Sometimes a picture really does tell a thousand words. Here’s a chart, based on data from the Philadelphia Fed, showing actual economic results compared to the predictions of professional economists. As you can see, my profession does a wretched job. Comparisons based on predictions from the IMF, OECD, CBO, and OMB doubtlessly would generate equally embarrassing results. This does not mean economists are idiots (insert obvious joke here), but it is an additional reason why Keynesianism is misguided. If economists are unable to predict what’s going to happen with the economy in the near future, why should we expect anything positive when politicians tinker with short-run economic performance? That’s especially the case when they pass so-called stimulus legislation that increases the burden of government spending.
h/t: James Montier, via Paul Kedrosky, via Andrew Sullivan
[…] you now understand why I have several columns based on why people should not trust […]
[…] I wrote the first edition of “Don’t Trust Economists” back in 2010, the column focused on a chart showing […]
[…] the risk of understatement, economists are not good […]
[…] My knee-jerk reaction to this chart is that nobody should pay attention to economic forecasters for the simple reason that they have a terrible track record. […]
[…] My knee-jerk reaction to this chart is that nobody should pay attention to economic forecasters for the simple reason that they have a terrible track record. […]
[…] was not a new revelation. Back in early 2010, I shared a graph that succinctly illustrated why economists shouldn’t be trusted when they make economic […]
[…] and potential policy options. You can watch the full interview here and get my two cents about economic forecasting, as well as Keynesian monetary […]
[…] Economists are lousy forecasters. […]
[…] the way, here’s a clip from earlier in the interview. Other than admitting that economists are lousy forecasters, I also warned that the economy is probably being hurt by Trump’s protectionism and his […]
[…] the way, here’s a clip from earlier in the interview. Other than admitting that economists are lousy forecasters, I also warned that the economy is probably being hurt by Trump’s protectionism and his failure […]
[…] way, here’s a clip from earlier in the interview. Other than admitting that economists are lousy forecasters, I also warned that the economy is probably being hurt by Trump’s protectionism and his […]
[…] As you can see, I discussed the benefits of pro-growth reforms, but also warned that monetary policy is the wild card and also admitted that economists are lousy forecasters. […]
[…] what about short-term fluctuations? Where are we in the so-called business cycle? I don’t think economists are good at forecasting the ups and downs of the economy, but I did mention the factors […]
[…] always respond with a giant caveat about economists being lousy forecasters, and I also warn that there are many policies that determine prosperity, which makes it inherently […]
[…] economists are lousy forecasters, I don’t pretend to know the answer, but I think we should worry about the legacy impact of […]
[…] economists are lousy forecasters, I don’t pretend to know the answer, but I think we should worry about the legacy impact of […]
[…] not pretending any of this is a forecast, particularly since economists have a miserable track record in that regard. Instead, the following lists are simply things I hope may happen or fear may […]
[…] since, based on a fairly miserable track record, my profession lives in a big glass […]
[…] since, based on a fairly miserable track record, my profession lives in a big glass […]
[…] Switching to a completely different topic, I’m the first to admit that economists are easy to mock, especially the ones who think they know enough to fine tune the […]
[…] To be sure, that doesn’t guarantee what will happen if any of the aforementioned tax plans are enacted. Moreover, one can quibble with the structure and specifications of the Tax Foundation’s model. Economists, after all, aren’t exactly famous for their forecasting prowess. […]
[…] economists are lousy forecasters, I won’t pretend to know how much additional growth the Bush economic plan would produce. But […]
[…] economists are lousy forecasters, I won’t pretend to know how much additional growth the Bush economic plan would produce. But […]
[…] While economist deservedly get mocked, we’re not totally useless. We occasionally show a bit of […]
[…] And I’ll be the first to admit that models are woefully inadequate in their attempts to measure millions of people making billions of decisions. Heck, I’ve even pointed out that economists are terrible forecasters. […]
[…] And I’ll be the first to admit that models are woefully inadequate in their attempts to measure millions of people making billions of decisions. Heck, I’ve even pointed out that economists are terrible forecasters. […]
[…] And I’ll be the first to admit that models are woefully inadequate in their attempts to measure millions of people making billions of decisions. Heck, I’ve even pointed out that economists are terrible forecasters. […]
[…] since I obviously don’t control Republicans and since I freely admit that economists are lousy forecasters, let’s do something more practical to start […]
[…] I shared a chart back in 2010 to show that economists are terrible […]
[…] I shared a chart back in 2010 to show that economists are terrible […]
[…] economic prediction earlier in the year. They basically admit they goofed (though, to be fair, all economists are lousy forecasters), as you can see from this excerpt, but we’re supposed to blame the lower GDP number on […]
[…] illustrated by this chart, economists are lousy […]
[…] let’s conduct a thought experiment. Economics is an inexact science (to put it mildly), so perhaps the Tax Foundation economists are wrong. As a matter of fact, let’s assume they […]
[…] let’s conduct a thought experiment. Economics is an inexact science (to put it mildly), so perhaps the Tax Foundation economists are wrong. As a matter of fact, let’s assume they […]
It doesn’t have a label for the y-axis…so it doesn’t really mean anything.
[…] in 2010, I shared a remarkable graph comparing the predictions of economists to what actually […]
When I was in college we learned about business cycles. They went up and down and always resembled a sign graph.
Where are the ups and downs of the business cycles in their predictions?
[…] in 2010, I shared a remarkable graph comparing the predictions of economists to what actually […]
[…] P.S. Never forget that economists are lousy forecasters. […]
[…] important to understand that I’m not blaming him for making bad predictions. After all, economists are lousy forecasters. I blame him for peddling the silly Keynesian theory that bigger government boosts economic […]
[…] a list of predictions. But I won’t try to predict the economy. As I already have explained, economists are lousy short-term forecasters. If we actually knew what was going to happen, we’d be […]
[…] I’ve already pointed out that economists are lousy forecasters. […]
[…] would have at least managed to get back to a semi-decent level of growth. More confirmation that economists are lousy forecasters. Rate this: Share this:PrintEmailFacebookTwitterMoredeliciousDiggFarkLinkedInRedditStumbleUponLike […]
[…] economists are lousy at predicting the future, that’s a legitimate […]
[…] economists are lousy at predicting the future, that’s a legitimate […]
[…] economists are lousy at predicting the future, that’s a legitimate […]
[…] economists are lousy at predicting the future, that’s a legitimate […]
[…] look very good with the benefit of hindsight, but economists are notoriously awful forecasters, as I’ve noted before. Moreover, Krugman legitimately could argue that his advice was for the specific circumstances of […]
[…] look very good with the benefit of hindsight, but economists are notoriously awful forecasters, as I’ve noted before. Moreover, Krugman legitimately could argue that his advice was for the specific circumstances of […]
[…] 28, 2010 by Dan Mitchell I posted an amusing (and disappointing) graph in January showing how economists consistently failed to predict major changes in GDP. Russ Roberts […]
What’s interesting in this, is that the biggest divergences are all overlooked market plunges. It suggests a serious case of rose-colored glasses.