The best policy for a state (assuming it wants growth and competitiveness) is to have no income tax. Along with a modest burden of government spending, of course.
The next-best approach is for a state to have a flat tax. If nothing else, a flat tax inevitably will have a reasonable rate since it’s politically difficult to pillage everyone (though Illinois is trying very hard to be an exception to that rule).
Moreover, a flat tax also sends a signal that politicians in the state don’t (or can’t) play the divide-and-conquer game of periodically raising taxes on different income groups.
Today, we have some good news. Kentucky has ditched its so-called progressive income tax and joined the flat tax club. The Tax Foundation has the details (including the changes in the state’s ranking).
…legislators in Kentucky overrode Governor Matt Bevin’s veto to pass HB 366, a tax reform package, in the last few days of the session. Ultimately, HB 366…increases Kentucky’s ranking on the State Business Tax Climate Index from 33rd to 18th.
…Here’s how HB 366 changes Kentucky’s tax code: Replacing the current six-bracket individual income tax, which has a top rate of 6.0 percent, with a 5 percent single rate individual income tax; …Replacing the current three-bracket corporate income tax, with its top rate of 6.0 percent, with a 5 percent flat rate; …Expanding the sales tax base to include select services…; and Raising the cigarette tax from 60 cents to $1.10 per pack. …the changes in this tax reform package dramatically improve the state’s tax climate. By broadening bases while lowering rates, starting to correct the inequities in the sales tax base, and taking steps to make the state more friendly to investment, policymakers in the state took a responsible approach to comprehensive tax reform.
Kentucky will have a better tax system, but there is a dark lining to the silver cloud of reform.
The legislation is a net tax increase, meaning state politicians will have more money to spend (which is a variable that is not included in the Tax Foundation’s Business Tax Climate Index).
As a big fan of the no-tax-hike pledge, that makes me sympathetic to some of those who opposed the legislation.
But I confess that I’m nonetheless happy that there’s now another state with a flat tax.
Which motivated me to create a five-column ranking for states with regards to the issue of personal income tax.
The best states are in the first column, since they don’t impose any income tax. The second-best option is a flat tax, and then I have three options for so-called progressive tax regimes. A “low-rate” state means the top bracket is less than 5 percent and a “class-warfare” state means the top bracket is higher than 8 percent (with other states in a middle group).
Kentucky has moved from the fourth column to the second column, which is a nice step. Very similar to what North Carolina did a few years ago.
Kansas, by contrast, recently went from the fourth column to the third column and then back to the fourth column.
And I may have to create a special sixth column for states such as California.
[…] I put together my first ranking back in 2018, there were 9 states with flat taxes and and 3 states with low-rate graduated tax […]
[…] conclude by observing that I put together a 5-column method in 2018 for ranking state tax […]
[…] conclude by observing that I put together a 5-column method in 2018 for ranking state tax […]
[…] another case study on the benefits of tax competition (just like we’ve seen in states such as Kentucky and North […]
[…] of their flat tax, Iowa’s 4 percent rate would be lower than the rates in North Carolina, Kentucky, Illinois, Michigan, Utah, and […]
[…] Since I’m most interested in fiscal policy, I’m reflexively drawn to Table 7. Kudos to Florida, Tennessee, New Hampshire, and South Dakota (the absence of a state income tax really helps). And I’m surprised to see Massachusetts in the top 10 (it helps to a have a flat tax). […]
[…] in part by an excellent graphic that I shared in 2016, I put together a five-column ranking of state personal income tax systems in […]
[…] in part by an excellent graphic that I shared in 2016, I put together a five-column ranking of state personal income tax systems in […]
[…] updated this 2018 visual to show how the referendum would have pushed Arizona into Column 5, which is the worst […]
[…] updated this 2018 visual to show how the referendum would have pushed Arizona into Column 5, which is the worst category, […]
[…] four states (all with no income tax) accounted for the bulk of America’s population growth. That’s a non-trivial […]
[…] in the next-to-last quintile in my ranking of income tax […]
[…] P.S. My favorite city is zero-income-tax Monaco. I’m not sure what American city would be at the top of my list, but you’ll notice on the map that most of the cities attracting residents are in states with no income tax. […]
[…] very good to live in a gray state (no income tax!) and you definitely don’t want to live in a red or maroon […]
[…] one fell swoop, Nebraska would join the list of states that have no income tax, which is even better than the states that have flat […]
[…] tax – The best approach for a state is to have no income tax, and a state flat tax is the second-best approach. Illinois is in that second category thanks to a long-standing provision of the state’s […]
[…] the list of the best and worst states. Unsurprisingly, states with no income tax rank very high, as do states with flat […]
[…] Utah, North Carolina, and Kentucky have all junked their so-called progressive systems and joined the flat tax club. […]
[…] Utah, North Carolina, and Kentucky have all junked their so-called progressive systems and joined the flat tax club. […]
[…] now in the next-to-last category and it’s probably just a matter of time before it’s in the 5th […]
[…] Another argument for states to join the flat tax club! […]
[…] Another argument for states to join the flat tax club! […]
[…] that zero-income-tax states—led by Florida—are at the top. And I’m also not surprised that flat tax states—led by Pennsylvania—also are […]
[…] new governor, J.B. Pritzker, wants to undo the state’s 4.95 percent flat tax, which is the only decent feature of the Illinois tax […]
[…] states – led by Florida – are at the top. And I’m also not surprised that flat-tax states – led by Pennsylvania – also are well […]
[…] the plus side, Colorado voters rejected an effort to replace the flat tax with a discriminatory system (in order to waste even more money on government schools), California […]
[…] and tired of high taxes and crummy government, should you have the freedom to move to a state with no income tax, such as Florida or […]
[…] to say, the states with better tax policy tend to be net recipients of taxpayers, and taxable […]
[…] half of the states on that unfortunate list are part of the “Class-Warfare Graduated Tax” […]
[…] taxes. But if they only want to cross one border, Indiana would be a very good choice. And Kentucky just shifted to a flat tax, so that’s another potential […]
Sadly, there is a Governor in Juneau, AK who has support for moving Alaska from Column 1 to Column 5. Bill “Captain Ahab” Walker (Unity ticket bucket of bait) is obsessed over his financially-nonsensical natural gas line from the Slope to Southcentral Alaska to sell gas at nearly no profit (after capital and operating costs) to (the current delusion) China. He’s looking at $65 Billion in assets sitting in the Permanent Fund, and he and the Democrats in the Legislature are salivating on emptying that Fund – or, borrowing against it – for this white whale of a project.
[…] North Carolina arguably has taken the biggest step in the right direction. Kentucky, meanwhile, has just switched to a flat […]
Always great to see your work and I’ve been a longtime fan. I have recommended this to my Economics students as suggested reading in preparation for exams where they need to give examples of effective government policy.
For this list it would be nice if you also sorted within the columns in terms of overall tax burden. Coming from the land of corn statism (Illinois) it’s hard to imagine that the flat tax will be appealing in the long-run. After all, the Tibetan Plateau is also flat, but you don’t want to face it. 🙂