Kudos to Nicki Kurokawa, a former Cato employee, for this short but substantive video explaining “moral hazard.” She notes that government-subsidized risk played a pernicious role in the housing bubble and financial crisis, and warns that “too big to fail” may create similar problems in the future.
Government-Subsidized Risk Is a Bad Idea
January 12, 2010 by Dan Mitchell
Posted in Fannie Mae, Financial Crisis, Freddie Mac | Tagged Bailout, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Moral Hazard | 37 Comments
37 Responses
Leave a Reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
-
Join 4,863 other subscribers
-
Recent Posts
Pages
- 100 Tragic Years of Communism
- Bureaucrat Hall of Fame
- Bureaucrat Humor (pending)
- Collectivism Humor
- Five Things About Me
- Government in Cartoons and Images
- Gun Control Satire
- Honest Leftists
- Libertarian Humor
- Libertarian Quandaries
- Mocking Europeans
- Moocher Hall of Fame
- Poverty Hucksters
- Sex and Government
- Victims of Government
Visitors (beginning December 23, 2010)
- Big Government Bureaucracy Bureaucrats Class warfare Competitiveness Constitution Corporate income tax Corporate tax Corruption Crime Cronyism Debt Deficit Dependency Donald Trump Economics Education England Entitlements Europe Fiscal Crisis Fiscal Policy Flat Tax Free Markets Government-run healthcare Government intervention Government Spending Government stupidity Government Thuggery Government waste Gun control Health Care Health Reform Higher Taxes Humor International bureaucracy IRS Jobs Joe Biden Keynesian Economics Laffer Curve Libertarianism Liberty Local government News Appearance Obama Obamacare OECD Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Political Humor Politics Poverty Protectionism Redistribution Regulation Republicans Socialism States Statism stimulus Supply-side economics Taxation Tax avoidance Tax Competition Tax Haven Tax Increase Tax Increases Tax Reform Trade Unemployment United Kingdom Value-Added Tax VAT Welfare Welfare State
Archives
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
Recent Comments
Categories
- 2nd Amendment
- Academic Bias
- African-Americans
- Al Gore
- Alarmism
- Argentina
- Arizona
- Asset Forfeiture
- Atlas Shrugged
- Australia
- Austrian Economics
- Ayn Rand
- Bailout
- Balanced Budget
- Barney Frank
- Baseball
- Basic Income
- Belgium
- Bernanke
- Bernie Sanders
- Big business
- Big Government
- Bob Dole Award
- Boondoggle
- Boris Johnson
- Botswana
- Brain drain
- Brazil
- Brexit
- Bulldogs
- Bureaucracy
- Bureaucrats
- Bush
- Buttigieg
- California
- Canada
- Capital Gains Tax
- Carbon Tax
- cash for clunkers
- Cato Institute
- Cayman Islands
- CBO
- Center for Freedom and Prosperity
- Central planning
- Centralization
- Charity
- Chile
- China
- Chris Christie
- Civil Disobedience
- Class warfare
- Climate change
- Clinton
- Cold War
- Collectivism
- Colorado
- Communism
- Competitiveness
- Congress
- Congressional Budget Office
- Connecticut
- Constitution
- Convergence
- Coolidge
- Corbyn
- Corporate income tax
- Corporate tax
- Corruption
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Creative Destruction
- Crime
- Cronyism
- Cuba
- Dan Hannan
- David Cameron
- Dawgs
- Death Tax
- Debt
- Deferral
- Deficit
- Delaware
- Democrats
- Demographics
- Denmark
- Dependency
- Deposit Insurance
- Discrimination
- Donald Trump
- Double Taxation
- Drug War
- Earmarks
- Easy money
- Economic Rankings
- Economics
- Education
- EITC
- Election
- Elitism
- Elizabeth Warren
- Eminent Domain
- England
- Entitlements
- Environmentalism
- Equality
- Estonia
- Euro
- Europe
- European Commission
- European Union
- Executive pay
- Fair Tax
- Fannie Mae
- Fascism
- Fatal conceit
- FATCA
- Federal Reserve
- Federalism
- Financial Crisis
- Financial Privacy
- Finland
- Fiscal Crisis
- Fiscal Policy
- Flat Tax
- Florida
- Food and Drug Administration
- food nazi
- Food Stamps
- Foreign Aid
- Foreign Policy
- France
- Freddie Mac
- Free Markets
- Free Speech
- Free State Project
- Freedom
- Gas Tax
- Geithner
- General Motors
- Georgia
- Germany
- Gingrich
- Global Taxation
- Global warming
- Gold Standard
- Gordon Brown
- Government Inefficiency
- Government intervention
- Government Spending
- Government stupidity
- Government Thuggery
- Great Depression
- Greece
- Green New Deal
- Gross domestic product
- Gun control
- Harmonization
- Hayek
- Health Care
- Health Reform
- Higher Taxes
- Hillary Clinton
- Homeschooling
- Hong Kong
- Hoover
- Housing
- HUD
- Human Rights
- Humor
- Hungary
- Hypocrisy
- Iceland
- Illinois
- Immigration
- Income tax
- India
- Industrial Policy
- Inequality
- Inflation
- Infrastructure
- International bureaucracy
- International Criminal Court
- International Monetary Fund
- International Taxation
- Iowa
- Iran
- Ireland
- IRS
- Israel
- Italy
- Janet Yellen
- Japan
- JCT
- Jimmy Carter
- Jobs
- Joe Biden
- John Stossel
- Joint Committee on Taxation
- Joker
- Jurisdictional Competition
- Jury Nullification
- Justin Trudeau
- Kamala Harris
- Kelo
- Keynes
- Keynesian
- KPMG
- Laffer Curve
- Lakers
- Leviathan
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Licensing
- Liechtenstein
- Liz Truss
- Lobbying
- Local government
- Macron
- Mandate
- Margaret Thatcher
- Marginal Tax Rate
- Massachusetts
- Media Bias
- Medicaid
- Medicare
- Mexico
- Michael Bloomberg
- Michigan
- Migration
- Minimum Wage
- Minnesota
- Mitchell's Golden Rule
- Mitchell's Law
- Mitchell's Theorem
- Mobility
- Monaco
- Monetary Policy
- Money Laundering
- Moral Hazard
- nanny state
- National Education Association
- National Sales Tax
- Netherlands
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New York
- New Zealand
- News Appearance
- Nixon
- North Carolina
- North Korea
- Norway
- Obama
- Ocasio-Cortez
- OECD
- Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
- Panama
- PATRIOT Act
- Patriotism
- Patriots
- Paul Krugman
- Paul Ryan
- Paulson
- Payroll Taxation
- Pelosi
- Pets
- Philippines
- Podcast
- Poland
- Political Correctness
- Political Humor
- Politicians
- Politics
- Polling Data
- Pope Francis
- Portugal
- Postal Service
- Poverty
- Price Controls
- Privacy
- Privatization
- Productivity
- Prohibition
- Property Rights
- Property Tax
- Prostitution
- Protectionism
- Public Choice
- Public Goods
- Public Opinion
- Race
- Rahn Curve
- Rand
- Rand Paul
- Rankings
- Reagan
- Recession
- Redistribution
- Regulation
- Rent Control
- Republicans
- Roads
- Roman Polanski
- Romney
- Roosevelt
- Rule of Law
- Russia
- Sales Tax
- Savings
- School Choice
- Scotland
- Singapore
- Sleaze
- Slovakia
- Snow
- Soccer
- Social Capital
- Social Security
- Social Security Privatization
- Socialism
- Societal Capital
- Softball
- South Africa
- South Korea
- Sovereignty
- Spain
- Spending
- Spending Cap
- States
- Statism
- stimulus
- Subsidies
- Supercommittee
- Supply-side economics
- Supreme Court
- Swedem
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- TABOR
- Taiwan
- TARP
- Tax avoidance
- Tax Competition
- Tax Compliance
- Tax evasion
- Tax Harmonization
- Tax Haven
- Tax Increase
- Tax Loophole
- Tax Reform
- Taxation
- Taxpayer Ripoff
- Tea Party
- Territorial Taxation
- Terrorism
- Texas
- Thanksgiving
- Theresa May
- Third party payer
- Thomas Sowell
- Tobacco
- Tobin Tax
- Toilet Paper
- Trade
- Transportation
- TSA
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Underground Economy
- Unemployment
- Union Bosses
- United Kingdom
- United Nations
- United States
- Value-Added Tax
- Vaping
- VAT
- Venezuela
- Video
- Virginia
- Vouchers
- Wages
- Wagner's Law
- Walter Williams
- Warren Harding
- Waste
- Wealth Tax
- Weekly Economics Lesson
- Welfare
- Welfare State
- World Bank
- World Health Organization
- World Trade Organization
- Worldwide Taxation
- Yankees
- Zimbabwe
- Zoning
[…] was amusing, of course, but also made a serious point about “moral hazard,” which is what happens when government policy rewards bad […]
[…] was amusing, of course, but also made a serious point about “moral hazard,” which is what happens when government policy rewards bad […]
[…] obvious moral of the story is that we should not have government-subsidized moral hazard.That’s not a proper role of the federal government, and it’s not a proper role of state […]
[…] The obvious moral of the story is that we should not have government-subsidized moral hazard. […]
[…] other words, IMF policy is a glaring example of “moral hazard.” By shielding politicians from the consequences of bad policy, the bureaucracy is actually […]
[…] get lavish, tax-freesalaries). But the biggest problem with the IMF is that it promotes “moral hazard.” More specifically, it provides bailouts for irresponsible governments and for those who […]
[…] the biggest problem with the IMF is that it promotes “moral hazard.” More specifically, it provides bailouts for irresponsible governments and for those who […]
[…] Which is very unfortunate since it will reward the jurisdictions that behaved recklessly. A classic example of “moral hazard.” […]
[…] I’ve shared two videos (here and here) for those who want more information about how bailouts encourage “moral hazard.” And this is […]
[…] I’ve shared two videos (here and here) for those who want more information about how bailouts encourage “moral hazard.” And […]
[…] If you want more information on the economic damage caused by bailouts, watch this video and this […]
[…] insurance encourages people to take on excessive risk (i.e., it creates moral hazard). And the subsidies often benefit rich people with beachfront homes (which may explain why Senator […]
[…] perspective, this is a far superior approach, mostly because it begins to unwind the “moral hazard“that undermines sound financial decision making in […]
[…] about the IMF’s bailout policies. For all intents and purposes, the IMF subsidizes “moral hazard” by reducing the perceived cost (to financial institutions) of lending money to dodgy […]
[…] Shughart explains that “public choice” and “moral hazard” play a […]
[…] a good economist recognizes that such policies impose considerable unseen damage by promoting moral hazard and undermining the efficient allocation of labor and […]
[…] bottom line is that government-subsidized risk is not a good […]
[…] a good economist recognizes that such policies imposes considerable unseen damage by promoting moral hazard and undermining the efficient allocation of labor and […]
[…] I fully agree. To the extent that we have private profits and socialized losses, we’ll have bigger and bigger problems with moral hazard. After all, if you’re in Las Vegas and someone else is covering your losses, why not make […]
[…] I fully agree. To the extent that we have private profits and socialized losses, we’ll have bigger and bigger problems with moral hazard. After all, if you’re in Las Vegas and someone else is covering your losses, why not make […]
[…] I fully agree. To the extent that we have private profits and socialized losses, we’ll have bigger and bigger problems with moral hazard. After all, if you’re in Las Vegas and someone else is covering your losses, why not make […]
[…] Bailouts encourage very bad behavior – There’s a saying that capitalism without bankruptcy is like religion without hell, which is simply a clever way of pointing out that you need both profit and loss in order for people in the economy to have the right set of incentives. Bailouts, however, screw up this incentive structure by allowing private profits while simultaneously socializing the losses. This creates what’s known as moral hazard. […]
[…] examples involve huge amounts of money, and both private-sector and public-sector bailouts have perverse long-run effects, but which is […]
[…] The last people to bear any costs should be taxpayers. They don’t own the bank. They don’t invest in the bank. And they don’t have big bucks. So why should they bear the cost when the big-money people screw up?!? Especially when TARP-style bailouts promote moral hazard! […]
[…] Simply stated, bailouts reward past bad behavior and make future bad behavior more likely (what economists call moral hazard). […]
[…] examples involve huge amounts of money, and both private-sector and public-sector bailouts have perverse long-run effects, but which is […]
[…] examples involve huge amounts of money, and both private-sector and public-sector bailouts have perverse long-run effects, but which is […]
[…] Simply stated, bailouts reward past bad behavior and make future bad behavior more likely (what economists call moral hazard). […]
[…] Simply stated, bailouts reward past bad behavior and make future bad behavior more likely (what economists call moral hazard). […]
[…] Government-subsidized risk, though, is just as foolish as government-subsidized success. Classificar isto: Share this:FacebookTwitterStumbleUponEmailMaisPrintDiggLinkedInGostar disto:GostoBe the first to like this artigo. Deixe um Comentário […]
[…] Government-subsidized risk, though, is just as foolish as government-subsidized success. Rate this: Share this:PrintEmailFacebookTwitterMoredeliciousDiggFarkLinkedInRedditStumbleUponLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. […]
[…] At the risk of stating the obvious, there’s a reason for the second word in the “moral hazard” […]
[…] approach would have recapitalized the banking system without the corruption, favoritism, and moral hazard that characterized the TARP bailout. "Which one of us is […]
[…] how is this system working? Well, if you understand the principle of moral hazard, you won’t be surprised to learn that it’s a big flop. Giving bailouts is like trying […]
[…] first quiz deals with how to spend taxpayer money, combined with a bit of moral hazard analysis. Which option would you […]
[…] first quiz deals with how to spend taxpayer money, combined with a bit of moral hazard analysis. Which option would you […]
[…] first quiz deals with how to spend taxpayer money, combined with a bit of moral hazard analysis. Which option would you […]