One of my annual traditions is to share the “best and worst news” for each year. I started in 2013, and continued in 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017.
Looking back, 2016 clearly was the best year, though entirely because of things that happened overseas (the Brits vote for Brexit, Brazil adopting spending caps, abolition of the income tax in Antigua, and Switzerland’s rejection of a basic income).
What about this year?
Sadly, there’s not much to cheer about. Here’s the meager list.
Amendment 73 rejected in Colorado – As part of a plan to expand the burden of government (for the children!), the left wanted to gut the state’s flat tax and replace it with a so-called progressive tax. Fortunately, voters realized that giving politicians the power to tax the rich at higher rates would also mean giving them the power to tax everyone at higher rates. The proposal was defeated by 11 percentage points.
Deregulation – The Administration’s record is certainly far from perfect on regulatory issues. But big-picture measures of the regulatory burden indicate that the overall trend is positive. Easing dangerous Obama-era car mileage rules may be the best step that’s been taken.
Positive trends – I’m having to scrape the bottom of the barrel, but I suppose a drop in support for bad ideas has to count as good news, right? On that basis, I’m encouraged that the notion of universal government handouts became less popular in 2018. Likewise, I’m glad that there’s so much opposition to the carbon tax that some supporters of that new levy are willing to throw in the towel.
Now let’s look at the bad news.
Here are the worst developments of 2018.
Aggressive protectionism – It’s no secret that Trump is a protectionist, but he was mostly noise and bluster in 2017. Sadly, bad rhetoric became bad policy in 2018. And, just as many predicted, Trump’s trade taxes on American consumers are leading other nations to impose taxes on American exporters.
The Zimbabwe-ization of South Africa – My trip to South Africa was organized to help educate people about the danger of Zimbabwe-style land confiscation. Sadly, lawmakers in that country ignore me just as much as politicians in the United States ignore me. The government is moving forward with uncompensated land seizures, a policy that will lead to very grim results for all South Africans.
More government spending – Ever since the brief period of fiscal discipline that occurred when the Tea Party had some influence, the budget news has been bad. Trump is totally unserious about controlling the burden of government spending and even routinely rolls over for new increases on top of all the previously legislated increases.
The good news is that this bad news is not as bad as it was in 2015 when we got a bunch of bad policies, including resuscitation of the corrupt Export-Import Bank, another Supreme Court Obamacare farce, expanded IMF bailout authority, and busted spending caps.
I’ll close by sharing my most-read (or, to be technically accurate, most-clicked on) columns of 2018.
- In first place is my piece explaining why restricting the state and local tax deduction was an important victory.
- Second place is my column (and accompanying poll) asking which state will be the first to suffer a fiscal collapse.
- And the third place article is my analysis of how rich nations can become poor nations with bad policy.
I guess those two pieces are oldies but goodies.
Now for the columns that didn’t generate many clicks.
- My worst-performing column was about how DC insiders manipulate so-called tax extenders to line their own pockets.
- Next on the least-popular list was a piece that looked at proposals to make taxpayers subsidize wages.
- And the next-to-next-to-last article explained how expanding the IMF would increase the risk of bailouts and bad policy.
I’m chagrined to admit that none of these columns reached 1,000 views. Though I try to salve my ego by assuming that many (some? most?) of the 4,000-plus subscribers eagerly devoured those pieces.
The other noteworthy thing about 2018 is that I posted my 5,000th column back in July.
And I also shared data indicating that I’m relatively popular (or, to be more accurate, I get a lot of clicks) in places like the Cayman Islands, the Vatican, Monaco, Bermuda, Jersey, and Anguilla.
[…] tradition (2020, 2019, 2018, etc), we highlight the best and worst developments of the year on December […]
[…] tradition (2020, 2019, 2018, etc), we highlight the best and worst developments of the year on December […]
[…] already cited my 2013 and 2019 editions. If you’re curious, here are my best and worst for 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015, and […]
[…] Time for my annual column highlighting the “Best” and “Worst” policy developments of the year, a tradition I sort of started in 2012 and definitely did in 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018. […]
If I am only one of 1000 people who read your posts – I may be one of the most appreciative ones – I forward many to friends of mine. I consider myself a libertarian conservative, and have been preaching about the 17th amendment and fiscal responsibility – yours are very helpful on the second part. THANK YOU!
On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 10:33 AM International Liberty wrote:
> Dan Mitchell posted: “One of my annual traditions is to share the “best > and worst news” for each year. I started in 2013, and continued in 2014, > 2015, 2016, and 2017. Looking back, 2016 clearly was the best year, though > entirely because of things that happened overseas (the” >
Dan- do not be a victim of false statistics. Here are some thigns you may ee leaving out of the equation:
– Have you looked for seasonality of reading your posts? I sometimes get behind and have to just bypass a bunch of them. I’d bet you’d find that we all take vacations around the same periods…
– How can you tell if I read your post if all I did was read it in my email browser window? It’s all there, and I don’t even have to click on it to read it.
– How many re-postings do you get that might increase the overall read value?
Sorry, just the statistical twitch I have. So what I am saying is don’t give uyp the ship because of statistical quirks that may have nothing to do with the attractiveness of your posts. I read them all when I can.
Happy New Year, Mr. Mitchell. I admit I don’t get to quite every one of your columns but I read most of them. They are always worth my time and even if I disagree with you on some points, you’ve made me examine my own assessments more…always a good thing. You even change my mind sometimes. Oh, and I enjoy your wit.
I just found out about you recently (3 months ago?), but I really enjoy your articles and website! I read all of your top articles and found you from your circle test article. 5,000 is quite an accomplishment! Keep up the good work! And the fight for better policy through appropriate incentives and smaller government!