Part I of this series looked at socialism’s track record of failure, while Part II pointed out that greater levels of socialism lead to greater levels of misery.
For Part III, let’s start with this video on the economics of socialism.
If the world was governed by logic, there would be no need to address this topic for a third time.
After all, the evidence is overwhelming that capitalism (oops, I mean free enterprise) does a better job than socialism.
But it seems that we don’t live in a logical world. We have too many people who have an anti-empirical belief in bigger government.
And, if the polling data is accurate, the problem seems especially acute with young people.
I’ve wondered whether sub-par government schools are part of the problem. Are they mis-educating kids?
I don’t know if that was a problem in the past, but Richard Rahn warns in the Washington Times that it will probably be a problem in the future.
Recent polls have shown rising support for socialism and an increasingly negative view of capitalism, particularly among the young. …Most of those who say they support socialism are probably unaware that it has failed every place and time that it has been tried. …They may also not be aware that socialism relies on coercion to function…
By contrast, capitalism relies on the voluntary exchange of goods and services… Last week at the NEA’s annual meeting, the delegates demanded that the union issue a study criticizing, among many things, “capitalism.” Has anyone thought through the alternatives – a system based on slavery or serfdom…? Under capitalism, investment and productive labor are allocated by individual consumer choice. …Under socialism, there is no good mechanism for meeting consumer demand; the socialist leaders decide what the people should have. There is no mechanism for creating and encouraging innovation – that is why socialist states normally only produce something new after it has already been produced in a capitalist country… So why then are the teachers’ unions advocating that capitalism be attacked, and socialism be applauded? The answer is simple, willful ignorance.
I’ve always supported school choice because I want better educational outcomes, especially for poor and minority students.
In recent months, I’ve wondered we also need school choice because of what teacher unions are doing on issues such as critical race theory and school re-openings.
Now it seems we need choice simply to protect kids from the risk of being propagandized.
P.S. Or protect kids from nonsensical forms of discipline.
[…] P.S. If you want information on why socialism is bad economics, you can peruse my three–part series. […]
[…] P.S. If you want information on why socialism is bad economics, you can peruse my three–part series. […]
[…] explained in my three-part series (here, here, and here), socialism is a poisonous ideology. With poisonous […]
[…] explained in my three-part series (here, here, and here), socialism is a poisonous ideology. With poisonous […]
[…] P.S. If you want information on why socialism is bad economics, you can peruse my three–part series. […]
[…] P.S. If you want information on why socialism is bad economics, you can peruse my three–part series. […]
[…] But since there’s never been a successful socialist economy (even voluntary socialist societies collapse), maybe it is time they realize they’ve been supporting a failed ideology. […]
[…] good enough to get added to this collection of Reagan videos, but it is a good description of why socialism is a […]
[…] And maybe we can also learn why socialism is a mistake. […]
[…] P.S. If you want information on why socialism is bad economics, you can peruse my three–part series. […]
[…] part of my ongoing efforts to show that free enterprise produces better results than statism, I often use data on per-capita economic output – especially when comparing nations over […]
[…] part of my ongoing efforts to show that free enterprise produces better results than statism, I often use data on per-capita economic output – especially when comparing nations over long […]
[…] good enough to get added to this collection of Reagan videos, but it is a good description of why socialism is a […]
[…] good enough to get added to this collection of Reagan videos, but it is a good description of why socialism is a […]
[…] ideas have caused immense damage, such as socialismand fascism. And others such as corporatism and the welfare state, have […]
[…] ideas have caused immense damage, such as socialism and fascism. And others such as corporatism and the welfare state, have undermined the benefits of […]
[…] The moral of the story is that you get great results with lots of economic liberty, okay results with some economic liberty, and miserable results with almost no economic liberty (i.e., lots of socialism). […]
[…] The moral of the story is that you get great results with lots of economic liberty, okay results with some economic liberty, and miserable results with almost no economic liberty (i.e., lots of socialism). […]
[…] good enough to get added to this collection of Reagan videos, but it is a good description of why socialism is a […]
[…] is a total and miserable failure, anywhere and everywhere it’s been […]
[…] P.S. If you want information on why socialism is bad economics, you can peruse my three–part series. […]
[…] or theoretical analysis. Just open your eyes and look around the world. The nations based on socialism and so-called positive rights have produced economic misery and […]
[…] good enough to get added to this collection of Reagan videos, but it is a good description of why socialism is a […]
[…] couple of years ago, to help build the case against socialism, I showed how West Germany enjoyed much faster growth and much more prosperity than East […]
[…] The Case Against Socialism, Part III […]
[…] P.S. If you want information on why socialism is bad economics, you can peruse my three–part series. […]
[…] this was a boxing match between capitalism and socialism, the refs would have stopped the fight several decades […]
[…] I want people to understand the intellectual and empirical case against socialism, as summarized in my three-part series (Part I, Part II, and Part III). […]
[…] I want people to understand the intellectual and empirical case against socialism, as summarized in my three-part series (Part I, Part II, and Part III). […]
[…] I, Part II, Part III, Part IV, and Part V) and the case against socialism (Part I, Part II, and Part III), while also noting that there’s a separate case to be made against redistribution and the […]
[…] On that point, I’ll agree, though I think it shows why that collectivist ideology is so destructive. […]
[…] On that point, I’ll agree, though I think it shows why that collectivist ideology is so destructive. […]
[…] The Case Against Socialism, Part III […]
While the common defense against socialism is that it has never worked (and a valid one), I think using this thread is not going to be very effective against those young people you mention (if you’re over 40, what’s your excuse?). They’re being taught that a new, nicer, and more “fair” system is achievable, and while they’re being taught that they don’t get the history either. So they are ignorant of both sides of the story.
I’m not sure how we overcome that, but I think we need to never give up.