We’re going to touch on two topics today.
I realize that not that many readers care about Greek economic policy, but sometimes other nations can teach us very important lessons. For better or worse.
And in the case of Greece, the lesson is that government intervention and bureaucracy is an enemy of entrepreneurship.
Probably the most amazing – and weird – example is that the Greek government wanted stool samples from entrepreneurs seeking to set up an online company (and, just to be clear, I’m not talking about furniture).
We now have another example, but it’s seems more tragic than bizarre. Here are some really sad passages from a column in the New York Times by a woman who tried set up a business in Greece.
I managed to master the perfect macaron. I was ready to sell them. I invested every penny I earned in high-quality photographs, a superbly designed website and tasteful packaging. “Le macaron grec” was born and the little olive green boxes of treats I was selling were, I thought, my chance to regain control of my life. “Le macaron grec” became a huge success, as I was in demand to cater parties and weddings. …I felt like I was on my way.
Until the visible foot of government interfered with the invisible hand of the market.
…as happens so often in Greece, the bureaucrats had other plans. In a country where you are viewed favorably when you spend money but are considered a criminal when you make it, starting a business is a nightmare. The demands are outrageous, and include a requirement that the business pay taxes in advance equal to 50 percent of estimated profit in the first two years. And the taxes are collected even if the business suffers a loss. I needed only 20 square meters for my baking business, but inspectors told me they could not give me permission for less than 150 square meters. I was obliged to have a separate toilet for customers even though I would not have any customers visit. The fire department wanted a security exit in the same place where the municipality demanded a wall be built.
So what happened? Was she able to satisfy the costly requirements of big government?
Alas, we don’t have a happy ending.
I, like thousands of others trying to start businesses, learned that I would be at the mercy of public employees who interpreted the laws so they could profit themselves. And so in the winter of 2013, my business was finished before it had a chance to take off. The website and a couple of empty boxes in the top of my closet are now the only evidence of the inglorious end of a dream.
Stories like this get me angry. Heck, I’m outraged that taxpayers from around the world have bailed out the Greek government so that bad policy can continue.
Having gotten ourselves all agitated, let’s now enjoy some good news.
It appears that the American people have figured out that our statist president is not doing a very good job. Indeed, they actually have decided he’s the worst president of the past 70 years according to new polling data.
Ironically, even though Obama is probably the most ideologically left-wing president since World War II, I wouldn’t put him in last place. I think Nixon actually did more damage, and Bush II definitely was a bigger spender.
But it’s still good that voters have soured on Obama. As he becomes more and more unpopular, that probably increases support for pro-market policies – such as genuine entitlement reform and real tax reform.
Sort of the way Jimmy Carter paved the way for Reaganomics.
And speaking of Reagan, I’m very happy that he is the runaway winner as America’s best post-WWII president.
P.S. So with Obama now considered the worst and Reagan considered the best, I wonder what the results would be if someone updated this Reagan vs. Obama poll.
P.S.S. Returning to the issue of Greece, that nation’s crazy politicians actually give disability payments to pedophiles.
P.S.S.S. Which is yet another reason why I’m incredulous that so many American politicians want us to mimic Greece’s profligacy (as illustrated by this Henry Payne cartoon).
[…] have you ever wondered why Americans rate Reagan as the best post-WWII President and put Obama in last […]
[…] have you ever wondered why Americans rate Reagan as the best post-WWII President and put Obama in last […]
[…] have you ever wondered why Americans rate Reagan as the best post-WWII President and put Obama in last […]
[…] regardless of polling data, the answer is not Barack Obama. Or even Jimmy Carter. Those guys are […]
[…] regardless of polling data, the answer is not Barack Obama. Or even Jimmy Carter. Those guys are […]
[…] regardless of polling data, the answer is not Barack Obama. Or even Jimmy Carter. Those guys are […]
[…] writing about tax loopholes, entitlements, fiscal policy, bureaucracy (twice), tax evasion, France, Greece, corporate inversions, and economic […]
[…] guess what? When a whole bunch of entrepreneurs and businesses decide that it’s no fun to work hard when the government is the main beneficiary, […]
[…] candidate isn’t available this election, though the fact that he wins this poll (and also this poll) is yet another sign that the American people still have very sensible […]
[…] occasions, dealing with diverse issues such as demographics, entitlements, fiscal policy, France, Greece, corporate inversions, supply-side economics, income inequality, the Ryan budget, Social Security […]
[…] also squander money on a bloated bureaucracy and a preposterous regulatory regime (click here and here to see I’m actually understating the […]
[…] destroys the dreams of […]
[…] have you ever wondered why Americans rate Reagan as the best post-WWII President and put Obama in last […]
[…] The regulatory burden in Greece is a nightmare, but some examples of red tape are almost beyond […]
[…] The regulatory burden in Greece is a nightmare, but some examples of red tape are almost beyond […]
[…] Bureaucracy and taxes in Greece strangle a woman’s dream of a baking business before she even gets it properly launched [Despina Antypa, New York Times via Dan Mitchell]: […]
it is the nature of bureaus to seize authority… engage in mission creep… and over time become contemptuous of the elected officials tasked with their oversight… at some point a nation becomes governed by bureaucratic regulation and not the rule of law… at that point… democratic governance ceases… the voting public becomes impotent… and the bureaus rule the nation… it’s happening before our eyes…
I agree except for one thing. Though the story has passing references to the “Greek culture” behind this type of state, the woman in the story is largely portrayed as a victim of an unwanted government.
But why does government in Greece have these laws?
It is because the Greek people want to exert collective control over the economy.
Want to produce Macaron Grec? Oh wait, we have to ask “The People” first, put the issue to a democratic vote and they, “The People”, will decide — in the form of a law on how to start a business, drafted by the elected representative that garners majority. Want to visit Mrs. Macaron at her toiletless bakery? Oh wait! The people again have some say.
Don’t even know if your idea and your business will fly yet? It doesn’t matter, the Greek people want to proactively harness you just in case one day you do turn a profit. They would not want you to become one of those people who simply offered something new, better, cheaper and not also surrender 50% of the 2c personal profit you charge per Macaron Grec. Yes, you may have created some great pastry that no one else thought of before and make it available at an affordable price, but those 2-3c , yeeeeessss those 2-3c of profits you make on each piece are just too much! You need to turn in half (actually a lot more than half if you also count all the other indirect taxes you pay).
All is done through the democratic process. After all, Greece invented Democracy and many people the world over naively and unconditionally equate Democracy to liberty (that simpleton mentality seems to be particularly elevated amongst Americans,… but that is another story).
The bottom line is that while Democracy is superior to other forms of government, if you live in a country with a collectivist electorate you are simply SOL.
When the dominant culture shows affinity for coercive collectivism the end result is a society driven by AVERAGE intelligence, the intelligence of the predominant voter. In a freer society where citizens (of all intelligence levels) have a more laissez-faire attitude and do not try to judge, enhance or block every activity, that society ends up being driven by the CUMULATIVE intelligence of all citizens.
So to summarize Zorba’s theorem:
Collectivist society = driven by AVERAGE intelligence of the citizenry.
Laissez-faire society = driven by CUMULATIVE intelligence of the citizenry.
Now you probably don’t have to be a mathematical genius to realize that given the large number of people in a country, cumulative intelligence dwarfs average intelligence (the effect increases with country size, which has implications for the large US where voters in California can apply their average intelligence to voters in Florida). Actually cumulative intelligence dwarfs even the intelligence of committees comprised of a few selected expert pundits, which again has implications for the dream of prosperity through coercive collectivism.
Sure politicians augment statism, because after all that is the product they sell: State. But people have to be receptive to it in the first place.
But to get back to Greece and other societies with high coercive collectivism indexes…
So what lesson does the new generation of Greeks (and other Europeans) learn from these experiences? “Remember Mrs. Macaron? She just wasted a number of years, wasted her youth and in the end accomplished little or nothing. Better find a government job Nikos, gum up the works a little more, and head to the beach in peace every weekend”. Mediocrity is elevated to virtue. ALAS,….meanwhile, in other parts of the world more motivated and productive warriors prepare Genghis Khan to take no prisoners.
So and all this would be simply another point of view to be chosen amongst many, were it not for one fundamental thing: Growth. The collectivist society is at best on a 2% growth trendline (that is the growth level of the “Tigers” [ha,ha] amongst the demotivating welfare economies of Europe). In a world that grows by 4% annually, they are steadily losing a compounding 2% of their world prosperity standing every year, compared to the rest of the world. They are simply and squarely on a fast track to dropping out of the developed world of the future. So sure, … soon they will be more equal. Becoming gradually more and more equally poor compared to the rest of the world, that is. This is going to be the inevitable destiny of the eternal mirage: An easier path to prosperity through coercive equality.
The worst part perhaps is that it becomes a vicious spiral: You don’t become Greece overnight. But once the process starts it becomes unstoppable. The more the electorate suffers under the declining effects of slow growth, the more it will demand imposed coercive equality. The vicious cycle closes.
That is why Americans will soon start voting like Europeans … consistently.