There are several features of President-Elect Trump’s tax plan that are worthy of praise, including death tax repeal, expensing, and lower marginal tax rates on households.
But the policy that probably deserves the most attention is Trump’s embrace of a 15 percent tax rate for business.
What makes this policy so attractive – and vitally important – is that the rest of the world has been in a race to reduce corporate tax burdens.
Ironically, the U.S. helped start the race by cutting the corporate tax rate as part of the 1986 Tax Reform Act. But ever since then, policy in America has stagnated while other developed nations are engaged in a virtuous contest to become more competitive.
And that race continues every day.
Most impressively, as reported by the Financial Times, Hungary will cut its corporate tax rate from 19 percent to 9 percent.
Hungary’s government is to cut its corporate tax rate to the lowest level in the EU in a sign of increasingly competitive tax practices among countries seeking to lure foreign direct investment. Prime Minister Viktor Orban said a new 9 per cent corporate tax rate would be introduced in 2017, significantly lower than Ireland’s 12.5 per cent. …The government said the new single band would apply to all businesses. “Corporation tax will be lowered to single digits next year: a rate of 9 per cent will apply equally to small and medium-sized enterprises and large corporations,” a statement said. …Gabor Bekes, senior research fellow at Hungary’s Institute of Economics…said the measure would likely provoke complaints of unfair tax competition from western capitals.
Needless to say, complaints from Paris, Rome, and Berlin would be a sign that Hungary is doing the right thing.
Croatia also is moving policy in the right direction, albeit in a less aggressive fashion.
Corporate income tax will…be cut from 20 to 18 per cent for large companies and from 20 to 12 per cent for small and mid-level companies whose income is no higher than 400,000 euros annually.
Though the Croatian government also plans to lower tax rates on households.
Before the reform, people with salaries between 300 and 1,750 euros a month were taxed at 25 per cent, while now everyone earning up to 2,325 euros a month will be taxed at a 24 per cent rate. People earning more than 2,325 euros a month will have a 36 per cent tax rate, replacing a 40 per cent tax rate for anyone earning over 1,750 euros a month.
But let’s keep the focus on business taxation.
Our friends on the left don’t like Trump’s plan for a corporate tax cut, but here are there things they should know.
- A lower corporate tax rate won’t necessarily reduce corporate tax revenue,
particularly over time as there’s more investment and job creation.
- A lower corporate tax rate will dramatically – if not completely – eliminate any incentive for American companies to engage in inversions.
- A lower corporate tax rate will boost workers wages by increasing the nation’s capital stock and thus improving productivity.
If you want more information, here’s my primer on corporate taxation. You can also watch this video.
Or, to make matters simple, we can just copy Estonia, which has the world’s best system according to the Tax Foundation.
[…] The Growing Need for Trump’s Proposed 15 percent Corporate Tax Rate […]
[…] Act. The U.S. system had become extremely anti-competitive thanks to a 35 percent rate that was far above the world average, so reform was desperately […]
[…] advocated for some of the president’s policies, but I’ve never defended Donald Trump when he’s […]
[…] advocated for some of the President’s policies, but I’ve never defended Donald Trump when […]
[…] advocated for some of the President’s policies, but I’ve never defended Donald Trump when […]
[…] it is possible to make incremental progress. I’ve argued, ad nauseam, about the need to lower the corporate tax rate and the benefits of ending the state and local tax deduction, and we actually took big steps in the […]
[…] it is possible to make incremental progress. I’ve argued, ad nauseam, about the need to lower the corporate tax rate and the benefits of ending the state and local tax deduction, and we actually took big steps in the […]
[…] their controversial lives. Well, I wasn’t overly optimistic that Trump was going to deliver on his proposal for a big reduction in the corporate tax […]
[…] their controversial lives. Well, I wasn’t overly optimistic that Trump was going to deliver on his proposal for a big reduction in the corporate tax […]
[…] because it is vitally important to reduce the corporate tax rate, even a curmudgeon like me will accept half a loaf (or less, […]
[…] been arguing all year that a substantially lower corporate tax rate is the most vital goal of tax reform for reasons of […]
[…] Lowering the corporate tax rate. […]
[…] Lowering the corporate tax rate. […]
[…] wrote back in May about plans for lower corporate tax burdens in Hungary and the United Kingdom and I noted last November that Croatia was lowering its corporate […]
[…] are all good reasons to dramatically lower the corporate tax rate, hopefully down to the 15-percent rate in Trump’s plan, but the House proposal for a 20-percent rate wouldn’t be a bad final […]
[…] are all good reasons to dramatically lower the corporate tax rate, hopefully down to the 15-percent rate in Trump’s plan, but the House proposal for a 20-percent rate wouldn’t be a bad final […]
[…] is appropriate. However, there are some very pro-growth provisions in the Better Way Plan, such as a lower corporate tax rate, expensing, death tax repeal, etc, so I definitely think the Tax Foundation’s projections are […]
[…] For what it’s worth, I assume Mr. Giegold is simply unhappy that a lower corporate tax rate would make America more attractive for jobs and investment. […]
[…] or 20 percent corporate tax rate, I’ll actually be quite pleased. That reform would be very good for the economy and national competitiveness. And regardless of what JCT projects, there would be […]
[…] their hearts in the right place. They are proposing that new source of revenue to help finance a lower corporate tax rate, as well as […]
[…] The ultimate answer is to junk the entire tax code and adopt a simple and fair flat tax. The best-possible answer we may get out of dysfunctional Washington is probably a lower corporate rate. […]
[…] Trump’s reform be that bold and that brave? His proposed 15-percent corporate tax rate deserves praise, and he seems serious about restraining the regulatory state, but he will need to do a lot more if […]
[…] the obvious solution (beyond simply lowering the corporate rate, which should be a given) is to get rid of the double tax on […]
[…] Trump’s reform be that bold and that brave? His proposed 15-percent corporate tax rate deserves praise, and he seems serious about restraining the regulatory state, but he will need to do a lot more if […]
[…] worrisome, I also pointed out that his budget proposal is “silent on the very important issues of tax reform and entitlement […]
[…] I also pointed out that his budget proposal is “silent on the very important issues of tax reform and entitlement […]
[…] Budget Blueprint doesn’t thrill me, largely because it’s silent on the very important issues of tax reform and entitlement […]
[…] doesn’t thrill me, largely because it’s silent on the very important issues of tax reform and entitlement […]
[…] The centerpiece of President Trump’s tax plan is a 15 percent corporate tax rate. […]
[…] The centerpiece of President Trump’s tax plan is a 15 percent corporate tax rate. […]
[…] The centerpiece of President Trump’s tax plan is a 15 percent corporate tax rate. […]
[…] made my standard points about the benefits a lower corporate rate and “expensing,” while also warning about the dangers of the “border adjustable tax” being […]
[…] corporate tax rate – Trump didn’t specifically reference the 15-percent rate he mentioned in the campaign, but he aggressively argued for a big drop in America’s punitive corporate tax […]
[…] corporate tax rate – Trump didn’t specifically reference the 15-percent rate he mentioned in the campaign, but he aggressively argued for a big drop in America’s punitive corporate tax […]
[…] made my standard points about the benefits a lower corporate rate and “expensing,” while also warning about the dangers of the the “border […]
[…] the Keynesian elixir of government infrastructure spending. But at other times, he talks about lowering taxes and reducing the burden of red […]
[…] need for the “stick” of protectionism if Trump delivers on the “carrot” of tax cuts and […]
[…] can actually deliver a big reduction in the corporate tax rate. Trump wants 15 percent, which would be great. House Republicans have proposed 20 percent, which also would be a big shift in the right […]
[…] can actually deliver a big reduction in the corporate tax rate. Trump wants 15 percent, which would be great. House Republicans have proposed 20 percent, which also would be a big shift in the right […]
[…] to encourage companies to create jobs in America, and Trump is proposing both good carrots such as a much lower corporate tax rate and bad carrots such as special Solyndra-style handouts (except, instead of loot for green energy, […]
[…] pulls in about $1.2 trillion over 10 years. And you can also see all the good reforms (expensing, rate reduction, etc) that are being financed with the various “pay fors” in the […]
[…] that Trump will get everything he wants, but the three items at the top of my wish list are lowering the corporate tax rate, ending the tax code’s bias against new investment by replacing punitive […]
[…] The Growing Need for Trump’s Proposed 15 percent Corporate Tax Rate […]
[…] good to me. I welcome sinners who want to repent. Is the OECD now recommending corporate tax rate reductions? A flat tax? Entitlement reform? Elimination of wasteful departments, agencies, and programs? A […]
[…] The Growing Need for Trump’s Proposed 15 percent Corporate Tax Rate […]
[…] The Growing Need for Trump’s Proposed 15 percent Corporate Tax Rate […]
“how can Trump be accused of helping his billionaire buddies?” … because the msm and the left play upon the ignorance of the [majority] of the people … I still hear the hate spewed by the voices of the left regarding how Trump does not pay taxes, even though his tax avoidance is well within the law …
Meanwhile in UK:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/corporation-tax-to-17-in-2020
And don’t even get me started on the US.
Jesus Christ, what the fuck are we doing.
First consumers should understand that they, themselves, are the main regulatory state.
When you hear “Power to the People”, what is really meant is not taking power currently in the hands of someone else and giving it to The People. What is meant is to create NEW powers and give those to the People’s Government.
Cutting the Individual Income Tax for the citizen, would also be a huge boost.
If we were to cut the excesses and waste that abound in this “tax-and-spend” mentality of Congress, we could certainly free up LOTS of resources to help our own, at least until we could “grow” the economy to it full potential again.
I would love nothing more than to see TRUE free-market practices, and a nullification of these one-sided “trade treaties”. There is just NO EXCUSE for maintaining these aberrant “poisons”, that are killing America’s global economic competitiveness!
Agreed nedlandp. My job touches on many aspects of ‘compliance,’ broadly defined, and employing staff to deal with regulations, etc. costs the company millions of dollars per year. While it’s hard to account for the total impact of the thousands of small cuts inflicted by the regulatory state, the most damaging result is creation of additional barriers to entry, which leads to higher prices.
In that sense, I’m sure the compliance costs are actually a useful for the company in that they perpetuate this madness and keep upstart competitors away.
By all means cut the corporate tax rate, but consumers and small and midsize businesses need relief from the regulatory state and central planners.
While I’m a big fan of lowering tax rates across the board, your focus on only the corporate tax rate is misplaced.
It is the total burden of government as reflected in the price of goods and services that is critical. That would be all taxes and the costs of mandates, regulations, and compliance. These are not the only factors that effect competitiveness, which might also include crime, education, availability of resources, and distance from customers. Burden of government is the most important, especially if government itself is corrupt (cronyism).
Back to the main point, corporate taxes are only a small portion of the total government burden. If that rate is lowered, but other rates are increased, you will have gained nothing in competitiveness, though you might gain in corporate tax compliance.
Jurgy,
I would agree with you, but it isn’t clear that corporations really pay taxes?? If, as many believe, corporations just pass tax costs along to us consumers, then how can Trump be accused of helping his billionaire buddies? They already may not be paying any corporate tax to the federal government?
I agree – Trump should start with cutting the death tax, then with the new lower rates for households before he slashes the corporate rates. If he starts with slashing corporate rates first he runs the risk of being accused of helping out his billionaire buddies, even though slashing corporate rates will have the most profound (positive) effect on an economic recovery.