The Great Depression was an unimaginably miserable period in American history. Income fell, unemployment rose, and misery was pervasive.
But there was still room for political satire in the 1930s. Here’s a cartoon that I shared back in 2012. Based on the notations in the upper right, I gather it’s from the Chicago Tribune, though I don’t know if that’s actually true. And I also don’t know the year.
But I certainly sympathized with the message since Hoover and Roosevelt were big-spending interventionists.
Hoover saddled the economy with taxes (an increase in the top tax rate from 25 percent to 63 percent!), spending, protectionism, regulation, and intervention. Roosevelt then doubled down on almost all of those bad policies, with further tax rate increases (up to 79 percent, and he even pushed for a 100 percent tax rate in the early 1940s!!), more spending, and lots of additional regulation and intervention.
And here’s a cartoon I posted the previous year. Since I don’t know whether public opinion was on the right side, I don’t know if it accurately captures the mood of taxpayers.
But it’s 100-percent accurate about the instinctive response of politicians. For “public choice” reasons, the crowd in Washington has an incentive to buy votes with other people’s money. One might even say they spend like drunken sailors, but that’s actually an understatement.
But I’m beginning to digress, as is my wont. Let’s get back to satire and the Great Depression.
And I’m going to be creative. That’s because I saw a cartoon on Reddit‘s libertarian page that makes a very general point about government causing a mess and politicians then blaming the private sector. But because I’m a goofy libertarian policy wonk, I immediately thought that this is a perfect summary of what happened in the 1930s. Hoover and Roosevelt hammered the economy with bad policy, the economy stayed in the dumps for an entire decade, yet the political class someone convinced a lot of people it was all the fault of capitalism.
While I will always view this cartoon as the spot-on depiction of what happened in the 1930s, it obviously applies much more broadly.
Consider the recent financial crisis, which was the result of bad monetary policy and corrupt Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac subsidies. Yet countless politicians blamed greedy capitalism.
Maybe what we have is the cartoon version of Mitchell’s Law. That’s because when politicians cause a problem and blame the free market, they inevitably then claim that the problem justifies giving them more power and control. Lather, rinse, repeat.
[…] is mostly because they get spoon fed inaccurate information in their history classes and now think that laissez-faire capitalism somehow failed in the […]
[…] is mostly because they get spoon fed inaccurate information in their history classes and now think that laissez-faire capitalism somehow failed in the […]
[…] as illustrated by this cartoon, some people still want to blame capitalism for problems caused by […]
[…] me of the superb crayon cartoon, which basically captures the first two-thirds of Mitchell’s […]
[…] probably the biggest falsehood, as explained in this video by Prof. Lee Ohanian, is the notion that big government saved us from […]
[…] probably the biggest falsehood, as explained in this video by Prof. Lee Ohanian, is the notion that big government saved us from […]
[…] crises that occur because of all the regulation, prohibition, and taxation that does exist (think Great Depression, 2008 financial crisis, […]
[…] as illustrated by this cartoon, some people still want to blame capitalism for problems caused by […]
[…] me of the superb crayon cartoon, which basically captures the first two-thirds of Mitchell’s […]
[…] rinse, repeat, all the way to a global downturn (a repeat of the Great Depression is unlikely since that would require big increases in income taxes and many other bad policies as […]
[…] a very safe bet that she’s blaming free markets for problems caused by government (a common theme in US economic […]
[…] I’ve found a story that symbolizes something (for instance, a Great Depression cartoon or the misery of […]
[…] I’ve found a story that symbolizes something (for instance, a Great Depression cartoon or the misery of […]
[…] I heartily encourage this cartoon for anyone who wants an easy way of understanding public policy and the Great […]
Dan, you’re the man! You make a seemingly complicated situation, such as the Great Depression, much clearer and easier to understand because you use the facts m’am, just the facts in explaining how it came to pass. Love you for it!
AMEN John Michael Wagner,,, it’s a full time job refuting Covetous people like Blend… he blames all the world’s problems on the rich, and wants to take the money they worked for. Then being the omnipotent one he is he’ll decide who the deserving poor are that should get some of this money.
Most people are not rich because of one simple thing, they do not make good financial decisions. Just getting beer, cigarettes, candy, and fast food out of your life will put money in your pocket and as a bonus make you healthier.
Richard
Blend,
The amount of wealth is not fixed! It can grow, if allowed. You say that wealthy people becoming wealthier necessarily means that “families at the bottom” have “not enough” wealth. The only way that logic could work is if the economy is a zero-sum game where one person wins only if he takes something from someone else. That is, the rich only get rich by stealing from the poor and middle-class.
This is clearly and manifestly WRONG. If the economy truly was a zero-sum game, how could Americans and Europeans of ALL socioeconomic conditions be so much more prosperous today than one century ago, or two centuries ago? How? They couldn’t.
Most people who are wealthy got so by (a) providing some product or service that society valued, (b) being frugal and saving money, (c) investing their savings rather putting it under their mattress, or (d) a combination of all these things. These people rise above the rest, but not by stealing from them!
True, a small minority of people get rich by stealing from others, whether criminal fraud and theft or via government. Like most people, I don’t like this method. But it’s a minority. Attacking ALL wealthy people means attacking the larger number of productive, frugal, savvy people mentioned above.
You fail to mention the real problem The Federal Reserve! The International Banksters that own the Fed wanted to crash the economy and bring in socialism/communism- FDR was the perfect stooge to accomplish those aims
[…] https://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2017/11/18/everything-you-need-to-know-about-assigning-blame-f… […]
When wealth is so concentrated that there is not enough for families at the bottom, the economy can implode. Today the poorer half of the population has just 0.5% of U.S. wealth. Those at the top will be saved by family trusts.