Since I’ve been writing a column every day since 2010, you can imagine that there are some days where that’s a challenge.
But not today. The Fraser Institute has released a new edition of Economic Freedom of the World, which is like a bible for policy wonks. So just like last year, and the year before, and the year before, and so on (you may sense a pattern), I want to share the findings.
First, here’s what EFW measures.
The cornerstones of economic freedom are personal choice, voluntary exchange, open markets, and clearly defined and enforced property rights. …The EFW measure might be thought of as a measure of the degree to which scarce resources are allocated
by personal choices coordinated by markets rather than centralized planning directed by the political process. It might also be thought of as an effort to identify how closely the institutions and policies of a country correspond with the ideal of a limited government, where the government protects property rights and arranges for the provision of a limited set of “public goods” such as national defense and access to money of sound value, but little beyond these core functions.
Now let’s get to the good stuff.
Unsurprisingly, Hong Kong is at the top of the rankings, followed closely by Singapore. Those jurisdictions have been #1 and #2 in the rankings every year this century.
The rest of the top 5 is the same as last year, featuring New Zealand, Switzerland, and Ireland.
The good news for Americans is that we’re back in the top 10, ranking #6.
Here’s what the report says about the United States.
…the United States returned to the top 10 in 2016 after an absence of several years. During the 2009–2016 term of President Obama, the US score initially continued to decline as it had under President Bush. From 2013 to 2016, however, the US rating increased from 7.74 to 8.03. This is still well below the high-water mark of 8.62 in 2000 at the end of the Clinton presidency.
It’s important to understand that the improvement in the U.S. score has nothing to do with Trump. The EFW ranking is based on America’s economic policies as of 2016 (there’s always a lag in getting hard data).
President Trump’s policies may increase America’s score (think taxes and regulation) or they may decrease America’s score (think trade and spending). But we won’t know for sure until we see future editions.
Here’s what’s happened to economic liberty in America between 1970 and 2016.
As you can see from the historical data, the U.S. enjoyed progress through the Reagan and Clinton years, followed by decline during the Bush years and early Obama years. But we’ve trending in the right direction since 2013.
Let’s look at other nations that get decent scores.
Here are the other nations that are in the top quartile.
Canada and Australia were tied for #10, so the rest of the rankings start with the under-appreciated success story of Taiwan at #12.
All the Baltic nations do well, especially Estonia and Lithuania. Chile also remains highly ranked, as is the supposedly socialist nation of Denmark.
Luxembourg, which was ranked #1 as recently as 1985, is now #25.
I also noticed that Rwanda (#40) has eased past Botswana (#44) to become the highest-ranked nation in Sub-Saharan Africa.
By the way, I’m not going to bother showing the bottom nations, but nobody should be surprised to learn that Venezuela is in last place.
Though that may simply be because there’s isn’t adequate data to include North Korea and Cuba.
Let’s close by including a chart that hopefully will show why economic liberty is important.
Simply stated, people enjoy much higher living standards in nations with free markets and small government. Conversely, people living under statist regimes suffer from poverty and deprivation.
The bottom line is that Economic Freedom of the World shows the recipe for growth and prosperity.
Sadly, very few nations follow the instructions because economic liberty is not in the interests of politicians.
[…] of many bad policies in the United States, it’s worth noting that America nonetheless ranks #6 for overall economic liberty according to the Fraser […]
[…] it wouldn’t be a bad idea to send American economists as well. Indeed, since it gets the top score from Economic Freedom of the World, the entire world can learn from Hong Kong’s spectacular […]
[…] economic liberty score jumped from 3.64 in 1980 to 6.46 in the most recent edition of Economic Freedom of the […]
[…] Japan was ranked in the top-10 back in 1990, but now it’s dropped to #41. […]
[…] But we shouldn’t make the perfect the enemy of the good. The United States is one of the world’s most market-oriented nations. […]
[…] good news is that the United Kingdom is ranked #9 for overall economic liberty according to the latest edition of Economic Freedom of the World, so it has a strong foundation for […]
[…] they directly measure economic liberty, my favorite global rankings are Economic Freedom of the World and the Index of Economic […]
[…] According to Economic Freedom of the World, Argentina is one of the most statist nations on the planet (the only nations that do worse are Libya and Venezuela). […]
[…] you peruse the data from Economic Freedom of the World, you’ll notice that they don’t rank very […]
[…] I want to feel optimistic about China, I look at data from Economic Freedom of the World to confirm that there was a lot of economic liberalization […]
[…] three of the Baltic nations rank highly according to Economic Freedom of the World. Estonia and Lithuania are tied for #13, and Latvia […]
[…] your benchmark is economic liberty, then Hong Kong is the answer according to both the Fraser Institute and Heritage […]
[…] scores high for overall economic […]
[…] ellos a veces están etiquetados como países socialistas, pero si miras las clasificaciones de Libertad Económica en el Mundo, observas que este análisis no tiene mucho […]
[…] be sure, China still needs a lot of reform. It’s only ranked #107 according the latest edition of Economic Freedom of the […]
[…] to avoid the bottom right (Venezuela being closest to that corner, which makes sense since it is in last place according to Economic Freedom of the […]
[…] is routinely ranked as the world’s 2nd-freest economy, trailing only Hong […]
[…] is routinely ranked as the world’s 2nd-freest economy, trailing only Hong […]
[…] He compartido gráficos que muestran cómo una mayor libertad económica conduce a una mayor prosperidad en las naciones. Lo mismo es cierto para los estados. Entonces, no debería sorprenderse al descubrir que también es cierto para las áreas metropolitanas. […]
[…] I wrote a couple of days ago about America’s best and worst cities for pro-market policy, and I noted that there are several rankings of economic liberty for states and nations. […]
[…] gets a decent ranking (#20) for overall economic freedom, but mostly because a bad score for fiscal policy is offset by […]
[…] Selon l’indice de liberté économique de l’Institut Fraser, les États-Unis jouissent d’une plus grande liberté économique que les pays nordiques, mais le Danemark et la Finlande se classent au-dessus de l’Amérique en […]
[…] of them are sometimes labeled as socialist countries, but if you look at the rankings from Economic Freedom of the World, you notice that this analysis doesn’t make much […]
[…] last sentence isn’t a typo. The United States has more overall economic freedom than the Nordic nations, but both Denmark and Finland actually rank above America when looking at […]
[…] if you want to measure economic freedom and competitiveness among nations (rankings from the Fraser Institute, Heritage Foundation, and World Economic […]
[…] Kong and Singapore are the best evidence for my hypothesis. These two jurisdictions have routinely ranked #1 and #2 for economic […]
[…] if you want to measure economic freedom and competitiveness among nations (rankings from the Fraser Institute, Heritage Foundation, and World Economic […]
[…] I wrote a couple of days ago about America’s best and worst cities for pro-market policy, and I noted that there are several rankings of economic liberty for states and nations. […]
[…] if you want to measure economic freedom and competitiveness among nations (rankings from the Fraser Institute, Heritage Foundation, and World Economic […]
[…] reforms were just a step in the right direction. The country currently ranks only #107 according to Economic Freedom of the World, largely because so much of the economy is hampered by subsidies, regulation, protectionism, and […]
[…] the Fraser Institute’s Economic Freedom of the World and, to a lesser extent, the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Report, the […]
[…] not claiming Chile is a perfect role model. It is #15 in Economic Freedom of the World, so there is considerable room for improvement. But I am arguing it is a successful example of how better policy is great news for all segments of […]
[…] is true for policy in other nations. That’s why I always check the Fraser Institute’s Economic Freedom of the World before writing about another country. I want a dispassionate source of data that covers all the […]
[…] option is to look at Economic Freedom of the World, which is an excellent resource, but it only measures the degree to which a nation allows free […]
[…] tampoco es una mala elección si tienes un poco de ambición. Ocupa el puesto número 16 en la última edición del Economic Freedom of the World, en gran parte porque tiene un enfoque muy laissez-fairesobre […]
Reblogged this on tomaz2015 and commented:
Simply stated, people enjoy much higher living standards in nations with free markets and small government. Conversely, people living under statist regimes suffer from poverty and deprivation.
Reblogged this on 1EarthUnited.
[…] My favorite publication every year is Economic Freedom of the World. […]
[…] My favorite publication every year is Economic Freedom of the World. […]
[…] because the GCR – unlike Economic Freedom of the World or the Index of Economic Freedom – does not rank nations based on economic policy. It’s more a […]
[…] because the GCR – unlike Economic Freedom of the World or the Index of Economic Freedom – does not rank nations based on economic policy. It’s […]
[…] akkor se rossz hely, ha van benned némi törekvés. Tizenhatodik az Economic Freedom of the World legutóbbi kiadása szerint, köszönhetően a kereskedelem, a szabályozás és a többi nem fiskális politikai kérdések […]
[…] also not a bad choice if you have a bit of ambition. It ranks #16 in the latest edition of Economic Freedom of the World, largely because it has a very laissez-faire approach on trade, […]
[…] Yesterday, I wrote about the newest edition of Economic Freedom of the World, which is my favorite annual publication. […]
[…] Yesterday, I wrote about the newest edition of Economic Freedom of the World, which is my favorite annual publication. […]
[…] Yesterday, I wrote about the newest edition of Economic Freedom of the World, which is my favorite annual publication. […]
[…] Yesterday, I wrote about the newest edition of Economic Freedom of the World, which is my favorite annual publication. […]
[…] I wrote about the newest edition of Economic Freedom of the World, which is my favorite annual […]
Perhaps Universidad Francisco Marroquín is actually having an influence in Guatemala. It will be interesting to see the consequences. Guatemala City still has a crumbling infrastructure.
It might be interesting to see how individual US states would rank on this list if scored as independent nations.
[…] « New Rankings for Economic Freedom: The United States Climbs to #6 […]
Surprised to see poor countries like Guatemala near the top. If your theory that more freedom means more growth, we should see Guatemala per capita GDP pulling ahead of , say ,Honduras in the next decade .