Last August, I shared a fascinating map from the Tax Foundation.
It showed which states have chased away taxable income and which ones have attracted more taxpayers (along with their taxable income).
In other words, what are the “Golden Geese” doing with their money?
Well, the obvious and unsurprising answer is that they are escaping high-tax states and moving to states that aren’t quite so greedy.
Now we have another map from the Tax Foundation. They’ve just released the latest data on state and local tax burdens as a share of state income. Because of lags in data, we’re looking at 2011 numbers, but that’s not important. The main thing is to notice that the states with the highest tax burdens are very much correlated with the states that suffered the great loss of taxable income.
You can tell a few additional things just by looking at the map, most notably that the high-tax states are largely along the Pacific coast, in the upper Midwest, and much of the Northeast.
The rest of the nation seems more reasonable.
If you specifically want to know the best and worst states, I’ve put together a list. But I’ve reversed the order. The state with the lowest tax burden is #1 while the state with the greediest politicians is #50.
A couple of observations on the data.
First, it helps to have no state income tax. The top four states, and seven out of the top 10, avoid that punitive levy.
Second, while it’s no surprise to see which states are at the bottom because of harsh tax burdens, it will be interesting to see how Chris Christie and Scott Walker explain the poor rankings of their respective states should they run for President.
This isn’t to say it’s their fault. After all, New Jersey and Wisconsin were high-tax states when they took office. But it will be incumbent upon them to say what they’ve done to make a bad situation better (or at least to keep a bad situation from getting worse).
Here are some more interesting maps, including international comparisons, national comparisons, and even one local comparison.
Which nations have the most red ink.
Which nations are money laundering centers (hint, not tax havens).
A crazy left-wing “Happy Planet” map.
Another silly map showing that America is supposedly one of the world’s most authoritarian nations.
Here are some good state maps with useful information.
Which states give the highest welfare payments.
In which state is the burden of government spending climbing most rapidly.
Which states are in a “death spiral” because of too many takers and too few makers.
Which states have too many school bureaucrats compared to teachers.
There’s even a local map.
How many of the nation’s richest counties are in the D.C. metro region.
P.S. I wrote recently about the foolishness of anti-money laundering laws, which impose very high costs without having any positive impact in terms of thwarting crime.
Now bureaucrats want to make these laws even worse. Casinos are going to be required to be more intrusive, regardless of whether there’s any evidence or suspicion that customers have done anything wrong. I’m not a gambler, so I don’t worry about the fate of Las Vegas, but even I feel sorry for the casinos since many high rollers from overseas will decide to go to Macau, Monaco, or other locations where they’re not treated poorly because of misguided government.
[…] article doesn’t mention that Texas is the 4th-best state in the Tax Foundation’s ranking of state and local tax […]
[…] article doesn’t mention that Texas is the 4th-best state in the Tax Foundation’s ranking of state and local tax […]
[…] article doesn’t mention that Texas is the 4th-best state in the Tax Foundation’s ranking of state and local tax […]
[…] article doesn’t mention that Texas is the 4th-best state in the Tax Foundation’s ranking of state and local tax […]
[…] article doesn’t mention that Texas is the 4th-best state in the Tax Foundation’s ranking of state and local tax […]
[…] article doesn’t mention that Texas is the 4th-best state in the Tax Foundation’s ranking of state and local tax […]
[…] article doesn’t mention that Texas is the 4th-best state in the Tax Foundation’s ranking of state and local tax […]
[…] article doesn’t mention that Texas is the 4th-best state in the Tax Foundation’s ranking of state and local tax […]
[…] article doesn’t mention that Texas is the 4th-best state in the Tax Foundation’s ranking of state and local tax […]
[…] article doesn’t mention that Texas is the 4th-best state in the Tax Foundation’s ranking of state and local tax […]
[…] article doesn’t mention that Texas is the 4th-best state in the Tax Foundation’s ranking of state and local tax […]
[…] article doesn’t mention that Texas is the 4th-best state in the Tax Foundation’s ranking of state and local tax […]
[…] article doesn’t mention that Texas is the 4th-best state in the Tax Foundation’s ranking of state and local tax […]
[…] article doesn’t mention that Texas is the 4th-best state in the Tax Foundation’s ranking of state and local tax […]
[…] article doesn’t mention that Texas is the 4th-best state in the Tax Foundation’s ranking of state and local tax […]
[…] article doesn’t mention that Texas is the 4th-best state in the Tax Foundation’s ranking of state and local tax […]
[…] article doesn’t mention that Texas is the 4th-best state in the Tax Foundation’s ranking of state and local tax […]
[…] article doesn’t mention that Texas is the 4th-best state in the Tax Foundation’s ranking of state and local tax […]
[…] article doesn’t mention that Texas is the 4th-best state in the Tax Foundation’s ranking of state and local tax […]
[…] article doesn’t mention that Texas is the 4th-best state in the Tax Foundation’s ranking of state and local tax […]
[…] there’s even a map showing the states with the highest wine taxes, as well as a map showing which states have the lightest and heaviest tax burdens compared to […]
[…] article doesn’t mention that Texas is the 4th-best state in the Tax Foundation’s ranking of state and local tax […]
[…] article doesn’t mention that Texas is the 4th-best state in the Tax Foundation’s ranking of state and local tax […]
[…] article doesn’t mention that Texas is the 4th-best state in the Tax Foundation’s ranking of state and local tax […]
[…] high-tax states such as California and New York get a […]
[…] high-tax states such as California and New York get a […]
[…] also deserves an unfavorable mention, while the deterioration of New Jersey and New York is hardly a […]
[…] A big reason for the difference is that Florida has no state income tax, which compares very favorably to the punitive system in New York. […]
[…] also deserves an unfavorable mention, while the deterioration of New Jersey and New York is hardly a […]
[…] to El Centro in California for winning this booby prize. As you can see, jurisdictions in New York and California […]
[…] state with high income taxes and high property taxes. If this map is any indication, places such as New York and Illinois are particularly awful for […]
[…] State tax burden. […]
[…] State tax burden. […]
[…] going to accelerate. Which, of course, will mean added pressure for lower tax rates in states like New York and California. And New Jersey, Illinois, […]
[…] going to accelerate. Which, of course, will mean added pressure for lower tax rates in states like New York and California. And New Jersey, Illinois, and […]
[…] rid of a very unfair distortion that enables higher taxes in states such as Illinois, California, New York, New Jersey, and […]
[…] could make a strong case that it is the overall share of income taken by politicians in the […]
[…] could make a strong case that it is the overall share of income taken by politicians in the […]
[…] could make a strong case that it is the overall share of income taken by politicians in the […]
[…] could make a strong case that it is the overall share of income taken by politicians in the […]
[…] could make a strong case that it is the overall share of income taken by politicians in the state. Or you could argue that the tax system for employers is the key […]
[…] could make a strong case that it is the overall share of income taken by politicians in the […]
[…] could make a strong case that it is the overall share of income taken by politicians in the […]
[…] could make a strong case that it is the overall share of income taken by politicians in the […]
[…] you have to wonder why anybody would move from New York to New Jersey. That’s like jumping out of the high-tax frying pan into the high-tax […]
[…] as the importance of limiting the destructive nature of […]
[…] if you look at the right-most column, you’ll see that New York and Connecticut could be considered the worst states. Both jurisdictions are richly deserving of […]
Interesting map… The first thing that I noticed was that ALL ten of the best states are red states (Republican) and ALL ten of the worst states are blue states (Democrat).
Interesting that the state I live in, Utah, has a middle-of-the-road tax burden. We also have a booming economy with low unemployment (even counting our many seasonal and part-time workers as unemployed), a AAA credit rating, rapid population growth, and decades of budget surpluses. We do have an income tax, but it is flat with a surtax for high-income taxpayers.
Interesting note: I was born and lived my first 11 years in one of the worst states on that map (California) and lived another 16 years in one of the best (Texas).
Reblogged this on Public Secrets and commented:
I’m very disappointed in my beloved California; we’re only #4 on this list. Surely we can do better and drive more people and jobs away!
North Carolina should be rated higher (that is, worse). It has a lot of local add-ons and sneaky ways of biting into income. I actually fared much better in Pennsylvania.