More than three years ago, I wrote that the Department of Transportation should be dismantled for the simple reason that we’ll get better roads at lower cost with the federalist approach of returning responsibility to state and local governments.
I echoed those sentiments in this CNBC interview.
Since there’s only an opportunity to exchange soundbites in these interviews, let me elaborate on some of the reasons why transportation should be a state and local responsibility.
1. Washington involvement is a recipe for pork and corruption. Lawmakers in Congress – including Republicans – get on the Transportation Committees precisely because they can buy votes and raise campaign cash by diverting taxpayer money to friends and cronies.
2. Washington involvement in transportation is just the tip of the iceberg. As I said in the interview, the federal budget is mostly a scam where endless streams of money are shifted back and forth in leaky buckets. This scam is great for insiders and bad news for taxpayers.
3. Washington involvement necessarily means another layer of costly bureaucracy. And this is not a trivial issues since the Department of Transportation is infamous for overpaid bureaucrats.
4. Washington involvement gives state and local politicians an excuse to duck responsibility for low-quality infrastructure. Why make adult decisions, after all, when you can shift the blame to DC for not providing enough handouts.
While I think I made some decent points in the interview, I should have addressed the assertion that our infrastructure is falling apart. My colleague at the Cato Institute, Chris Edwards, effectively dealt with this scare tactic in his recent Congressional testimony.
I also should have pointed out that a big chunk of the gas tax is diverted to boondoggle mass transit projects.
Last but not least, I’m disappointed that I failed to connect some very important dots. Gov. Rendell and the CNBC host both fretted that the current system isn’t producing a desirable outcome, but they’re the ones advocating for a continuation of the status quo! Heck, they want even more of the system that they admit doesn’t work.
Sigh.
P.S. While I obviously want to get rid of the Department of Transportation, it’s not at the top of my list for the most wasteful and counterproductive federal bureaucracy.
P.P.S. On a completely separate topic, I can’t resist sharing this Ramirez cartoon.
And since we’re making fun of our Statist-in-Chief, here’s some satire about the award Obama received from Steven Spielberg.
The teleprompters are a nice touch, reminiscent of some very amusing jokes here, here, here, and here.
[…] Though the real scandal isn’t his use of private jets rather than commercial flights. It’s the fact that he’s the head of a department that shouldn’t even exist. […]
[…] rid of various needless departments (Education, Transportation, Agriculture, Energy, Housing and Urban Development, etc) also would diminish opportunities for […]
[…] rid of various needless departments (Education, Transportation, Agriculture, Energy, Housing and Urban Development, etc) also would diminish opportunities for […]
[…] rid of various needless departments (Education, Transportation, Agriculture, Energy, Housing and Urban Development, etc) also would diminish opportunities for […]
[…] that metric, it has something in common with the Department of Energy, Department of Agriculture, Department of Transportation, Department of Housing and Urban Development, and almost every bureaucracy in […]
[…] Eliminate the Department of Transportation. […]
[…] Second, his costly infrastructure plan also was approved last year, though only a small fraction of new spending was actually for roads and bridges (and even that spending should be handled by state and local governments). […]
[…] Eliminate the Department of Transportation. […]
[…] Eliminate the Department of Transportation. […]
[…] Second, his costly infrastructure plan also was approved last year, though only a small fraction of new spending was actually for roads and bridges (and even that spending should be handled by state and local governments). […]
[…] Second, his costly infrastructure plan also was approved last year, though only a small fraction of new spending was actually for roads and bridges (and even that spending should be handled by state and local governments). […]
[…] As a matter of sensible public policy (and well as fealty to the Constitution), the federal government should not be involved in transportation. […]
[…] As a matter of sensible public policy (and well as fealty to the Constitution), the federal government should not be involved in transportation. […]
[…] Urban Development, Department of Education, Department of Energy, Department of Agriculture, Department of Transportation, […]
[…] Urban Development, Department of Education, Department of Energy, Department of Agriculture, Department of Transportation, […]
[…] As a matter of sensible public policy (and well as fealty to the Constitution), the federal government should not be involved in transportation. […]
[…] As a matter of sensible public policy (and well as fealty to the Constitution), the federal government should not be involved in transportation. […]
[…] tax costs on tobacco because they want less smoking. And environmentalists want higher gas prices so there will be less […]
[…] impose higher tax costs on tobacco because they want less smoking. And environmentalists want higher gas prices so there will be less […]
[…] means shutting down the entire Department of […]
[…] means shutting down the entire Department of […]
[…] (Department of Education, Department of Agriculture, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Department of Transportation, etc) get much of their funding from the non-defense discretionary […]
[…] and Urban Development, Department of Education, Department of Energy, Department of Agriculture, Department of Transportation, etc) doesn’t […]
[…] Eliminate the Department of Transportation. […]
[…] should be handled by state and local government. Or, even better, the private sector. In my fantasy world, we’d shut down the Department of Transportation and repeal the federal gas […]
[…] that message applies to bureaucracies that are affected by the current shutdown (such as HUD and Transportation) as well as to some of the bureaucracies that are unaffected (Education, Energy, Agriculture, […]
[…] that message applies to bureaucracies that are affected by the current shutdown (such as HUD and Transportation) as well as to some of the bureaucracies that are unaffected (Education, Energy, Agriculture, […]
[…] same is true for the Department of Education, Department of Agriculture, Department of Transportation, Department of Energy, and many other boxes on the federal […]
[…] Some departments of the federal government should be shut down because of federalism. High on that list would be the Department of Education and Department of Transportation. […]
[…] rankings for road and airport connectivity. Something to keep in mind the next time politicians push for higher gas taxes because of a supposed infrastructure […]
[…] de reducir los niveles de pago. El pago correcto para los burócratas en los Departamentos de Transporte, Vivienda y Desarrollo Urbano, Educación, Energía y Agricultura es cero. ¿Por qué? Porque […]
[…] government rather than shrinking pay levels. The correct pay for bureaucrats at the Departments of Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, Education, Energy, and Agriculture is zero. Why? Because those […]
[…] rather than shrinking pay levels. The correct pay for bureaucrats at the Departments of Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, Education, Energy, and Agriculture is […]
[…] rather than shrinking pay levels. The correct pay for bureaucrats at the Departments of Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, Education, Energy, and Agriculture is […]
[…] rather than shrinking pay levels. The correct pay for bureaucrats at the Departments of Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, Education, Energy, and Agriculture is […]
[…] government rather than shrinking pay levels. The correct pay for bureaucrats at the Departments of Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, Education, Energy, and Agriculture is zero. Why? Because those […]
[…] government rather than shrinking pay levels. The correct pay for bureaucrats at the Departments of Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, Education, Energy, and Agriculture is zero. Why? Because they […]
[…] government rather than shrinking pay levels. The correct pay for bureaucrats at the Departments of Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, Education, Energy, and Agriculture is zero. Why? Because they […]
[…] Eliminate the Department of Transportation. […]
[…] And I also explained that there shouldn’t be a Washington infrastructure plan for the simple reason that we shouldn’t have a federal Department of Transportation. […]
[…] And I also explained that there shouldn’t be a Washington infrastructure plan for the simple reason that we shouldn’t have a federal Department of Transportation. […]
[…] down departments, for instance, which is unfortunate given the target-rich environment (including Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, Education, Energy, […]
[…] down departments, for instance, which is unfortunate given the target-rich environment (including Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, Education, Energy, […]
[…] get rid of all the programs and departments that clearly shouldn’t exist (such as Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, Education, Energy, and Agriculture), and then we can have a fun […]
[…] as well as providing most of the outlays for departments that shouldn’t even exist (such as Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, Education, Energy, and […]
[…] called for the abolition of the Department of Transportation. On more than one […]
[…] called for the abolition of the Department of Transportation. On more than one […]
[…] called for the abolition of the Department of Transportation. On more than one […]
[…] called for the abolition of the Department of Transportation. On more than one […]
[…] want to imply that the United States has good infrastructure policy. As far as I’m concerned, increased federal involvement has caused our system to become somewhat […]
[…] From a libertarian perspective, you can argue that Trump’s budget is a big disappointment. Why isn’t he proposing to get rid of the Department of Housing and Urban Development? What about shutting down the Department of Education? Or the Department of Energy? How about the Department of Agriculture, or Department of Transportation? […]
[…] or Department of Education are permanently shuttered. And let’s add the Department of Energy, Department of Transportation, and Department of Agriculture just for the fun of […]
[…] The Department of Transportation […]
[…] the same is true for the Department of Energy, Department of Labor, Department of Transportation, Department of Veterans Affairs, and Department of Housing and Urban […]
[…] of Housing and Urban Development, etc) or should be handled by state and local governments (Department of Transportation, Department of Education, […]
[…] Eliminate the Department of Transportation. […]
[…] what I argued back in […]
[…] Eliminate the Department of Transportation. […]
[…] what I argued back in […]
[…] what I argued back in […]
[…] is an under-appreciated reason why redistribution is so damaging. I’ve tried to make this point by talking about how federal spending involves taxing people around the nation, carrying the money […]
[…] of them? Well, we have lots of bureaucracies that shouldn’t exist, such as HUD, Education, Transportation, Agriculture, etc. So that’s true as […]
[…] of them? Well, we have lots of bureaucracies that shouldn’t exist, such as HUD, Education, Transportation, Agriculture, etc. So that’s true as […]
[…] good, though repealing the tax would be even […]
[…] is a recipe for cronyism that will further expand the federal government’s role into an area that should be reserved for states, local governments, and the private […]
[…] useless and counterproductive departments such as Housing and Urban Development, Energy, Education, Transportation, and […]
[…] J. Mitchell of the Cato Institute has said that the volume of pork and bureaucracy should justify shutting down the federal Transportation Department in favor of state and local governments having power over […]
[…] argued (repeatedly) that we should abolish the Department of Transportation and allow states to make […]
[…] argued (repeatedly) that we should abolish the Department of Transportation and allow states to make […]
[…] So yet another reason to shut down the Department of Transportation. […]
[…] So yet another reason to shut down the Department of Transportation. […]
[…] So yet another reason to shut down the Department of Transportation. […]
[…] So yet another reason to shut down the Department of Transportation. […]
[…] plans, and neither Chairman proposes to get rid of a single Department. Not HUD, not Education, notTransportation, and not […]
[…] And I definitely don’t like the idea of a higher gas tax. The federal government should be out of the transportation business. […]
[…] And I definitely don’t like the idea of a higher gas tax. The federal government should be out of the transportation business. […]
[…] and neither Chairman proposes to get rid of a single Department. Not HUD, not Education, not Transportation, and […]
[…] plans, and neither Chairman proposes to get rid of a single Department. Not HUD, not Education, not Transportation, and not […]
[…] Yet another reminder that government is just a giant money pit of waste (and a reminder that we should also abolish the Department of Transportation). […]
[…] Department of Agriculture, Department of Education, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Department of Transportation, […]
[…] Department of Agriculture, Department of Education, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Department of Transportation, […]
[…] Eliminate the Department of Transportation. […]
[…] I argued in this debate with former Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell, we need to get Washington out of the business of […]
[…] Repeal the Gas Tax…and Get Rid of the Department of Transportation […]
The difference, of course, is that they invest more in their infrastructure.
Other countries have a Department of Transportation. Why shouldn’t we? http://ec.europa.eu/transport/index_en.htm
Reblogged this on Public Secrets and commented:
It’s a good start. The way to end cronyist corruption in DC is to take the money away.
Typical. Your associates on the video say that our infrastructure is falling apart, so we need to do more of what has failed!
Reblogged this on U.S. Constitutional Free Press.
Reblogged this on Gds44's Blog.