Venezuela in 2015, socialism has failed. Socialists have promised a utopia marked by equality and abundance. Instead, they have delivered tyranny and starvation. Young Americans should keep that in mind.
And if they forget, here’s an excellent cartoon from Pat Cross that may be easier to remember (h/t: Mark Perry).
P.S. The table looks at starvation in the 20th century. Let’s not forget that people currently are dying of malnutrition in the socialist hellhole of Venezuela (the lucky ones raid zoos and eat household pets for food).
[…] Our fourth item makes a lot of sense if you know history. […]
[…] observation that capitalism is the unequal sharing of the blessings while socialism is the equal sharing of the miseries (other than the ruling […]
[…] Our fourth item makes a lot of sense if you know history. […]
[…] Our fourth item makes a lot of sense if you know history. […]
[…] item notes that the dictators (and their progeny) live fat and happy lives while ordinary people suffer immensely under communism and […]
[…] Our fourth item makes a lot of sense if you know history. […]
[…] Our fourth item makes a lot of sense if you know history. […]
[…] since there are plenty of private charities in capitalist societies and starvation only occurs sporadically in communist […]
[…] an exaggeration since there are plenty of private charities in capitalist societies and starvation only occurs sporadically in communist […]
[…] Though maybe today’s Marxists are simply big fans of very strict diets? […]
[…] Though maybe today’s Marxists are simply big fans of very strict diets? […]
[…] second example of satire takes advantage of the historical link between communism and empty […]
[…] Our fourth item makes a lot of sense if you know history. […]
[…] be sure, starving because of socialism didn’t become a big thing until the 20th […]
[…] of Marx, he’s bragging in this meme about the most notable cuisine of communist […]
[…] As epitomized by the Soviet Union, it was an economic failure and a humanitarian failure. […]
[…] As epitomized by the Soviet Union, it was an economic failure and a humanitarian failure. […]
[…] As epitomized by the Soviet Union, it was an economic failure and a humanitarian failure. […]
[…] As epitomized by the Soviet Union, it was an economic failure and a humanitarian failure. […]
[…] Our fourth item makes a lot of sense if you know history. […]
[…] economic ideas led to policies that produced mass deprivation, starvation, and immense human […]
[…] be sure, starving because of socialism didn’t become a big thing until the 20th […]
[…] be sure, starving because of socialism didn’t become a big thing until the 20th […]
[…] Our fourth item makes a lot of sense if you know history. […]
[…] I wonder if he also thinks that this joyous communal solidarity extended to the people who starved to death because of […]
[…] second item in our collection is a further reminder that you have to choose whether you want full socialism or a full […]
[…] a meme showing that socialism is capable of solving one societal […]
[…] a meme showing that socialism is capable of solving one societal […]
[…] I sometimes wonder whether we should laugh about ideologies that have imposed so much death and misery on the […]
[…] economic ideas led to policies that produced mass deprivation, starvation, and immense human […]
[…] economic ideas led to policies that produced mass deprivation, starvation, and immense human […]
[…] economic ideas led to policies that produced mass deprivation, starvation, and immense human […]
[…] start with some gallows humor about the link between communism and […]
[…] Last but not least, here’s the humorous version of my full-socialism-vs-full-stomachs column. […]
[…] And when Sanders attracted a lot of youth support in 2016, I gave the issue even more attention, and I’ve since continued to investigate why so many young people are sympathetic to such a poisonous ideology with a lengthy track record of failure and deprivation. […]
[…] appropriate given what I wrote about two weeks […]
with the exception of butchering and eating rodents and zoo animals many California cities are displaying the same symptoms of full blown socialism as Caraccas..,. it’s next to impossible to generalize and identify the exact causes of this structural decay but there’s ample empirical evidence of socialist governance at play on the west coast… it’s all there… the homelessness… human excrement and syringes on the streets… rolling blackouts… and finger pointing… socialism can destroy prosperity in an amazingly short period of time… in 1998 Venezuela was still in the economic miracle category… with more oil than Saudi Arabia… Chávez brought in socialism in 98 and in a relatively few years… the country went from economic miracle to basket case… if socialism continues it’s march in California… we can expect a similar result… if you live in CA… it probably wouldn’t hurt to stock up on toilet paper…
Reblogged this on Gds44's Blog.
Try using two dimensions. Lay international socialists claim freedom is divisible and want economic coercion. Christian national socialists believe the same thing, but their altruism wants coercion to crush individual rights. This is the same as in 1933, when Hitler’s party said “you’re both right” and instituted total coercion at gunpoint. The number of words in the Constitution may prove a useful metric for size of political state.