I wrote a couple of days ago about America’s best and worst cities for pro-market policy, and I noted that there are several rankings of economic liberty for states and nations.
But what if you want to know the place with the most overall freedom? In other words, what is the most libertarian place to live based on both economic liberty and personal liberty?
If you don’t mind a bit of travel, the answer is New Zealand.
For those who prefer to stay in the United States, Will Ruger and Jason Sorens periodically crunch numbers to calculate Freedom in the 50 States.
Their previous edition had New Hampshire in first place, so let’s take a look at the newest version.
This 2018 edition of Freedom in the 50 States presents a completely revised and updated ranking of the American states on the basis of how their policies
promote freedom in the fiscal, regulatory, and personal realms. …More than 230 policy variables and their sources are now available to the public on a new website for the study. …the 2018 edition provides annual data on economic and personal freedom and their components back to 2000. …Freedom in the 50 States is an essential desk reference for anyone interested in state policy and in advancing a better understanding of a free society.
The publication is loaded with data, as you’ll see from the following charts.
To put all this data in context, the report separately calculates fiscal freedom, regulatory freedom, and personal freedom.
We’ll start with the fiscal section, which includes variables about taxes and spending, as well as other measures such as debt and government employment.
For those interested, the report has plenty of analysis and explanation about the variables that are used and the weights that are assigned.
Most of us, though, simply want to see which states get good scores and which ones get bad scores.
I’m not surprised to see that zero-income-tax states – led by Florida – are at the top. And I’m also not surprised that flat-tax states – led by Pennsylvania – also are well represented.
I assume nobody is surprised to see New York in last place.
Now let’s shift to regulatory policy and see where the burden of red is most onerous.
This part of the ranking covers a range of issues, most notably controls on land use and restrictions on the use of markets in health care.
But there are other important variables, including the extent and burden of occupational licensing.
Indeed, before getting to the overall rankings for regulation, I want to share those scores because it is so galling and upsetting that politicians impose barriers that limit the freedom of people to earn income.
Colorado deserves hearty applause for being at the top, edging out Idaho by a narrow margin. And even though Vermont was near the bottom of the fiscal rankings, it merits a mention for being good on the issue of occupational licensing.
California deserves hearty condemnation for being in last place. And I’m not surprised to see states like Illinois and New Jersey near the bottom.
I’m very disappointed, however, that Texas and Florida have such a dismal record.
But let’s not fixate on just one of the variables. If we look at the rankings for all regulatory issues, Kansas is in first place, followed by Nebraska and Idaho.
The worst states (hardly a surprise) are New York, New Jersey, and California.
Now let’s combine fiscal policy and regulatory policy and see the report’s ranking for overall economic freedom.
Florida is in first place by a comfortable margin, followed by three other zero-income-tax states (though the absence of a state income tax does not guarantee a good score, as you can see from the poor performance of Alaska, Wyoming, and Washington).
New York wins the Booby Prize by a large margin.
Hawaii and California also stand out in a bad way.
The above table tells us which state enjoys the most economic liberty, but that doesn’t tell us where to live if you want the maximum amount of overall freedom.
To identify the nation’s most libertarian state, we also need to look at rankings for personal liberty.
This means, in part, whether people are harassed and persecuted for victimless crimes, but it also includes measures of educational freedom and gun rights.
Speaking of which, I can’t resist sharing the data on which states most respect the 2nd Amendment.
Kansas gets the best score, followed by Vermont(!), Arizona, Idaho, and Mississippi.
Hawaii is the worst state by a significant margin and we (again) find California near the bottom.
Another issue which is near and dear to my heart is asset forfeiture.
I am nauseated and disgusted that governments are allowed to steal property from people who have not been convicted of any wrongdoing.
So let’s applaud New Mexico, Nebraska, and New Hampshire for putting limits on this awful practice.
And let’s heap unending scorn on Rhode Island for having the nation’s worst track record on this issue.
But what happens when we combine all issue relating to personal freedom?
Well, that’s exactly what the authors did, which means we get a comprehensive ranking for personal freedom. I’m not surprised that Nevada, Colorado, and New Hampshire are in the top 5, but I’m surprised to see that Maine leads the pack.
Likewise, I guess I’m not too surprised that Texas and other bible-belt states are socially conservative.
But Hawaii next to last?!?
In any event, the report combines economic freedom and personal freedom and tells us which state could be considered the most libertarian.
And the winner is the Sunshine State of Florida, followed by New Hampshire, Indiana, Colorado, and Nevada. I’m surprised that Florida does so well, though some of the other high-scoring states make sense (especially when I look at data on who reads these columns).
By contrast, the most dirigiste state is New York. That doesn’t surprise me, and I’m also not shocked by some of the other bottom dwellers.
I’m tempted to end here since we’ve already surveyed so much information.
But there’s one final chart which hopefully should be very fascinating.
We just looked at the data on how states currently rank for overall liberty.
This final selection tells us which ones have been moving in the right direction and wrong direction since the turn of the century.
Kudos to Oklahoma for adopting a lot of good reform. Same for New Mexico. And it’s also interesting to see that several states from the Great Lakes region boosted their scores (with Illinois being a laggard, of course).
Vermont has the dismal distinction of having moved the fastest in the wrong direction (No wonder it’s the Moocher State).
Hawaii also deserves an unfavorable mention, while the deterioration of New Jersey and New York is hardly a surprise.
[…] York is ranked #50 in the Freedom in the 50 […]
[…] York is ranked #50 in the Freedom in the 50 […]
[…] Citadel is going to Florida, a state famous for having no income […]
[…] Citadel is going to Florida, a state famous for having no income […]
[…] Citadel is going to Florida, a state famous for having no income […]
[…] I wrote about the 2018 edition of Freedom in the 50 States, Florida ranked as the nation’s most libertarian […]
[…] those taxes enable excessive government spending, which is why I think South Dakota and Florida actually have the nation’s best fiscal […]
[…] those taxes enable excessive government spending, which is why I think South Dakota and Florida actually have the nation’s best fiscal […]
[…] tax policy. There are all sorts of other policies that determine whether a state is an attractive place for people looking to […]
[…] tax policy. There are all sorts of other policies that determine whether a state is an attractive place for people looking to […]
[…] tax policy. There are all sorts of other policies that determine whether a state is an attractive place for people looking to […]
[…] It ranks #36 for overall economic liberty. […]
[…] ranks #36 for overall economic […]
[…] York è al 50° posto nell’indice Freedom in the 50 […]
[…] Click here and here if you want to peruse comprehensive measures of state economic […]
[…] Click here and here if you want to peruse comprehensive measures of state economic […]
[…] Click here and here if you want to peruse comprehensive measures of state economic […]
[…] Click here and here if you want to peruse comprehensive measures of state economic […]
[…] tax policy. There are all sorts of other policies that determine whether a state is an attractive place for people looking to […]
[…] tax policy. There are all sorts of other policies that determine whether a state is an attractive place for people looking to […]
[…] tax policy. There are all sorts of other policies that determine whether a state is an attractive place for people looking to […]
[…] tax policy. There are all sorts of other policies that determine whether a state is an attractive place for people looking to […]
[…] is due to tax policy. There are all sorts of other policies that determine whether a state is an attractive place for people looking to […]
[…] York is ranked #50 in the Freedom in the 50 […]
[…] York is ranked #50 in the Freedom in the 50 […]
[…] York is ranked #50 in the Freedom in the 50 […]
[…] York is ranked #50 in the Freedom in the 50 […]
[…] this doesn’t mean Texas is perfect. Or that California is always bad (it’s much better than Texas with regards to asset forfeiture, for […]
[…] #35 according to Freedom in the 50 […]
Some of the metrics used to determine freedom are completely superfluous with other elements being only of marginal impact, like motorcycle helmet laws. Real freedom is when the government leaves the citizens alone to do what they will without unnecessary regulation. Occupational License requirements, Tax Burdens, Asset Forfeiture of any kind, Incarceration Rates, and then things such as State portion of GDP consumption, Local Services costs – like electric or water/sewer, Zoning Regulations, and other property control measures should carry the highest value in the metrics. Also, personal self-defense freedom should be a metric, which would include things like gun ownership and carry restrictions as well as the prosecution of individuals who defend themselves from criminal threats should all be part of that Personal Self-Defense Freedom metric. Oh and when someone is forced to defend themselves for self-defense actions, does the government reimburse them for their expenses once they are acquitted? This is a huge gap in understanding malicious and gratuitous prosecution of innocent people – it will literally bankrupt you to defend yourself against a false allegation where the state prosecutes – and you typically won’t even get an apology for stealing that money IF you walk out a free person… Because face it, our judicial system – everywhere, is not about “innocent until proven guilty” which is supposed to be a basic tenant of our system because you can almost never prove a negative, innocence, but all the state must do is allege your violation, present a single “witness” – a lot of times they are motivated by personal reasons or gain to be such – and then rest their case and unless you have an attorney able to negate that “testimony”, either on a technicality, an emotional plea to a jury, or some other rare piece of evidence – you LOSE! Hell, in most cases, a prosecutor withholding exculpatory evidence won’t even seal your acquittal. The system, executive, legislative, judicial, and administrative typically works against the freedoms of the individual citizen – there needs to be more exposure regarding the consequences of these behaviors by the state when discussing Freedom!
Which states recievve the most government subsidies/welfare
[…] written favorably about the pro-growth policies of low-tax states such as Texas, Florida, and Tennessee, while criticizing the anti-growth policies of high-tax states such as Illinois, […]
[…] to comprehensive estimates of economic liberty in Freedom in the 50 States, New York’s politicians seem to be the worst and […]
[…] to comprehensive estimates of economic liberty in Freedom in the 50 States, New York’s politicians seem to be the worst and Florida’s are […]
[…] Sounds like we should turn the 50 states into 500 states (to help ensure good political outcomes, let’s leave California, New York, and Illinois alone and subdivide the libertarian-leaning states). […]
[…] and small government, but Minnesota doesn’t fare well in rankings of economic liberty (see here, here, and here) and Minneapolis scores poorly when cities are […]
[…] York is ranked dead last for fiscal policy according to Freedom in the 50 […]
I think if the data researchers where to dig in a bit more beyond just the state level (maybe I missed something, but this is my take-away), some of the rankings of these states would change, because counties and cities add-on taxes and regulation that don’t always coincide with what is visible at the state level; Sales tax being one of those, as well as property tax, both of which can be an enormous burden on the economic freedom of individuals as well as companies and corporations.
[…] to comprehensive calculations in Freedom in the 50 States, New York’s politicians seem to be the worst and Florida’s […]
[…] when you consider other policies, the net result is that the Golden State is ranked only #48 out of 50 for overall economic […]
[…] and Wisconsin, good states include Utah, Nebraska, South Dakota and Texas (honorable mention to Florida, which just […]
[…] and Wisconsin, good states include Utah, Nebraska, South Dakota and Texas (honorable mention to Florida, which just […]
[…] last month why that would be a mistake, in large part because bailouts would reward states for irresponsible fiscal policy (similar to my argument that countries like Austria and the Netherlands shouldn’t be bullied into […]
We were already looking at real estate in Florida. Now all the more fired up.
[…] last month why that would be a mistake, in large part because bailouts would reward states for irresponsible fiscal policy (similar to my argument that countries like Austria and the Netherlands shouldn’t be bullied […]
[…] the strongest piece of evidence is that New York is ranked #50 for fiscal policy according to Freedom in the 50 […]
[…] also has a very unfriendly regulatory regime, ranking a lowly 48 out of 50 according a comprehensive […]
[…] simply note that the states most anxious for bailouts are near the bottom in rankings of small government and economic […]
[…] hookers, fireworks, and drugs). That category doesn’t exist int he most-recent edition, but Nebraska ranks #1 in the “victimless crimes” […]
[…] be a good idea considering that the state is only ranked #28 according to the Tax Foundation and is way down at #44 according to Freedom in the 50 […]
[…] has had a dull profile. It doesn’t have a track record of notably good policies, such as Florida and Texas, and it doesn’t have a track record of notably bad policies, such as Illinois or […]
[…] If you want to see how states rank for tax policy, click here, here, here, and […]
[…] not surprised to see New Hampshire in first place, and I’m not surprised to see Florida in second […]
[…] why income has grown faster in Colorado, I don’t think it is a coincidence that the state gets high scores for economic […]
[…] no variable to measure the burden of government spending, which would give a better picture of overall economic liberty. This means that states that finance large public sectors with energy severance taxes (which also […]
[…] As he noted, his contract may not be as big as some of the players drafted above him, but he may wind up with more take-home pay since Florida is a fiscally responsible state. […]
[…] As he noted, his contract may not be as big as some of the players drafted above him, but he may wind up with more take-home pay since Florida is a fiscally responsible state. […]
[…] has the nation’s most onerous state income tax. And it ranks very low in measures of fiscal […]
[…] ranks #1 for economic freedom while New York languishes in last […]
[…] shared data a couple of weeks ago showing that Florida is the freest state in America (for both overall freedom and economic freedom) […]
If you compare the overall freedom rankings and the change values to the annual Guns & Ammo gun friendly rankings for the 50 states plus the District of Columbia, you might be surprised at how close they are.
[…] to Freedom in the 50 States, which we reviewed a couple of days ago, New Jersey is in the bottom 10 and has been moving in the wrong […]
Didn’t I see that occupational licensing requirements are about to change for Texas? Billed as the biggest deregulation changes for Texans in modern history. Mind you, since they’re almost last, they need it badly…
see https://www.cleburnetimesreview.com/news/occupational-license-deregulation-more-work-to-come-in-texas/article_cf5cb73a-ad63-11e8-8ba8-67c7034314d5.html
Didn’occupational licensing changing for texas state
Reblogged this on Truth Is Power.
I’m a seasonal resident of New York and lived there until I was about 40.The place is a nightmare of regulations and high taxes. Why am I not surprised that the state has a budget shortfall.