In 2016, I posed a rhetorical question about whether young people are so stupid that they shouldn’t be allowed to vote. After all, many of them thought Bernie Sanders would make a good president (of America, not Greece or Venezuela).
Well, maybe we really should increase the voting age. It seems 2016 was not an anomaly. Millennials are dangerously ignorant.
Here’s some analysis from CNN.
Millennials are…bringing a distinctly Millennial approach to policy and governing. And that might include Democratic socialism. Case in point: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez,
the 28-year-old Democratic socialist who won her primary in New York Tuesday in an upset over a 10-term incumbent. More than any other generation before them, Millennials are OK with socialism. A 2016 Gallup poll found 55% of those then aged 18-29 said they had a positive view of it (it’s worth noting 57% supported capitalism and 78% supported free enterprise). …Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign was instrumental in mainstreaming Democratic socialism.
What’s particularly galling is that young people are pessimistic about their economic future and they’ve decided to blame capitalism for problems that exist because of excessive government!
Millennials’ economic situation also plays a role. …A recent study by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis found Millennials born in the ’80s have a net worth 34% below what was expected. And student debt since 2009 has doubled to $1.4 trillion… For many cash-strapped Millennials in debt, Democratic socialism isn’t radical, it’s a way to fix a system they believe failed them.
In other words, young people want to make Mitchell’s Law a never-ending reality.
Let’s look at another example. Here’s some of what Michelle Goldberg wrote in a fawning column in the New York Times.
…all over the nation, people, particularly women, are working with near supernatural energy to rebuild democracy from the ground up… For younger people who see Donald Trump’s election as the apotheosis of a rotten political and economic system, it often means trying to remake that party
as a vehicle for democratic socialism. …Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a 28-year-old democratic socialist, shook the Democratic Party by toppling Joseph Crowley, a 19-year incumbent, chairman of the Queens County Democratic Party and potential heir to House minority leader Nancy Pelosi. …the real red wave may be democratic socialism’s growing political influence, especially among young people. …The D.S.A., to which Ocasio-Cortez belongs, is the largest socialist organization in America. Its growth has exploded since the 2016 election… Many of the D.S.A.’s goals, reflected in Ocasio-Cortez’s platform, are indistinguishable from those of progressive democrats. But if the D.S.A. is happy to work alongside liberals, its members are generally serious about the “socialist” part of democratic socialist. Its constitution envisions “a humane social order based on popular control of resources and production, economic planning, equitable distribution, feminism, racial equality and non-oppressive relationships.”
In other words, these cranks are real socialists. They actually want government to own and manage the means of production (“popular control of resources and production” and “economic planning”).
This is a problem for the non-crazy left.
Talk of popular control of the means of production is anathema to many older Democrats, even very liberal ones. …After Ocasio-Cortez’s win, Pelosi denied Republican claims that socialism is ascendant in the Democratic Party. It’s hard to blame her for being defensive, since for generations “socialist” was considered a slur, and it’s one that’s hurled at Democrats indiscriminately.
But young people seem prone to fantasy.
…one recent survey shows that 61 percent of Democrats between 18 and 34 view socialism positively. The combination of the Great Recession, the rising cost of education, the unreliability of health insurance and the growing precariousness of the workplace has left young people with gnawing material insecurity. They have no memory of the widespread failure of Communism, but the failures of capitalism are all around them.
Needless to say, Ms. Goldberg doesn’t list the “failures of capitalism,” but it’s a very safe bet that she’s blaming free markets for problems caused by government (a common theme in US economic history).
No wonder young people are so deeply confused. This is probably what they’re taught in government schools.
But there is a silver lining. Courtesy of Libertarian Reddit, we can enjoy some humor poking fun at Ms. Ocasio-Cortez’s overly earnest form of socialism.
Amusing, but very unfair to religion. After all, we can’t go back in time to confirm details from the bible.
But we can look today at countries like Cuba, Greece, Venezuela, and North Korea to confirm the utter insanity of supporting any type of socialism.
Let’s close with a video from 2013. It’s about Obamanomics and young people, but it’s really about why big government makes it hard for young people to get ahead.
I especially like the explanation of how young people are big losers because of the entitlement state.
Makes me wonder if Ms. Ocasio-Cortez will take the lead on, say, Social Security reform when she gets to Congress?
Needless to say, I won’t be holding my breath.
P.S. Young people aren’t a (totally) lost cause. They may not like capitalism, perhaps because they confuse it with cronyism, but they are sympathetic to “free enterprise.”
[…] if the polling data is accurate, the problem seems especially acute with young […]
[…] if the polling data is accurate, the problem seems especially acute with young […]
[…] if the polling data is accurate, the problem seems especially acute with young […]
[…] if the polling data is accurate, the problem seems especially acute with young […]
[…] if the polling data is accurate, the problem seems especially acute with young […]
[…] of this is a surprise. I’ve written a couple of times about the foolish views of young […]
[…] of this is a surprise. I’ve written a couple of times about the foolish views of young […]
[…] interesting question of why millennials and Gen-Zers don’t appreciate capitalism and instead are sympathetic to the dirigiste ideology that will make their lives more […]
[…] question of why millennials and Gen-Zers don’t appreciate capitalism and instead are sympathetic to the dirigiste ideology that will make their lives more […]
[…] I’ve written a couple of times about a disturbingly large share of young people support statist economic policies. […]
[…] written a couple of times about a disturbingly large share of young people support statist economic […]
[…] favor a different approach if we want to cure young people of their infatuation with socialism, but any port in a […]
[…] a lot of youth support in 2016, I gave the issue even more attention, and I’ve since continued to investigate why so many young people are sympathetic to such a poisonous ideology with a lengthy track record […]
[…] for socialism is disturbingly high among the […]
[…] for socialism is disturbingly high among the […]
[…] Even the young. Maybe especially the young. […]
[…] suspect the average supporter of Bernie Sanders or Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez thinks that socialism is big government with lots of handouts financed by class warfare taxation. […]
[…] can vaguely understand how some naive youngsters can be seduced by socialism. Especially if what they have in mind is merely a pro-market Nordic […]
[…] bad news is that a lot of young people nonetheless believe in this evil […]
Come on now…be honest. You really believe Jesus was a capitalist?
[…] young people seem susceptible to this ideology, even when they are among the main […]
[…] like to think this isn’t what really motivates Bernie’s young supporters, but you have to wonder what’s rattling around in their […]
[…] already shared some AOC humor, but only incidental examples while making other […]
[…] the people who buy sporting goods are not the vapid social justice warriors who proclaim their hostility to capitalism while patronizing some of the world’s most […]
[…] the people who buy sporting goods are not the vapid social justice warriors who proclaim their hostility to capitalism while patronizing some of the world’s most […]
[…] El resultado más perturbador de la reciente elección a medio plazo no es que Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez sea miembro del Congreso. En realidad, espero eso por su valor humorístico. […]
[…] The most disturbing outcome of the recent mid-term election isn’t that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez will be a Member of Congress. I actually look forward to that because of the humor value. […]
[…] The most disturbing outcome of the recent mid-term election isn’t that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez will be a Member of Congress. I actually look forward to that because of the humor value. […]
[…] directed to mushy-headed young people in America, but it neatly summarizes how Brazil go in […]
[…] now look at Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez‘s brilliant observation about rescuing Venezuela’s crippled […]
[…] suspect the average supporter of Bernie Sanders or Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez thinks that socialism is big government with lots of handouts financed by class warfare taxation. […]
[…] suspect the average supporter of Bernie Sanders or Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez thinks that socialism is big government, with lots of handouts financed by class warfare taxation. […]
[…] suspect the average supporter of Bernie Sanders or Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez thinks that socialism is big government, with lots of handouts financed by class warfare taxation. […]
[…] Republican friends that if they don’t want crazies like Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to wind up in charge of Washington, they need to stop playing footsie with special interests and […]
[…] to the boomlet she’s created, I’ve already written about why young people are deluded if they think bigger government is the answer, and I also pointed out that Norway is hardly a role […]
[…] have to wonder why so many young people are intrigued by socialism when they’re the ones getting screwed by big […]
The strongest anti-Communists are the ones who escaped from the old hardliner regimes.
“How Socialism Can Ruin Your Life”
BY JOHN HAWKINS JULY 4, 2018
https://pjmedia.com/trending/how-socialism-can-ruin-your-life/
Therefore, another strong signal that,
The long term prospects for the US are for further suppression of economic growth and an even larger economic growth rate deficit compared to the world average — which is mathematically synonymous to decline.
Therefore stay mobile. Do partake in the big American smorgasbord as Europeanized modern American voter-lemmings consume the advantage built by American generations past — but do keep a salvage boat handy because these same voter-lemmings are going down.
“Multiple Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) leaders are openly endorsing communism on social media, indicating that the already far-left organization has taken a sharp left turn.”
“Democratic Socialists of America Leaders Say ‘Communism Is Good'”
BY DEBRA HEINE JULY 2, 2018
https://pjmedia.com/trending/democratic-socialists-of-america-leaders-say-communism-is-good/
happy 4th of July comrades…………………………….
People’s definition of socialism / communism / capitalism are all over the map. I hear some on the right call any government action socialism or communism, and those on the left call any negative action by business, including government action on behalf of business, capitalism.
The poll from ’16 shows 85% support for free enterprise vs 60 for capitalism, indicating people aren’t operating on clear definitions.
It would be more instructive if you asked something like “Should the government own most / all property?” or “Should government set the price of all / most things.”
Socialism is to be abhorred as a form of slavery. One would think it would be obvious to even the meanest intelligence, that it is the state that blunders and fails – not the free market.
Reblogged this on Gds44's Blog.
Capitalism has negative connotations because of widespread, despicable Crony Capitalism.
But everybody wants freedom to do what they want, which means the phrase “free entreprise” is vastly more attractive. So only call our philosophy free enterprise – it’s seen as FAR more beneficial.