This is getting surreal. We now have layers of bailouts around the world.
Different nations are doing their own bailouts. On top of that, the Europeans have set up something called the European Financial Stability Facility, which does bailouts across the continent. And then there’s the International Monetary Fund, doing bailouts on a global basis. (and we’re not even counting the indirect bailouts from the Federal Reserve and European Central Bank)
So how is this system working? Well, if you understand the principle of moral hazard, you won’t be surprised to learn that it’s a big flop. Giving bailouts is like trying to cure an alcoholic with more booze.
But the problems are much deeper than promoting bad behavior. Bailouts also undermine growth by misallocating capital. And, most ominously, they create even bigger problems down the road.
Which is now what’s happening. The queen bureaucracy of bailouts, the IMF, may run out of bailout money, and presumably will demand more handouts from member nations – with the United States on the hook for providing the biggest share. Here’s a blurb from the story in the Daily Telegraph.
The head of the IMF has warned that its $384bn (£248bn) war chest designed as an emergency bail-out fund is inadequate to deliver the scale of the support required by troubled states.In a document distributed to the IMF steering committee at the weekend, Ms Lagarde said: “The fund’s credibility, and hence effectiveness, rests on its perceived capacity to cope with worst-casescenarios. Our lending capacity of almost $400bn looks comfortable today, but pales in comparison with the potential financing needs of vulnerable countries and crisis bystanders.”
At the risk of stating the obvious, the IMF should not get any more money. This is one of those moments for which the phrase “Hell No!” was invented.
The time has come to stop the cycle of bailouts. As Greece has demonstrated, bailouts simply give politicians some breathing room to postpone necessary reforms.
But it’s not just that bailouts encourage bad behavior in the public sector. They also promote moral hazard, leading financial institutions to make excessively risky loans because of an expectation that taxpayers will be coerced into making up any losses.
To understand why bailouts and moral hazard are so misguided, here’s a video narrated by Nicole Neily of the Independent Women’s Forum.
The video largely focuses on American policy issues such as Fannie, Freddie, and TARP, but the principles apply to all bailouts.
[…] explained over and over again why it’s not a good idea to give more matches to a pyromaniac. But I never […]
[…] Monetary Fund. Thіѕ imposes thе costs οn thе entire world (wіth U.S. taxpayers picking up thе Ɩаrɡеѕt раrt οf thе tab), addresses thе small-rυn crisis, аnԁ promotes tеrrіbƖе […]
[…] have a right to be statist, but the question we have to decide is whether American taxpayers should subsidize that destructive mindset. Not surprisingly, I say no. Indeed, the IMF may even be worse than the […]
[…] A front-door bailout of Europe by the United States – The bad news is that there have been bailouts of Greece, Ireland, and Portugal via the clowns at the IMF. The good news is that the bailouts […]
[…] states via the International Monetary Fund. This imposes the costs on the entire world (with U.S. taxpayers picking up the biggest part of the tab), addresses the short-run crisis, and promotes bad long-run […]
[…] states around a International Monetary Fund. This imposes a costs upon a complete universe (with U.S. taxpayers picking up a greatest partial of a tab), addresses a short-run crisis, as well as promotes bad long-run […]
[…] states via the International Monetary Fund. This imposes the costs on the entire world (with U.S. taxpayers picking up the biggest part of the tab), addresses the short-run crisis, and promotes bad long-run […]
[…] I’m against bailing out international bureaucracies that are running short on cash because they’ve been busy engaging in bailouts, which is the […]
[…] head Christine Lagarde recently signaled that the Fund is running low on bailout money. According to the Telegraph, “the IMF has warned that its $384 bn war chest […]
[…] head Christine Lagarde recently signaled that the Fund is running low on bailout money. According to the Telegraph, “the IMF has warned that its $384 bn war chest […]
Great response, Zorba! Dr. Mitchell, thanks for the post – posting on my FB page. Getting to the point of speechlessness!!! Especially as the American public at large are inert regarding such issues. Most do not understand economics and appear to not want to take the time to understand it. We are truly at an enormously sad time in American history.
Are western democracies reaching the point of running out of sandbags to put on the dam they have erected to protect themselves from the decreasing competitiveness inherent in welfare state incentives flattening the effort v.s. reward curve?