I’m glad the United States is now ranked #1 in the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Report, though I point out in this interview that Trump’s performance is mostly a net wash.
His sensible approach to tax and regulation is offset by his weak approach to spending and his problematic view of monetary policy.
I’m embarrassed to admit that I forget to mention protectionism as another area where Trump is pushing in the wrong direction.
But let’s not focus on Trump. Instead, let’s take a closer look at the new data from the World Economic Forum.
And we’ll start with a look at the top 20. You’ll see some familiar jurisdictions, places that always get good grades, such as Singapore, Switzerland, and Hong Kong.
But you’ll also notice that there are several European welfare states with very good scores.
That’s because the GCR – unlike Economic Freedom of the World or the Index of Economic Freedom – does not rank nations based on economic policy. It’s more a measure of the business environment.
But since good policy tends to create a good business environment, there is a connection. Nations such as Germany and the Netherlands, as well as Scandinavian countries, have big welfare states. But the damage of those policies is offset by a very laissez-faire approach to businesses. So the big companies that help put together the GCR understandably give those places good scores.
By the way, it’s also worth mentioning that the 2018 edition uses a revised methodology. And based on this new approach, the United States retroactively gets the top score for 2017 as well.
All that being said, does it matter if a nation is ranked higher rather than lower?
Based on this strong relationship between competitiveness scores and economic output, the answer is yes.
The bottom line is that there’s a very meaningful link between economic liberty and national prosperity.
Now let’s take a closer look at the scores for the United States. As you can see, our top score is mostly due to our market efficiency and innovation environment.
For what it’s worth, I don’t fully agree with the report’s methodology. But that’s mostly because I prefer to look at the degree of economic liberty rather than whether a nation is business friendly. There’s an overlap, of course, but it’s nonetheless important to distinguish between pro-market and pro-business.
In any event, here are a couple of additional findings that caught my eye.
- Chile is easily the highest-ranked nation in Latin America, illustrating again the wisdom of pro-market reforms.
- The United States enjoys a top-10 overall score for infrastructure, including best-in-the-world rankings for road and airport connectivity. Something to keep in mind the next time politicians push for higher gas taxes because of a supposed infrastructure crisis.
- Venezuelans can be proud that they are not the worst nation in the world. That dubious honor goes to Chad. Though the communist paradises of Cuba and North Korea were not ranked.
[…] publish a Global Competitiveness Report that I often favorably cited (2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2016, 2018), even though it was not as methodologically sound as Fraser’s Economic Freedom of the World […]
[…] Most readers care about economic developments and economic comparisons involving the United States. […]
[…] Most readers care about economic developments and economic comparisons involving the United States. […]
[…] Economic Freedom of the World, Index of Economic Freedom, World Competitiveness Ranking, the Global Competitiveness Report, or the World Bank’s Doing Business, publications that endeavor to give us apples-to-apples […]
[…] I also like the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Report and the Institute of Management Development’s World Competitiveness Rankings, both of which […]
[…] you get different answers if you focus on specific features such as competitiveness (the United States) or ease of doing business (New […]
[…] There are several options if you want to measure economic freedom and competitiveness among nations (rankings from the Fraser Institute, Heritage Foundation, and World Economic Forum). […]
[…] There are several options if you want to measure economic freedom and competitiveness among nations (rankings from the Fraser Institute, Heritage Foundation, and World Economic Forum). […]
[…] There are several options if you want to measure economic freedom and competitiveness among nations (rankings from the Fraser Institute, Heritage Foundation, and World Economic Forum). […]
[…] Economic Freedom of the World and, to a lesser extent, the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Report, the Heritage Foundation survey is filled with interesting data on economic liberty in various […]
[…] article is by Dan Mitchell and comes from International Liberty. It was posted there on 18 October […]