I wonder whether October 3, 1913, was the worst day in American history. That’s when one of America’s worst presidents signed into law the income tax.
The top rate was only 7 percent when Woodrow Wilson approved the income tax, and the tax only applied to the very richest Americans. But as is so often the case, taxes on the wealthy are a precursor to taxes on the rest of us.
And that’s exactly what happened and today we’re burden with a grossly unjust and punitive tax code.
But it doesn’t have to be this way. I’ve been at a conference in Monaco for the past few days and I’ve seen firsthand how a nation with zero income tax can be a prosperous Mecca (and I’ve also noticed that the Princess of the Levant is far more likely to accompany me on a trip when she has an opportunity to show off a new dress).
No income tax, by the way, means no income tax. Nothing. No capital gains tax, either. The main source of revenue is a value-added tax, generally about 20 percent, along with a tax on business income, but only if a substantial share is earned outside Monaco.
So is this benign tax regime actually conducive to prosperity?
Yes. Here is the data from the United Nations on per-capita economic output. You’ll see several of my favorite places, including the Cayman Islands, Liechtenstein, Singapore, Switzerland, and Bermuda. But leading the list is Monaco.
By the way, Monaco’s good policy doesn’t just generate domestic prosperity.
It also means some spin-off employment for France.
Every day some 41,000 people come from outside to go to work and all these non-Monegasque nationals, most of whom are French, depend on our economic success. …commerce and the manufacturing also employ significant numbers; over 3,000 workers are, for instance, taken up by the latter.
While Monaco’s per-capita GDP numbers are very impressive, the numbers on per-capita wealth are even more astounding. The average person has more than $1.5 million of assets.
By the way, the unluckiest people in the world are the residents of Roquebrune and Menton in France. That’s because those towns were part of Monaco until the mid-1800s. Now they’re part of a tax hell rather than a tax haven.
So what’s the bottom line? What can we say about Monaco?
Students for Liberty has a good summary.
P.S. In addition to zero income tax, Monaco also apparently has widespread gun ownership. What a great place.
P.P.S. Monaco is in 5th-place for per-capita readership of International Liberty, so the people are both prosperous and discerning!
[…] interested, the horizontal line at the bottom is for Bermuda, though other jurisdictions (such as Monaco and the Cayman Islands) also deserve credit for having no corporate income […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] tax are on the list. And there’s a lot to admire when looking at jurisdictions such as Bermuda, Monaco, and the Cayman […]
[…] are on the list. And there’s a lot to admire when looking at jurisdictions such as Bermuda, Monaco, and the Cayman […]
[…] a wish that the report eventually gets expanded to include jurisdictions such Bermuda, Hong Kong, Monaco, Liechtenstein, Singapore, and the Cayman Islands. It would be very interesting to see if all of […]
[…] a wish that the report eventually gets expanded to include jurisdictions such Bermuda, Hong Kong, Monaco, Liechtenstein, Singapore, and the Cayman Islands. It would be very interesting to see if all of […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] interested, the horizontal line at the bottom is for Bermuda, though other jurisdictions (such as Monaco and the Cayman Islands) also deserve credit for having no corporate income […]
[…] interested, the horizontal line at the bottom is for Bermuda, though other jurisdictions (such as Monaco and the Cayman Islands) also deserve credit for having no corporate income […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] interested, the horizontal line at the bottom is for Bermuda, though other jurisdictions (such as Monaco and the Cayman Islands) also deserve credit for having no corporate income […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] interested, the horizontal line at the bottom is for Bermuda, though other jurisdictions (such as Monaco and the Cayman Islands) also deserve credit for having no corporate income […]
[…] interested, the horizontal line at the bottom is for Bermuda, though other jurisdictions (such as Monaco and the Cayman Islands) also deserve credit for having no corporate income […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] as good as the Cayman Islands and Monaco, to be sure, but it is obviously better to keep 90 percent of the income you earn rather than only […]
[…] as good as the Cayman Islands and Monaco, to be sure, but it is obviously better to keep 90 percent of the income you earn rather than only […]
[…] interested, the horizontal line at the bottom is for Bermuda, though other jurisdictions (such as Monaco and the Cayman Islands) also deserve credit for having no corporate income […]
[…] interested, the horizontal line at the bottom is for Bermuda, though other jurisdictions (such as Monaco and the Cayman Islands) also deserve credit for having no corporate income […]
[…] interested, the horizontal line at the bottom is for Bermuda, though other jurisdictions (such as Monaco and the Cayman Islands) also deserve credit for having no corporate income […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] interested, the horizontal line at the bottom is for Bermuda, though other jurisdictions (such as Monaco and the Cayman Islands) also deserve credit for having no corporate income […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] interested, the horizontal line at the bottom is for Bermuda, though other jurisdictions (such as Monaco and the Cayman Islands) also deserve credit for having no corporate income […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] interested, the horizontal line at the bottom is for Bermuda, though other jurisdictions (such as Monaco and the Cayman Islands) also deserve credit for having no corporate income […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] interested, the horizontal line at the bottom is for Bermuda, though other jurisdictions (such as Monaco and the Cayman Islands) also deserve credit for having no corporate income […]
[…] interested, the horizontal line at the bottom is for Bermuda, though other jurisdictions (such as Monaco and the Cayman Islands) also deserve credit for having no corporate income […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] type of income tax. But I’m in the United States rather than a fiscal paradise such as Bermuda, Monaco, or the Cayman Islands. So if we start with the assumption that a corporate income tax is going to […]
[…] type of income tax. But I’m in the United States rather than a fiscal paradise such as Bermuda, Monaco, or the Cayman Islands. So if we start with the assumption that a corporate income tax is going to […]
[…] of income tax. But I’m in the United States rather than a fiscal paradise such as Bermuda, Monaco, or the Cayman Islands. So if we start with the assumption that a corporate income tax is going to […]
[…] best-possible tax system of no income tax. So it would be very bad news for places such as Bermuda, Monaco, and the Cayman […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] approach, picking the best of the best from around the world (Switzerland’s fiscal rule, Monaco’s tax system, Chile’s private pension regime, […]
[…] approach, picking the best of the best from around the world (Switzerland’s fiscal rule, Monaco’s tax system, Chile’s private pension regime, […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] My favorite city is zero-income-tax Monaco. I’m not sure what American city would be at the top of my list, but you’ll notice on […]
[…] some rich people will become tax expatriates and move to jurisdictions (not just places such as Monaco, Bermuda, or the Cayman Islands, but any of the other 200-plus nations don’t tax wealth) […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] haven’t seen any from some of my favorite places, such as the Cayman Islands, Monaco, and […]
[…] First, we’re not actually the world’s richest nation. […]
[…] to impose very bad tax policy on economic activity inside their borders (just as places such as Monaco and the Cayman Islands should be free to impose very good tax policy on what happens inside their […]
[…] sobre vendas. Seja como for, eu diria que o sistema fiscal das Ilhas Cayman tem mais em comum com Mônaco de hoje do que com os Estados Unidos do século […]
[…] were some big losers other than the Labour Party. The people who sell property in places such as Monaco, Cayman Islands, Jersey, Bermuda, and Switzerland doubtlessly are disappointed that there […]
[…] At the risk of being wonky, the best sales tax is zero. Just like the best income tax is zero. […]
[…] whether Hong Kong and Singapore would beat out Estonia. And would zero-tax jurisdictions such as Monaco and the Cayman Islands get the highest scores of all? Also, what would happen if a variable on the […]
[…] I was amused to see that this warmongering focused on tiny jurisdictions such as Monaco and the Cayman Islands rather than the well-armed […]
[…] many good role models in the world. There are a few small jurisdictions such as Bermuda, Monaco, and the Cayman Islands that are worth highlighting because of strong rule of law and good fiscal […]
[…] This doesn’t mean tax rates need to be zero (though I like that idea). […]
[…] he included every jurisdiction, I very much suspect Monaco would be at the top of the […]
Interesting piece The only problem is that you don’t mention that the population of Monaco is only about 39000. An argument can be made that smallness is the single biggest factor. I think there are studies that suggest that there is a correlation between population size and prosperity, or at least with levels of government intrusion. Tom Woods did a piece about this a few years ago, I seem to recall.
[…] per-capita GDP or per-capita wealth is your benchmark, then Monaco wins the […]
[…] are some fortunate people (in the Cayman Islands, Bermuda, Monaco, Vanuatu, Antigua and Barbuda, and a few other places) who don’t have to pay income […]
[…] are some fortunate people (in the Cayman Islands, Bermuda, Monaco, Vanuatu, Antigua and Barbuda, and a few other places) who don’t have to pay income […]
[…] currently in the Cayman Islands, which is one of my favorite places since—like Bermuda, Monaco, Vanuatu, Antigua and Barbuda, and a few other lucky places in the world—it has no income […]
[…] currently in the Cayman Islands, which is one of my favorite places since – like Bermuda, Monaco, Vanuatu, Antigua and Barbuda, and a few other lucky places in the world – it has no income […]
[…] (or, to be more accurate, I get a lot of clicks) in places like the Cayman Islands, the Vatican, Monaco, Bermuda, Jersey, and […]
[…] Index, presumably because of inadequate data. I suspect places such as Bermuda, Liechtenstein, Monaco, and the Cayman Islands would all get very high scores if they were […]
[…] this is damning with faint praise. Our tax system is very unfriendly if you compare it to Monaco, Hong Kong, or […]
[…] an unusual economic model. There is no income tax, and you won’t be surprised to learn that I think this helps to explain why it is the world’s richest jurisdiction. Makes me wish we could reverse that terrible day […]
[…] tax. For what it’s worth, I would argue Cayman’s fiscal system has more in common with Monaco today than with the United States in the […]
[…] (just like I try to draw certain conclusions when showing how many low-tax jurisdictions have higher levels of economic output than the United […]
[…] all of these options are inferior to Monaco, where rich people (and everyone else) don’t pay any income tax. Same with the Cayman Islands and […]
[…] all of these options are inferior to Monaco, where rich people (and everyone else) don’t pay any income tax. Same with the Cayman Islands […]
[…] all of these options are inferior to Monaco, where rich people (and everyone else) don’t pay any income tax. Same with the Cayman Islands and […]
[…] all of these options are inferior to Monaco, where rich people (and everyone else) don’t pay any income tax. Same with the Cayman Islands […]
[…] we really want to learn from other places about the ideal tax system, we should check out Bermuda, Monaco, and the Cayman […]
[…] if you look at jurisdictions such as Bermuda, Monaco, and the Cayman Islands, they don’t get ranked by the Index of Economic Freedom, but they […]
[…] right to secede from the rest of the nation (though that seems highly unlikely since it is the second-richest nation in the […]
[…] It would be even better to move to Monaco, Hong Kong, or the Cayman Islands, but those presumably aren’t very practical options for most of […]
[…] It would be even better to move to Monaco, Hong Kong, or the Cayman Islands, but those presumably aren’t very practical options for […]
Dan Mitchell, I agree with you. What is so bad about a 0% income tax?
[…] P.S. No wonder there’s discussion in Sardinia on leaving Italy and joining Switzerland. After all, the luckiest Italian people in the world are the ones in Ticino, the southernmost canton of über-prosperous Switzerland (just as the unluckiest French people live in Menton and Roquebrune, which used to be part of Monaco). […]
[…] P.S. No wonder there’s discussion in Sardinia on leaving Italy and joining Switzerland. After all, the luckiest Italian people in the world are the ones in Ticino, the southernmost canton of über-prosperous Switzerland (just as the unluckiest French people live in Menton and Roquebrune, which used to be part of Monaco). […]
What is so bad about existence of a nation with a 0% income tax rate?
numpty mctumshie: sounds like you’re not a serious commentator. you assume that a ”proper, full – size state” has to have the sort of responsibilities it claims it has. this is precisely the point. nowadays states are a big con. most of tax money are wasted on senseless bureaucracy machines which exist only for the existance sake. they are parasites. so what exactly is the responsibility of a ”full size state” ?? to facilitate some groups of people to live off other people’s work? to maintain hundreds of thousands of soldiers, to waste billions on wars and military gear? to forbid private people to posses military gear? to maintain monopoly of money creation? to expand the web of laws in order to enslave the population? to forbid people to serve fellow men by all sort of licences, certificates, illegality laws, school duties, external tarrifs and aother business obstacles?
don’t you see that the whole state ”responsibilities” are precisely tthe things that hamper wealth creation and make people poorer? you’re indeed a humurous commentator if you cannot comprehend it and instead advocate a near totalitarian state in charge of insurance, schooling, health care, post office, railways, infrastructure, house builing, reputation control( licencing), redistribution centrese, labour control, monopoloy of money and banking etc etc . indeed, socialism failed over and over again yet all sorts of you cannot comprehend it as an intelligent sapient creaturea would be expected to comprehend things
Oh for heaven’s sake. It’s attracted rich people from all over the world precisely because it’s a tax haven. But it has none of the responsibilities of a proper, full-size state (with its vastly different demographics), in terms of defence, social security, large-scale health and education systems, foreign aid, and so on and so on.
No serious commentator (the writer included I’m sure) believes this guff, it’s just clickbait for ‘low-information’ right wing nut jobs.
The per-capita GDP numbers in the table of this article for Denmark and Sweden are considerably higher than those in your March 9, 2016 article in which the point was to show how they would be in the lower 1/3 of US states. Why are the tables different?
Reblogged this on Gds44's Blog.