I periodically explain that you generally don’t get a recession by hiking taxes, adding red tape, or increasing the burden of government spending. Those policies are misguided, to be sure, but they mostly erode the economy’s long-run potential growth.
If you want to assign blame for economic downturns, the first place to look is monetary policy.
When central banks use monetary policy to keep interest rates low (“Keynesian monetary policy,” but also known as “easy money” or “quantitative easing”), that can cause economy-wide distortions, particularly because capital gets misallocated.
And this often leads to a recession when this “malinvestment” gets liquidated.
I’ve made this point in several recent interviews, and I had a chance to make the same point yesterday.
By the way, doesn’t the other guest have amazing wisdom and insight?
But let’s not digress.
Back to the main topic, I’m not the only one who is worried about easy money.
Desmond Lachman of the American Enterprise Institute is similarly concerned.
Never before have the world’s major central banks kept interest rates so low for so long as they have done over the past decade. More importantly yet, never before have these banks increased their balance sheets on anything like the scale that they have done since 2008 by their aggressive bond-buying programmes.
Indeed, since 2008, the size of the combined balances sheet of the Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, the Bank of Japan and the Bank of England has increased by a mind-boggling US$10tn. …in recent years, if anything central bank monetary policy might have been overly aggressive. By causing global asset price inflation as well as the serious mispricing and misallocation of global credit, the seeds might have been sown for another Lehman-style economic and financial market crisis down the road. …the all too likely possibility that, by having overburdened monetary policy with the task of stabilizing output, advanced country governments might very well have set us up for the next global boom-bust economic cycle.
If you want the other side of the issue, the Economist is more sympathetic to monetary intervention.
And if you want a very learned explanation of the downsides of easy money, I shared some very astute observations from a British central banker back in 2015.
The bottom line is that easy money – sooner or later – backfires.
By the way, here’s a clip from earlier in the interview. Other than admitting that economists are lousy forecasters, I also warned that the economy is probably being hurt by Trump’s protectionism and his failure to control the growth of spending.
P.S. The “war on cash” in many nations is partly driven by those who want the option of easy money.
P.P.S. I worry that politicians sometimes choose to forgo good reforms because they hope easy money can at least temporarily goose the economy.
P.P.P.S. Easy money is also a tool for “financial repression,” which occurs when governments surreptitiously confiscate money from savers.
P.P.P.P.S. Maybe it’s time to reconsider central banks?
[…] I’ve always assumed that the Fed goofs because it wants to stimulate the economy (based on Keynesian monetary theory). […]
[…] I’ve always assumed that the Fed goofs because it wants to stimulate the economy (based on Keynesian monetary theory). […]
[…] a recession with fiscal Keynesianism (politicians borrowing in order to boost spending) and/or monetary Keynesianism (the central bank creating money to boost […]
[…] the central bank’s easy-money policycreated artificially low interest rates, but those policies also produced high inflation, and now […]
[…] the central bank’s easy-money policy created artificially low interest rates, but those policies also produced high inflation, and now […]
[…] Well said. Easy-money policy is like having six drinks at the bar. The consequences – rising prices, financial bubbles, and recessions – are akin to the hangover. […]
[…] Well said. Easy-money policy is like having six drinks at the bar. The consequences – rising prices, financial bubbles, and recessions – are akin to the hangover. […]
[…] This is nonsense. At the risk of being boring and wonky, the factors mentioned in the article are important, but they will only change relative prices in the absence of bad monetary policy. […]
[…] This is nonsense. At the risk of being boring and wonky, the factors mentioned in the article are important, but they will only change relative prices in the absence of bad monetary policy. […]
[…] The bad news is that false booms almost always are followed by real busts. […]
[…] The other bad news is that easy-money policy sets the stage for future hard times. In other words, the Fed causes a boom-bust cycle. […]
[…] bottom line is that Keynesian monetary policyproduces inflation and rising prices while Keynesian fiscal policy produces more wasteful spending […]
[…] bottom line is that Keynesian monetary policy produces inflation and rising prices while Keynesian fiscal policy produces more wasteful spending […]
[…] his support for Keynesian fiscal policy, I suspect Biden also believes in Keynesian monetary policy. As such, we presumably would have had the same policy if Biden had been elected in […]
[…] obvious lesson to be learned is that central banks such as the Fed shouldn’t try to steer the economy with Keynesian-style […]
[…] obvious lesson to be learned is that central banks such as the Fed shouldn’t try to steer the economy with Keynesian-style […]
[…] of misguided monetary policy. Politicians from both parties seem perfectly happy with Keynesian policy from the Federal […]
[…] of years of misguided monetary policy. Politicians from both parties seem perfectly happy with Keynesian policy from the Federal […]
[…] Trump has been profligate with our money, and he was that way even before the coronavirus became an excuse to open the budgetary spigot. Moreover, he was just like Obama in pressuring the Federal Reserve for Keynesian-style monetary policy. […]
[…] Trump has been profligate with our money, and he was that way even before the coronavirus became an excuse to open the budgetary spigot. Moreover, he was just like Obama in pressuring the Federal Reserve for Keynesian-style monetary policy. […]
[…] in a world of Keynesian monetary policy, that’s a very real […]
[…] data on key indicators such as taxes, spending, regulation, trade policy, rule of law, and monetary policy, here are the top-20 […]
[…] data on key indicators such as taxes, spending, regulation, trade policy, rule of law, and monetary policy, here are the top-20 […]
[…] Trump has been profligate with our money, and he was that way even before the coronavirus became an excuse to open the budgetary spigot. Moreover, he was just like Obama in pressuring the Federal Reserve for Keynesian-style monetary policy. […]
[…] in a world of Keynesian monetary policy, that’s a very real […]
[…] in a world of Keynesian monetary policy, that’s a very real […]
[…] I’m not a big fan of the Federal Reserve, mostly because of its Keynesian monetary policy. […]
[…] Trump has been profligate with our money, and he was that way even before the coronavirus became an excuse to open the budgetary spigot. Moreover, he was just like Obama in pressuring the Federal Reserve for Keynesian-style monetary policy. […]
[…] (the Federal Reserve should be blamed for creating a fragile market with easy-money policies). But a trade war could be the trigger that leads to the next […]
[…] Trump has been profligate with our money, and he was that way even before the coronavirus became an excuse to open the budgetary spigot. Moreover, he was just like Obama in pressuring the Federal Reserve for Keynesian-style monetary policy. […]
[…] Trump has been profligate with our money, and he was that way even before the coronavirus became an excuse to open the budgetary spigot. Moreover, he was just like Obama in pressuring the Federal Reserve for Keynesian-style monetary policy. […]
[…] approach of easy moneyand artificially low interest rates, but we don’t have firm evidence (yet) of negative […]
[…] approach of easy moneyand artificially low interest rates, but we don’t have firm evidence (yet) of negative […]
[…] approach of easy money and artificially low interest rates, but we don’t have firm evidence (yet) of negative […]
[…] a good year. The economy suffered a big drop thanks to bad government policies (easy-money from the Federal Reserve and corrupt housing subsidies from Fannie Mae and Freddie […]
[…] Trump has been profligate with our money, and he was that way even before the coronavirus became an excuse to open the budgetary spigot. Moreover, he was just like Obama in pressuring the Federal Reserve for Keynesian-style monetary policy. […]
[…] Trump has been profligate with our money, and he was that way even before the coronavirus became an excuse to open the budgetary spigot. Moreover, he was just like Obama in pressuring the Federal Reserve for Keynesian-style monetary policy. […]
[…] Trump has been profligate with our money, and he was that way even before the coronavirus became an excuse to open the budgetary spigot. Moreover, he was just like Obama in pressuring the Federal Reserve for Keynesian-style monetary policy. […]
[…] leads to predictable battles over how to address the fallout as well as battles over how to avoid the same mistakes in the […]
[…] Keynesianismo monetario – el gobierno crea más dinero con la esperanza de que las tasas de interés más bajas estimulen los préstamos y los receptores gasten más. […]
[…] that it was the fault of “Wall Street greed,” when the crisis actually was caused by bad monetary policy from the Federal Reserve and corrupt housing subsidies from Fannie Mae and Freddie […]
[…] Monetary Keynesianism – the government creates more money in hopes that lower interest rates will stimulate borrowing and recipients will spend more. […]
[…] As I mentioned in the interview, that’s grotesquely inaccurate. The crisis was caused by easy-money policy by the Federal Reserve and misguided subsidies from Fannie Mae and Freddie […]
[…] I was interviewed yesterday about the possibility of a recession and potential policy options. You can watch the full interview here and get my two cents about economic forecasting, as well as Keynesian monetary policy. […]
[…] I also make a point to regularly read non-libertarians such as Desmond Lachman, Will Wilkinson, Dalibor Rohac, and Noah Smith even though I sometimes – or even often […]
[…] doesn’t need more so-called stimulus policies. Whether it’s Keynesian fiscal policy or Keynesian monetary policy, trying to artificially goose consumption is a dead-end […]
[…] economists also point out that false booms instigated by easy money can do a lot of […]
[…] obvious answer is that the Central Bank is susceptible to Keynesian monetary policy, which results in a harmful boom-bust […]
[…] close, here’s what I said back in October about Trump’s Keynesian approach to monetary […]
[…] monetary policy is the big threat. Mistakes by the Fed sooner or later cause recessions (and the false booms that are the leading indicator of future […]
[…] P.S. As I noted in my interview, the current shakiness of financial markets should be blamed on Trump’s protectionism and the hangover from Keynesian monetary policy. […]
[…] from the Austrian School have explained, artificially low interest rates and other types of Keynesian monetary policy create the conditions for subsequent […]
[…] the way, none of this changes my view that monetary policy is always the first place to look when assigning blame for economic downturns and […]
[…] policies and statement (the Federal Reserve should be blamed for creating a fragile market with easy-money policies). But a trade war could be the trigger that leads to the next […]
[…] This article was reprinted with permission from International Liberty and sourced from FEE.org. […]
[…] His sensible approach to tax and regulation is offset by his weak approach to spending and his problematic view of monetary policy. […]
Red pill,
Another bad thing happened in 1913. The 17th amendment made Senators elected by popular vote instead of appointed by state legislatures. This weakened federalism and helped make the federal government more powerful.
John M. Keynes was a progressive. Many terrible things for this nation started in the era of Woodrow Wilson, with particular emphasis on the year 1913: The Revenue Act of 1913, The Federal Reserve Act of 1913, when Congress abdicated their fiscal, financial and monetary responsibility to the American public.
We’ve been on a progressive/socialist/communist road ever since. socialism is a failed socio-economic construct, but allows wealth and power transfer to the few at the expense of the many. Just look at the corpses of socialist regimes littered throughout history for confirmation of this fact. Venezuela is the latest incarnation; soon to be yet another casualty.
Free markets and sound money have been proven over time, but there are too few opportunities for graft and corruption. Centrally planned, command economies are doomed to fail.
1) “The statesman who should attempt to direct private people in what manner they ought to employ their capitals, would not only load himself with a most unnecessary attention, but assume an authority which could safely be trusted, not only to no single person, but to no council or senate whatever, and which would nowhere be so dangerous as in the hands of a man who had folly and presumption enough to fancy himself fit to exercise it.” – Adam Smith, The Wealth Of Nations, Book IV, Chapter II, p. 456, para. 10.
2) “There is no art which one government sooner learns of another than that of draining money from the pockets of the people.” – Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations
3) “The popularity of inflation and credit expansion, the ultimate source of the repeated attempts to render people prosperous by credit expansion, and thus the cause of the cyclical fluctuations of business, manifests itself clearly in the customary terminology. The boom is called good business, prosperity, and upswing. Its unavoidable aftermath, the readjustment of conditions to the real data of the market, is called crisis, slump, bad business, depression. People rebel against the insight that the disturbing element is to be seen in the malinvestment and the overconsumption of the boom period and that such an artificially induced boom is doomed. They are looking for the philosophers’ stone to make it last.” — Ludwig von Mises (1940)
4) “I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world, no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.” – Woodrow Wilson
5) “I have had men watching you for a long time and I am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the Bank. … You are a den of vipers and thieves.” – Andrew Jackson, 1834, on closing the Second Bank of the United States; (unabridged form, extended citation)
[…] article is by Dan Mitchell and comes from International Liberty. It was posted there on 13 October […]
Reblogged this on James' Ramblings.