According to Freedom in the 50 States, which we reviewed a couple of days ago, New Jersey is in the bottom 10 and has been moving in the wrong direction.
This dismal ranking is not an anomaly. New Jersey also is in the bottom 10 of states according to Economic Freedom of North America, and the Garden State is dead last according the State Business Tax Climate Index and State Fiscal Condition.
In a perverse way, I admire New Jersey’s politicians. They’re not satisfied with the state’s low scores. They want to become even less competitive. If that’s even possible.
As I noted in the interview, the latest proposal for a “rain tax” isn’t necessarily objectionable if examined in isolation.
But in the context of New Jersey’s fiscal deterioration, it’s almost as if politicians are writing another passage in a very long suicide note for the state.
Consider what happened recently with the gas tax, as explained by the Wall Street Journal.
…a silver lining used to be the Garden State’s relatively low gasoline tax of 14.5 cents a gallon—second lowest in the U.S. No more, and therein lies a tale of why taxing the rich to finance government is an illusion. In October 2016, then-Gov. Chris Christie signed a bill raising the gas tax by 22.6 cents to 37.1 cents a gallon
…the bill also included a clause that automatically raises the gas tax if it doesn’t produce the expected revenue each year. This is a self-fulfilling economic prophesy. A higher gas tax causes people to drive less, which in turn has meant that revenues have fallen short of the expected $2 billion target. So on Oct. 1 the gas tax will rise another 4.3 cents to 41.4 cents per gallon, which will be the ninth highest in the U.S. …This will be the state’s third tax increase in four months, following June’s increase in income and corporate tax rates. …The larger lesson is that sooner or later the middle class always gets the bill for bigger government. Higher income and corporate taxes drive the affluent out of the state, which means less revenue. That leaves the middle class to pay in higher sales, property and now gasoline taxes.
Needless to say, New Jersey’s taxaholic lawmakers want even more revenue.
Here are some excerpts from a report by Politico.
Gov. Phil Murphy said Wednesday he may propose new tax increases when he unveils his budget in March, saying he’s worried that the state has not done enough to achieve what he called “tax fairness.” …The governor…had sought some $1.7 billion in new taxes…
Murphy was met with fierce resistance from fellow Democrats in the Legislature… Murphy ultimately agreed to…$1.6 billion in annual revenue. …Murphy, speaking at a church in Newark where he delivered a speech on his first-year accomplishments, said he needs to leave his options open as he starts to prepare a budget… “I would say everything is on the table. Period, full stop,” he added when pressed again about the idea of new tax increases.
If all this sound worrisome, that’s because it is.
But it gets even worse. As I warned at the end of the interview, the 2017 tax law restricts the ability of federal taxpayers to deduct taxes paid to state and local governments.
And that means the full burden of those taxes is now much more explicit, which means more and more taxpayers in high tax rates are going to “vote with their feet” and move to states with less onerous fiscal regimes.
In other words, New Jersey politicians are making their tax system worse at precisely the moment that the geese with the golden eggs have more incentive to fly away.
Insane.
P.S. Given this grim news, I’m surprised that fewer than 9 percent of people picked New Jersey to be the first state that will suffer fiscal collapse.
P.P.S. What’s really remarkable – albeit in a very sad and tragic sense – is that New Jersey in my lifetime used to be like New Hampshire, with no state income tax and no state sales tax.
P.P.P.S. There is a Jersey with good tax policy, but it’s far away from the American version.
[…] Some politicians from New York must be upset that New Jersey edged them out for last place (and the Garden State does have some wretched tax laws). […]
[…] to the proposals to have Uncle Sam provide bailouts of poorly governed states such as California, New Jersey, and […]
[…] and New Jersey are the next worst states, followed by Oregon and Minnesota. Though it’s definitely worth […]
[…] people say that California is the worst-governed state (I would probably choose Illinois or New Jersey, but it’s a close […]
[…] This is because the Commonwealth has had a dull profile. It doesn’t have a track record of notably good policies, such as Florida and Texas, and it doesn’t have a track record of notably bad policies, such as Illinois or New Jersey. […]
[…] was important because the federal tax code was subsidizing high tax burdens in states such as New Jersey, Illinois, and […]
[…] not a good idea to have a tax break that benefits the rich while subsidizing profligate states like New Jersey and […]
[…] also no surprise to see New Jersey in last place. The state has fallen dramatically, especially considering that it was like New Hampshire as recently as the 1960s, with no state […]
[…] is high-tax states such as Illinois and New Jersey are trying to make their already-punitive systems even […]
[…] forget other states that are heading in the wrong direction. Politicians from California, New York, New Jersey, and Illinois also will be lining up for […]
[…] If people like paying high taxes in exchange for big government, I’m sure politicians in New Jersey, California, and Illinois will be happy to oblige. But if Crazy Bernie is wrong, maybe people will […]
[…] between states. Unsurprisingly, successful people move from high-tax hellholes (places such as New Jersey, Illinois, and California) to zero-income-tax jurisdictions (places such as Texas, Florida, and […]
[…] when tax rates go up – and they will if states like Connecticut, New Jersey, and California are any indication – that will mean very bad news for middle class […]
[…] best, they’ll delay the day of reckoning. For what it’s worth, I actually think New Jersey or Illinois will be the first state to fiscally […]
The good folk who gave you AOC.
[…] Mitchell loves to report the weird things that big government politicians do. New Jersey is a classic case. Petrol was quite recently taxed at […]
Left 3 years ago for FL (not retirees, we’re young). NJ is not accommodating to the middle class.
Hi Dan! — I’ve lived in New Jersey almost my entire life. I was a youngster when Jersey sales tax kicked in at 3% in 1966, and remember being astonished that although the price of a Spalding rubber ball remained 29 cents, it somehow suddenly cost 30 cents to get one. Seems like that shock never wore off.
With the roots we have here, we might never leave Jersey. But leaving is tempting partly because it seems clear the pols are destroying the values of Jersey-based assets. How much will the ever-more-severe tax and regulatory environment erode the value of New Jersey homes?